Earlier Letters to the Editor
Proud to be a Platte County Pirate
I love my hometown.
The one thing that I miss SO much is the feeling that the whole town is hanging onto Friday night. I know in my high school time, we were disappointing. Then I looked up in the stands and they were FULL. Brings me to my point. . .
I watched the Landmark Live episode tonight (with Platte County Pirate head football coach Bill Utz). I watched it and I was so proud as an alumni that bled on that field to see a coach and person like Bill Utz talk about Platte County football like that. He came in after Chip Sherman and knew he had all eyes on him. He has met every challenge and prepared these kids for life after football. I loved how he talked about life after football.
I say thanks for continuing The Platte County tradition.
I am always going to be proud to say I am a Platte County Pirate.
Help with the holiday lighting
I would like to thank all the firefighters of the Central Platte Fire Department for the wonderful help on Sunday morning, Nov. 11.
With all their help, we were able to check and replace bad Christmas lights with bulbs and sockets on the buildings on Main Street in Platte City.
Also, a temporary light string was installed on a vacant building so there would not be a dark spot when the drone movie is taken.
The county needs a check and balance
The South Platte YMCA Community Center in Parkville recently closed the recycling facilities, citing illegal dumping which allegedly caused fines and penalties. As we had recycled there for quite a few years, we did see recently that major dumping became an issue. However, the timing is suspect, because it's a very easy way for any facility that doesn't want to support recycling anymore to have this type of event occur so they can stop providing the service.
As the facility is a COMMUNITY CENTER, and our proud commissioners have control of the budget for parks, recreation, etc., it's not difficult to trace the reason the service was discontinued. The commission participates in the financial operation of the community center,
contracting with the YMCA to operate it. The commission has been very clear that they intend to slice funding to the bone for any county services, roads, parks, etc. not related to building the new prison they can control. While losing this recycling opportunity may seem unimportant, it's a small shot across the bow and portends the loss of a multitude of other services that we provide hard earned tax dollars to sustain.
Here's an example: if the old Hen House grocery store on Hwy. 45 at I-29 becomes a Planet Fitness type facility that operates at really reduced monthly rates, it could undercut the YMCA operating funds to the point the community center could not be sustained. The commission's attention to the prison planning seems to coincide with the announcement that Hen House would close several months ago.
Beware all, what starts out subtly small
has the potential to end up affecting millions and millions of dollars already invested in the property in Parkville, not to mention any future construction this commission envisions.
Educational experience is an extremely important component in governing, however, Platte County needs much more. We need dedicated people with real urban planning and execution experience for a fiscal check and balance.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. We need to start attending the commission meetings regularly, to ask relevant questions and make sure we comprehend the needs and intentions of the people we have entrusted with our future.
Kansas City in Platte County
Farm Bureau should favor bipartisanship
As a member of the Missouri Farm Bureau, I am deeply concerned about the lopsided, partisan endorsements in favor of Republicans as evinced in the newest issue of ShowMe, the organization’s quarterly publication.
Farmers need bi-partisan support in today's economy and it makes little sense to me to only woo one side, when the other is needed, too.
For example, the strict work requirement for SNAP, the food assistance program of the federal government, favored by Republicans, would hurt low-income families in rural areas where it is harder to find work, and also lessen the market for many farm products. Democrats oppose that.
To prefer the unproven Josh Hawley over Sen. Claire McCaskill also shows little concern for rural population, as Hawley's lawsuit against the ACA aims to end the protection of pre-existing conditions without offering any concrete replacement, while Sen. McCaskill is fighting to preserve these and to improve the law.
Furthermore, Hawley is also totally toeing Donald Trump's line, despite it being clear that the president's irresponsible trade policies are apt to harm the nation's farmers with trade wars that only exacerbate the already existing predicament of low commodity prices.
Fully incomprehensible is the recommendation of the Farm Bureau to oppose "Clean Missouri,” Amendment 1, which is aiming to reduce the influence of money on Missouri's politicians.
Instead of these misguided partisan leanings our organization should work at policies which end the relentless attrition among farms, caused by overproduction and resulting low prices for agricultural products.
Every county is still witnessing the Darwinian fight for survival among farmers till "the last man standing.” We need politicians from both parties to help design a different agricultural system that is not constantly "consolidating farms,” a euphemistic term for smaller farms being gobbled up by bigger ones as it happens now in a misplaced and misunderstood concept of what efficiency means in the agricultural context.
Recommendations on the ballot issues
Several ballot issues are coming up next week. For me, MOST are no-brainers.
First, the initiative petition process put Constitutional Amendments 1, 2, and 3 on the ballot as well as Proposition B & C. There is no A. You can read the rules at this web address:
It is rather dry reading. Have some chocolate handy. Basically, anyone can propose an Amendment or Proposition (statutory change) and, with enough signatures (5% or 6% in six of the eight congressional districts), get it on the ballot. So, 1/20 of the population can get something on the ballot and word it in such a way or add “compassion items” so that you will have trouble opposing it. Be careful if you vote YES.
Amendment 1. This would make Missouri the only state to politicize the redrawing of voter districts. Sure, there are other things thrown in, gifts, lobbying, and contributions, but make no mistake this is about gerrymandering. Don't be fooled by slick wording. VOTE NO.
Amendment 2. Medical marijuana. This is the first step to legalizing recreational use of marijuana. We don't need more drugs and more people driving after using an
hallucinogenic drug. VOTE NO.
Amendment 3. See Amendment 2 only with different taxes and uses of tax monies. VOTE NO.
Amendment 4. Oh, those terrible bingo players and advertising. This is the only Constitutional Amendment submitted by the legislature. VOTE YES.
Prop B. I used to work on the farm for a buck an hour. As mandated minimums are enacted all prices go up. Businesses must raise prices, increase sales, or absorb the cost thus cutting profits (and taxes paid) in order to offset the higher wages. Plus, this puts Missouri out of step with the Federal Minimum Wage, currently $7.25. Let the market place manage the cost of labor. It is much more accurate and accounts for local variances. As labor becomes tighter, wages will increase, unless we allow the entire army of illegal aliens currently approaching our southern border to enter the country. Oh my. Was that just code for Build the Wall? VOTE NO
Prop C. Marijuana. See Amendment 2 & 3. VOTE NO.
Prop D. Proposed by the legislature. Gas taxes would increase by 60%. Tax on a gallon of gas in 2023 (only four years away) would total 45 cents if federal tax doesn't increase, $.27 State + .18 Fed. Most of this would go to law enforcement, not roads. There is no sunset, so the taxes would
remain high. I could probably stomach a 2 ½ cent increase and splitting the money between law enforcement and roads but four increases makes me ill. VOTE NO.
I know, seems a little negative. Remember, our county commissioners want to build a new prison palace in Platte City and there will be a tax increase with that also. Our commissioners are good, conservative people but somehow have bet their tenure on of all things, a jail house. But that's an editorial for a later date.
It seems there are no fiscal conservatives, right or left, but we must retain our Republican people, county, state, and nationally. There are too many social and ideological issues to allow a Democrat takeover. AND McCaskill must be booted.
I implore you to vote, and VOTE REPUBLICAN.
Here is my cheat sheet. Clip it and take it with you to your polling place.
Constitutional Amendment 1 – NO
Constitutional Amendment 2 – NO
Constitutional Amendment 3 – NO
Constitutional Amendment 4 – YES
Proposition B – NO
Proposition C – NO
Proposition D – NO
Deal with attorney is concerning
I am very concerned about the way the contract between the Platte County Commission and Graves Garrett LLC was handled. The contract is for legal advice “regarding Platte County's legal options associated with the 2007 bond offering for Zona Rosa and the associated revenue shortfall.” The cost is stated as an hourly rate of $375 plus expenses.
First, there was no competitive process used in the selection of the contractor. A competitive process to review qualifications, though not legally required, gives the opportunity for other providers to describe their qualifications and be
considered. This process helps assure taxpayers that contracts are not simply offered to friends and acquaintances but are established based on merit.
The lack of a maximum amount to be paid under the contract and the lack of an end date are very concerning. Without these components, the contract can continue for many years and cost many thousands of dollars without the public being aware of the costs involved. Contracts with maximum amounts communicate to the public what the total cost might be; and, if it exceeds that amount, an amendment must be approved by the Commission.
Likewise, contracts that extend beyond
an end date must be amended. Ordinances to amend contracts give the public the opportunity to be informed and provide input during commission meetings. As it has been approved by the commission, this contract will never have to be amended, regardless of the amount spent or time involved.
This process and type of open-ended contract could easily be utilized to steer lucrative county contracts for political purposes or personal gain. That concerns me and should be a concern all to county taxpayers.
Commissioners are being cavalier
Upon reading last week’s issue of The Landmark, I see that Todd Graves has been, without any fiscally prudent procurement process, hired to assist with the Zona Rosa bond payment debacle. When questioned about the sole source selection, Presiding Commissioner Ron Schieber indicated that no bid process is LEGALLY required for professional services. I seem to remember Presiding Commissioner Schieber clearly stating at a prior meeting the bond payment was not legally required, however he had been informed that it was "a moral requirement.”
Then the county bond ratings immediately tanked. Why would anyone pull that kind of stunt when, in back room meetings, the commissioners have been and are still trying to push construction of a $45 million prison? The bond downgrade now ensures borrowing for any future
county infrastructure improvement will negatively affect the debt interest rate and overall cost.
Commissioner John Elliott also indicated that previous county commissioners who okayed the bond deal are protected from such legal action through sovereign immunity. These commissioners are astoundingly cavalier regarding their legal, ethical and monetary actions affecting their constituents. And they may not be totally correct about sovereign immunity.
However, as I pondered having Todd Graves participate, I realized now is the perfect time at first opportunity to ask him why his brother, Congressman Sam Graves, will not hold any town hall meetings in Platte County. Congressman Sam Graves has a district office at 11724 NW Plaza Circle, Suite 900 of the Platte County Resource Center. Although his district office staff have been asked repeatedly for
Congressman Graves’ presence here to meet, they all turn a blind eye.
Is Congressman Graves concerned with the cost of providing the town hall meeting? Does he care about how the meeting would benefit the economy and citizens of Platte county? Why are our county and our citizens being boycotted? Seems like taxation without representation to me.
I want to thank David Park for attending commission meetings and asking the difficult questions, he clearly has the interest of taxpayers at heart. I also want to thank Mr. Foley and The Landmark for reporting the situation in a clear and factual manner.
--Carol A. Clopton
in Platte County
Global warming is real and serious
I'm writing to comment on Brian Kubicki's recent Parallax Look column in The Landmark concerning global warming.
Below is a link to a review of 18 surveys that shows a 97% acceptance by climate scientists that human activity is the major cause of global warming is too high. But it also shows that an average of 93% of publishing scientists agreed that human activity is the major cause of global warming. An average of 79% of non-publishing scientists also agree. The
average of the two groups is 86%.
As for consensus in science, the Galileo example couldn't be any more apples and oranges. Hundreds of scientists were not studying Earth's position in the universe at the same time as Galileo. Other scientists of the time accepted the prevailing myth without any investigation. There is rarely universal consensus in science or any other field. But adapting an old adage, if 86
people tell you that you don't look well and only 14 people think that you look fine, you better lie down.
Evaluating changes in natural disasters with a link to global warming from one or two sources is not enough. The entire body of data must be evaluated and it shows that global warming is real and serious and will eventually change the lives of all of us if it is not addressed.
in Platte County
Tracking the jail proposal discussion
Platte Countians must all appreciate the diligence of The Landmark in scrutinizing the assessment of our county's need for jail expansion. Critical law enforcement resources include stable and secure funding as well as adequate jail space. It will be interesting to see the study results of the county commission's hired consultant.
Also maintaining a watchful eye on this issue is David Park, candidate for Platte County presiding commissioner. He does
not miss a commission or committee meeting in which our jail needs are discussed. Like The Landmark, he's doing his homework and asking questions to determine the soundness of various proposals
The length of wait for Legal Aid representation and leasing out jail beds to ICE are certainly contributing factors to this perception that a new jail is needed. A comprehensive appraisal of our current system is imperative. Meanwhile the county's credit rating is an embarrassing,
unnecessary crisis that will impact any strategic planning for the future.
I urge everyone to follow The Landmark's reporting on this matter and to get to know more about David Park, who is working tirelessly to explore what is best for the county and how to support our law enforcement system. He's seeking a seat on the Platte County Commission. His name is on the November ballot.
Conservatives should be inspired
The Democrat circus with the center ring being the well-oiled smear, metaphorically assassinate, and the facts-be-damned machine was clearly on display over the past three weeks.
With no corroboration and outright denials of accusations by the very people who were supposed to be eyewitnesses, Democrats have shown that they will stop at nothing to achieve their goal of "fundamentally changing America.”
Lies, mob rule, accusers coached for hours to "recall" suppressed memories all
show that facts, truth, and decorum have no place in the left's playbook.
This should inspire all conservatives, and every American for that matter, with an ounce of decency to show up at the polls and vote every Democrat that opposed judge, now Justice Kavanaugh, out of office, starting here in Missouri with Claire McCaskill.
And we must exercise our right to vote.
As Dietrich Bonhoeffer said, “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.”
Bonhoeffer was attempting to
overthrow the Third Reich and oust Hitler. He was imprisoned and ordered killed less than two weeks before the fall of Hitler. One of his books, The Cost of Discipleship, is worth the read.
The confirmation hearings and embarrassment created by the faux charges leveled against Brett Kavanaugh should act as a call to arms for conservatives everywhere.
Cites PTSD symptoms in withdrawing
About four months ago, I contacted the VA to get help. It had been about 11 years since I left Afghanistan as an Army Intelligence Officer, and my tour over there still impacted me every day. So many men and women who served our country did so much more than me and were in so much more danger than I was on my four-month tour. I can't have PTSD, I told myself, because I didn't earn it.
But, on some level, I knew something was deeply wrong, and that it hadn't felt that way before my deployment. After 11 years of this, I finally took a step toward dealing with it, but I didn't step far enough.
I went online and filled out the VA forms, but I left boxes unchecked – too scared to acknowledge my true symptoms. I knew I needed help and yet I still stopped short. I was afraid of the stigma. I was thinking about what it could mean for my political future if someone found out.
That was stupid, and things have gotten even worse since.
By all objective measures, things have been going well for me the past few months. My first book became a New York Times Bestseller in August. Let America Vote has been incredibly effective, knocking on hundreds of thousands of doors and making hundreds of thousands of phone calls. I know that our work is making a big difference. And last Tuesday, I found out that we were going to raise more money than any Kansas City mayoral campaign ever has in a single quarter. But instead of
celebrating that accomplishment, I found myself on the phone with the VA's Veterans Crisis Line, tearfully conceding that, yes, I have had suicidal thoughts. And it wasn't the first time.
I'm done hiding this from myself and from the world. When I wrote in my book that I was lucky to not have PTSD, I was just trying to convince myself. And I wasn't sharing the full picture. I still have nightmares. I am depressed.
Instead of dealing with these issues, I've always tried to find a way around them. Most recently, I thought that if I could come home and work for the city I love so much as its mayor, I could finally solve my problems. I thought if I focused exclusively on service to my neighbors in my hometown, that I could fill the hole inside of me. But it's just getting worse.
So after 11 years of trying to outrun depression and PTSD symptoms, I have finally concluded that it's faster than me. That I have to stop running, turn around, and confront it.
I finally went to the VA in Kansas City yesterday and have started the process to get help there regularly. To allow me to concentrate on my mental health, I've decided that I will not be running for mayor of Kansas City. I truly appreciate all the support so many people in Kansas City and across the country have shown me since I started this campaign. But I can't work on myself and run a campaign the way I want to at the same time, so I'm choosing to work on my depression.
I'll also be taking a step back from day-
to-day operations at Let America Vote for the time being, but the organization will continue moving forward. We are doing vital work across the country to stop voter suppression and will keep doing so through November and beyond.
Having made the decision not to run for mayor, my next question was whether I would be public about the reason why. I decided to be public for two reasons: First, I think being honest will help me through this. And second, I hope it helps veterans and everyone else across the country working through mental health issues realize that you don't have to try to solve it on your own. Most people probably didn't see me as someone that could be depressed and have had PTSD symptoms for over decade, but I am and I have. If you're struggling with something similar, it's OK. That doesn't make you less of a person.
I wish I would have sought help sooner, so if me going public with my struggle makes just one person seek assistance, doing this publicly is worth it to me. The VA Crisis Line is 1-800-273-8255, and non-veterans can use that number as well.
I'll close by saying this isn't goodbye. Once I work through my mental health challenges, I fully intend to be working shoulder to shoulder with all of you again.
But I'm passing my oar to you for a bit. I hope you'll grab it and fight like hell to make this country the place we know it can be.
Luetkemeyer vs. Rucker debate set
News-Press Now is holding a live-streamed and televised debate for the Missouri Senate District 34 race at 7 p.m., Wednesday, Oct. 3, in the News-Press Now newsroom.
Republican candidate Tony Luetkemeyer and Democratic candidate Martin T. Rucker II will answer questions from News-Press Now senior political reporter Ken Newton.
Most of the questions will be fielded from social media in the days leading up to debate. We will begin soliciting questions on social media Sept. 26. News-Press Now
producers and editors also will field live questions during the debate from social media and on the LiveStream platform, where viewers are encouraged to participate in the debate.
How to submit questions:
· Using the hashtag #Mo34 on Twitter or Facebook
· Commenting on the Facebook post from News-Press Now previewing the debate
· Replying to the tweet from @newspressnow previewing the debate
· Visiting newspressnow.com/share/
· During the debate, more questions can be submitted on these platforms and on the
Livestream platform by creating an account and interacting with our editors in real time.
How to watch the debate:
· Visit newspressnow.com the night of the debate
· Visit our LiveStream page at https://npnow.news/2AgXUHx
· Watching it over the air on 26.3 (Buchanan County and Northern Platte County only) or on the local NOW channel on Suddenlink Cable channel 3.
St. Joseph News-Press
Parkville Planning Commission praised
My name is Jason Maki and I am a resident who lives directly across the street from Parkville's proposed development of the Creekside Area of I-435 and Hwy. 45.
The development as currently authored calls for the placement of four motels, a commercial district consisting of three fast-food restaurants, apartments, four-plex townhomes, high-density housing and other mixed-use commercial spaces.
Like most community members, I was alarmed at the size and scale of the development and its impact on the approximately 1000 families in the immediate area.
Furthermore, I was shocked to see the
recorded testimony of the Sept. 4, 2018 city council meeting in which Alderman Marc Sportsman and others sought to marginalize the input of those impacted by this development through label and limitations of time.
Fortunately, through the stewardship of Keith Cary, the vice chairman of the Parkville Planning and Zoning Commission, that was not the case. Mr. Cary made a point of making sure all parties present were given an opportunity to provide input without prejudice as to what side of Brink Meyer Road they resided on.
It is also worth acknowledging the engagement and wisdom displayed by the other members of the committee. As the night went on, many people had to leave
prior to being able to give verbal testimony due to their family commitments. At the request of the residents, the commission agreed in a 4 to 1 vote in favor of continuing the public testimony during the next regularly scheduled commission meeting of Oct. 9. By continuing the meeting, the commission afforded many more residents the opportunity to provide input into this expansive development effort.
On behalf of the many families, citizens and neighbors of Parkville – thank you.
Frustrated by ads and backtracking on taxes
I am so frustrated by political ads, Trump bashing, Senate confirmation hearing disruptions, the Woodward book, the Mueller investigation, and backtracking on no-new-taxes.
Together it is overwhelming and much too long for this space so let’s look at the Democrat/McCaskill hit piece claiming AG Hawley sued to take away your health care. This is pure spin, political lies and deception, and the belief that if something is said enough times the public will believe it…regardless of truth.
Somehow the Democrats’ TV ad, through the Majority Forward Super PAC, claims AG Hawley wants to take away your health care, preexisting conditions clause, basically destroy your life. Here’s the take on Majority Forward. The Majority Forward
helps support the Senate Majority PAC (Democrat PAC), has the same address, same staff, but does not have to reveal its donors. Go figure. And, get this, “will be engaging in non-partisan voter registration” (emphasis mine).
Here is the partial news release from Hawley’s office. Pay attention to “preliminary injunction,” “20-state coalition,” and “Obamacare unconstitutional”.
Apr 27, 2018, 08:54 AM
Jefferson City, Mo. – Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley, as part of a 20-state coalition, filed a motion seeking a preliminary injunction against the federal government’s Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare. In February, the same 20-state coalition filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare, explaining that Congress
rendered all of Obamacare unconstitutional by doing away with the tax penalty in Obamacare’s individual mandate when it enacted President Trump’s tax overhaul.
Further, “My office will continue to fight to take health care choices out of the hands of bureaucrats and return them to the hands of Missourians and their physicians,” Hawley said. “This unlawful Obamacare must be enjoined as soon as possible so that free choice is again made possible for states and individuals.”
Go to https://ago.mo.gov/home/ag-hawley-and-20-state-coalition-file-injunction-against-obamacare for the complete news release.
How about a jail committee of taxpayers?
Our commissioners have short memories. Some of their campaign slogans were "smaller government, more transparency in their dealings for the county, lower (or no new) taxes.” Remember?
Now we find out we need a new and bigger jail. This after no input from the taxpayers - US! In 2014, a committee was formed by the commissioners (at that time) to look into this problem. They studied the information given them and after several
meetings decided that maybe we could use the "futures room" as an answer to our "jail problem.” However, figures, growth, and money showed that we didn't need this new jail. The question died. The committee decided the prison population wasn't going to grow as fast as indicated.
Funny thing -- current First District Commissioner Dagmar Wood was the loudest voice against expanding the jail; now she has talked to Kansas City and wants to rent beds to them. The county also rents beds for ICE prisoners and guess what - now
she says we do need more money, space and beds.
My question is, who called whom? Was our jail offered as bait for additional money?
The commissioners are talking of hiring a "jail expert.” How about giving the taxpayers their say: our committee?
Talk the talk, walk the walk
I was 11 years old watching the funeral of President John F. Kennedy in the auditorium at school on a round screen black and white television. I vividly remember the caisson, John Jr. saluting, and our president lying-in state. We were studying the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and government. Fifty-five years later, again I watched our nation honor a fallen hero.
With the passing of the Honorable Senator John McCain, it's an appropriate time to recognize the significant role and responsibility of all public servants.
Elected officials take an oath of office
swearing their service, loyalty and efforts will be for their entire constituency, the rich, middle class and very poor. Elected officials are first and foremost public servants during their entire term of office. It is an honorable vocation.
As a public servant, the taxpayers select and trust each official to manage and administer public funds accrued from taxes and other normal government sources. It takes a particular selfless skill set to perform multiple services to the best of their ability and do no intentional long term financial harm.
Sen. McCain, during his entire public service, held true to his legal, fiduciary, moral
and ethical standards. He talked the talk and walked the walk. It's the way we expect to remember all of our public servants. It's a matter of respect and ideals.
Politically these ideals and standards may get tarnished from time to time. However, we as a nation will resurrect and polish them up again as we always have. This nation will live in infamy for centuries to come, always great.
Kansas City in Platte County
Tackling the county issues
I ran for associate commissioner on a platform of lower taxes, long-term budgeting/planning, dealing with the cans that for far too long had been kicked down the road and making public safety the number one priority of county government. I’m still committed to these ideals.
Property values, quality of schools, safety of parks are all dependent on quality law enforcement. Fulfilling my promises will not be easy and might not even be possible and that may be how the county got into the mess it is in.
Two years ago, I knew each of the following would one day be a problem: the $32 million Zona Rosa parking garage debt that a previous commission pledged county dollars to; the sheriff’s department need for more funding to not only keep employees but to fill empty positions, his need for more jail space for the growing inmate population, his need for more storage for physical evidence and equipment, the demand for additional school resource officers; and the upward spiraling cost of medical examiner services.
What I didn’t know was that the problems created by these concerns would need to be dealt with today.
The commission, sheriff and auditor have been diligently working the past two months to review, research, analyze and address the aforementioned issues. The commission had considered putting a short term fix on the November ballot but has instead decided to put a proposal to the voters in April.
The additional time will allow us to fully consider a longer term jail plan or a short term plan that gets us to a long term plan.
Three questions must be answered: 1) what do we do with the growing number of inmates that we are constitutionally required to house? 2) how far into the future does the plan extend? 3) how do we pay for it?
Right now, every decision we make or don’t make concerning these issues has financial and safety implications to the county and to the taxpayers.
In spite of all of this, I’m still thankful for the opportunity to tackle these tough issues, and am grateful to be working with two commissioners who have the same vision for Platte County and its citizens.
District 2 Commissioner
Getting government out of the way
It’s been a pleasure serving Platte Countians for the past year and a half alongside Commissioners Ron Schieber and John Elliott. Your commission continues to work diligently on putting the County’s financial ship back on course. Here are some highlights.
The county’s healthcare costs are finally heading in the right direction. Hiring a new pro-active healthcare broker has helped immensely. If the year continues on this positive trend it will be a significant financial win.
This year we’ve focused on continuing to protect taxpayers by passing three new critical finance ordinances:
1 - No more Certificates of Participation to finance the acquisition or renovation of
real property by Platte County. This has been a loophole that allowed the County to bypass voters when buying buildings through lease-to-own deals.
2 - No more Industrial Development Chapter 100 bonds. This is a type of private business welfare. Chapter 100s allow counties to purchase or construct projects with bonds and to lease or sell the project back to a company, thereby avoiding tax liability at the expense of our schools, roads, parks, etc.
3 - No more Zona Rosa-type bond deals without a vote of the people. If you recall, County taxpayers were put on the hook to backstopping Zona’s infrastructure bonds by a 2 to 1 vote of a previous commission. Taxpayers had no say on this deal and now that Zona’s owners have refused to renew their letter of credit, taxpayers may be asked
to make up any revenue shortfall to make future bond payments.
The purpose of these ordinances is to protect taxpayers. I strongly support free-market capitalism and believe that the best way of encouraging economic growth is to keep everyone in their respective lanes. That means getting government out of the way of taxpayers and business owners, and focusing on the critical needs of public safety and infrastructure. If our neighborhoods and families aren’t safe, then very little else matters.
Honored to serve you.
Pre-K education has dirty secrets
In last week's letters to the editor section of The Landmark, Kirby Holden gave you excellent facts showing the ridiculous arguments liberals use for Pre-K education, but I intend to expose their dirty little secrets.
Pre-K has very little to do with preparing our kids for elementary education. That's the cover story. It has two primary goals: (1) increase the number of hired teachers in the system and (2) begin indoctrination as early as possible in the child's life.
The teacher's union salivates over the concept of Pre-K education. Adopting this requirement means more teachers, more
union dues, bigger paychecks for the union shadow bosses, and more money to the Democratic Party.
Liberal educators who have infested our public schools and universities see Pre-K as an opportunity to begin “early childhood indoctrination.” Some of us may prefer the term brainwashing. Here are just a few of the topics they will “innocently” blend into their lesson plans: gender identity, global warming, evolution, multi-culturalism, gun control, abortion rights, etc. If you are a conservative, this is not what you want your kids to hear. Additionally, you can probably expect an undertone of anti-Christian bias in everything that is taught.
I agree with Mr. Holden's assessment. Throwing money at the problem, if there is one, is not the answer. Let's demand that school districts spend our tax dollars on things like armed security guards and not more unneeded teachers. Then, start by returning to the fundamentals of education we had when Christians founded institutions like Harvard and Yale. But wait, we can't do that because it would bring the Bible and prayer back into the classroom.
Other people's money
Interesting that Platte County R-3 decided to not proceed at this time with plans to add Pre K to their curriculum as the public needs "further education" on the subject after review of their most recent survey. One week after this press release, like clockwork Sly James sends in a letter to your paper listing in great detail the need for Pre K in the school systems.
I agree with Mr. James, kids do learn better if they are taught from an earlier age than kindergarten, but why stop there? Studies also prove kids learn more if they are taught and read to from the age of three, two, one and in the womb. So by his logic the taxpayer and school districts should also start hiring people to read to your kids when they are even younger than four as this would also improve test scores. Don't forget kids also learn better when they have had three balanced meals per day so maybe the meal programs in the schools should also extend to the time a child is born?
Oops, almost forget sleep, youngsters need lots of it and this also helps the learning
process so maybe we should use tax dollars to hire people to make sure parents are getting their kids to bed on time.
I know this is extreme but am I crazy thinking parents should be responsible to see that their kids are ready for first grade not the taxpayer?
In the most recent PEW research study the United states ranked 38th in math, 24th in science and 24th in reading compared to 71 other advanced countries while spending more money per student than 66 of them. The US finished behind countries like Russia, Hungary and Slovakia in math for 15 year olds and the Slovakia republic spends less than half of what the US does per student.
Districts like R-3 in Missouri are looking for more tax dollars to add even more Pre K programs while kindergarten is still not even mandatory in Missouri. That's right, by law your child does not have to attend kindergarten but the districts do have to offer it for at least a half day, I believe R-3 already spends more dollars than required by offering it for a full day along with taxpayer subsidized half day pre school for over 50
students now. And how has that extra time with the students worked out so far long term? R-3 is in the bottom half for district ACT scores in the area.
Several of the countries ranked above the US in education do have Pre K programs available to all kids while Finland, on the other hand, which finishes way above the US does not start formal education until kids are seven.
As usual the liberal way is to throw money at a problem. Our education problems could not be teachers unions, weak school boards, parents not invested in their kids’ education or the fact funds are continually being funneled to sports not academics in the public schools.
You are supposed to feel good if you support all of the new programs in the public schools as they are touted as "visionary" and "innovative,” bad if you don't.
The problem is these failed programs can only be supported until you run out of other people’s money.
Rural Platte County
Proposition A is pro-worker
In 2017, Missouri's elected officials passed legislation ensuring Missourians the freedom to work without having to join or pay fees to a union. Now national union bosses are attempting to change the law by opposing Proposition A, which would take away worker freedom.
One of the reasons Missouri lags the nation in economic growth, placing 47th out of 50 states, is we didn't have a worker
freedom law. Meanwhile, businesses considering Missouri have gone to states with freedom to work. In fact, every state surrounding Missouri except Illinois is a freedom to work state.
Opponents of Proposition A have been operating a dishonest campaign. One of their ads was fact-checked by KMIZ-TV, which found their assertions on jobs and wages to be false. Even so, they continue making these untrue claims. The truth is Prop A will lead to higher wages and more jobs.
If Prop A passes, union bosses would be more accountable to their membership. If union leaders want more members, they should make members want to belong instead of forcing workers to pay dues.
Prop A is not anti-union, it is pro-worker. Missourians who care about jobs and workers should vote “yes” on Prop A on Aug. 7.
Kansas City in Platte County
Proposition A, yes or no?
Proposition A on the ballot set for August 7 (moved up from the general election set for November 6) is either going to uphold legislation passed in 2017 or cause it to be nullified.
All the signs I have seen are union organized “Vote NO on Prop A.” One reason is Missouri is the 28th state to enact right-to-work legislation and the unions have made this referendum a focal point in the 2018 election cycle.
Just as a reference about me, I was a member of The Airline Pilots Association for all my airline career. Not because I wanted to but because I had no choice. Don't get me wrong, ALPA does much good work in the area of safety, grievance disputes, as an agent in collective bargaining, and in many other areas. Here's the rub.
ALPA never, to my recollection, supported a Republican candidate and some of the money collected from my paycheck went to ALPA National that would in turn provide financial support for the Democrat. They always advocated for Democrats whom I always opposed. Maybe the Democrats would present a candidate that would claim they would fight for some conservative cause but in the end they would always vote in a block for all the things that I
oppose, funding Planned Parenthood, abortion, gay marriage, more taxes, higher national debt, all the “progressive” things that I considered wrong.
In the end, the union at the national and local level should be responsive to the desires of its constituency. ALPA, politically, was not. And neither will your union if Prop A is defeated! Your union will listen to your concerns and embrace your views only when their funding stream is at risk. If, and maybe that should be a capital IF, if your union knows that in order to gain support, voting and financial, they will listen. IF it is such a great good to be a union member then the leadership must prove that. IF the membership which seems to be very prevalent based on the signs I've seen, if they believe the union is doing a great job with negotiations, grievance disputes, wage and benefit increases, and all the other good things a collective bargaining agent can accomplish, the membership will continue to support the union. It is in the member's interest to do so. But…
Consider for yourself, is it worth relinquishing your basic ideology and moral sense of right and wrong regarding how you live your life and raise your children? Do you teach your kids that there is no such thing as gender? Would you prefer that your child engage in a homosexual marriage? Would
you teach your child that killing their unborn child is OK? Do you teach them that it is almost sinful to work hard and get ahead or do you teach them that hard work is old school, everybody should get a check from the government to even out the financial disparity? Do you teach your kids that higher taxes and more people on welfare somehow benefit our great nation? Thank goodness most of you don't.
I understand there will be some freeloaders, there will always be some who enjoy the benefits and mock the hard workers. But a NO vote will assure the unions that they don't have to listen to you because the money stream is assured. It is back to business as usual. And to underline my point as of July 13 as reported by Missouri Proposition A, Right to Work Referendum (2018) there has been $13,510,000 raised to oppose Prop A, $2,270,000 coming from the AFL-CIO of Missouri.
on't you think your union dues could be put to better use or reduced to give you more take-home pay?
If you want a more responsive, accountable union, the only answer is a YES vote on Prop A.
Prioritize school security over pay raises
School boards across the country are protecting teacher's pensions and raising salaries but many are not protecting the kids. I have written about this before: It's never about the kids; it's about money and politics.
I applaud the recent U.S Supreme Court decision that prevents public sector unions from automatically extracting dues or agency fees from employee paychecks. Let's hope this breaks the back of all public-sector unions, especially the teacher's unions. It's despicable that an organization funded by the taxpayer ever be allowed to unionize. Even former President Franklin D. Roosevelt, a committed liberal, agreed with this.
Why is this a problem? it's simple. Public sector unions extract mandatory dues from all members, whether they be liberal or conservative. Then they funnel a great percent of these dues back into the Democratic Party to elect candidates that are more than willing to raise local and state taxes, which fund the rising pensions and salaries of the union workers. It's a vicious cycle of self-entitlement and redistribution of wealth. This is a major reason why so many Democratic-run cities in the country are facing bankruptcy. They can no longer afford to pay the inflated salaries of public workers or their retirees. The people have been taxed to death.
But I started this letter talking about protecting the kids. Is there a common thread? I think so. It's money and how it is prioritized. As a taxpayer funded entity, you cannot do everything and still be faithful to the taxpayers. You must decide where you can take acceptable risk and where you cannot.
The next time your school board votes for another administrative/teacher pay raise have they adequately addressed school security? Do they have trained, full-time, on-site officers carrying weapons open or concealed? I certainly hope so.
Let's take risk in the right places. Could school districts prioritize security over arbitrary pay raises? Would school boards and administrators be willing to make that investment in the lives of our children?
For those of you who agree with this letter, it is about the kids.
Accountability lacking at R-3 school district
After reading your front page story two weeks ago about the upcoming school board vote to accept the resignation of the teacher/coach I have to wonder...what would someone possibly have to say to a student(s) to get fired in the Platte County R-3 School District? If you wonder what I am talking about, ask around.
Ask around then ask yourself how did this district get to the point a teacher gets paid severance, time off and is allowed to resign after what you find out. What happened to "Kids First"?
Parents were embarrassed to even repeat what allegedly happened when I was contacted. I know there is a strong teachers’ union and policies that have to be followed but from what I have been told if district HR had been doing its job correctly previous to the alleged incident maybe your headline would have read differently.
In the time I have had the PlattecountyR3facts.com website, many issues with leadership have been pointed out to me and if even half of them were true it would be tough for district administration to fire any employee for misconduct of ANY kind. In following up on several of the issues pointed out to me, out of hundreds of teachers in the district I have seen transfers and job changes but no one fired.
How is that possible? Maybe the school district can publish the amount of certified staff fired since Dr. Mike Reik took over 10 years ago? No names needed, just numbers. I think you will find the number is zero or very close.
Recently a police report was filed with the Platte City Police Department alleging a possible felony committed by school board president Sharon Sherwood. The police report alleges that over her previous term while serving as board president, Mrs. Sherwood allegedly had unpaid individual income taxes and garnishments by the state. This was not her first tax issue.
There allegedly was also outstanding tax debt during her 2012 term. Mo. Statute 115.306 states you cannot have delinquent taxes and run for an elected office, you also cannot be a felon, along with a short list of other requirements. When running for office a form is signed by the candidate and notarized that you meet these qualifications, a form signed by Mrs. Sherwood on Dec. 20, 2016 which appears to be two weeks before court documents show her final release letter from the Missouri Department of Revenue, dated Jan 4, 2017.
Mo. Statute 115.631 talks about election offenses that are deemed felonies and that if you sign an election form making a false statement you could be imprisoned and or be hit with a fine of not less than $2,500. It is hard to hold others to a high standard when the leader of the school board allegedly sets this example. On a side note, as of the last time I checked the police department has been sitting on this for over three months.
It is potentially a felony. If the law is not going to be enforced why was this law put in place? Would it be okay with the Platte City Police Department if a felon ran for the school board?
So it looks like the R-3 school board president, the person that handed my daughter and hundreds of other students their diplomas, the person that leads the way in spending $45 million of our tax dollars was apparently not voluntarily paying her own? Does that sound right or legal? Maybe it turns out to be legal but it sure doesn’t seem right. She could have waited several weeks until the garnishment was final and signed the election paperwork but it looks like she had to make sure she was first on the ballot by signing up the first day, which anybody at the election board will tell you is the place you want to be.
Is there an excuse for this? Illness, ignorance of the law or maybe she did not read the forms she was signing? How could you not notice the state was taking money from your bank account? Everyone remember, this is a person you are trusting to oversee $45 million of your tax dollars, helps control academics and sets the moral compass for the district.
Here is the really, really, really bad part. The certified court documents and information were sent to each of the Platte County R-3 School Board members the day before they decided to vote Sharon Sherwood in as school board president for another term in April of this year. I believe the vote for her was unanimous. These are the people who not only handle your tax dollars and the map for your kids’ academic future but are also over Dr. Rob Gardner and the HR department for the district, which probably decided to let the teacher mentioned above resign last week.
The next R-3 school board meeting is July 19. I have no doubt as always no one other than employees will be there, no one will speak up and this kind of thing will continue but after reading this you can't say you were not informed.
(EDITOR’S NOTE: Platte City police confirm they are investigating the issues, including the signing of the documents, mentioned in the above letter. “I don’t see an offense. I don’t see any intent,” said Platte City Police Lt. Al Devalkenaere. However, Devalkenaere said he will be forwarding the information to the prosecutor, who will make a decision on any criminal charges. A copy of the police department’s incident report, a public document obtained by The Landmark, contains the allegations listed in this letter).
Nice work by sheriff's department
Last week, a Shawnee man settled a dispute with bullets in the 5400 block of NW Venetian Drive in Houston Lake.
Law enforcement officers successfully apprehended the suspect shortly after the incident.
Houston Lake residents would like to extend their deepest gratitude to the Platte County Sheriff's Office and assisting law enforcement agencies for their strong-mindedness and dedication to protect the good people of Platte County.
We are proud to have police visually a part of our community.
Publicly funded library should be neutral
I have always been a supporter of the Mid-Continent Public Library system, often going there to get an escape from the rest of the world.
Recently, however, that all changed. I went to the Liberty branch searching for some good books when I saw a display right in the middle of the teen section.
This, mind you, was in an area were children go to regularly.
I love reading and visiting this library but I do not appreciate the incessant barrage of propaganda promoting same-sex sexuality.
This is, essentially, displaying pornographic material in the library, where people of all ages visit. This subject matter occurs in the bedroom and whatever goes on there should stay there. If they want to display sexual material then they might as well put up a biography of a porn star right in that spot.
MCPL is also a public, taxpayer funded organization. It is not proper to push a partisan political ideology in a public place that thousands of other people with a variety of beliefs pay for. A publicly funded library should be a neutral place that is free from that kind of thing. I would prefer to see displays about things that are appropriate for the library, like local history, reading, science and art.
If there were a library system that was privately funded, they would have every right to express any opinions they desire and promote whatever they want, because anyone who agrees can support with their dollars, while anyone else could go where they choose. It's a shame that isn't possible, because I can't take my money to a competing library.
In summary, I find it extremely inappropriate to promote this kind of material in a public institution, material that is often very explicit and offensive to lots of the people who fund the library. I think many people would appreciate it if they were to be replaced with material that is not heavily political.
Mail floating out in the ether
I found it astonishing that a week after reading your comments about the postal service in The Landmark that I received a strange piece of mail.
I pulled the envelope out of the mailbox and studied it. It was returned to us as “undeliverable.” We hadn't used that return address stamp in over a year and I couldn't remember sending anything to this particular addressee.
I left the envelope on the kitchen counter and my wife opened it when she got home from work. “What the hell?!” I think is what she said.
It was a Christmas / New Year's card and letter that we sent out in late 2014 and early 2015. It took THREE YEARS for the postal service to return this piece of mail to us.
I've had issues with my Landmark arriving late as you described, but I didn't really think I was otherwise affected by the postal service. But this takes the cake. Now we wonder what other mail of ours is floating out in the ether.
Greetings from 64151!
Don't fear your fruits and vegetables
We all want to eat healthy food and keep our children safe from toxic substances, and simple lists and clean-versus-dirty shopping guides appeal to some consumers. But context matters. Scientists thoroughly test thousands of substances, from water to arsenic, to determine how much of them would be toxic to humans. Some level of every substance is toxic to humans, but conversely, the human body can safely process a trace amount of almost anything without any risk to health.
In April, the Environmental Working Group (EWG), a nongovernmental organization dedicated to promotion of organic-only production methods, released its 25th annual “Dirty Dozen” list. This report utilizes U.S. Department of Agriculture data to identify the 12 fruits and vegetables that tested highest in pesticide residue. Regardless of the actual levels found, the EWG labels the top 12 each year as “dirty” foods and encourages consumers to avoid eating conventionally-grown versions of those crops.
For this year, the EWG report identified strawberries, spinach, nectarines, apples, grapes, peaches, cherries, pears, tomatoes, celery, potatoes and sweet bell peppers for its “dirty” list. But just how “dirty” are these foods?
According to data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Service (EPA), a man could consume 5,080 large strawberries in one day without any effect, even if the strawberries had the highest residue recorded for strawberries by USDA. Strawberries are delicious, but it would be pretty tough to eat that many. For celery, the safe level for a man is 27,451 servings in a day. That's a lot of celery. A child could consume 310 servings of spinach in a day without any adverse effect. How many kids do you know who do that?
The true problem with the “Dirty Dozen” marketing ploy is that a peer reviewed study showed that exposure to its messaging makes low-income consumers less likely to purchase ANY produce, either organically or conventionally grown. With only one in ten Americans currently eating enough fruits and vegetables, this marketing does far more harm than good, especially to lower-income Americans.
The bottom line is, eating more fruits and vegetables of any kind is far more beneficial to your diet than the potential harm of any miniscule residue they may carry – most of which washes off with a simple rinse anyway. Listen to your mom and eat your fruits and veggies. And remember that food decisions should be made with facts, not fear.
Mo. Farm Bureau
Director of Public Affairs
Mail delivery in Parkville is inconsistent
Your comments on postal service are 64152 interesting.
It has been this way along Hwy. 45 in Parkville for a year or two now.
On May 25, 2018 there was no delivery at all. Mail has been delivered from 9:15 a.m. through 7 p.m. or anytime in between. Don’t count on a given time each day.
Keep up your great newspaper. Several times this year it arrived on Friday and once on Saturday but it gets here.
The financial struggles at Zona Rosa
I was just reading your most recent column and hearing about Kathy Dusenbery's statement about Zona Rosa not having any problems.
When I hear a statement like this, I feel the need to check a few facts (even though sometimes the factual information is difficult to obtain). So I looked up the following:
Zona Rosa retail gross square footage: 500,000 square feet.
Zona Rosa vacancy estimate (your comment): approximately 40% or 200,000 square feet.
That results in a revenue square footage of 300,000 square feet.
Then I looked for average sales per square foot and found that the sales range from $325-375 per square foot per year. I use that number to then calculate the estimated sale tax revenue.
If we assume the current vacancy is 200,000 square feet and use a conservative annual sales per square foot of $250 per square foot, that calculates to $50 million in gross sales that are lost due to it being vacant. Then multiply that by a sales tax rate of one percent (one cent per dollar of gross sales) that equals $500,000 in lost tax revenue.
Hmmm, seems like this gets close to the estimated shortfall in revenue to pay the special district bill.
But of course, Ms. Dusenbery says that there is not a problem.
State legislature made strides
Congratulations are in order to state legislators for their work completed during the 2018 regular session. Important legislation passed the chambers that will, among other things, lower income tax rates, promote accountability in our government unions, provide greater education access to our students, and relieve some of the burdens imposed by the state's Byzantine licensing system.
While other measures fell short of passage -- including the repeal of the prevailing wage, comprehensive reform of tax incentive programs, and the enactment of an earned income tax credit -- those were uncommon valleys in a mountain range of success. I am hopeful that in 2019 the legislature will build on its 2018 successes and re-engage the issues that did not cross the finish line this year.
The Parkville Post Office = not good
The Parkville Post Office : How bad is it?
Last year I mailed three letters for my wife's business by dropping them into the box inside the lobby of the Parkville Post Office.
One of those letters, which contained a check, was going to an address in Riss Lake.
It was never seen again.
The Parkville Post Office was not capable of getting a standard #10 envelope up the hill and around the corner!
We have had other lost mail that was sent from the Parkville Post Office but nothing as incredible as that.
We've learned to add tracking to any, even slightly, important mail. Tracked mail never seems to get lost but it also costs a lot more.
I can also tell you that The Landmark does not always show up on the same day at my Parkville address.
Mail delivery issues at Weatherby Lake
I read with interest your issues with the post office in zip code 64152. That covers Weatherby Lake, where we have been fighting mail delivery issues for several months.
During my campaign for alderman, and now after my election, I have been leading the presentation of our issues to the Parkville Post Office.
I have had several meetings with the management there. The story is almost what you would expect from such an organization.
However, this squeaky wheel has gotten some measure of relief for the westside area of Weatherby Lake. Mail service has improved and we are hopeful it will get even better.
I can't speak to your issue specifically, but I hope your congressional staff person will be of assistance.
Cox stood strong
Your opinion of school board members "guts and testicular fortitude" shows just how short your memory must be.
I agree that over the years many of these board members clearly don't deserve recognition or respect because of their rubber stamp attitudes. However I am not one that appreciates the use of generalization because often we offend those who have stood up and gone against the grain, accomplishing great things for the Park Hill School District.
I can suggest you forgot to mention David Cox, who in one year had no problem standing alone in his efforts to cut costs, refuse to raise taxes and keeping the administration in line. He definitely has shown he has the knowhow and fearlessness to take on the majority. And voted the right way. He did not cower and you should do some fact checking before you lump all school board members into one category. I don't want to have to lump The Landmark into #FAKENEWS.
We are a country of people
Thank you for having the courage to print the column other voices “his own enemy” (May 9, 2018 issue of The Landmark, page A-2).
If our voices are heard we can find an elected official to lead us with Christian values without hate, anger and self serving decisions.
It will not happen until more papers like yours find the courage to speak out.
We are not a country of two opposing political parties we are a country of people, Americans.
The need to protect forests
Every minute, logging companies and farmers cut down or burn about 30 football fields' worth of forest in developing nations.
That's not just an environmental tragedy. By forcing animals from their habitats and bringing them into closer contact with humans, deforestation accelerates the spread of dangerous animal-borne diseases like Ebola, Zika, Lyme, and the plague.
In other words, deforestation doesn't just kill trees and animals -- it kills people. Leaders worldwide must start treating it as a public health crisis, in addition to an environmental one.
Humans cut down trees for many reasons. Farmers need space for crops and livestock. Governments need room for new roads. Companies from homebuilders to candy makers rely on lumber, wood pulp, and other commodities harvested from forests.
The problem is huge. Every year, 18.7 million acres of forest -- an area roughly the size of South Carolina -- vanish. From August 2015 to July 2016, the rate of deforestation in the Amazon surged 29 percent compared to the previous twelve months. If deforestation continues at its current pace, every rain forest on the planet will disappear within 100 years.
This assault on animals' environment has unleashed many of the most dangerous diseases of the twentieth century.
Consider the case of Madagascar. I traveled there in November to aid with the international response to their first ever urban outbreak of pneumonic plague -- a disease similar to the Black Death, but deadlier. More than 2,000 cases were reported; 200 people died. The outbreak closed schools, reduced tourism, and overwhelmed the health system.
Deforestation fueled this disaster. During the rainy season, locals burn forests to create more room for crops. The fires drive plague-carrying rats into nearby communities. The island nation -- plague-free a century ago -- now reports more cases of the disease annually than any other country.
Deforestation has also accelerated the spread of the Zika virus, which has caused thousands of children to be born with severe brain defects in the Western Hemisphere -- including 51 in the United States in 2016. Ebola outbreaks preferentially occur in recently deforested areas of Central and West Africa. In Brazil, deforestation has likely engendered several recent outbreaks of yellow fever by dispersing mosquitoes into new territory.
These diseases were virtually unknown to humans a generation ago, yet new epidemics are appearing almost yearly now. It's petrifying to consider what diseases could emerge in the next generation.
Fortunately, there are several ways to stop deforestation.
Richer nations could pay developing countries to stop cutting down trees. Take the case of Liberia. In 2008, the country sold half its forest to timber companies. Six years later, the government of Norway agreed to pay Liberia $150 million to end legal logging operations and develop programs to protect forests.
Organizations could also partner with locals to establish protected areas and generate revenue from tourism. Consider the World Bank's Transfrontier Conservation Areas Program in Mozambique. Since 1996, the initiative has helped preserve forests and boost tourism. Now, nearly one-quarter of the country's land is under formal conservation.
Large companies could also pressure vendors to embrace responsible forestry practices. Thus far, many have failed to do so. Of the 250 companies with the greatest influence over forests, only 18 earned a top score for their efforts to prevent deforestation, according to watchdog group Global Canopy Programme.
Deforestation isn't merely a threat to the environment. It endangers humanity's present and future. Madagascar's pneumonic plague, Liberia's Ebola, Brazil's Zika, and the United States' expanding Lyme problem must be a wakeup call about the need to protect forests.
--Dr. Rob Cohen
Open access sought from fire district
I have had the pleasure of meeting many of the citizens of Platte City, and of the Central Platte Fire Protection District (CPFPD), discussing the quality of service and the operational procedures. There were a few common items mentioned in my discussions, including:
· Questioning the need of a ladder truck in our district
· The concept that the CPFPD was a “Good Old Boys Club”
· A feeling that the CPDPD wanted to have the “biggest and best” equipment
Now, before we go much further, I want to be clear that I was a candidate for the board of directors on the April 3 ballot, and Stanley George was chosen by the voters to serve in that role.
During the campaign I stated that I was proud of the volunteers of CPFPD, and I am proud of them. I am very thankful that we have the group of men who volunteer to rush into harms way, while the rest of us hurry away. I am thankful that we have those who give so much of themselves at all hours of the day and night, to render aide whenever we call. In my visits I promised that I would be fiscally responsible and that I believed in open communications and business dealings. When the voters spoke, I immediately made the comment that “my work was not done,” and it isn't.
It is my belief that we, the taxpayers and citizens should have easy, open access to the operations and finances of our political subdivisions. I have been obtaining copies of the agendas, minutes and financial reports from the monthly board meetings, and making them readily available for the citizens review and knowledge. If you are interested in these, simply go to Facebook and search for “CPFPD PCMO Followers.” This is a public group, and please join to be notified of new information as it is received.
Whatever you choose, please thank the volunteers for their service. You could easily do that at the monthly board meetings, 7 p.m. on the second Tuesday of the month at the fire station (Station 1) located at Second and Main Street, Platte City.
In service to you.
Farm Bill would hurt the hungry
One in eight people in Missouri, including one in six children under age 18, are at risk of hunger.
Rural counties across the state often experience even higher rates of hunger. A new Farm Bill debated soon by the U.S. House of Representatives puts our most vulnerable at risk and would have a devastating effect on families, seniors and children.
The proposed bill takes food away from unemployed and underemployed workers and their families by making structural changes and imposing stricter work requirements for the SNAP (Food Stamp) program. Punishing people for being unemployed by taking away their food assistance won't help them find a better job or find work faster. It will only destabilize families and make it harder for them to get back on their feet.
In rural areas, jobs and work-support services are less available, and there's no infrastructure in place to support these programs. Additionally, community-based charitable organizations, like Harvesters and our network of pantries and kitchens, lack additional resources to feed the thousands who would likely lose SNAP benefits under this proposal.
We want to get a Farm Bill passed this year for the security and stability of our Kansas farmers and families, but we simply can't support one that takes food away from hungry people to create a large, unproven job tracking and training bureaucracy.
I encourage you to call your Congressional Representative and voice your concern about these cuts. Visit www.harvesters.org to find out how and to learn more.
Harvesters Food Network
Kansas City Chiefs are no good
Hearne Christopher’s rant about the Chiefs (April 11 issue, Hearne Christopher’s column, KC Confidential, page A-3) was no good, like the Kansas City Chiefs are.
He and other Chiefs lovers should ask “How long has it been since they went to the Super Bowl?”
An owner and coach who cannot make their players stand for the National Anthem will never be good.
Go back to the Kansas City Star. They need more Kansas City Chiefs writers.
in Platte County
(EDITOR’S NOTE: As noted in the column at the time, the thoughts on the Chiefs in KC Confidential on April 11 were written by Craig Glazer, a contributor to Hearne’s column, not by Hearne)
GOP committee rejects Van Meter
The Republican Party is a big tent party and we welcome like-minded people who embrace the Republican platform. Nonetheless, Scot Van Meter is a known Democrat who has held the office of Buchanan County Assessor as a Democrat since 2001, having been re-elected in November 2016. The 34th Republican Senate District Committee voted on Saturday, April 7, to refuse to recognize the candidacy of Scot Van Meter as a Republican in the 2018 primary election for the open seat representing Buchanan and Platte Counties in District 34 of the Missouri Senate. Mr. Van Meter has never sought the endorsement of any member of the Republican County, Legislative or Senatorial District committees for the Missouri Senate seat. Nor has he ever discussed his candidacy with any member of the local GOP.
The reason we are not recognizing Mr. Van Meter goes to a First Amendment Freedom of Association issue. In the words of US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in California Democratic Party v. Jones, 530 U.S. 567 (2000), “… [T]he Court has recognized that the First Amendment protects the freedom to join together in furtherance of common political beliefs, which necessarily presupposes the freedom to identify the people who constitute the association, and to limit the association to those people only. That is to say, a corollary of the right to associate is the right not to associate. Freedom of association would prove an empty guarantee if associations could not limit control over their decisions to those who share the interests and persuasions that underlie the association's being. In no area is the political association's right to exclude more important than in the process of selecting its nominee.”
Mr. Van Meter can rectify the situation by withdrawing from the Republican Primary Election ballot.
--Jim Rooney, Chairman
Enjoyed Hearne's piece on the Star
Hearne Christopher’s April 11, 2018 article in The Landmark (page A-3) referencing the Kansas City Star was most interesting.
Having gotten the KC Star since it became the morning newspaper in the 80's, I can see how it has changed a lot and for the worse.
Have you looked at USA Today lately? It’s not much better and has really gone downhill the past six months, not like it was years back. Neither paper is worth more than 25 cents.
Many thanks for your column, I make sure to read it every week. Find it most enjoyable. I will continue to read it since I’m also a longtime subscriber to The Landmark. Have to keep up with Ivan.
Zona Rosa, Ferrelview finances
It seems that between the situation with Ferrelview, where I lived as a youngster many years ago, and with Zona Rosa's financial troubles, you have lots of job
security writing stories for quite some time.
Both are sad financial situations plus Ferrelview has the added excitement of city leaders and others acting shamefully.
Please keep up with both stories. I will
wait with much anticipation to hear the next chapters in both stories.
Ethics reform being 'offered as bait'
Clean Missouri is the political action committee pushing an unparalleled attempt to change Missouri's political map. Their primary focus is constitutionally changing the redistricting process, even though their messaging is on ethics reform.
The adage “if you can't win the game, change the rules” seems applicable here.
Clean Missouri would more aptly named Make Democrats Win Again. Their promise to “stop the big money, powerful lobbyists, & partisan games” is brazenly hypocritical.
Their entire campaign is being funded by big money partisan traditional democratic
special interests: abortionists, unions, and trial lawyers.
It's donor lists are a who's who of progressives: $100,000.00 from Planned Parenthood and its political arm, $500,000.00 from the National Education Association (NEA) and Missouri NEA, and a minimum of $250,000.00 from George Soros' network as reported by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
While ending the lobbyist-legislator power nexus may sound great to Missourians, we must remember that the ethics reforms offered as bait will not end cronyism. It will however, cause liberal-progressives to start winning elections.
Democratic candidates have failed to win in the Legislature since losing their majorities in the early 2000s. It's gotten worse, culminating in 2016's historic statewide losses. Now they are executing a long-ball strategy to position themselves for future wins.
Your signature is necessary for their success. My advice: decline to sign.
Ferrelview's treasurer speaks out
I have spent a lot of hours just trying to evaluate where we are right now in the Village of Ferrelview, financially. I have tried every way I know how to impress on the board where we are. Every month as I give my report I see one board member rolling his eyes and another, if she attends, is fidgeting impatiently for me to get done.
Last night I had a list of items that I got out of conversations with the auditor that they should be aware of. One rolled his eyes and acted impatient and the other did her usual (she did attend last night). I have come to the conclusion that not only do they not respect me they do not respect the state auditor’s office.
Last night (at a village board meeting held Tuesday night) I told the board that if a water main break occurred I did not know where the money would come from. We have $35,000 in bank CD's and we are supposed to have funds for the water deposits that are posted by each residence. That $35,000 would just about cover that. The water checking account has enough in it right now to pay the sewer bill from Kansas City. Again, eye rolls and impatience.
I have done my job. I have done all I can and the residents of Ferrelview are not being properly represented right now. It has been a year of fighting over the police chief that we cannot afford in the manner he was being allowed to work. He was setting his own hours and working overtime every week. That was scheduled overtime. He worked his 40 hours during the week and scheduled himself every Saturday night to work with one of the reserves. The board allowed it.
I have done everything I can to make the board and the public understand. I have given them the information. The auditor says the bank statements don't lie. Last night I was accused of trying to run the town. I have been accused of misrepresenting the finances. There were people in the audience making comments, asking me to resign and saying I was going to be fired after the election.
The audit will prove out and I know it will, but what I see is a general disrespect by some board remembers of even that process. I don't fear that audit. What I do fear is that by the time the results are in it will be too late. It could be as late as October before we get results but the auditor is giving us suggestions as he goes.
I know my facts will prove out. We (the village) are literally on the verge of bankruptcy. One, even minor, catastrophe can take us down. We have nothing for collateral for a bank loan. We have a $10,000 CD in the general fund and with us having to pay for the audit and the excess revenue collected in 2016 we will have to use that $10,000 to make the budget.
In 2015 we had a windfall of $88,000 and that would have been a good time to put that money aside to replace some of the CD's that had been cashed in. In 2016 there was no budget and the entire $64,000 that was taken in court revenues was spent. The bank accounts were not reconciled for 2016. There was no accounting, no controls. On Jan. 1, 2017 the general fund was negative. I have made it as clear as I can.
I am not the problem. The board is letting the residents down with all of the fighting and the standoff over one thing - the chief of police. So when suddenly the village is in a position where their water system is bankrupt and Kansas City won't manage it, the police chief is going to be a very minor thing.
Village of Ferrelview
Water usage in March is expensive
It's been a very dry winter and lawns could use some water now that the weather is warmer.
If you live in an area served by the Platte County Regional Sewer District, be careful because any extra water you buy in March will cost you dearly.
The PCRSD averages your January, February and March water usage and uses that number to calculate your sewer bill for the current year. What could go wrong with that system?
Here is an example: Last year, I used extra water in March to start up my lawn. The lawn watering cost me an additional $70 on my March water bill. But, the extra water also raised my three-month average usage by quite a bit because the January and February numbers are so low.
That $70 worth of water raised my PCRSD bill by a little over $20 a month, or almost $250 for the year. So, $70 worth of water ended up costing me $320 after causing me to get a much higher sewer bill.
Some residents of Parkville are on the city-owned sewer system and they do not have this problem. The City of Parkville uses December-February average water usage to calculate their sewer bills.
This means my neighbors are free to water in March, but even though I live in the same city, I'm not allowed to do that without being punished financially.
I have asked the PCRSD to please bring their policy in line with the City of Parkville's policy, but so far there is no response to that request.
If you live anywhere in the PCRSD and need to use extra water in March (and well into April if that's when your meter is read), be aware that you are buying punishingly expensive water.
KEEP LINES OF COMMUNICATION OPEN
(Following the recent school shooting in Florida, Park Hill Superintendent Dr. Jeanette Cowherd sent this message to patrons)
Dear Park Hill Family:
I know that, like mine, your heart broke (last week) to see more students lose their lives at school. I could not help but think of all the young lives we have in our care here in the Park Hill School District.
We realize that these tragedies can and do happen in places just like Park Hill all the time. While it is frightening to realize that we can never guarantee complete safety, we take our responsibility very seriously to do everything we can to keep our students and staff safe.
This is why we work so hard on efforts like renovations and improvements to limit access to our schools, training to help our staff support the mental health of our students, and constantly updated crisis prevention and response plans. We appreciate the support of our local emergency responders and mental health professionals who work with us regularly on these safety efforts.
The most important thing we do to keep our people safe is keep the lines of communication open. You can help us with this by letting us know if you hear of anything suspicious or alarming, and encouraging students to do the same.
Thank you for your support of Park Hill's schools as we work to protect our safe, caring learning environment.
--Dr. Jeanette Cowherd
Park Hill School District
NEW BLOOD NEEDED AT PLATTE COUNTY R-3
After reviewing Platte County R-3 School District financials there appears to be a shortage in the general fund or savings. Currently the district is sitting on only $6 million in savings, the lowest level in over 17 years. That’s $4 million less than they had back in 2008 when the district had 1,000 fewer students .
In 2013 and 2014 the district had about $8 million in savings. At that time I asked why some of this money was not being used to alleviate the overcrowding at Barry and Pathfinder and was told by Superintendent Dr. Mike Reik that this "general fund" needed to stay between 18 and 21% of expenditures to cover any emergencies, so it could not be used. At that time the fund was over 20%.
You may also remember during this same time period the district had "emergency budget cutting" meetings as the 2012 levy question had just failed and district administration was preparing parents for doom and gloom. R-3 solicited public input looking at cutting magazines in the library, the activities bus, charging parents for sports etc. Several nights of public meetings looking at total cuts of about $500,000. Cuts which never took place.
Fast forward to 2017 and savings now sit at just 14% of expenditures, 33% lower than when we were having community “budget cutting” meetings. Do you think those meetings were needed or just scare tactics?
Less than two years ago with a tax increase we gave the district about $30 million in additional funds to be used for "capital projects" as they saw fit. Now district savings is at its lowest level in 17 years.
Looking back I guess it was not important enough to reduce savings to cover overcrowding at the southern schools but it was ok to reduce the amount in savings this year to build the tennis courts, upgrade the sports facility, add more staff and new parking lots. District administration sent out information to the public telling us that extra projects were due to good fiscal policy in how the levy money was handled.
So what happened to the $2 million dollars that was in savings?
Two school board spots are open for this April election. We were fortunate enough to have at least one good person step up last year, now we need two more. The open spots are currently filled by two board members who over their combined nine years on the board have voted YES on every single item presented to them, YES to all spending, YES to high bidders, YES to giving Rising Star Elementary School away for 20 cents on the dollar and YES to letting our kids play on an unsafe football field for two years waiting for the 2015 levy to pass before repairs were made.
All of this while the R-3 district has the highest per student debt in the state at $22,000 per student, $6,000 more per student than another Missouri district that has grown by 5,000 students the past 10 years, while R-3 has grown by just 1,000.
I think you can see new leadership is sorely needed. You do not have to have a student in the district to be on the school board, just a willingness to give up a night or two a month in meetings and hopefully the will to not just rubber stamp items you do not understand.
You can sign up at the R-3 district office until Jan 16. Dates and times are listed on the PlattecountyR3facts Facebook page and at plattecountyr3facts.com.
Rural Platte County
NO CLEMENCY FOR FAMILY OF VICTIM
You know I love your paper and always appreciate your reporting, but the second half of your front page story on Judy Henderson sounded like a press release from the Missouri Innocence Project. Ms. Henderson was convicted of capital murder by a jury who heard all of the evidence, not just a summary based on the defendant's side of the story. That means, despite the spin Ms. Henderson puts on her conviction, the jury found that she aided or encouraged the killer and that her purpose was to commit murder. To convict of capital murder, the jury must have found that she didn't just lure the victim to be robbed (a very serious crime), but that she wanted him to be killed. That is the only way she could have been convicted. If people are going to celebrate her release, they must have a full understanding of the crime for which the jury found her guilty.
Despite the contention that the war on drugs significantly increased incarceration rates, it is also important to recognize that our prisons are not full of first-time, non-violent drug and property offenders. Missouri has about 35,000 prison inmates. 99% percent of those people (1) are violent criminals, (2) are sex offenders, (3) have at least one prior felony, or (4) were given a chance at probation or parole and got revoked (which takes some doing). Only about 350 Missouri inmates don't fall into one or more of these four categories.
I promise you the typical person who is convicted of drug possession in a tough, law-and-order jurisdiction like Platte County does not go to prison for a day, much less the 5.7 years as cited in the article. First time drug possession offenders almost always get probation or drug court. It is rare for first time offenders to serve any prison time even when caught with more than 100 pounds of drugs.
By sending violent, sex, and career criminals to prison more often and for longer sentences, we have achieved historically law crime rates. Make no mistake about it, criminal justice "reform" advocates like Ms. Kajstura want to let these offenders out of prison sooner or not send them to prison at all. Criminal justice "reform" is not about drug or property crimes, which almost never result in prison sentences for first time offenders. It is about shorter prison sentences for violent, sex and career criminals. We follow their advice at our peril of returning to the "bad old days" of the 1980's and 1990's when violent crime soared.
If you need a case study on the results of shorter sentences for violent crimes, look no further than Jackson County where nearly 150 murders were committed this year. . .a number not seen since the 1990's.
While criminal justice "reform" advocates cheer the release of a convicted murderer, I will be thinking about and praying for the family of her victim. There is no clemency for them.
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney
PEOPLE IN COUNTY HAVE STORAGE NEEDS
I was disappointed that Platte County does not recognize the need for more services. People with money are flocking to Platte County and those people have storage needs that cannot be met at their own homes.
Home associations do not allow homeowners to have their own storage buildings. There are reasons that home associations do not allow them. They want to make a more cohesive appearance in the neighborhood and not distract from the beauty of each individual home and the green space of the neighborhood.
A new storage facility would give homeowners a safe, clean, and secure environment in appropriately located storage spaces built on properly zoned commercial areas. These homeowners are going outside of the county to store their items. Hmm, monies that could go here.
A future resident of Platte County, maybe?
Kansas City, Kan.
FCC MUST FOCUS ON DIGITAL INCLUSION
In Kansas City, we have a vibrant technology and entrepreneurial community. Our Smart City program is among the best in the nation, distinguished from our peers by the level of connectivity throughout our city. Driving that success is the idea that Smart Cities are inclusive cities. In the same way that geographic divides, like Troost Avenue, plague our community with economic and social inequities, digital divides solidify lasting economic disparities between neighborhoods, creating barriers for the next generation of potential learners, inventors, and entrepreneurs. By failing to address these divides with effective policy, 30-50% of our citizens will find it more difficult to maximize their potential. That's why last year, Kansas City implemented our Digital Equity Strategic Plan, which aims to make KC a more digitally inclusive community.
Unfortunately, our digital inclusion efforts will be severely hampered by the FCC's recent actions regarding the Lifeline program and net neutrality rules.
The FCC voted to substantially cut funding to Lifeline, which has provided critical discounted phone and Internet services to low-income Americans, including 171,984 Missouri households. This move comes as a result of the FCC attempting to address systemic issues with fraud and overspending, created in part by a lack of oversight over phone and broadband providers. While the intentions are valid, it comes at the cost of low-income residents that are in need of affordable phone and broadband service. Consequently, the FCC is now shifting funding toward infrastructure, giving carriers subsidies to incentivize them to expand into rural areas. While infrastructure is important to digital inclusion, it's only part of the equation and will ultimately have little value if residents are unable to afford the Internet service itself.
Additionally, the FCC is also attempting to repeal existing net neutrality rules. Recognizing that Internet access has become a necessity for survival in our interconnected world, net neutrality rules establish the Internet as a utility, requiring Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to provide equal access to the Internet to all users. Equal access ensures that all consumers, regardless of income, zip code, and perspective, can access any website or that all websites, regardless of content, size, and profit margin, are accessible to consumers. Repealing net neutrality means that ISPs will become the gatekeepers of online content, enabling them to control Internet speeds, restrict bandwidth, and create paywalls. ISPs would have the ability to, in effect, censor content based on their business interests. These policy changes further demonstrate that under FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, the FCC's policies increasingly focus on aiding the ISPs, often to the detriment of public.
The Lifeline program and net neutrality rules are integral to creating digital inclusion in Kansas City. Without these policies, Kansas City's low-income residents could be unable to access the Internet to apply for jobs, affordable housing and job permits, as well as find public transportation routes, Medicaid and Medicare information and education options for their children. Many of these processes are now only available online, unless the user is willing and able to travel or pay additional fees. Kansas City's students and schools could face even greater hurdles, no longer having access to the full world wide web, but rather a selection of sites made available by the ISPs, depriving them of a 21st century education. Kansas City's small businesses could struggle to find customers if their website and social media pages are placed behind a paywall or made completely inaccessible by ISPs. Kansas City's veterans and military families could find it harder to stay connected with one another when the cost of the Internet services they rely on become prohibitive and services like Lifeline are cut. Without access to affordable Internet services, many Kansas Citians could be excluded from the digital economy, which is becoming a larger and larger chunk of the economy at large, and deprived of the opportunity to be a part of their community.
In Kansas City, we are one community. And in this community we place a high value on equity. When we passed our Digital Equity Plan this year, we did so to ensure that our residents have equal access to broadband Internet and the digital economy. While we have and will continue to make significant progress to facilitate access for our residents, lack of access due to unaffordability of broadband, equipment and lack of the requisite skills plague many of our low income residents despite where in the city limits they reside. The federal government should take a similar view of our nation as one community and enact and stand behind policies that benefit the nation as a whole.
Smart cities must be inclusive cities. Right now we fight for that.
Kansas City Mayor
The allegations against Roy Moore
The allegations against Roy Moore, the Republican senate candidate from Alabama, are every man's nightmare.
His first and only wife, Kayla, is 14 years younger than he. Does that make him a sexual predator? No.
The media, the senate, his supporters and detractors, need to be looking at the last 35 years of his life. He stood against removing the Ten Commandments monument from the Alabama Supreme Court building. He was removed from office for that. He was reelected chief justice. He stood against allowing same sex marriage and again was removed from office for his stand. He is founder and former president of The Foundation for Moral Law.
No one is perfect. "All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." I'm certain that 90% of all men could be accused of the same things as Moore. I am thankful for the mercy of God that would save my soul. I am also thankful for strong willed individuals like Roy Moore who would sacrifice their careers for righteousness.
No one is talking about what he has done in the last 35 years, only his dating practices 40 years ago. And no one has touched the fact that he married a younger woman, was faithful, has a beautiful family, and is a man of God.
The current environment of Hollywood has thrown open the door of accusations, patterns, and consistency of unwanted sexual advances. Compare that to Moore's life over the last 35 years and examine his moral character. The liberal arm of the Republican senate was worried about Moore long before these women came forward. McConnell, McCain, Murkowski, Flake, all knew he would expose the corruption in government and in themselves. That's why McConnell spent over $9 million in support of Strange during the primary to defeat Moore. Strange lost and so did McConnell. His ego was shattered in front of America. Their agenda is much more cynical, more perverse, darker.
"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." Many in the senate have never heeded that advice.
Alabama has seen through McConnell's charade. The entire senate needs to come to Moore's defense, not abandon him.
By the way, Bill Clinton gets a pass, even support from the feminists. What a contradiction.
Eagle Scout says thank you
I would like to take this time to say THANK YOU for the outpouring of compliments and support I received during my Eagle Scout project and upon completion of my project. It was such an honor to work on such a project that would benefit so many people in this community, especially our very deserving veterans.
I would also like to extend a thank you to the following:
•My fellow scouts, along with the adult leaders and adult helpers, as I could not have done this project without your help and support. I also want to thank Macey Noe, Scoutmaster of Troop 351, Tony Morgan, new Scoutmaster of Troop 351 and Peter Itao, Advancement Chair, for keeping me on track as I worked toward the rank of Eagle.
•Rick Clark, Carolyn Clark and Blakeley Clark, owners of Running Horse Ranch & Home, for donation of the landscaping blocks and other materials needed for the construction of the patio area and sitting wall for my project. Your generous donation and support is very much appreciated.
•Rudy Klopher, director of the VA Outpatient Clinic, for allowing me to construct the patio and sitting wall for the clinic and for holding a dedication ceremony at the project site.
•Rick Hill for helping with the excavation and preparation work and Justin Hill, the owner of Hill’s Lawn & Landscape, along with his amazing crew, for their help in preparing the project area, the donation of the rock and sand and assisting me on the day of my project. I truly appreciate the many hours you and your crew spent helping to make sure my project was successful.
•Platte City Mayor Frank Offutt for the Letter of Commendation and for attending the dedication ceremony.
•The Disabled Veterans for donating a bench at my project site for the veterans and community to enjoy. Your group does amazing things for our veterans!
Again, I want to thank all of you for your support as I worked to obtain the rank of Eagle Scout.
Mowing, tree trimming along roads
A month ago, I wrote concerning mowing and dead trees on North Winan Road. That afternoon they were mowing. Nothing has been done about the dead trees and they are already dropping limbs.
Neither has the Platte City Special Road District called to let me know when they are going to replace the tubing they destroyed and removed.
Two weeks ago on Sunday morning while eating breakfast I watched a program on TV concerning lack of road work in Missouri.
The gentleman started by telling how the utility companies are keeping trees cut under their lines. How they use bar cutters to cut limbs overhanging into traffic. His question: “What is this going to do to our utility bills?” Then he said to look at the other side of the road and how unkept it is.
He gave a report on the number of wrecks and the number of injuries or deaths over the past three years.
He said the road districts have done away with larger American tractors with sickle bars and going to the stupid little foreign-made tractors is the problem.
He talked about the high winds and snow coming, saying that something needs to be done now.
He ended by saying that those in charge did nothing but sit on their butts and collect a paycheck.
Let me tell you when the last mowing was done, maybe halfway up the bank, I was shocked to see Johnson grass growing further up the bank. For years men were hired to ride horseback and find and destroy this stuff. Now it is back. And those little tractors are not big enough to cut it, even if they could make it up the hill.
Rural Platte County
Being in the middle sucks
I don't know why I picked this day to read Chris Kamler's editorial from the Oct. 11, 2017 issue of The Landmark, but I am glad I did. He is spot on.
I think many more people share your opinion than you think. You, my friend, have hit the proverbial nail on the head: "Being in the middle sucks.”
That is how I feel sometimes, but after dwelling on this for a moment - It's ok - It doesn't suck. That's where I am and I like it.
Perhaps someday somebody with those qualities will run for office. Perhaps you will like cats.
Kansas City in
Hawley says he’ll take on McCaskill
Erin and I have been thinking a lot about the future and the path our country is on.
But D.C. looks a lot like the past. Even after the last election, the career crowd in Washington keeps on doing the same old thing.
Claire McCaskill is a part of that crowd. She's been in D.C. forever, and she doesn't represent Missouri.
We know too many people who can't get a job. If they've got a job, they can't get a raise to improve their lives and take better care of their families.
Erin and I have decided we have to do something about it. That's why, next year, I'm running for the U.S. Senate.
This wasn't our plan, but Missourians deserve a change. Farmers are hurting. Healthcare costs and taxes just keep climbing.
Claire McCaskill has turned her back on the people of Missouri. It's time for a new direction.
If you agree, I'm asking you to join me. This will not be easy, and it's going to feel like an uphill battle at times. But all the most important fights do.
We need a change in Washington, and that has to start here in Missouri.
Fed up with the NFL
The NFL can kiss my behind.
I hope the entire NFL enterprise utterly collapses. A mass withdrawal from a rejection of the NFL.
Should the taking a knee folly--telling us ‘you’re a bunch of racists, America!’--spread to baseball, basketball, etc. may the entire professional sports franchise utterly collapse. May there be a mass turning away, a mass rejection.
It wasn’t enough that our obsession with filling our sports stadiums kept us from filling our streets to support cops. No, we had to let leftist football players protest us.
This will not be a suppression of First Amendment freedom but rather a loss of interest, a loss of affinity, a loss of identifying with.
Screw the NFL.
Concerned about road maintenance
More than five years ago the Platte City Special Road District destroyed the tubing at the driveway at 16035 N. Winan Road and removed it. At the time I was told they were out of the correct tubing and installed one of probably six inches.
At the time there was only a Wick Storage building. Several times I asked when the correct tubing was going to be put in and the answer was always the same. I will check on it. Never an answer back.
Last year I built a home there. With the rain we have had, my driveway serves as a ditch. Again recently I asked Frank Offutt, manager of the special road district, when this was going to be taken care of. He came back with an answer: “Your drive was grandfathered in. I will check.” Absolutely nothing. The first house was built here in 1862 and the present house was built here in 2016. You better believe it is a grandfather.
Last winter I had to drag dead tree limbs off the road. Right now there are dead limbs just north of my driveway on the west side of the road, ready to fall with wind, rain or snow. This tree is about quarter mile south of my house and it was reported. The tree is still there and more if it is dying. Will there be dead limbs on the road that cause a wreck?
This has become one of the busiest roads with people coming down from northern Platte County, Clinton and Buchanan counties, going to the airport and businesses in that area. They can go straight across Hwy. 92 and not have to make a turn.
Banks have not been mowed. There are cracks so wide grass and weeds are growing in them. Where is our road tax money being spent?
Winter is coming so something needs to be done now.
Rural Platte County
Low hunting fees have big benefits
For many Missourians, autumn is a time of family gatherings. Thanksgiving is the most obvious occasion, but for thousands, hunting season also serves as an opportunity to spend time with parents, children, extended family, and those friends who might as well be part of the family, too.
Fortunately, Missouri's fee burdens on the hunter are among the lowest in the country, and that's an important point to make now that bow season has opened.
For management purposes those low fees mean more hunters, and more hunters means more opportunities to control deer and other animal populations. For families, lower costs mean more opportunities to spend quality time hunting together.
It's true: When government is smallest, freedom is greatest.
Good luck to our hunters.
Director of Government
The superintendent's residency status
The Park Hill School District takes residency very seriously. Ask anyone who has tried to enroll a student with only a real estate or builder's contract in hand. There are very specific guidelines that prevent families from, say, renting an apartment in-district and continuing to live elsewhere.
At times, the district even dispatches security staff to neighborhoods or apartment complexes to ensure compliance with the general standard that a student “lay his head on a pillow every night” within school boundaries. While it can seem heavy-handed, district leaders feel strongly that students' families should be fully--and financially--invested in supporting our schools.
So it's fair to question if this same standard is applied to the superintendent; past practice certainly establishes precedent. Dennis Fisher, who commuted as an assistant superintendent, sold his long-time family home in Liberty and moved to Park Hill when he took the job. Scott Springston transplanted his family here from Kansas. But current superintendent Jeanette Cowherd's residency is less clear.
When contacted for clarification, school board president Janice Bolin acknowledged that it is a board expectation the superintendent live in the district. And while it appears Dr. Jeanette Cowherd has rented an apartment in our area, a quick check of the public tax records reveals she continues to own and maintain a half-million dollar two-story home in Johnson County, Kansas. Where would you suspect she puts “head to pillow” most nights—a two-bedroom apartment or her upscale Johnson County home?
Other than the obvious hypocrisy, this is a problem for several reasons.
While this arrangement may meet the “letter” of this condition of employment, it clearly violates the “spirit” of it. As former superintendent Gayden Carruth once reminded her administrative team, leading schools is a full-time, 24/7 responsibility. People want to see you at little league games, exchange pleasantries at church and bend your ear at the grocery store. It's not enough to “talk the talk” by telling the Rotary Club what a wonderful district it is in which you work; parents and patrons want to know you “walk the walk” by genuinely committing to the area. It's one of the things communities have a right to expect when they pay a quarter-million dollars a year to a superintendent.
When proposing bond and levy initiatives, it is generally accepted that advocates for these tax increases will share in the financial burden for the overall good, and the superintendent serves literally as the face of these efforts. If, in fact, Dr. Cowherd maintains a home in Kansas while renting an apartment in Missouri, thousands of her real estate tax dollars benefit Johnson County schools and amenities rather than supporting Park Hill schools and Platte County programs.
I believe most voters assumed their superintendent was investing in our schools in the same way she asked them to do so last April.
Finally, the superintendent's residency is relevant because she was paid to move to Park Hill. Board president Bolin acknowledged that Dr. Cowherd was given a $5,000 stipend for “moving expenses.” This money should be used to offset the cost of relocating one's family and buying a house in the school district upon hire; it shouldn't be a “sack of cash” bestowed as yet another financial perk of the job. I would challenge current board members to ask for documentation of moving expenses and require this money be re-paid if it was used to furnish part-time living quarters and not to truly relocate Dr. Cowherd's family home to our area.
In my correspondence with Mrs. Bolin, I asked what percentage of the time Jeanette Cowherd lives at her apartment in our district. I wasn't provided an answer.
When it comes to the superintendent's investment in Park Hill, I think our community deserves some answers.
Inflation of superintendent pay is a problem
At the end of last school year, Park Hill Superintendent Jeanette Cowherd got a nice pay increase, even though she was already the highest paid government employee in Platte County.
Dr. Cowherd makes more than our circuit court judges, more than the sheriff or commissioners, more than the county prosecutor. Other than a handful of big district superintendents around the state, she's one of the highest paid government employees in Missouri.
Jeanette Cowherd is paid more than the Missouri Supreme Court chief justice, more than the parole board chairman, even more than Gov. Eric Greitens. And it isn't even close. The Park Hill superintendent is paid tens of thousands more than any of them every year.
School board members will argue that superintendent salary is simply a reflection of the market, like big league ball players making millions of dollars based on the economics of the game and the availability of talent.
The difference, of course, is that school leaders are paid with public tax dollars not private business investments. There are no TV/radio contracts or shoe endorsement deals to supplement district coffers. Superintendent salary increases are dollars, plain and simple, that could be used to support teachers, students and learning.
And let's be honest. While every district tries to make a superintendent search look like the selection of a new chief of neurosurgery at the Mayo Clinic--contracting with headhunters, posting in national professional journals and flying in potential candidates from out of state--it really isn't “brain surgery.” In my experience, most districts have a handful of school leaders who could readily step in to do these jobs and more times than not one of them is hired to do it. After months of focus groups, surveys and interviews, “seeking input from stakeholders and constituents,” the school board ceremoniously declares the “best and brightest candidate was right here in our own district after all!” It's a disingenuous and expensive charade.
Just a few years before she was hired as superintendent, Jeanette Cowherd wasn't leading a Fortune 500 company or publishing academic articles/books on educational best practices. She was handling student discipline and supervising ball games as the assistant principal at Park Hill South High School. Necessary and valuable work but hardly specialized expertise or experience that would justify the doubling or tripling of her salary in her new position as superintendent.
I'd propose an easy fix. The superintendent's pay increases should be the same as those received by the highest paid teacher. This should be a fixed dollar amount and not a percentage since the latter creates ever-widening disparities in actual earnings for teachers and district leaders.
The excessive inflation of superintendent salaries is a problem that needs to be addressed by communities across the state. Park Hill School Board members can use their position and reputation to set the example by creating more fair and fiscally-responsible limits on superintendent compensation. Excellent candidates will still be attracted to Park Hill because they want the same quality of life opportunities for their families that drew all of us here—great schools, safe neighborhoods and abundant community resources.
Public school staff are government employees; it is inexplicable that the superintendent of our local district is paid $40,000/year more than the governor of our state. Parents, patrons and taxpayers need to stand up and be heard by offering comment at school board meetings, calling individual board members or speaking out in other public forums. We need to demand our district tax dollars are used as intended--to benefit the many and not merely to enrich the few.
Removal of a monument
As someone who has had direct family members sacrifice greatly for our communities and the preservation of our supposed liberties during the American Revolution, Civil War, World War II and the Vietnam War, it was with great concern that I read about the Kansas City government's upcoming removal of a Veteran Monument on 55th and Ward Parkway.
The monument, which was recently vandalized, is a memorial to the women who served their country by sacrificing for their husbands, brothers, fathers and sons who fought in a bloody war waged all throughout our communities in Missouri. As an individual who has studied local 19th century history and am well read on the subject, I can also point out that it's a fact that some of these women were even killed for their service. But without any kind of vote by the community (that I'm aware of), the solution to the UDC's request to move the monument to safety is to instead remove it from public view. On taxpayer dime, no doubt. Yeah, land of the free.
What's so concerning is that, in this Orwellian campaign of eradication and censorship, facts are often lost because of a poor or outright biased understanding of history. Not to mention the outrageous hypocrisy of politicians claiming to support veterans and women's rights, then turning around and hiding away monuments dedicated to them.
At the very worst it's erasing history: The history of all people. This includes the documented cases of African American, Native American and Hispanic veterans who fought and sacrificed on the side of the South, and who these monuments also seek to remember. Why is it that today there are so few veterans organizations or rights groups speaking up for these people who served their communities during one of the most terrible wars our country has experienced?
The truth, in my opinion, is that these monuments are not racist nor are the people who support them. This should go without saying but in this time of gestapo-like tactics from those who would use these issues to raise funds and secure power for themselves, it needs to be said. These monuments were placed as a means to honor the hundreds of thousands of men, women and children who suffered and died through attacks by a brutal and aggressive enemy. Most of these people owned no slaves, and as there was no "third" option to align themselves with, ended up fighting in order to receive some kind of justice during a conflict where voter rights were stripped, freedom of the press was lost, freedom of religion was denied, men and boys were shot on their doorsteps under martial law, and women and children of all races were left to starve as their homes were torched.
Our communities once understood the lessons of history, and the hardships and horrors that the Civil War time period wrought upon us all. They worked to come together the best that they could after years of bloodshed, hatred and intolerance. Perhaps we should try to do the same today.
Note: for more information, please see The Real Lincoln by Tom DiLorenzo, The War Between the States by John J. Dwyer, Black Southerners in Confederate Armies by J.H. Segars and Charles Kelly Barrow, Quantrill in Missouri by Paul R. Petersen, Paxton's Annals, The Half Not Told by Preston Filbert, The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History by Thomas E. Woods, the Antifederalist Papers or When The World Ended, the Diary of Emma LeConte.
Independent thinkers needed at R-3
As your front page story last week talked about Platte County R-3 debt, I thought it might be easier for people to see the problem with some basic numbers.
There are 520 school districts in the state of Missouri and according to the most recent verified budget numbers from the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary education, NONE, ZERO ZIP, NADA have more debt per student then Platte County R-3.
This includes a district in St Louis that has grown by 5,000 students in the past 10 years while R-3 has grown by only 1100 in that time. Another area district, Grain Valley, has grown by 1200 in that same time period and shows less than half the debt of R-3.
Why use debt per student for a comparison? No district is exactly alike so you divide the number of students into total district debt and it gives you a good number to compare to others.
Out of those 520 districts, R-3 also leads in percentage of debt that is financed by lease purchase, with 28% of R-3 debt being unregulated by the state as mentioned in your article.
Unregulated lease purchase debt is renewed yearly which comes with yearly paperwork, yearly fees and you are unable to piggyback on the state of Missouri’s very high bond rating. So you have to use R-3's lower bond rating (even lower when doing a lease purchase) which typically means a higher interest rate.
The district that I mentioned with growth of almost 5,000 students only shows 1% of their debt as lease purchase. Grain Valley show zero percent. See a problem?
By Superintendent Dr. Mike Reik's logic
in your article, costs constantly go up so you need to use creative financing to secure items immediately. According to Reik’s logic, this means we should probably go ahead and take on more debt now to build a new high school along with any other purchase we can think of. I mean, in 10 years it will cost twice as much, right?
Apparently this school board can see into the future and seems to know something 519 other districts have not figured out yet. 519 other districts not spending $800-$1,000 per student per year on interest. That's right , R-3 is spending $800 per student on interest only.
The R-3 district is like a college student who has maxed out his/her line of credit so they get a credit card at a higher interest rate and buy items they don't need but really, really want and then try to convince their parents it actually saved them money.
What are the items R-3 really wanted that caused this large debt not related to capacity challenges? 3,000 computers, $5 million for the administration building, $5 million for energy upgrades, replacing lighting that still has loans from previous upgrades, $600,000 in school funds and property for tennis courts, of course the swimming pool, the turf on the football field and the big one, one new R-3 employee for every 4.5 new students.
That's about $250,000 plus per year in salaries and expenses for every new classroom added in the district the past five years.
Board President Sharon Sherwood mentioned in the article the district was looking at slowing down on hiring. I would hope so because at this rate before long everyone in the county may work or have a relative that works in the district. Keep in
mind the district enrollment only grew by 40 students last year.
If you wanted to complain about the debt, or district administration to a board member in private how are you to do it? Every single district that surrounds PCR3 (and all others I checked) lists an email address or a phone number to communicate with their school board members. At R-3 you have to send all communication through the administrative office for review before it is forwarded on.
So say someone wanted to report they saw a district administrator ticketed for going almost 80 mph in a 55 mph zone in his SUV on a school bus route. Currently the only way you could report that is if the information is sent to that administrator’s office.
So what happens now? That ticket ends up on my desk, like multiple other items people are concerned with.
Does that sound right to you? Shame on you, R-3, for being one of the only districts that does not allow the voting public direct communication with its elected officials.
Its very simple to fix, you assign your board member a school email address and post it on line. Seems to work for everyone else. Why exactly has it not been done?
Intelligent, independent thinkers are needed for the PCR-3 School Board. The next school board election will be in April. Please start thinking now about running if you would like to help with some of the problems listed above. The end of the year will be here before we know it.
Rural Platte County
There's another KCI plan
One of the many “'Listening Sessions” on the new single terminal airport at KCI was held Monday, July 10. The assembled citizens assumed that the city council would be listening to us. Instead, it was a lecture. We were told about all the benefits we would get from a new one-box single terminal.
Burns & McDonnell assured us they had everything under control and that we taxpayers would not be paying for it.
The director of marketing and air service named his Powerpoint 'Listening Session.’ We listened. He presented a one-box 'single terminal.’
Two members of the business community (Chamber of Commerce and A Better KC) tried to make the case that with a new state-of-the-art terminal, new businesses would come to Kansas City. I regret to say this but people don't bring a business to an area because of its airport. How about creating an environment tax wise that would invite new business?
Attendees were given an index card for a question, cards were collected at random and the moderator decided due to time constraints that no one could speak to his question.
Five members from the city council were up next. Four of them stated:
•The original roll-out to voters of a single terminal in 2011-2012 was ill advised.
•We've spent over $400,000 on legal fees (for a project the voters have not approved).
•I was against it before I was for it.
•We lengthened the bidding process to allow others (besides Burns & McDonnell) to submit bids.
The only dissenting voice from the council was that of Teresa Loar, second district, sidelined by being asked to go first. Her plain and simple comment: “We have put the cart before the horse. First should come the vote of the people, and then the plans to develop.”
To their credit, the five council members in attendance stated that voters would be able to see all the proposals before they vote on the one chosen by the selection committee. Let's make sure the voters agree to having a new airport first.
At a previous meeting, 80% of citizens stated preference for the current configuration.
For one third the cost ($335 million), Terminal A could become state-of-the-art with all the upgrades on the wish list. Yes, there's another plan to vote on.
Residents and visitors alike appreciate the convenience. Law enforcement would continue to have ease of access since they are close to any call for assistance.
Amenities for travelers would be provided by doubling the current width to include shopping, restaurants, and bathrooms.
Although the city council and Burns & McDonnell are moving ahead with a one-box single terminal, it is not their decision. It is our decision.
Vote NO. There's a NO in November.
in Platte County
The freedom of opportunity
Thomas Jefferson is arguably the most important person in American history.
He executed one of our biggest ever land deals, he forged alliances with foreign powers that were critical to the survival of our union, and his philosophies on liberty and self-governance became central tenants of the U.S. Constitution.
But of all his accomplishments, perhaps most important was when he put down these 55 words in the Declaration of Independence.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
On this, the anniversary of our independence, Jefferson's words remain as true today as they were 241 years ago. The guiding principle of this experiment in representative democracy is that our government derives its powers from those it governs.
We still adhere to the beliefs that all men are created equal. Regardless of our occupation, wealth, background or origin, we all have the same freedom of opportunity, and the decisions of those in government can never change that.
On this July 4th, we must remember the role we all have to play in preserving our freedoms. Otherwise, as President Reagan said, “One day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”
Enjoying her weekly Landmark
Just want you to know how much I look forward to The Landmark arriving in my mailbox every Thursday.
Love your column and opinions by Hearne Christopher, Chris Kamler and Brian Kubicki. Keep up the good work.
Incidentally, I canceled my subscription to the Kansas City Star after 40 years. It’s a joke.
Thank you and your staff for keeping us informed in Platte County.
More specifics on the location of Drydale
Regarding a recent article in The Landmark: “The Death of a Lawman” on Wednesday, May 3, 2017. I think that I may be able to give more information on the location of Drydale. My maiden name was Poss. I was born in 1933 and grew up on a farm about a mile south of Stillings along what is now called Kisker Road.
According to what I remember, my parents when referring to Drydale said it was located quite near where the railroad bridge came across the Missouri River from Leavenworth into Missouri, west of Stillings.
They would have had reason to remember the location, as an uncle of my father had a business in Drydale for a time--a saloon, I would imagine.
in Platte County
REAL ID compliant driver's licenses
Missourians will soon have the option to obtain a driver's license that is compliant with the federal REAL ID Act. The bill I sponsored passed out of both the Senate and the House last week and is now on its way to the governor for his signature. The legislation will require the state revenue department to issue REAL ID-compliant driver's licenses and identification cards to those who want them. Compliant licenses will be needed to do things like board airplanes and enter military bases and federal buildings.
Passed by the U.S. Congress in 2005, The REAL ID Act was designed to enhance security procedures by establishing new minimum standards for driver's licenses. Missouri responded to the requirements by passing a state law in 2009 to protect the private information of Missouri citizens by prohibiting the Missouri Department of Revenue from complying with the federal act. Because of this law, current Missouri driver's licenses are not compliant with the federal standards and were set to no longer be valid at airports and federal facilities beginning in 2018.
With the legislation approved this week, Missourians will now have the option to obtain a federally compliant driver's license. The bill will also allow individuals with a non-compliant driver's license to obtain a compliant version at no additional cost. However, even with the change, it will take the Department of Revenue as long as two years to make the new REAL ID-compliant licenses available. In order to allow people to travel and access federal facilities, the state will seek a waiver from the federal government to allow existing identification to continue to work until the new IDs are attainable.
For Missourians who do not want to comply with the REAL ID requirements because of privacy concerns, the legislation will allow them to request the existing style of Missouri identification that is not compliant with the federal act.
For those who want or need the federally compliant driver's license, the bill will establish safeguards so that any additional data gathered is used only for purposes of issuing the identification. One provision would ensure the source documents to obtain an ID are stored on a server that is not connected to the Internet in order to prevent hacking of the database. The bill also includes criminal penalties for misuse or unlawful access of personal data.
Other changes made in the bill will require the legislature to revisit the issue in the event the federal government changes the REAL ID Act, and will repeal the section entirely if the federal government ends the program.
The bill is designed to provide a reasonable solution that will ensure Missourians aren't burdened with having to get alternative identifications to access federal facilities or to visit family members on military bases. The legislation gives Missourians the freedom to decide whether to obtain identification that is compliant with REAL ID.
Law Enforcement Appreciation Day
On Saturday, May 20, over 30 area law enforcement agencies will hold a Northland Law Enforcement Appreciation Day in English Landing Park in Parkville.
There is no charge for the event and it is open to the public. Activities will include lunch with a cop, car seat inspections and installation, child fingerprinting and photo ID kits, bicycle rodeo, vehicle and watercraft displays and more.
The event is scheduled to take place from noon to 4 p.m. The event will be dependent on weather and there is no “rain date” for the event.
The event is being coordinated by the Platte County Sheriff's Office, the Parkville Police Department and the Kansas City Police Department.
I want to thank all of the law enforcement agencies and community organizations that have agreed to participate in the event.
This event is a great opportunity for citizens to interact with a variety of law enforcement agencies and officers that work throughout the Northland and our region. There will be activities for kids and adults, it should be a fun day.
Platte County Sheriff
It's public service not self service
As of this writing, dozens of important bills sit idly before the Missouri Senate, and if the past is indicative of future behavior, most if not all of these bills will die when the legislative session soon closes. Those bills include labor reforms, ethics reforms, tax cuts, education improvements, and countless other items of primary importance to the people who elected these senators.
To be clear, senators have had time to literally sing "Kumbaya" to one another on the Senate floor and filibuster the reading of the Journal; they haven't had time for actual priorities important to the public.
The barrier here has not been ideological gridlock--self-described conservatives hold a supermajority in the chamber--but shameful and selfish behavior by a handful of senators more interested in settling personal scores than carrying the People's business to enactment.
You didn't get on a committee? No one likes your bill? Grow up.
The Senate would be well-served to be reminded they're engaged in public service, not self-service. Stop complaining. Start doing the people's business.
Director of Government
Police officer goes above and beyond
I am writing to publicly express my gratitude to the Platte City Police Department, specifically Sgt. Levi Riley.
As I was driving on I-29 in a rental car, the rear passenger side tire blew out. I managed to get off highway onto the exit for Platte City.
The rental car company said it would be two hours before they could get someone to help me. They called the Platte City Police.
Sgt Riley responded. He didn't feel it was safe for me to wait the two hours and made the decision to change the tire and put on the spare.
Afterwards, he followed me along the highway, to the end of his jurisdiction, making sure I was safe to drive with the spare.
Thank you, Sgt. Levi Riley!
McCaskill on why she holds town halls
When my mom was alive, she would sometimes travel with me to public town halls I held across the state.
She sometimes introduced me by saying, “I call this the dog and pony show—I'm the dog, and she's the pony.”
My mom—never at a loss for something sharp and witty to say—raised me in rural Missouri. And one of the many things she passed on to me was the value of never forgetting where you came from, and the idea that when you're in public service, to never be afraid to let folks chew on you and tell you what they think.
After all, I represent all Missourians, whether they voted for me or not. And I'm in this for them.
The values my mom taught me have never left me during my time in the Senate. It's those values that've led me to hold public town halls with Missourians—including eight public town halls across Missouri last week.
When I announced these town halls, some colleagues in Washington questioned why I would choose to travel to the rural counties won by the other party in last year's election—often by a large margin.
For me, it was a no-brainer. I was humbled by the election, and think I owe folks in every corner of Missouri my time and respect, whether they agree with me or not.
I heard from Missourians concerned about the opioid epidemic and about losing their health care, or seeing their costs increase. I talked about my work to combat sex trafficking, and my investigation into the price of prescription drugs.
I talked with military veterans about ensuring they get the benefits they've earned, and I talked with kids and teachers about the importance of quality education and affordable college tuition.
I was asked about the Syria missile strike, and about my thoughts on the President's proposed budget cuts, which would disproportionately punish rural Missouri by slashing drinking water and wastewater infrastructure.
Thousands of Missourians were able to share their thoughts directly, in-person. And more importantly, I was able to hear your thoughts, your concerns, and your ideas.
After all, how can I be the best fighter for you in Washington if I don't listen to what you want me fighting for?
I'm planning more town halls this year that'll take me to other parts of the state to keep on listening.
Unlike when my mom served on the city council in Columbia, Missouri, today there are lots of ways for politicians to avoid having public town halls. Facebook, telephone town halls, and other way to connect online have made it easy. And those tools are perfectly fine—the more ways to connect with folks the better.
But there's no substitute for public, in-person town halls, where any Missourian can show up. There's no substitute for meeting with Missourians face-to-face, no substitute for giving you the opportunity to tell me publicly how I'm doing, and what you'd like to see me doing differently.
That's why I'll keep at it. Because it's the honor of a lifetime to hear from you and fight for you in the U.S. Senate.
Opposed to charter school expansion
HB 634 will allow charter schools to be operated in any school district in which at least one school building has received a score of 60% or less on its annual performance report. The League of Women Voters opposes charter school expansion because:
·Public charter schools are not held to the same standards as traditional public schools.
·Charters are not accredited by MO Dept. of Elementary and Secondary Education
(DESE) and public charter schools are required to have only 80% of school faculty certified.
·Public charter schools are not required to serve their “fair share” of students who take more resources because of challenges like special needs and homelessness.
·Charters are governed by non-elected public elected boards; however, they operate public funded schools.
·2016 data shows of the 35 Missouri charter schools, 20 charters met only 75% of state accountability standards. Six charters
met less than 50% of those standards.
The LWV of Missouri calls for the defeat of HB 634. Our resources should be put into traditional schools that educate all children. Contact your Senator in Jefferson City.
--Donna Hoch and Linda Smith
League of Women Voters
Kansas City/Jackson, Clay and
Our military must remain strong
We live in a dangerous world. That's undeniable. But it doesn't mean there aren't steps the United States of America can take to make the world a safer place.
Last week more than 80 people were murdered in a horrific chemical weapons attack on the northern Syrian town of Khan Sheikhoun. On Thursday night, the United States launched a targeted strike on the airfield in Syria from where that chemical attack was launched.
Our response makes clear that the United States is committed to preventing international war crimes and that we strongly condemn the use of weapons of mass destruction, especially against innocent civilians. I will continue to support any effort to ensure the Assad regime is held accountable for that atrocity.
It's critical for Congress to work with the President and the Pentagon to craft a prudent and responsible path forward in
Syria. And that's why it's so important for America to continue investing in our military, ensuring it remains the strongest and most well-equipped force for good in this world.
Last month I joined a bipartisan majority in the House in helping to pass the Department of Defense Appropriations for 2017. But as the Senate stalls on this desperately needed bill, the House Armed Services Committee is working to ensure our military gets the long-term funding they deserve.
Plain and simple, a short term budget would be devastating to our men and women in uniform.
Without it, we would be leaving our military vulnerable at a time we can least afford it. We would break faith with service members and their families, cutting pay and delaying deployment announcements until the last minute.
Without it, we would be shrinking our military even further – doubling down on the cuts our armed forces suffered through
under President Obama.
And without a real defense appropriations bill, the Air Force would be unable to retain pilots; the Navy would be unable to deploy ships to Europe and the Middle East; and the Marine Corps will run the risk of having too few munitions to respond to a crisis.
A fundamental responsibility of the federal government is to ensure our military remains the strongest on earth. And part of that is doing everything possible to support the men and women who risk their lives to serve our country. As your Representative and a member of the House Armed Services Committee, that will continue to be my top priority in Washington.
The benefits of domestic energy
The United States leads the world in the production and refining of oil and the production of natural gas. I think it is important to consider the benefits of that status in relation to geopolitical and national security issues.
Our allies depend on us as a reliable alternative for oil and natural gas as opposed to other nations that do not share our values and which are less stable. In January of 2016, the U.S. began freely trading crude oil after Congress lifted the decades-old ban that had far outlived its usefulness. As a result, the number of nations buying American crude oil has risen to 22.
We are also positioned to supply other nations with U.S. produced natural gas which
could assist them in the reduction of carbon emissions, just like we have seen here at home. Natural gas for U.S. electricity generation has reduced our carbon emissions to levels not seen in more than two decades. The Department of Energy projects that America will become a net energy exporter sometime in the mid-2020's because of declining oil imports and increasing Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) exports.
Congress and the Trump administration have signaled support for policies that will support the leadership role of energy production. We are not only well positioned to support our military with the vital energy resources needed to ensure the protection of our country, but to assist key allies with those resources. This transition to energy
production leadership means that conflicts which have been a concern of military conflicts in the past will no longer be a factor in our nation's security.
By encouraging domestic energy development, building necessary infrastructure, and removing export delays and barriers, we can ensure the economic, environmental, geopolitical and security benefits of U.S. exports reach their full potential.
--Sen. Wayne Wallingford
Missouri State Senate
Government workers deserve protections
Earlier this year state legislators passed right-to-work legislation to great fanfare. For the private-sector workers affected, the law promises greater flexibility and control over their jobs and their money. But legislators should not stop there; government workers deserve similar protections to those enjoyed by their private-sector counterparts.
That's why worker empowerment legislation for government-sector employees is so important. This bundle of reforms would protect the paychecks of government workers; truly empower them to choose their union and monitor its spending (or choose no union at all); and let the public see the negotiations and contracts that their tax dollars ultimately pay for.
These are common-sense reforms that put power back in the hands of our government employees, and I hope that rather than stopping with right to work, legislators will keep this year's labor reform momentum going. Government workers deserve as much.
Director of Government Accountability
The Show-Me Institute
'No tax increase' doesn't mean there is no cost
It means more than posting information on a website or answering specific questions from a constituent. Transparency is communicating clearly and understandably so that people can make informed decisions.
It has become popular for school districts to promote “no tax increase bond” issues, like the one proposed on the April ballot in Park Hill, with a smile and glib assurance no one's taxes will increase. But make no mistake. When a district asks for over $100 million dollars in bond revenue, that money will be paid by local taxpayers.
By way of example, let's say you have a car loan you're about to pay off. You're excited about the extra money you'll have each month, but a few months before you do, the dealership offers to help “extend” your loan. You can get more money to trade in
your old car and get a new one. And with NO INCREASE in your monthly payment—just an extension of an additional three years of your current loan.
“No tax increase” language is little more than a clever marketing campaign for the continuation of a current tax rate that was due to expire. It is, in truth, a “no tax RATE increase bond.” The inherent assumption is, “If you haven't missed that money up to now, you're probably willing to do without it for a while longer.” It does NOT mean there is no cost to taxpayers.
As a school board candidate, I've been asked if I support the proposed bond. My simple answer is that I trust the parents, patrons and taxpayers to do what's right for children and schools in this community. It isn't a dodge. Park Hill voters have consistently “gotten it right,” including multiple tax issues that passed over several decades and the most recent levy that failed
in 2014. With the latter, the district has since moved forward with nearly every project and initiative they claimed they needed money to implement (e.g., one-to-one computers, technology infrastructure upgrades, safety improvements). In retrospect, it didn't feel very honest—or transparent.
Should you vote for the upcoming bond? I'd encourage you to extend our “car loan” if you want to get something newer and nicer for the community or if you accept district projections that we're outgrowing our current “ride” and need something bigger.
But don't take on this obligation because you've been led to believe it comes at no cost.
There is no free ride.
REAL ID is a privacy goldmine
On the calendar for a vote -- SB 37 and HB 151-- REAL ID on driver's license. The vote is imminent.
REAL ID bills are a privacy goldmine for the government. The recent massive CIA data breach and the National Security breach in Congress for criminal access to the nation's most sensitive data have just happened. What makes you think the DMV will keep iris scans and personal biometric data safe on the chip of your new driver's license?
Alert: call your state rep and senator to tell them to vote NO on SB 37 and HB 151.
Some legislators would like to scare us into giving up our privacy by saying we won't
be able to fly without the REAL ID fix. Citizens know that better options exist. We can drive across the states without having to show all our data at each state line. Why do we need REAL ID to cross state lines if we're in the air? The TSA has not yet announced all the alternatives they will accept to allow us to fly. Military bases accept alternate ID, listed on their web site, other than the proposed REAL ID.
If these bills pass, we will have to get a birth certificate for a new driver's license. Get it for yourself instead of for the DMV. Privacy matters.
Missouri passed a law in 2009 protecting our personal information. In 2012, 75% of Missourians ratified an amendment to our state Constitution that protects electronic
data from search and seizure. Yet the following year, the DMV illegally compromised the personal data of Missouri residents by giving the Dept of Revenue access to concealed carry data, and the DOR sent it off. Will the DMV keep your personal data safe? Will those who ask for your driver's license for verification protect your data?
Tell your state senator and representative that data integrity matters (note recent CIA and National Security data breaches). Vote NO on REAL ID for driver's licenses.
Misinformation from R-3 is out of control
I was surprised this past week to open my Platte County R-3 School District newsletter Treasures to find that the district has almost completed the eight court tennis facility and stated it cost the taxpayers "less than $200,000" while incorrectly insinuating that contributions of $82,500 and $117,500 were included in this number.
The actual cash cost so far to R-3 for the courts is over $300,000 plus the former Rising Star Elementary building.
If you add in the lost money in the trade of the Rising Star Elementary School for a donation of just $82,500, a building which was owned by the taxpayers and according to the district was appraised in late 2014 for $405,000 you are actually looking at a real cost of over $600,000 in R-3 dollars. Plus over $150,000 of additional funds came from your taxes paid to the city and county.
The Treasures publication states the tennis facility is valued at $750,000. I would hope so because if you throw in the donations and grants received to build these courts on top of that $600,000 you come up with a total cost of almost $1.1 million and that is not counting the land.
How do you get to $1.1 million when we were told in 2013 four courts would cost just $225,000 and four years later we spend over a million dollars for eight?
I could not find where any bids were taken for the work and the district accepted 25 cents on the dollar for taxpayer owned real estate.
The Platte County R-3 School District accepted grants from the city so the courts can be used by anyone and guess what, upkeep on tennis courts is one of the highest priced items in the sports world for the amount of people that actually use them.
Court resurfacing costs from $4,000 to $8,000 each and is done every four to eight years, depending on use. And don't forget about the nets and the Windscreen that will need replacing. (The district paid $2,420 just to get the school logos on the windscreen!)
Upkeep is now your baby, R-3 taxpayers.
This is one small example how a district of this size gets over $100 million in debt.
All of this information above was presented to the school board. If I can keep track of the actual cost, why can't administration and the school board?
The Treasures number was low by over 30%. Maybe it was because they spread the expenses out over three different jobs hoping no one would keep track?
More misrepresentations (lies?) from the district. Just like when the same district publication told us that the football field hardness was tested yearly for safety.
After requesting the actual test I found that in fact it was not tested yearly and the year previous to the 2015 levy vote it was not tested at all, as it had failed the test the previous year.
Testing just happened to have been requested the year it failed by the person who then received the new turf contract with the high bid. Then a change order was added on for over $35,000 to this same person signed off on by Superintendent Dr. Mike Reik.
Just like the publications emailed to me recently from the district showing students receiving honorable mention at a tournament when this award did not exist. Along with statements from another stating "our kids who placed finished well within the top 10%" when in fact none of them did and several mentioned were almost last.
I am not anti-tennis court, I am anti-misinformation.
If students do poorly at a tournament just congratulate them for participating. You don't have to make up awards. It only taints the award for those who really do place at an event.
But the goal at this district is not to be correct, the goal is to continue to make everyone feel good about finances and academics with information that may not be true.
And it is getting worse. Misinformation from the district is out of control.
At this point they know most patrons will not speak up and district administration has a large email and mailing list, allowing them to disseminate incorrect information to thousands with no retribution. It appears the school board is paying no attention.
What can you do?
Vote this April and vote for anyone who is not currently on the school board.
The two incumbents running, Lenora Miles and Sharon Sherwood, both former educators, have 15 years combined on this board and I have not found a single NO vote from either one on anything ever presented to them.
Yes votes on raises, turf, four-wheelers, pools, etc.
The ballot will state "vote for three" but you do not have to. If you vote for three you only dilute the ballot.
If you want someone new on the board, vote for that one person only. That one vote will count.
The incumbents will always have an advantage in an April election as many only turn out to vote if it affects them.
R-3 employees are the largest voting bloc in an R-3 election.
In a previous election, Sharon Sherwood actually sent out emails using employee district email addresses insinuating "more progress" was needed with "compensation.”
What more will it take to get you and your friends to the voting booth next month?
If you want to see information used for the numbers in this letter it will be posted at www.plattecountyR3facts.com.
Rural Platte County
Wetland at Parkville would bring problems
I want to comment on the proposal to flood and create a wetland adjacent to the dog park and planned ball fields at Platte Landing Park at Parkville.
There is already a significant mosquito problem in the dog park. The pests that I kill while walking my dogs at the park during the summer are the largest I have seen in Missouri. During the recent warm spell in February my dogs and I were chased hundreds of feet by a swarm of mosquitoes.
My husband's family owns a pond and hungry insects are encountered hundreds of yards away. He assures me they are from the pond and have plagued the area for over 50 years. This pond is about three miles from Parkville.
There is no reason to believe a wetland in this area will not produce a significant insect problem. After Parkville has expended significant resources making this area a center for recreation it does not seem like a good idea to expose people to potential infection from Encephalitis, West Nile, or Zika.
Every summer we are warned to drain standing water to fight disease. Why would we want acres of standing water?
Kansas City in Platte County
Advocating for pay equity legislation
Here I sit at my kitchen table gathering my IRS materials together. April 15 not only marks income tax day, but how long a woman must work to gain equity with men for the same work. That's more than a quarter of the year. On average, women who work full-time earn about 80 cents for every dollar a full-time male worker earns.
Over a worker’s lifetime (47 years), the total estimated loss of earnings of women compared to men are $700,000 for a high school graduate, $1.2 million for a college graduate, and $2 million for a professional school graduate. That's a lot when 40% of households with children include a mother who is either the sole or primary earner for her family.
As I get ready to retire, I know my retirement savings and benefits are significantly less due to salary discrepancy.
American Association of University Women (AAUW) advocates for strong pay equity legislation, regulation, and enforcement to protect employees and assist employers. Legislation to guarantee and protect pay equity is long overdue.
AAUW Kansas City
Expect more desperate measures
A statement in your article about Parkville's Brush Creek and Brink Meyer Road NID limited obligation bonds (B2 NIDs) was spot on: “Construction moved forward with the hope of future development.”
The city could have reigned in spending after 2008 like almost every other developer. But that didn't fit with the progressive agenda. Besides, the bonds were secured, or so they thought.
From the 2015 audited financial statement footnotes: "As a result of the judicial foreclosure default judgment.....on May 24, 2016....the City acquired the property.....With the sale, all past, current and future Brink Meyer Road and Brush Creek Drainage NID special assessments due......were "cleared"......the principal portion of the special assessment receivable of $4,427,331, net of the estimated property value of $1,600,000 resulted in $2,827,331 being charged to expense."
In early 2014, I questioned city officials about a disclosure in the June 2013 semiannual report, which reads as follows: "NID debt payments are funded by special assessments on the NID properties, but may be considered a contingent liability of the City." I told the city they had it backwards; the recoverability of the assessments was the contingent factor.
The city's response: “There is a non-tax revenue source securing these limited obligation bonds. We will keep this in mind for the next report.”
The June 2016 semiannual report states:
"NID debt payments are a valid and legally binding indebtedness of the City payable from special assessments on properties benefitted by the improvements."
Even after the city foreclosed on a property and cleared the assessment receivable, thus proving its 2013 semiannual report disclosure inaccurate, city officials continued to make an inaccurate disclosure.
"You don't understand this debt." Circa 2008 statement made to me by a city official when I questioned the original 2006/2007 B2 NID debt.
“In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.” Yogi Berra.
In theory, the B2 NIDs are limited obligations secured by a non-tax revenue source. In practice, these obligations are not limited and the security is a promise to pay.
While the city does a number of things well, police and streets come to mind, on balance sheet, debt and financial risk management matters, they have an abysmal record. Long aided and encouraged by progressives and municipal financial advisors, the city has operated on theory without adequately assessing the underlying risks, assuming they ever understood the risks.
The city now owns 35% of the Brush Creek NID tracts. Annual debt payments on the B2 NIDs run to 2034.
In follow up to my Landmark letter to the editor dated Dec. 7, 2016, the increase in the allocation of administrative expenses from the general fund to the sewer fund for 2017 is
now making more sense. Not that the method itself makes sense. Certain of the underlying assumptions are bogus and the calculation method has errors.
The administrative allocation to the sewer fund for 2016 was $103,500. The new target administrative allocation from the general fund to the sewer fund is $365,644. Using 2016 B2 NID numbers from your article, the 2017 shortfall in debt payments versus collected assessments is $396,083. Is there anyone who believes the debt payment shortfall and the new target administrative allocation being so close is coincidence? The increase in the shortfall from 2016 to 2017 is because the permanent financing completed in 2014 deferred principal payments to 2017.
Also in early 2014, city officials concocted a scheme to sell the sewer system to generate funds to pay the oncoming B2 NID debt. That scheme was quickly debunked as it would have significantly increased sewer rates.
With a portion of assessments receivable having vanished, Parkville's residents will be paying the debt, whether through higher taxes, decreased services or increased sewer rates.
Expect more ridiculous and desperate measures.
REAL ID is bad for freedom, privacy
NOTE FROM THE EDITOR;: This writer asked us to share her letter sent to State Rep. Kevin Corlew of Platte County.
TO REP. KEVIN CORLEW:
You are quoted that REAL ID allows us to obtain photo ID. How interesting to hear the assertion that this is what the bill is about. We know it's not.
Did your 2017 survey mention anything about photo ID? Or producing original documents for the DMV to scan to prove you are who you say you are? Of course we'll get to take our originals home with us. Will the
DMV share our copied originals with the country? Of course. What does that do to privacy?
You seem glued to a deadline rather than to your constituents, who do not want to give up their privacy for freedom to travel. You say we have the freedom to choose. If REAL ID passes, the government gives us permission to travel. Or not.
How long before those who opt out will be required to join in, or be rounded up?
When will you decide the rights of the people you are supposed to serve are more important than the government wanting a national ID? History tells us that when the
government controls our travel, they will have checkpoints to ask, "Papers, please."
Is this what you want? Are you on the side of more regulation, or freeing us from it? Whose side are you on?
Do what is honorable for We the People. Please pull back your REAL ID bill, HB 151.
Are we supposed to comply to the government rules, or do we set the rules for the federal government? What does state sovereignty mean?
Concerned for freedom.
Snowden 'a gift to Trump' is fake news
Stories in the press say that Putin is going to give Snowden to Trump as a "gift.” It comes from "intelligence sources” and it's all fake news.
Our intelligence community are not only liars but they aren't even good liars. And when you think things through it's rather obvious.
Snowden was Obama's obsession, not Trump’s. Why would Putin even think that Trump was interested in Snowden? I would think that Trump would rather have a bottle of Vodka or sexy Russian spy to sleep with than someone who exposed America's illegal activities. It doesn't make sense.
Our intelligence community is out of control. Instead of learning what's going on in the world they just make stuff up. They are
expressing their personal hatred of Snowden for exposing their illegal activities.
Heads should roll in the intelligence community. Their behavior borders on treason.
Protect and support Israel
The United States has no stronger ally in this world than Israel. I strongly believe that global security – particularly that of the United States and our closest allies – depends on the presence of democracy and stability in the Middle East.
Israel is a pillar of that stability. And it's why I've always supported every means necessary to protect and support Israel during my time in the House of Representatives.
America was the first country to recognize Israel as a state in 1948. Since then, our nation's relationship with Israel has not wavered, anchored by strong and mutually beneficial military, cultural and financial partnerships.
Last Congress, I co-sponsored the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership Act, which passed the House and was signed into law late in 2016. The bill expands a number of critical partnerships with Israel, including enabling the transfer of military equipment between our two countries, offering assistance for the Iron Dome missile defense system, and promoting cooperation in energy, water, science, homeland security and agricultural interests between the U.S. and Israel.
I believe that it is imperative to continue strengthening our relationship with Israel, particularly in the face of new and significant security threats across the globe. By confronting those challenges in the Middle East together, we can help ensure the safety of the American people as well as that of our allies around the world.
As your representative, I will continue to push for more serious actions that support Israel. That includes always protecting them against acts of aggression coming from the Iranian regime or any other unstable Middle East actor, and doing whatever possible to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The fate of freedom and democracy everywhere in the world depends on it.
A lack of confidence in county auditor
I am a native of Platte County. I just read your “Between the Lines” column about the new county budget. In a word, APPALLING!!!
As I understand from your column, Platte County Auditor Kevin Robinson was specifically asked about the payment for the radio system over two weeks prior to the final version of the budget being prepared. Then at the last possible minute, he admits a
mistake and says the payment was NOT accounted for.
I have been in local government for over 40 years and have been faced with budget ups and downs due to the economy. Those are things that cannot always be predicted, yet must be dealt with when they occur. It seems that this is not the case here, but what happened is just plainly negligent or incompetent.
Either way, this incident results in a lack
of confidence in all of the financial reports coming from the auditor.
Maybe Mr. Robinson needs to take some time off of his current job and take a course in basic budgeting for local governments.
Litchfield Park, Az
Drain the Renewable Fuel Standard
Incoming President Donald Trump's promise to "drain the swamp" is getting an early test from one of his closest friends.
Billionaire investor and Trump confidant Carl Icahn is requesting changes to the Renewable Fuel Standard, the federal law requiring gasoline manufacturers to incorporate renewable fuels into their blends. Coincidently, Icahn would reap massive financial rewards from the "fix."
Trump must push back. If truly committed to ending crony capitalism, he should end the RFS entirely. The policy has failed to help the environment or the economy and has cost taxpayers billions of dollars.
Icahn's proposal centers around the definition of "obligated parties," which is the term for the entities required to blend in renewables. Currently, obligated parties are limited to petroleum refineries and importers. And the volume they have to add in steadily increases; in 2017, they'll be required to blend 19.28 billion gallons, nearly a 1.2 billion -gallon increase over 2016.
If the refiners and importers exceed the required blend, they're rewarded with "credits." Those credits can then be sold to other refiners and importers.
Today, companies along the supply
chain -- like marketers and gas-station chains, which don't produce the gasoline blends -- are exempted. But under Icahn's proposal, such companies are required to purchase a set amount of credits annually.
Icahn claims the market for these credits is broken, rife with "manipulation, speculation, and fraud."
He's correct that the price of these credits has spiked. The average cost of a credit has jumped from one penny in 2012 to nearly a dollar today. Icahn's proposal expands the definition of "obligated party" to include virtually every firm along the supply route, moving the obligation to include local fuel distributors.
All Icahn really wants is a handout. He's an investor in CVR Refining, a mid-size refinery that is an obligated party. The company must spend hundreds of millions of dollars on credits, and its stock has plummeted 60 percent over the last three years. Removing CVR from the obligated party definition would slash expenses and net Icahn a massive windfall while those that invested to comply with the law are left in a less competitive position and the smaller companies are burdened with having to comply with the RFS.
The solution isn't faux reform; it's repeal. The RFS costs taxpayers $2 billion annually -- and it hasn't accomplished
The goal of the RFS was to reduce dependence on foreign oil. That goal has been realized, but only because of innovative drilling techniques like fracking that have opened swaths of oil reserves .Consequently, our daily oil production has jumped from six million to nine million barrels. Meanwhile, cars are becoming more fuel efficient. Imports have steadily fallen.
Ethanol, the most popular renewable fuel, comes from corn. Nearly 40 percent of the national corn crop has been dedicated to ethanol production. That has driven up demand for corn that goes into cereal, syrup, and countless other basic food items. Those products have become more expensive. It's estimated that the RFS has increased the consumer price index for food by 25 percent.
The RFS is exactly the kind of ill-conceived policy that Trump promised to end. He needs to look past his friendship with Icahn, reject Icahn's phony reform, and work with Congress to dismantle the RFS entirely.
Taxpayer Protection Alliance
School spends $13k on meals for tech staff
As a career educator, I worked to support students, teachers and schools, and as a taxpayer, I am dedicated to the use of public funds to provide the best for all three. I want to live in a community where we make children and education the highest priority.
My experience in public schools taught me district leaders need to clearly and regularly communicate an expectation for focused, strategic use of funds. In the absence of this carefully-developed message and culture, waste and misspending become not only inevitable but commonplace.
After the most recent tax levy proposal was defeated several years ago, Park Hill leadership appears to have pushed “all in” in implementing a technology initiative. Former district colleagues have expressed alarm at the amount of money and resources devoted to the technology department in the months following the failed tax increase.
Instead of hiring more teachers, paraprofessionals or special educators, the district has devoted personnel resources to technology, a department which has grown significantly over the past several years resulting in a corresponding increase in spending.
The technology department has received unprecedented access to
resources, not only for computers, infrastructure and software (much of which isn't yet working effectively), but for many questionable, if not clearly inappropriate, expenditures.
With the burgeoning staff there was a new-found need for transportation, and thousands of dollars were spent renting vehicles, raising some questions about whether these were always being driven exclusively for district business. Eventually the technology department was allowed to buy vehicles; the most recent expenditure was this past summer when the school board approved a request for three vans at a cost of $70,000.
However, the most egregious area of spending for the technology department has been food. District records reveal providing meals for technology staff has become quite common, with multiple payments to restaurants such as Hooters, Bravo, Smokehouse BBQ, Panera, Abuelos, Stone Canyon Pizza, at a cost of thousands of dollars. District leaders approved of the expense—they created the dedicated line item titled “food for meetings.” But often “meetings” meant little more than staff working late. Our district has paid to keep technology staff well-fed; last year alone this department spent nearly $13,000 for food, exceeding their $8500 budget by over 50%.
Why does this matter? First, because it's inequitable. Teachers, coaches and
music directors routinely grab fast food or “brown bag” meals, at their own expense, for their many hours beyond the school day. I don't think we need to routinely pay for adults' meals, but if we're going to do it, let's start with these hard-working, dedicated folks. Second, it highlights the issue of priorities and decision-making. When the music teacher at Park Hill HS asked for funds to replace a broken sound system during the musical last year, the answer from central office was “no money available.” This repair was eventually made through a Go Fund Me campaign launched by staff, something which is utterly inexcusable given ample district resources. Finally, this all matters because our tax dollars are for KIDS—kids' needs and kids' learning. No building PTA or booster club should be scrambling to pay for field trips, school supplies or activity equipment while this type of spending is taking place at central office.
It's time for the school board and district leadership to re-evaluate excessive allocations and wasteful practices that appear to have become routine. And it's time for teachers, parents and patrons to question and “push back” when district spending seems misaligned with our shared values and goals.
To laugh or cry at Weatherby Lake?
I don't know whether to laugh at or cry for those poor people in Weatherby Lake and other areas under the KCI "flight path” (see “Weatherby Lake influencing KCI flight paths,” Dec. 21 issue of The Landmark).
They didn't know airplanes would be flying overhead when they bought their homes? They had no clue when they signed on the dotted lines that airplanes can be loud? Really??
They're victims of circumstance, I'm sure. They must have all lived there since
before the early 70's when KCI began operation. What's even funnier is that they've convinced themselves, their neighbors, and money-hungry attorneys that their real concern is "safety" and that they want to help airplanes avoid the Canadian geese.
Well, guess what, regardless of how much they think of their respective neighborhoods, the driver for Canadian geese flight patterns is not their neighborhood ponds, it's the Missouri River. The corps of engineers could drain those pontoon boat playgrounds and the
bird issue around KCI would not change one iota. Not one. I mean, has anyone noticed the size of the lake at KCI?
But, alas, like so much of the rest of this society who refuses to take responsibility for their own decisions (like buying a house near an airport), I'm sure their efforts make them feel good.
Things to know about the bond package
Starting this week, you will hear a lot of discussion about a G.O., or general obligation, bond package that voters will be asked to approve in April.
Conversation is starting now because it's a significant investment, but one that signals our commitment to a making Kansas City a world-class city for years to come.
When I took office in 2011, the city faced around six billion dollars in 'deferred maintenance.’ That's billion, with a “B.” Simply put, our infrastructure needs as a city had been kicked down the road for too long.
These are dollars that fix or maintain roads, bridges and sidewalks, along with making curbs ADA compliant. This kind of investment updates city facilities to be more energy efficient, and makes neighborhoods better equipped to handle flooding. We use these funds to maintain the infrastructure our city relies on, and to make sure we're planning wisely for future generations.
So as the conversation here at City Hall
begins this week about what the GO bond package will entail, I want to lay out a few things every Kansas Citian should know about this debate:
1. We must build accountability and transparency measures into the plan that give our residents confidence they will see a strong return on this $800 million investment and will know where their money is going.
2. The GO bond package should be strategic. Facts and data should guide our thinking. Not politics or a old ways of thinking that carve up investment with little regard for future planning.
3. We must take a comprehensive approach to our infrastructure needs. We need roads (that are designed for vehicles, bikes and feet), bridges, sidewalks, capital improvements to city facilities, and flood control improvements. We cannot ask Kansas Citians to approve a plan that does not adequately address all of those basic infrastructure needs.
4. Every part of our city has basic infrastructure needs. Kansas Citians have
my word that I will not support a GO bond plan that does not improve every single corner of our community.
When I ask my community members for their support on something like this, I do not take it lightly. My days in the Marines taught me a lot about loyalty, hard work and a sense of duty. I'll carry those lessons with me each day as I make my way across the city this winter and spring to talk with you about this important step we can take, together.
Let's keep in mind the type of city we want to be in five years, 10 years, 20 years and beyond.
Let's keep our commitment to the next generation of Kansas Citians by maintaining the things that make our city a great place to live, work and raise your family.
Let's do this, Kansas City.
Sewer hikes and accounting shenanigans
The 2017 Parkville City Budget was released Friday night. The first reading and likely approval will have occurred by the time you read this letter.
Excluding transfers, 2017 general fund revenues are 1% lower than 2016 and 1.5% higher than 2015. 2017 general fund expenses are 15% higher than 2016 and 24% higher than 2015.
Included for 2017 are: 1) across the board salary increases; 2) a 46% increase in retirement contributions; 3) $2.4 million in debt financing for Highway 9 improvements; 4) $317,500 allocated to emergency reserves to cover the NID debt ticking time bombs otherwise known as Brink Meyer and Brush Creek; 5) a 10% increase in sewer fees; and 6) lots of fluff.
Don't expect any challenges to this budget. You should expect unanimous approval and some back slapping to acknowledge the efforts of city staff.
Regarding the sewer budget, the plan that was now isn't, as "unplanned" expenses are eating into working capital reserves. I recall that former City Administrator Lauren Palmer said that 3% rate increases would be sufficient for years to come. The 2017 budget recommends a 10% rate increase, and even that leaves a working capital balance below the city's so called target.
Of real concern is the allocation of general fund expenses to the sewer fund. The board is so desperate to find money to fund its pet projects, it hired Springsted Incorporated to devise a calculation to allocate more general fund expenses to the sewer fund. Springsted recommends allocating $365,644 or 10.7% of 2016 general fund expenses to the sewer fund.
A number of years ago, I questioned this allocation but didn't pursue it. Now I wish I had. I seem to recall it starting at $50,000 or $75,000.
Sprinsted's recommended allocation amount includes direct costs of $106,249 said to be incurred within the general fund plus overhead costs of $259,396 to arrive at the total allocation of $365,644. Included in overhead are things like the time for the receptionist to take your phone calls, time for staff to post on social media, police department costs, and management time to define policy goals and direction. After reading the Springsted report and the budget report, I am left wondering how anyone can come up with the justifications for these allocations and keep a straight face.
Staff opted to limit the 2017 allocation to $150,000. How generous of them. The budget report goes on to recommend annual increases of $15,000 for five consecutive years to bring the total allocation to $225,000 in 2022.
Unfortunately, there are errors in both the underlying assumptions and the calculations. One of the key errors is the 18% ratio applied to sewer fund costs to calculate the overhead charge.
To illustrate, instead of using actual sewer costs, assume sewer costs are $20,000,000. Then assume general fund expenses of $3,600,000. Using Springsted's method, the 18% overhead ratio is applied to $20,000,000 and yields $3,600,000. The city would then allocate $3,600,000 of general fund expenses (i.e., 100%) to the sewer fund.
As we middle aged, Platte County males might say, "That dog doesn't hunt." It doesn't take an accounting background to know that something is amiss.
Consider me skeptical, but Parkville residents will recall that water rates from Missouri American Water were decreased earlier this year. I suspect that city officials had internal discussions to the effect that residents could afford a higher sewer rate with water being less expensive. For those unaware, Parkville's per gallon water rate before the decrease was one of the highest in the state of Missouri.
Regardless of how old this allocation is, it is an unapproved tax increase. And regardless of stated intent, it is double dipping and a deceptive means to raise revenues. Understanding costs to better manage resources is one thing; using that to increase charges to residents is quite another. Does anyone really believe that allocating receptionist time is justifiable?
I suppose you have two choices. One, you can say it doesn't amount to much and ignore it. Or two, you can think about the message being sent by being silent and allowing your board to assess you on the basis of an erroneous calculation and an accounting shenanigan. If you choose to ignore it, expect more of the same in other areas.
I recommend you contact your aldermen and the mayor. Don't wait for the public hearing on Jan. 17, 2017. Tell them you don't agree with the administrative allocation. Tell them if they need funds for projects, to do it with clean accounting.
For 2017, there is more than enough fluff in the general fund budget to absorb the “overhead.”
Don't let the board try to confuse you with cost accounting. It's obvious they don't understand it.
Hospital rules are too strict
I am concerned that hospital rules are too stiff. People who have smoked all their lives find it very difficult to not have a cigarette, especially at such a stressful time. They will do just about anything to have one, even if it means leaving the hospital at one's own risk of losing his or her life.
The staff at Saint Luke's Northland Hospital did give my wife a nicotine patch but it did little to curb her urge to smoke. I feel like they should have either let her step outside or offered her some medication to take the edge off.
With that being said, she chose to leave the hospital and within 10 minutes of arriving home her condition worsened. She was white as a ghost (no pun intended for this was Halloween night) and again lost a great deal of blood. After calling 9-1-1, I rushed her back to the ER.
I'm not putting down the hospital, but I am
questioning the procedures that are in place.
Just because that's what the rules say to do doesn't necessarily make it right.
May God bless the emergency room staff, as I know they have a very difficult job to do. Thanks to all the hospital personnel who helped get my wife back to being healthy.
You can thank a veteran for that
Election Day should be a time for Americans to celebrate, to reflect on what the right to vote really means for all of us. Regardless of the outcome of any single election, the fact that each of us has a choice, a say on the path our government takes in the future, is something no one in this country should take for granted.
But as consequential as Election Day was, America observed an even more important day last week. Friday was Veterans Day, a time to step back and think about why we are fortunate enough to live in a country that guarantees all of those freedoms.
That process we completed on Tuesday-- the democratic election that allowed all of us the opportunity to select the people who represent us in government--you can thank a veteran for that.
You can thank a veteran for the right to freely express yourself in America--the right to protest, the right to free press, and the right to practice whatever religion you want. None
of those persists without the men and women who have risked everything to serve and protect the country we love.
We officially honored them for that last Friday, on Veterans Day. But the sacrifices they made for this country affect all of us every day, and we can never forget that.
Why Platte County R-3 has high debt
Platte County R-3 projects for this past year are nearing completion so as the district is starting its release of information for what it has spent. I thought it would be interesting to look at some of the actual numbers pulled from their reports.
Football Field Re-turf: Not only did they use the high bid for the project but the school board also spent over $100,000 of "unbudgeted" tax dollars. Total for the re-turf project cost to date $471,330, which is almost equal to the cost of the initial installation.
Tennis Courts: This past week I received a school district publication stating the courts cost the district "less than $200,000.” This looks wrong. Expenses for the courts were tough to keep track of as district administration spread the information over several different change order sheets presented to the school board. Expenses for the tennis courts were added to the "Kentucky Ave Project,” new school project and "county campus improvements.”
Every project, including the turf, had its own spreadsheet except for the tennis courts. To date the published cost for the eight court project has been over $740,000
and as far as I can find none of the work was publicly bid.
Remember in 2012 the levy increase that was voted down included four tennis courts we were told would cost $230,000. Earlier this year Superintendent Dr. Mike Reik raised the amount to $250,000. With $740,000 now being spent, over $260,000 appears to have come directly from district funds and not included in this amount is the trading of Rising Star Elementary and acreage in Platte City to get the funds to finish the project. Rising Star Elementary, built and maintained with tax dollars, then was traded for $82,000 to pay for about the cost of a single tennis court.
Another troubling item is the fact that going back to May I could find where none of the district expenses for the tennis courts have shown up under "unbudgeted expenses" with the monthly invoice report. So either the bills for the courts were mixed in with the facilities expenses for the other school projects--which is wrong--they have not been paid yet or they were actually budgeted, which would mean this was not a grassroots project started just this year as we were led to believe.
Engineering Fees: About two million dollars ($2,000,000!!) is the amount
engineering companies have invoiced the district so far for this summer’s projects. That is engineering only and does not include the general contractors’ fees. I guess that $10,000 donated to "Kids First" to get the levy passed in 2015 was a good investment for these guys.
Energy Upgrades: Earlier this year a $5 million loan was approved to do energy upgrades at the district. A cost analysis was done and presented to the board. What was not included in that analysis was the fact the district is still currently paying for a several hundred thousand dollar lighting upgrade passed in 2012 that does not have a break even date until 2018.
Lights from the 2012 upgrade were replaced again this year but we are still paying for the 2012 loan and in several cases the loan for the initial installation. Three loans one light fixture!
Remember these items when you see the district’s debt numbers, currently the highest in the state at over $20,000 per student. This is how it happened.
Library doesn't deserve tax increase
Mid- Continent Public Library (MCPL) President Trent Skaggs recently made public statements about my opposition to the proposed 25% tax increase (Proposition L) for MCPL. After reading his statements, I was pleased to see that he confirmed almost every point I made in my opposition letter to this proposed tax increase. And as expected, his argument for more taxes is largely based on emotions.
Mr. Skaggs provided no indication that MCPL wants to live within its means, that being the $897 million they will receive over the next 20 years. He also says nothing about why MCPL has lost so much money over the past six years.
Again, how does an entity with a known
source and amount of revenue and predictable costs lose money? Answer: if the MCPL board was on top of things, it wouldn't.
Perhaps the most ridiculous statement was that the library provides space for organizations such as AARP, whose main purpose is political lobbying. I find it almost comical that Mr. Skaggs believes providing facilities at no cost to a political lobbying organization is a necessary library function.
He then goes on to state that $4.03 is returned for every dollar of taxes. That also was one of my main points; providing free things is not a basis for measuring the value of a library.
Mr. Skaggs notes the effort of the board and staff in deriving the 25% tax increase. No facts and no evidence. Translation: "Trust us."
Best of all, Mr. Skaggs states that the cost is "an additional $22.80 per year" for the average homeowner. Like any public spender, after they have fleeced you for $100, they claim that you won't miss another $25.
Think of this as if you were a banker. A bank doesn't loan money to someone who doesn't demonstrate an ability to use resources wisely and operate within constraints. MCPL hasn't expressed a willingness to do that.
And for that reason, they don't deserve any more tax dollars.
Vote NO on Proposition L.
Library needs more funding
A public library system is a basic community service. Thousands of people of all ages rely on libraries for books, magazines and newspapers, computer and internet use, special children's program, and free classes.
Can you imagine a community where these things are either not available or limited?
On the Nov. 8 ballot, Mid-Continent
Public Library is asking for a levy increase in order to continue providing essential library services. This is known as Prop L.
Mid-Continent Public Library has a good track record of providing service but population growth, building maintenance, technology and the need for new branches all take more funding.
The League backs long term, assured, stable and adequate funding for library services. Mid-Continent's past record and
well considered plans for the future all justify a levy increase that will be the first in 33 years.
The League of Women Voters endorses Proposition L as a clear YES vote.
--Linda Vogel Smith
League of Women Voters
Tax dollars wasted at Park Hill
In March, 2014 I wrote an editorial, printed in this newspaper, urging Park Hill district patrons and staff to vote “no” on a proposed tax increase. I feared a glut of tax dollars being wasted on a computer initiative when the district had shown little ability to successfully manage the demands of technology in recent years. At the time, I challenged teachers to consider a number of factors:
·If you have struggled to help a class of kids when the wireless connection (or email or software program or. . .) didn't work, and you long ago gave up hope of getting meaningful, “real time” tech support to fix the issues —.
·If you can't imagine how district infrastructure is going to handle 10,000 additional computers when it has never functioned consistently and effectively—.
·If you've struggled through the adoption and implementation of a technology-based program (e.g., Digits), and couldn't get a common sense fix for the myriad of technical problems—.
Taxpayers wisely rejected the measure but district leaders decided to move forward with their initiative anyway, spending millions of dollars over the past three years on digital infrastructure, software, devices and staffing. In fact, some within the district
report the technology department has been given a “blank check” to spend with unprecedented access to funds and lack of oversight.
Recently, Superintendent Jeanette Cowherd sent an email message to all staff, acknowledging significant problems with district technology. She assured teachers of the “commitment to resolve ongoing issues with technology and to reduce the impact. . .on instructional time.”
Not only has this initiative failed to make good on the promise of enhanced opportunities for teachers and students, it is negatively impacting teaching and learning.
The problems are significant, widespread and affecting even the most basic technology functions. In her memo, Dr. Cowherd addresses problems with WiFi connectivity and “black screens.” She goes on to address unresolved problems with “LanSchool,” a software program purchased for grade K-8 schools. And the superintendent acknowledges serious problems with “touch screens” on the expensive, newly-purchased computers provided to 6-12 grade students. If you recall, these computers (over $700 each) were purchased for all high school students at a cost of over $2.5 million this year.
Chromebooks, purchased by many other districts for their kids at $150/each, are looking very attractive right now. Not only would they have been more cost effective, but these less-complicated devices would
likely have been easier to bring online and maintain.
District leaders have had three years to get this right, so who's responsible for this wasteful debacle? The academic services team who relentless advocated for this initiative? The technology department who has been unable to make it work? The superintendent who followed her predecessor down the same misguided path, or the school board members who nodded and “green- lighted” every step throughout this process? Someone should be held accountable when election and contract decisions are made in the spring.
In what other business environment today can you imagine email, WiFi, computers or needed software not working consistently and effectively?
There is no pleasure in saying, “I told you so.” I hoped with public scrutiny and years to prepare, the district would check and double-check to ensure all systems were “go” before launching this effort.
In the next few months district leaders will again be asking voters to approve a tax increase. It will be hard to vote “yes” when there is clearly no one leading with the experience and skill needed to wisely manage the budget or successfully implement a significant, district-wide initiative.
More on the Dirty Shame Saloon
This letter is in response to Keith Myers’ recent letter bashing the Platte County Fair and the good people that are involved with it. Keith only gives partial truth to support his opinion and then defends it with false accusations with no evidence. In this letter I will dispel everything he wrote.
Keith states that the Fair and the Dirty Shame Saloon have the Confederate Battle flags waving in every direction. FALSE. Prior to Keith's first op-ed last year, there was one Confederate flag hung and it had been there before Keith was born. lt was removed and a historical Camden Point battle flag with ties to the local area is hung on the north side with an American flag from the Civil War era below which a placard of its history is posted. Funny how he did not mention that in his piece.
Another fact that he failed to mention is there are five military flags and a Merchant Marine flag hung in the Dirty Shame. They also have placards posted below each flag with its history. The saloon has Old Glory hanging high above, as well. Funny how he did not mention that, either.
The flag in question now is the one hanging from the center of the saloon around the ceiling fan, he called it a disgrace and people found it insulting to include veterans. FALSE. Though it may once have been a flag, the stars were cut away and the rest is currently hung and it actually accents the decor of the saloon.
I volunteer at the Saloon each year and am myself a veteran and I have yet to hear anyone offended by its presence. He also stated that veterans find the flag insulting, which is further from the truth. Keith wants you to believe he actually talked to veterans and assumes that "they'' have a collective mind. This writer is a retired Army veteran with multiple tours of combat and I can guarantee you that myself and the other veterans that I know do not find anything about the Fair and the Dirty Shame Saloon offensive than do some find country music or tractor pulls offensive.
Keith also failed to mention that many wearing of the Confederate flag memorabilia and waving of the Confederate flag comes from a few of the African-American citizens. We can assume no one made them wear it and that they are proud of their Southern heritage and want everyone in the saloon to know that. Anyone that attended the fair and had a beer at the Dirty Shame will tell you that they witnessed all races and genders proudly supporting attire with both the American and Confederate flags, as well as a few Union Jacks from some visitors from across the pond.
I can tell you that I volunteer my time at the Dirty Shame and have witnessed all this personally. I see a diverse crowd that attends the Dirty Shame and no one is offended by the decor of the saloon. Many veterans are there and do not find the place insulting.
The truth is that the fair is a fun week for the citizens of Platte County. The citizens that attend the fair are diverse. I have been to the fair for over 10 years and have witnessed only three altercations, none of them provoked by the Saloon nor its appearance. The security is great and the law enforcement is present, engaged, and noticeable.
In closing, I find Keith to be insulting to the citizens of Platte County. He is short sighted and in company of very few. He is one voice and the Fair committee was respectful and unbiased to Keith and all the Platte County citizens they serve in their research, consideration, action, and review of the Shame following his concern.
He only caused frustration and undeserved attention to the fair committee when it didn't respond as he believed they should. Everyone should be asking, what has he done for the community? His country?
I wrote this letter because in Keith’s letter there was only one side told about the Platte County Fair. There are great people that work hard year round to ensure they put on a great fair and it is all volunteer.
Praise for the sports festival
The second annual Platte County Youth Sports Festival held recently at Zona Rosa warrants a commendation for the folks who inspired this idea.
Clubs, organizations and businesses ranging from lacrosse to soccer to martial arts showcased their programs and in one location showed off the incredible variety of activities available to Platte County citizens.
After attending the inaugural event last year, we participated as an exhibitor this year. The growth in just one year in terms of size, variety and attendance is impressive and a credit to the county staff and the Platte County Sports Commission volunteers who made it happen.
Besides kudos for the festival, the Platte County Sports Commission website deserves mentioning as well. During the dozen years my daughters played youth sports I never came across a resource as valuable as this one. If only it existed a few years ago!
Do yourself a favor and check out http://www.plattesports.com. In one location you can find a variety of youth sports organizations, and website and contact information for each. Parents will appreciate this resource when searching for the club or league most suitable for their child.
It's clear that, more than most places, Platte County understands the importance of recreational opportunities in providing a high quality of life for its citizens. While other county governments don't quite “get it,” Platte County seems to be the exception.
Vote against Amendment 3
As a second generation farmer, I am all too familiar with taxes and regulations that begin with noble intentions and end with unintended consequences. Take for instance the troubling provisions contained in Amendment 3-the “Raise Your Hands for Kids” measure which receives 90% of funding from out-of-state interests. These are the same interests seeking to raise taxes on smaller competitors in order to gain increased market share.
This inequitable proposal does not raise taxes across the board on tobacco products, companies nor manufacturers. My questions is, why does the proposal single out certain entities for an almost 750% increase while only raising taxes by a fraction of that amount for their own companies?
In addition to the flawed and unfair taxation provisions, this proposal would add language to the state constitution relating to the funding of “emergency services” for women, drawing the ire of folks in the pro-life community, such as myself. When you factor in opposition from education and health-related entities, groups traditionally supportive of increased tobacco taxes, it becomes apparent how problematic this flawed proposal is.
I began farming 45 years ago and raising tobacco is what helped my family survive the farming crisis in the 1980s. This proposal is harmful to farmers such as myself.
This November, I encourage fellow members of the Missouri Farm Bureau and all Missourians to oppose Amendment 3's troubling provisions.
Library needs to control its spending
In 2013, Mid-Continent Public Library (MCPL) changed its vision statement from "MCPL will be the portal for life-changing resources" to "MCPL will provide the best library experience in the United States." That message also states, "...we will continue to provide the traditional with the innovative..."
Two years later, the 2015-16 budget message states that the combined effects of inflation and the Missouri Hancock Amendment have impaired purchasing power and restricted revenue growth. It states that these factors as well as "tax diversions and abatements" create serious budget stress. MCPL expresses no concern for those paying taxes who have been equally impacted by inflation and a lack of real wage growth.
The voter approved Hancock Amendment, which limits growth in government, seems to be working as intended. To MCPL, it is an obstacle. And is it not interesting that MCPL claims a right to taxes "that the voters approved and the levy should provide" on properties that would likely not exist if not for tax abatements?
This is an entity with a defined source and known amount of revenue. It should be next to impossible to lose money. For the six years 2005 to 2010, tax revenues were $227 million and what I term operating profit was $15 million. For the six years 2011 to 2016, MCPL incurred a loss of $6 million on tax revenues of $240 million. Tax revenues declined in 2010 and may be growing slowly, but the problem is spending. If MCPL doesn't have the discipline to control spending, there is no amount of money that is going to satisfy them.
I was unable to determine the basis for MCPL's proposed 25% tax increase (Proposition L – an eight cent tax increase over the thirty-two cent tax per hundred dollars assessed valuation) other than a “trust us” statement and the Capital Plan. MCPL provides no other data.
MCPL states that a NO vote will result in reduced maintenance, no expansion, crowded spaces, decreased outreach and reductions in digital resources. Implying that assets will deteriorate without a tax increase is irresponsible. Responsible business owners adapt to a changing business climate. And they don't overspend a known revenue stream.
MCPL states that a YES vote means new buildings, expansion of services and hours, faster internet, services for small business owners, increased investments in materials, digital books, movies and music, research tools, informational databases, online instruction for every age, and so on. In other words, lots of "free stuff" as well as services that appear to compete with the private sector.
MCPL's Capital Plan calls for public meeting spaces, new auditoriums (when did auditoriums become a library function?), drive-thru service windows, new food venues, free computers for loan, among other items. In MCPL's vision of the future, when you check out a book you may be asked, "Would you like fries with that?"
Using a 20 year period and 1% annual asset growth, the value of Proposition L is $227 million. That is money redirected from your personal savings to an activity that is non-essential and by MCPL's own admittance, "challenged by how to measure success" in an industry "that struggles to show value and worth."
MCPL currently collects taxes of $41 million annually. Using the same parameters as above, the current tax rate will generate revenues of $894 million over 20 years. If the tax increase is approved, MCPL's tax revenues will exceed $1.1 billion over 20 years.
One would think $894 million would be sufficient, but as noted above, MCPL overspends.
The Capital Plan totals $86 million: $10 million for minor remodeling and maintenance, $4 million for renovations, $62 million for new and replacement buildings, and $10 million for inflation. The component costs are based on round numbers per square foot: $100, $200 and $300, depending on type, in addition to $50 for consultants and furnishings. The plan states, "All costs are opinion only."
Round "opinion" numbers like these should be used to start a discussion. They should never be presented as a basis for approving more taxes.
To estimate population growth, MCPL uses Mid-America Regional Council (MARC) forecasts. Landmark readers will recall that for the 2014 Platte County new jail proposal, the then Platte County commissioners were projecting exponential population growth based on MARC forecasts. In the end, those projections were proven to be farcical.
MCPL's Capital Plan also uses the term "exponential growth" and estimates population growth of 125,000 from 2010 to 2020 and every ten years thereafter. According to data obtained from MARC's website, actual population growth in the three MCPL counties from 2000 to 2010 was 73,000 and from 2005 to 2015 was 77,000. Forecasts should bear some resemblance to actual results. Where are those other 50,000 residents hiding?
I would also note concerns related to the ability of the pension plan to achieve projected asset returns and other post employment benefits, which are unfunded and have increased from $1.0 million in 2010 to $3.4 million in 2016. How much of the proposed tax increase will be redirected to retirement obligations?
This tax increase proposal looks suspect. How was the $.08 increase derived? Where is the projection?
The library system, if it is to be supported, needs to change. I like traditions, but those are by choice and they are mine to fund. The traditional library system resembles steam driven locomotives. Taxpayers should not be asked to fund outdated delivery systems or the free stuff MCPL desires to provide based on some squishy utopian vision. MCPL needs to narrow its focus, manage for sustainability and manage profitably. It does not need more money to do that.
The MCPL board wants you to vote based on emotions. Don't do it. This vote is not about the additional $22 or $38 per year on your tax bill; it's about the $227 million more that MCPL wants. Don't give it to them. Boards like MCPL's can never get enough of your money.
On Nov. 8, vote NO on Proposition L.
Amendment 3 will hurt farmers
Regarding: Missouri Amendment 3
As a farmer, I am very familiar with taxes and regulations that put a real “damper” on the state and U.S. economy.
Taxing a select few places a real burden on a select few and is unjust to say the least.
Most of these “select” taxes get so lost in the state (and national) revenue, they never end up going where they are intended to go. A good example, as proof, is the Master Tobacco Settlement that found revenue going everywhere it wasn’t supposed to go by each state and at the national level.
Amendment 3, a tobacco tax scheme designed to raise taxes on cigarettes $1.27
per pack, is endorsed by what I will refer to as “big tobacco.” In many cases, “big tobacco” has turned its back on the U.S. tobacco producer, and chosen to purchase cheap, lower priced tobacco overseas, much like low paying “sweat shops” in the manufacturing business overseas.
“Big tobacco” has done the U.S. farmer no favors, much like the U.S. labor force has been treated with the manufacturers leaving the U.S. for cheap labor, less regulations, and fewer taxes. “Big tobacco” like many manufacturers, chooses the easy way out, leaves us here to suffer the consequences, whether consumers or workers, and ship products back to the U.S., maintaining their profit margins while the rest of us suffer through theirdecisions.
A trip to Richmond, V.A. to watch imported tobacco be unloaded from overseas is available to doubters.
This tobacco tax, if passed, will be a tax increase in Missouri of 747%, be a job killer, possibly provide “emergency services” for women, send public dollars to private schools, get lost as originally being “for the kids,” and penalize small tobacco companies which “big tobacco” wants in order to keep and gain market share.
Vote no on an unjust tax that will affect U.S. farmers, U.S. workers, your friends, consumers, and small “grass roots” tobacco companies.
Eliminating 'Moves' funding is a mistake
Thursday Governor Nixon eliminated funding for the Missouri Moves cost share program. This program provided cities and counties with local match funding for much-needed transportation projects.
MoDOT had reserved 2/3 for road and bridge projects and 1/3 for multimodal projects, such as those benefiting Missourians who walk, bicycle, and use public transit.
This type of funding is much needed in Missouri. In FY 2015, Missouri invested just 9 cents per resident in public transportation. Before Missouri Moves, Missouri had invested no dedicated state transportation funding in walking or bicycling.
This puts us out of step with neighboring states--all of whom are investing far more in transit, bicycling, and walking--and with the needs of our residents.
Missouri Department of Health data shows that nearly half Missourians have no sidewalk at all in their neighborhoods. Over 3/4 have no safe place to bicycle in their community.
A broad coalition of citizens and groups have been working for more than two decades to address this problem and create flexible state transportation funding that can address the transportation needs of all Missourians.
In 2016 we saw Missouri Moves passed with bipartisan support by both houses of the Missouri legislature. It was the first state transportation funding source to take this "total transportation" approach--providing funding to meet the transportation needs of all Missourians, whether they drive, walk, bicycle, use public transportation, or do all of the above.
Cities across Missouri are hungry for this type of funding and citizens support it.
The response to Missouri Moves proved this--more than half of applications received by MoDOT included transit, bicycle, pedestrian, or other multi-modal elements.
That is why it is so disappointing to see Governor Nixon completely eliminate this new and innovative program--and without creating or even proposing any alternative.
When taxes are cut, programs must be cut proportionally. But two small tax cuts do not require the wholesale elimination of an important program that will benefit all Missourians. We urge Governor Nixon to restore Missouri Moves funding and we urge all of our elected officials to prioritize much-needed funding for public transit, bicycling, and walking in Missouri.
Missouri Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation
Memories of Tomahawke
Congratulations on the Gish award.
We are so lucky to have you in our community. Ever since the Tomahawke mess, we have gotten to know you via your editorials and appreciate your dedication and hard work.
Today, so few "say it like it is" that it is a standout when one does.
Thanks for every day you spend keeping us informed.
--Terry and Adrienne Glaeser
Rural Platte County
EDITOR’S NOTE: Lake at Tomahawke Ridge was a high density housing proposal that was presented about eight years ago east of Platte City along Hwy. 92 near North Winan Road. Many neighbors, including the Glaesers, vigorously opposed the developer’s proposal and The Landmark also editorialized against it. The county eventually denied the developer’s application.
County fair has taken 'exclusionary path'
You can put lipstick on a pig but at the end of the day it's still a pig. The same can be said for the Dirty Shame Saloon at the Platte County Fair. Adding "museum" to its name does not make the beer hall, open four days a year, a museum. The naming gymnastics is just a thinly veiled ruse so that some members of the fair association can promote their outdated and misguided ideas such as a display of the Confederate flag. At a time when the fair should be striving for inclusion and engagement with all residents of the county without regard to race, creed, color, politics, religion or sexual preference it has taken an exclusionary path with racist, vulgar and unpatriotic displays in the Dirty Shame.
If placed in a real museum setting, with context, the Confederate "Stainless Banner" could provide a lesson in the county's history. But in the beer hall, surrounded by alcohol-fueled revelers, the flag comes across as a symbol of intolerance and the continuation of white supremacy. Writing about the Confederacy, its vice-president Alexander H. Stephens penned in 1861: "its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth." While slavery fell with the Confederacy, white domination as outlined in Stephens' cornerstone speech, has carried forth for over a century through Jim Crow laws, segregationists and hate groups such as the Klu Klux Klan. The Klan's website currently sells over 125 items emblazoned with images of the flag. To state the obvious, this clearly puts the fair in bad company.
I can hear the cries now about taking down the flag. "It's political correctness run amok." "It's heritage, not hate." But the trouble is, it is heritage AND hate. The two cannot be divorced. It costs the fair nothing to be sensitive to African Americans and others offended by its display. Its removal, in fact, would benefit the fair by encouraging more attendance by people of color, few of which could be found on the grounds in recent years. The flag has never been an official part of the fair and should never be.
Nearby, above the dance floor is a "museum" exhibit that is not fit for any civilized society. A mannequin simulating a sex act is pressed up against the hindquarters of a sheep. Perhaps this display of bestiality is intended to be a lonely Confederate soldier finding comfort on the battlefield?! Added to this is a desecrated American flag whose remnants, the star field, have been cut away and tacked to the ceiling.
The vile displays in the Dirty Shame Saloon are an embarrassment to me, they are an embarrassment to the fair and they are an embarrassment to decent people everywhere. Including, I would presume, fair sponsors such as the Platte Valley Bank, the Bank of Weston, Wells Bank, Budweiser and others. The fair should be a celebration of what's good in our county with wholesome, family-friendly entertainment and exhibits. It should be a gathering place for young, old, black, brown, white, gay or straight from all walks of life.
I'm reminded of a quote I once heard that I'll paraphrase here: "It's one thing to open the door while it's quite another to welcome people in." For the fair to thrive for the next 150 years it needs to do more than open the door each year. It needs to provide an atmosphere of acceptance and inclusion. It needs to be sensitive to the changing world, encourage diversity in all its forms, including the ranks of the Fair Association itself, and give a heartfelt welcome to everyone entering the gates. The first step in this process involves the fair's leadership removing the racist, vulgar and unpatriotic displays in the Dirty Shame Saloon.
County leader at odds with library district
The Platte County Commission recently received a resolution from Consolidated Library District No. 3, commonly known as the Mid-Continent Public Library, to place a 25% tax increase on the ballot this November. The tax increase of eight cents would increase our library tax from 32 cents to 40 cents or about $1.9 million per year in Platte County alone. Forever!!!
For perspective, the library tax increase alone exceeds the current county levy of six cents. When you look at your real estate or personal property tax bill, you will see where the library tax falls in relation to the other taxing districts.
So who makes this decision? There are 12 appointees (not elected) to the library board, four from each member county (Platte, Clay, and Jackson.) I immediately called one of the Platte County appointees, Nancy Kraus Womack, to pose a simple question. What in the world are they thinking? Nancy informed me that she was the only member of the library board to oppose the resolution to increase the tax. Thank you, Nancy. (One member was absent and one chairman abstained but supports the tax).
As I dug into the process, I found some disturbing information. Under the law, it appeared, at first glance only, that the Platte County Commission would be required to put this massive tax increase on the ballot. In a meeting with library district personnel, they were very quick to point out that Missouri Statutes state that after the commission receives the resolution from the library board, the Platte County Commission “shall order that the proposed tax increase in the rate of taxation be submitted to the voters.” I sincerely appreciate the service of our appointees to the library board. However, that an appointed board can mandate tax policy is very disturbing. That needs to change.
Digging further, I found more disturbing news. The ballot language in the resolution did not meet the statutory requirements. You see, part of the tax increase will be used to build new buildings, a one-time expenditure. Under the statutes, taxes for new buildings must be a separate tax through a separate ballot measure and must include a 10-year sunset. Not a forever tax. By the way, the word “shall” is also used in this section of the law. But when I pointed this out to the library district, they disagreed and said that they feel they can do the forever tax. They cited some obscure loophole in the way the statute is written. I'm not buying it and neither should the taxpayers.
One last very important point is that this tax can be passed by a majority of the cumulative vote of Platte, Clay and Jackson County. So even if the majority of Platte County voters voted “no”, we will still have to pay the tax if it passes by more votes in the other counties.
The library district personnel and their attorney have also stated that this is the way it has been done in other areas of the state, like St. Charles County last year, and that they do not understand why this is getting so much scrutiny. There are three answers to their question. Although I know the taxpayers of Platte County can figure out the answers on their own, I am going to give them to you. First, this is Platte County not St Charles County. The second answer comes from my mom on many occasions when I was young. Are you going to jump off of a building just because all of your friends are doing it? And, three, I ran on, and was elected to, protect the interests and tax dollars of Platte Countians.
The commission had a meeting this week with library district personnel and three of our four appointees to the board to try to come to some sort of amicable resolution to this problem. Our appointees are open to new discussion and possibly reconsidering the vote on this resolution as the library district attorney and/or director failed to share all this information with the board before its vote. However, that would involve getting the Clay and Jackson County appointees on board with this reconsideration. I'm told that this could be a real uphill battle since the deadline for getting this on the November ballot is Aug. 30 and the library district appears to be very determined to put a tax increase before the voters, with all the loopholes. As Nancy Kraus Womack said in the meeting Monday, “I'm not an attorney but I can read what the statute says.” I'm with Nancy on this one.
The library district's attorney has indicated that there may be some other legal maneuvering to make sure this is on the ballot in Platte County, including a legal action against the county.
I for one will not be voting to put a tax on the ballot that includes loophole language and a forever tax increase. In fact, I will not be voting to put any tax increase on the ballot for the library district.
Park Hill out of touch with fiscal values
Several years ago, the Park Hill School District proposed a tax levy increase with a goal of using a large portion of the revenue generated to purchase computers for every student. Voters overwhelming rejected the measure. However, in the months and years following the vote, district leaders nonetheless chose to invest in thousands of new computers. In doing so, they exposed their initial claim, mistaken at best and flatly misleading at worst, that additional tax funds were ever needed to support this initiative. In short, wise voters clearly made the right decision in rejecting the call for new taxes.
This year, individual laptops are being issued to all Park Hill high school students. The expense is a lesson in obscene government waste. Rather than choosing relatively inexpensive Chromebooks or even moderately-priced laptop options, the district purchased individual computers at a cost of over $700 each. These devices boast far more features (e.g., digital stylus, touch screen, tablet conversion) and power than is needed to provide students with reasonable access to technology. District staff have confirmed the total cost for this most recent purchase of laptops for high school students—over $2.5 million.
I believe that most people in our school community, like myself, support the idea of putting technology in students' hands, and no one is suggesting digital literacy isn't a critical skill in today's world. But this can be done at reasonable cost. By way of analogy, I also fully support providing transportation for children to and from school, but I don't believe we should replace buses with hundreds of minivans so our kids have a “more authentic suburban experience.”
Not only have district leaders moved forward with this huge expenditure funded by tax dollars, they are helping themselves to parents' wallets as well. With expensive computers placed in the hands of their children, parents are being offered “optional” insurance if devices are stolen or damaged. With memories of kids' damaged/lost textbooks and a district-provided list of frightening, costly repairs (e.g., touch screen display--$472, system board--$592), most parents feel little choice but to pay $50 for insurance and an additional $50 deductible per claim. One could reasonably expect that a certain number of these computers will malfunction due to no fault of students. Who pays for these repairs or replacements?
And who is making the repairs on this horde of thousands of individual student computers? The district technology department. And who pays the salaries of these technicians? The taxpayers. Then who is collecting money from the insurance company for repairs? Once again, the district technology department.
In short, it appears the school district is “double-dipping,” using our tax dollars to fund a technology department and then collecting additional insurance payouts for computer parts and repairs through insurance premiums and deductibles paid by families.
I've asked district leaders if they believe these additional charges are proper or even legal. In her response, Superintendent Jeanette Cowherd equated these costs with fees for band instruments, athletic equipment, or even damaged textbooks. Of course, involvement in courses like music or extracurricular programs such as sports are optional. And textbooks are more durable, less susceptible to damage and less expensive to repair.
District leaders have chosen to indenture families to a computer as costly as some people's rent/mortgage payment and then demand these same families be responsible for its care, repair or even replacement.
Park Hill board members and district leaders seem to be growing more and more out of touch with the fiscal values and financial constraints of the families and community they serve.
At R-3, it's all about the money
Here they go again. Another round of pay raises for the employees of the Platte County R-3 School District simply because it is a new school year. In our stagnant economy, it seems like the only folks getting salary increases are public and government employees and these increases come on the backs of all taxpayers.
Everyone needs to understand that teachers automatically get salary step increases each year, as a result of years of service and or education levels achieved. Some also receive stipends. The district does not call step increases “pay raises,” but you and I would. When the board of education approves an annual pay raise, it is in addition to the step increases already programmed. Pay raises adjust the entire salary schedule. You could say it's the gift that keeps on giving. As a result, many teachers can get two pay raises each year.
At July's school board meeting, I asked what metrics the district used to determine the size of these raises. The answer I overheard at the meeting did not surprise me. An administrator said the increase is based on how much the superintendent is “able to levy.” In other words, if the voters approve a tax increase for the district to build a new school (as they did in April 2015) you should expect them to launder a lot of that money into pay raises and they are.
In 2012, concerned citizens defeated the school district tax levy increase. They were stunned. For the first time in recent history, the voting public refused to support the school district’s lofty demands.
As a partial consequence, the school district “froze” annual step increases for three years. However, I learned at the school board meeting that two years of step increases have already been paid back. One school board member had the audacity to ask if the district would be paying interest on those payments.
Do you see what is going on here? It's all about the money. There is little sacrifice as long as it involves other people's money. Meanwhile, the school district's debt load with interest exceeds $90 million.
If you extrapolate out to 12 months the average school teacher's base pay in Platte County R-3 ($53,037) as reported by the Missouri Department of Elementary & Secondary Education, they would make over $70,000 a year, excluding benefits and stipends. That's very fair pay for the “average” teacher.
For the last four years, they received annual pay raises, several equal to or exceeding 3%, in a struggling economy with cost of living increases much lower than their raises.
If you are frustrated by this, take the time to attend a school board meeting. You will notice the board of education never says “no” to the administration. You will observe the decisions of public sector “servants” who sometimes seem more concerned about their pocketbooks than yours.
I could draw comparisons to the failure of progressive education reforms, the greedy teacher's unions, public-private partnerships enmeshed in conflicts of interest and tennis courts voted down by the public but I won't.
I will just say, it's your money and once they get it, you have no say in how it is used “for the kids.”
Remember this the next time they come back to you for another tax levy increase.
- Janet Stark
Salary info given to R-3 board incomplete
In last week’s article on the Platte County R-3 pay raises my short speech to the school board was misinterpreted by your reporter. The point I was trying to make was that once again misinformation is being given to the public and the board by district administration. It has been a busy summer for the district, from lies about the turf and tennis court expenses to this newest manipulation.
For the third straight year the salary information given to the board by Rob Gardner has failed to mention that our teachers are not just competitively paid but in fact are the second highest paid teachers in Kansas City of the 15 districts looked at, next only to Park Hill.
The information provided by Dr. Gardner fails to list the fact that all three of the districts shown to pay teachers more than PCR-3 either have more years of service or more teachers with higher degrees.
Both of these items step the pay level up significantly. Lee’s Summit teachers have an average of 15 years of service compared to R-3’s 12.9 and 83.9% of Park Hill’s teachers have a Master’s or higher while R-3 sits at 76.3%.
Park Hill is also one of the highest performing districts academically in the state while R-3 is not. These are pretty important items to leave out of your salary presentation to the board.
When you do surveys and ask the public if they want "competitive" pay for their teachers the answer is a given, of course we do. Who would answer no?
The question would then be, what is competitive pay? In the eyes of Dr. Mike Reik the answer is to compete with the highest pay of any area school. That's tough to justify when your academic performance has been lacking, so you leave that out along with important items like years of service and hope no one catches it.
It is hard to compare R-3 to Park Hill, Lee’s Summit or Blue Springs when they have so many more teachers making $2,000 to $5,000 more due to having a masters or higher.
Smithville which has an average pay of 12% less than R-3 maintains their teachers and academically performs about the same as R-3. Kearney teachers make less than R-3 staff and 5% more have higher degrees, along with almost three more years of average service, which means three more years of step increases.
Kearney High School has also been a Blue Ribbon awarded school an actual state award you don't have to pay for.
So it is possible to maintain a quality staff in suburban KC without having to constantly one up everyone on pay year after year whether deserved or not.
When asked at the board meeting how pay was decided, Dr. Gardner said a set amount is in the budget yearly for raises then "Team Platte County," made up of 23 employees, decides how it is divided up. The board then votes unanimously as always and it’s a done deal.
It is now possible for a teacher in PCR-3 to make almost $100,000 per year with the current pay and stipend schedule. That’s about $30,000 more than the average household income in Platte County. Households of which most inhabitants work 12 months.
It is pretty easy to see why R-3 superintendents are paid less than other area districts as pointed out in your article. This example of how they do their jobs shows they may still be overpaid.
Rural Platte County
Wood is the right choice in the first district
Dagmar Wood is running for first district county commissioner. If you would like to be represented by an officeholder who cares about you keeping your hard earned money in your pocket as much as you care, then I highly encourage you to vote for Dagmar in the upcoming Republican Primary Aug. 2.
I have known Dagmar for over 20 years. While I have known her to be very sagacious, what I observed as a member of an ad hoc jail committee was nothing short of spectacular. We were presented with a plethora of information that at first appeared overwhelming and seemed to point to a looming crisis concerning the current jail. Within a few days Dagmar had vetted the sources of the information, checked the veracity of the data and cut straight to lucid recommendations that were strictly based on research and facts.
She wasn't concerned about her audience or if any political oxen might get gored. What she was concerned about was what was best for each taxpayer in the county as opposed to what a few thought would be best for a few.
She even recommended the county ask for their money back from the “consultants” that had fed the committee such grossly inaccurate data.
Had Dagmar been on the commission during the past 15-20 years many, if not all, of the financial issues the county is dealing with now would be nonexistent.
Please join me in voting for Dagmar Wood for first district Platte County commissioner on Tuesday, Aug. 2. It will be a positive vote for the county and for your pocket.
A pro-patient update needed
Imagine?you got a nasty cut that needed stitches while you were?vacationing in Florida. Would you be concerned that you wouldn't be able to see a Missouri-licensed doctor?
Probably not. Whether the doctor was based in Florida or some other state, most of us would be confident in the care we'd receive. Indeed, an M.D. from another state is trained pretty much the same way as an M.D. here.
That's why for the benefit of patients, Missouri should reform its medical licensing laws and allow more licensed, out-of-state doctors to serve Missouri patients without undue government interference.
More doctors available to Missouri patients should mean greater access not only for some of our most under-served communities, but for all Missourians. I hope policymakers will consider pursuing this pro-market, pro-patient update to our laws.
Director of Government
Tennis courts will be a source of pride
On behalf of the Platte County Tennis Court Committee, I would like to express much appreciation and gratitude for the recent collaboration among the Platte City Parks and Rec Board, the City of Platte City, and the Platte County School District to secure the remaining funding needed to construct eight tennis courts on the R-3 campus.
This commitment to expand the complex from the original four courts will now provide adequate space to allow full team practices, home meets, and even district tournaments. When the high school teams are not utilizing the facility, it will be available for public use, with opportunities for lessons, tournaments, youth programming, adaptive tennis instruction, and even pickleball.
As a committee, we are aware of the time and effort that went into making this project a reality. Thanks go to the Platte County R-3 School Board and administration for listening to and taking seriously the concerns of a large group of students, parents and community members. Without their willingness to modify the original plans and look for creative solutions to support our tennis team's needs, a resolution for the space dilemma would not have easily been found.
I also want to recognize the Platte County Park Department's contribution to the project in the form of a grant that was awarded toward the construction of the first four courts. Together, these public entities—the city, the county, and the school district--have cooperated and made possible a project that could not otherwise have been completed in so timely a manner.
The new tennis court facility will be a source of Pirate pride and will benefit our kids, our school, and our community for many years to come.
Thanks to all who have committed to making the eight court tennis facility a reality.
Priorities of the parks department are off
"How important do you think it is for Platte County to make maintenance and safety at parks and recreational facilities our number one priority?"
This is a survey question that is asked in Platte County's 2009 Park System Master Plan. The citizens' response: 92% Very Important, 8% Somewhat Important. The results of this study were used to advocate and to ultimately receive the voters' approval for the renewal of the county's half cent parks, recreation and stormwater sales tax.
But now there's a problem. The park department's expenditures and savings reflect a different priority than that of the voters. My perspective on this issue is based upon my 34-year career of professional parks and recreation management experience, including 13 years of service as the assistant director of the Platte County Parks Department. I assisted with the writing of the county's updated parks master plan, and I had the pleasure of working with park supporters, park board members, municipal leaders and many other citizens.
The county's park tax is not intended to be a playground for building personal legacies. These funds belong to the citizens and must be managed with accountability. Our park system must be responsibly maintained according to the citizens' wish. This is exactly why I support Dagmar Wood (1st District) and John Elliott (2nd District) for the Platte County Commission. They will provide much needed stewardship of our parks system through a fiscally responsible plan. They will do this by holding themselves and the parks department officials accountable.
I applaud Presiding Commissioner Ron Schreiber for instructing the parks department to produce an estimate for annual maintenance costs. The department estimates that it will cost $2 million per year to maintain the parks system. But to-date the department has saved an insufficient amount of funds totaling $3.4 million.
This “savings” will not even cover two years of maintenance. A deep hole has been dug for us to climb out.
Lack of accountability and mismanagement of our park funds has put our parks system at risk. Designing and building parks, trails and recreational facilities is intoxicating but the parks department wanted to avoid the maintenance hangover.
A park project is not a "complete" project unless it can be maintained.
Partnerships between the county, municipalities and organizations are critical and a worthwhile pursuit, but as evident by the $2 million a year maintenance cost projections, partnerships are not a 100 percent guarantee for a sustainable park system.
Dagmar Wood and John Elliott will be responsible stewards of our park system and they will hold accountable themselves and the parks department officials to ensure that our parks, trails, green space and recreational facilities are exceptionally maintained and safe for all Platte County citizens to enjoy for many years to come.
I ask that you join me in supporting Dagmar Wood and John Elliott for the Platte County Commission.
Pokemon Go can be dangerous
The real world can be a dangerous place to Pokémon Go as police across the nation are quickly discovering, with the gaming app suddenly becoming a new concern for traffic, crimes and even robberies.
Pokémon Go is an entry into the mobile space, now available for a free download on Android and iOS.
Pokémon Go uses your phone's GPS and clock to detect where and when you are in the game and make Pokémon "appear" around you (on your phone screen) so you can go catch them.
As you move around, different and more types of Pokémon will appear depending on where you are and what time it is. The game encourages users to walk around their homes, neighborhoods and surrounding areas to search for and 'catch' Pokemon that appear on their phone screens.
Do NOT use Pokémon GO mobile gaming apps while driving.
If you spot a Gyarados or other character in your next door neighbor's pool, the very fact that you can see it on your map means you can tap on it from exactly where you are. It's not necessary to enter private residences or buildings to catch them. Know where you are when you are playing. Be respectful of other people's property and space while using the app. Be keenly aware of private property and boundaries. Trespassing is illegal.
Players are urged to be aware of their surroundings while walking around in public. Don't get so engrossed you aren't aware of your surroundings or where you’re walking.
In the St. Louis area over the weekend, four teens are accused in multiple armed robberies in which they allegedly used Pokémon Go to target their victims, according to the O'Fallon Police Department. Be careful when sharing your location with strangers through the app.
Parents, treat Pokémon Go like any kind of outdoor activity with your children. Don't leave them alone while they play and make sure they are secure.
Supreme Court blocks Obama's amnesty
Late last month, the Supreme Court decided to block one of the many executive orders President Obama has issued during his time in office. The Court ruled what all of us already knew- Obama can't just hand out amnesty to 4 million illegal immigrants.
The ruling was a win for the Constitution and for our entire legal system. But more than that, it was a win for American workers and everyone who's followed our immigration laws. These are the people hurt the most by amnesty.
Regardless of the reason they are here, illegal immigrants are just that- illegal. They take from our welfare system, contribute to overcrowding at public schools, and push down wages for Americans.
Politicians that support amnesty have made the problem worse. Amnesty provides an incentive for people to cross our borders and live in America - despite the fact that it's against the law - with the hope that they'll eventually become citizens anyway.
Poor border defense hurts too. That's why I have always supported building a fence along the entire southern border and increasing the number of border patrolmen stationed there.
I'll continue fighting for resources that strengthen our border and make it harder for people to cross over into the U.S. from Mexico.
There is no reason why we should be encouraging immigrants to come here illegally. It punishes everyone who follows our laws, it sends the wrong message to the rest of the world, and it is a huge drain on our budget. I have always opposed amnesty in every form. And I always will.
The county's technology system
On June 10, the auditor's office released the first of two audit reports stemming from a scam and loss of county funds.
The first audit report focused on the electronic wire payment made by the treasurer on Friday, May 27, the result of a spoof e-mail scam.
The audit report provided the citizens with critical information and assurance of:
1. The fraudulent wire transfer of $48,220 was an isolated incident,
2. Banking interests are secure and each of the accounts were reconciled to the general ledger balances, and
3. The county's procedures are compliant with state statutes, as they were derived directly from the statutes, and have undergone internal and external scrutiny and testing without issue or findings.
If procedures had been followed, the wire would never had been released and the request would have been determined to be fraudulent. Releasing the wire was the sole action of the treasurer.
On July 5, the auditor's office released the second audit in response to the scam, an internal examination of the county's Information System (IS) practices, risks, and threats. With the growing number of cybercrime incidents in the public and private sector, an audit similar to what was completed had been anticipated in 2016. The scam elevated the importance of completing the audit and examining the county's IS processes to ensure, at minimum, most common risks are mitigated and sensitive data is secure.
The IS audit report provides citizens with critical information and assurance of:
1. Common cyber security issues are monitored and resources are in place to mitigate risk and exposure to internal and external threats,
2. The county has electronic media/internet policies and the county's level of compliance with the policies,
3. Reasonable steps are in place to ensure the protection of citizens' and employees sensitive information.
The IS audit identified areas for the county to strengthen its processes and practices. The audit further confirmed the current county IS procedures would not have prevented the wire transfer from occurring. The county's electronic media policy defines approved use of county equipment, which is to be used strictly to conduct county business. The wire transfer was perceived by the treasurer as county business and, therefore, does not violate the county's electronic media and internet policies. Releasing the wire was the sole action of the treasurer.
The auditor's office works to ensure the proper use of public funds and to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Platte County government by performing a variety of audits. The audits examine financial accountability, waste, opportunities for fraud, and whether county entities are achieving their purposes and operating economically and efficiently.
The two audits along with other reports are available on the auditor's office page of the county website. Questions or comments from citizens are welcome and encouraged.
--J. Kevin Robinson
Platte County Auditor
Gun control won't stop radical Islam
More gun control is not going to stop radical Islamic terrorism.
Absolutely no one who loves this country and values human life wants to see what happened in Orlando recently happen ever again. It was terrible and tragic and disgusting. Our prayers are with everyone affected by the attack, especially the families of the victims.
The terrorist attack in Orlando was everything we associate with radical, hateful groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda.
But more gun control isn't going to stop this evil. And new laws that impact the constitutional rights of law-abiding Americans are not going to end radical Islamic terrorism.
We need to find new ways to weaken groups like ISIS. We have to cut off their finances and stop them from coming into this country. And we must do more to prevent people from being radicalized by foreign terrorist organizations.
But the spectacle that took place in the nation's capital recently would do none of those things.
The so-called “No Fly, No Buy” bill would not have prevented Omar Mateen from doing what he did in Orlando. He was not on the No-Fly List when he purchased the firearms he used in the attack, and every single person “sitting in” at the U.S. Capitol knew that.
Anti-gun liberals treat every crisis or national tragedy as an opportunity to push their agenda on the American people. This is no different. And no scare tactic will make me support the unconstitutional gun laws they want us to live under.
Radical Islamic terrorism is the root of the problem we're facing. Everyone in the federal government has to do a better job of finding ways to contain and destroy the groups that promote this evil. But nothing anti-gun liberals are proposing would stop it. And they know that.
Guns are not the problem
The Obama administration will take advantage of every crisis to advance its anti-gun agenda. No one has ever been killed by a gun that did not have a human hand wrapped around it. Guns do not kill people; people kill people. There is no such thing as gun violence. Violence flows from the evil natures of unredeemed men.
Any effort to ban so-called “weapons of war” or assault rifles is nothing more than a precursor to banning all semi-automatic firearms. The average liberal elitist knows very little about firearms, since most of them don't own one. They don't understand how to use them or the difference between a semi-automatic and an automatic. Their politicians would like the uniformed public to believe all assault rifles are machine guns. Banning assault rifles is the first step towards confiscating semi-automatic handguns, shotguns, and hunting rifles. It's a foot in the door.
What really fuels the violence problem in our country? I believe it starts with our government. They gave guns to Mexican drug cartels during Operation Fast and Furious in a failed effort to justify gun control across Texas. They refuse to do anything about inner-city violence where dozens of young black-Americans are shot and killed every weekend across the country. By the way, these cities are all run by Democrats.
They release minority drug-offenders from prison before their sentences are completed, many of whom committed crimes with guns. They shame our police officers. They refuse to fully enforce gun laws already on the books, especially if it means an illegal immigrant may go to jail. They don't secure our borders. They don't let the FBI monitor mosques.They don't allow our military commander's to execute decisive operations against terrorists. They refuse to use the word Islam and terrorist in the same sentence but have no problem giving billions of dollars to Iran, the greatest exporter of terrorism in the world. They disdain our ally Israel, abandoned our hard-fought gains in Iraq, and implemented failed policies in the Middle East that gave rise to ISIS. They believe the global warming hoax is a bigger threat than Islamic terrorism. They blame America for the problems in the world.
I don't directly blame our government for the deaths in Orlando any more than I blame a gun. However, the government’s first and foremost responsibility is to protect us. In my opinion, they are failing at this Constitutional duty in favor of political correctness and faux social justice initiatives. In many instances, they trade our security for votes.
I am a proud, lifetime member of the NRA. You have heard it before – to stop a bad guy with a gun it takes a good guy with a gun. No one should be denied their Second Amendment rights without due-process. Why do we resist any effort at gun control? The answer is simple. Guns are not the problem. Democrats will shamefully use any crisis to block gun ownership. They believe they will never realize their progressive utopian dreams as long as the law-abiding public is armed. As the former president of the NRA, Charlton Heston, once said while brandishing his rifle overhead: “Out of my cold dead hands!”
The fox guarding the chicken coop
I am very upset over the “mistake” of our county treasurer, Rob Willard.
In my estimation, he is incompetent to watch over the county's money. Not only that, he does not know how to follow office procedures. If he had, we wouldn't be in this mess.
They have recovered a little over half of the money; however, what does that do to the operating budget for the rest of the year? How will that affect our bond rating? When Willard was campaigning, he promised to “safeguard and protect our money.” It's probably going to cost us more money now. Do you think this is the definition of his promise?
This is more than a “mistake,” this is using the county's money without permission and as such, should be grounds for termination. If this “mistake” were made by a Democrat, what do you think the outcome would have been?
Everyone who knows me knows I am a Democrat. There are more like me in our county – if I were able, I would be a write-in candidate in November; however I do not have the education to be Platte County's treasurer. But, there is someone out there who can. Step up – we need you.
Who ever heard of the fox guarding the chicken coop?
Labor reformers running out of patience
Late last week the administration and the Department of Justice sent letters to over 100,000 school districts across this country mandating that transgender individuals be allowed in restrooms of their choice. That means men in women's restrooms, locker rooms, and yes, in showers.
By the 2010 census, only one in 2400 identify as transgenders. The transgender community claims one in 300. Take your pick. Either way, we are saying that .003, 3/10's of one percent to as little as .0004, 4/10,000's of the population is dictating the bathroom rules for the rest of us. Ludicrous.
This administration is claiming that restricting school bathrooms to a single sex somehow violates Title IX, which is a federal financial aid program/non-discrimination law used primarily for women's sports. If you believe that, then I will start driving on the left side of the road because I feel like I'm British today. Both policies are equally ridiculous and dangerous.
Already two states have refused to abide by this perverted, immoral mandate, Texas and North Carolina. Attention U Haul, your business is about to grow exponentially.
Can we, the people, allow this administration to force us to give up the sex education of our vulnerable children to confused individuals who believe God made them incorrectly? The answer is an absolute NO! Are we ruled by a king or a Constitution? It is time to defy this dictate and institute civil disobedience.
For starters, call your school's superintendent's office and tell them that you do not want your child scarred for life by this misguided federal mandate. For Platte County R-3, 858-2822. For West Platte R-2, 640-2236.
Next, call your representative and senator and demand that they put a lawful stop to Obama's overreach. The main switchboard number for the Capitol is 202-224-3121. Ask for your representative or senator by name.
This is a diversion of this administration to advance the LGBT agenda which in itself is allowing two percent of our population to rule. Folks, it is the rest of us who are accepting this politically correct agenda to proceed. By accepting this we are tacitly advancing a cause which few of us believe in. Intolerant you say?
I think if we tolerate this, we have lost any sense of right and wrong. As a side note, Target has lost over $4 billion of market value since allowing unisex bathrooms. We can thank the American Family Association for calling for a boycott of Target.
As for me, if a crossdresser goes into a bathroom with my wife, my adult girls, or my granddaughters, he has much more to be concerned about than emptying his bladder.
Here's the bottom line (no pun intended), you get to pee where your plumbing agrees!
Accountability should be stressed at R-3
The Platte County R-3 School Board and its leader Dr. Mike Reik need to take a step back and review their spending habits. $2.25 unanimously approved? Hard to believe without at least one board member having questions when the R-3 school district debt
shows to be among the highest of any school district in the state.
I live in St. Joseph and our school district has gone through many changes due to spending of taxpayers’ monies. FBI probes as well as state audits are not anything your district would want.
Every citizen needs to be informed.
Children of the district need to be considered before voting on lavish spending.
Again, may I stress the importance of accountability to the taxpayers, teachers and children of your district.
--Beverly J. Nelson
R-3 taxpayers are subsidizing pre-school
Looks like last week’s front page article in The Landmark woke some people up.
Questions I have been asked about the R-3 debt load are: How did this happen and what can we do about it?
Here are a few examples of how, in addition to what has been pointed out on the plattecountyr3facts.com website. The district has a tuition based non-state required pre-school, Great Beginnings. Tuition is $2,300 per year. Tuition has been $2,300 per year since opening in 2008. The classes for the 30 plus tuition-based students are held in a portion of a $4.8 million building and the teachers (2) pay alone for the classes is somewhere around $70,000.
Tuition for the preschool does not even cover the cost of the instructors let alone the building, maintenance or administration costs.
If you use Platte City area preschool square footage costs and allow for administration cost you the taxpayer are subsidizing each preschool student to the tune of $1,000 plus per year. At a minimum it has cost the district (taxpayer) about 1/4 of a million dollars since Great Beginnings has opened.
When asked about the shortfall Dr. Mike Reik said he felt that preschool is an important part of learning and felt the "small subsidy' was worth it.
I cannot find where any of this has been voted on by the board. Preschool is important which is why my kids went. I did not know I was paying for other people’s kids to attend preschool.
Preschool is important but only subsidized if using the district’s daycare. R-3 in turn lists these students as an enrollment number in the district newsletters, leading to inflating the district’s growth number. Preschool is not mandated by the state only for kids with special needs.
Park Hill’s tuition-based preschool clearly states on its website that tuition covers all costs of the program. Not so with
Dr. Reik said they had an empty room and it helps to "normalize' the state mandated day care. There are already non special needs kids in their classroom who have free tuition. So why not charge enough to cover the costs like other preschools? Why no increase in tuition for eight years?
Is that a good way to handle your taxes? This has been going on while R-3 has had Budget Cutting Committees, levy increases, roof leaks and increases in parking and lunch fees.
More examples: Paxton is getting a half million dollar makeover to prepare it for use by the high school. They are using the entire school, which had over 400 students but now will only have 10 standard classrooms for the high school, only allowing about 210 students using the district’s "functional capacity" calculations. Not enough to even cover projected growth by 2018.
So what happens in 2018 when you are told it is overcrowded again? And your new levy funds? $1.5 million in change orders for construction projects and additions so far in the past three months, including a new parking lot at the high school not mentioned as a possible project in information from the district during the last levy election.
The "Kids First" flyers my household received prior to the election said levy money would not be spent for "unnecessary additional facilities" (source: DON'T BELIEVE THE LIES, April 2015 Kids First mailer, Quality R3 Schools, Vic Perrin Treasurer).
Your Platte County R-3 District is in debt to its eyeballs, PERIOD.
Last year’s audit said they spent $1.5 million more than was budgeted.
How do you fix it? The obvious answer would be to replace the superintendent with someone who understands how to stretch a dollar, but remember he does not spend money in most cases without the permission of the school board.
A superintendent is pretty much a paid fundraiser, about everything they say and do
is to convince you that your district/school is wonderful and performs at the highest level but needs more room, needs more security, more technology upgrades, more pay for teachers and staff (that makes their life easier). And here is the biggest thing: NO ONE but the superintendent really understands what is most important for your kids and that usually involves giving them more, wait for it........MONEY.
It is the superintendent’s job to ask for funds for projects and the school board’s job to hold that in check. What we are missing at PCR-3 is that last part.
There must be a special class for school administrators where they learn to say things like "Knowing this information (on debt) serves little utility" and the quote from R-3 School Board president that "districts have different debt loads at different time.” Of course they do, which is why my numbers are based on the budget posted every year by every district in the state of Missouri and sent to Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
It only "serves little utility" when they don't want you to comprehend how high that debt is. Comments like this are meant to make you think there is something you might be missing when you are not.
Every project and program at a school can be justified as it is "for the kids" but at some point the board has to start saying NO until some of the old debt is paid off.
Everyone can quietly continue to sit and complain about the district’s performance, afraid of retribution on your kids or grandkids (which is what they bank on) or you can start talking to your school board members about their continued spending sprees.
If you don't speak up the debt will just continue to grow after the current superintendent and board are long gone. But we will still be saddled with the taxes to cover their unneeded "innovative" projects and "small subsidies.”
Rural Platte County
Platte-Clay's proposed bylaw change
I am writing to alert customers of Platte Clay Electric Cooperative (PCEC) about a proposed bylaw change to be voted on at the May 12 annual meeting.
Article IV, Section 4 currently specifies that the board of directors must appoint a nominating committee at least 30 days before Director elections. The committee must then select nominees at least 20 days before the election. Members may nominate
their own candidates at least 15 days beforehand.
The proposed change leaves the first two deadlines as is, but moves the third to at least 70 days before the election. This means that members must make their nominations up to 40 days before the nominating committee is even appointed, and up to 50 days before the nominees are actually chosen.
While nominations from the floor are still allowed in both cases, the proposed bylaw
change, if approved, would severely curtail members' ability to nominate alternative candidates. As the first two deadlines are left intact, I can see no legitimate reason to change the third.
As such, I strongly encourage PCEC customers to attend the annual meeting and vote against this proposal.
Former local principal says hello
How are you doing, Ivan? I was in contact with Laura (Hulett) at Platte County R-3 and she gave me your email. How fortunate I am that you are still at the newspaper.
I wish to let you know that I am blessed to have known you and worked with you while in Platte City.
You were such a valuable ally to Platte City Elementary School and Annex. I have many pictures and articles in my treasure chest that you wrote and printed in the newspaper. Occasionally I will look at them and remember great times interacting with you and talking with you.
It is with much fondness that I remember you. I have the article you wrote about me framed and hanging on a wall in my house. That was such a wonderful article and one that I truly treasure.
I hope all is well with you and that life has treated you kindly. You are a very special and unique person. I will always treasure the memories of you and what you did for the children and teachers at Platte City Elementary and Annex while I served as principal there.
May God bless you daily and fill your life with happiness and joy.
Platte City Elementary
Fracking brings jobs, cuts energy costs
Despite clear evidence that hydraulic fracturing can safely extract oil and natural gas from previously unreachable deposits, attacks on "fracking," as it's known, have grown harsher.
At a recent Democratic debate, Hillary Clinton said that under the restrictions she'd like to impose, "I do not think there will be many places in America where fracking will continue to take place."
Bernie Sanders was even blunter: "No, I do not support fracking." When the moderator pointed out that even many Democratic governors do, Sanders said they were just wrong.
With their blind opposition, elite Democrats and other environmental activists are endangering America's economy -- and ignoring science. Fracking -- or, injecting fluid into shale rock to extract oil and natural gas -- is an enormous boon to American workers. And it's safe.
Let's imagine the America of Clinton and Sanders -- an America without fracking.
Thanks to fracking, in 2014, America became the world leader in oil and natural-gas production. For the first time since 1970, we only import a quarter of the oil we use. In the America of Clinton and Sanders, the United States will again become dependent
on foreign sources of energy.
From 2007 to 2012, fracking jobs grew 40 percent while the rest of the private sector grew at a 1 percent annual rate. Fracking currently supports about 2.1 million jobs. In the fracking-free America of Clinton and Sanders, those jobs are gone.
American households gained on average $1,200 from fracking in 2012, thanks to increased income from reduced energy costs. These same households could save $3,500 annually by 2025. In the America of Clinton and Sanders, incomes will decline and energy prices will rise.
From 2012 to 2025, fracking will provide $1.6 trillion in tax revenue to the American government - enough to cover the current federal deficit for almost three years. In the fracking-free America of Clinton and Sanders, government will be starved of an important source of revenue.
The oil and gas industry adds hundreds of billions of dollars to the nation's GDP annually, and natural-gas exports are a big plus on the ledger of America's trade deficit. In fracking-free America, the economic contraction will run hand-in-hand with a ballooning trade deficit.
Yet Clinton and Sanders have condemned natural gas development and production. But it's dangerous to attack proven energy sources of electricity for the
pursuit of renewables that can't meet our energy needs.
In the fracking-free America of Clinton and Sanders, we'll have to get by on less electricity and live with rolling brownouts like the kind California endured in the first decade of this century -- and almost suffered again in 2014.
Why the hostility to fracking? Many claim it contaminates water. But studies by key federal agencies show fracking is safe. In a systematic review of the evidence, the EPA "did not find evidence" that fracking had "led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources in the United States."
Like any energy technology, fracking must be employed with care. But there is no reason to ban it, as Sanders would, or regulate it to death, as Clinton would.
Fracking creates jobs, generates tax revenue, reduces the cost of energy, and results in lower greenhouse-gas emissions. The risks to local environmental conditions are minimal and can be addressed with reasonable regulation. The fracking-free America of Clinton and Sanders is an America that is much poorer economically and no better off environmentally.
--Tom Borelli, Ph.D.
"No" vote on car sales tax aids city
The April 5 Platte City municipal election includes a city resident only ballot measure to decide the fate of the city sales tax on out of state vehicle sales.
After discussions with the Chamber of Commerce and local automobile dealers, I urge voters to vote “No” on this ballot measure.
A “No” vote supports a level playing field for Missouri (and local) business; a “No” vote maintains the current revenue supporting Platte City services; and, a “No” vote results in an equal sales tax rate for everyone who owns a car, truck, trailer or boat.
The purpose of this ballot measure is to correct a technicality in state law. For nearly 50 years, Missouri local governments, including Platte City, collected sales tax on all motor vehicle sales. In 2012, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the sales tax was valid only for motor vehicles, boats, motors and trailers purchased from Missouri dealers; the same items purchased out of state (but registered in Missouri) were no longer subject to sales tax but could be charged an equivalent use tax.
For Platte City and other communities (such as Parkville, Gladstone and North Kansas City) who do not charge a use tax, the ruling meant that vehicles purchased from an out of state dealer would pay a lower tax than vehicles purchased from a car dealer located in Missouri, This ruling created an unfair playing field against Missouri car dealers, reduced city revenue and resulted in some vehicle owners paying a higher tax rate to maintain local streets than others.
The state legislature subsequently acted to delay enforcement of the court order to provide cities an opportunity to ask their citizens to fix this tax problem by voting on whether to continue the decades old practice of charging the same tax rate for all vehicles, boats, motors and trailers regardless of whether or not the purchase occurred in Missouri or out of state.
A “No” vote on the Platte City out of state vehicle issue will maintain the existing tax rates on all motor vehicles. A “No” vote will not increase taxes or add any new City revenue. A “No” vote will maintain a level playing field for Missouri car and boat dealers, including the three dealerships located in Platte City, a “No” vote prevents special tax treatment for a small group and ensures everyone pays the same vehicle sales tax.
Local car dealers have invested in Missouri and invested in Platte City. A “No” vote protects them by treating all vehicle sales equally whether that sale occurs in Missouri or in any other state. A “No” vote maintains existing city revenue. Platte City strives to provide high quality services including streets maintenance, snow plowing, police, parks while maintaining low property taxes and a low cost of living. A “No” vote maintains the tax revenue that funds our high quality service.
Tax policy should be fair and equal for all taxpayers. A “No” vote ensures that everyone who uses city streets pays the same vehicle tax rate as everyone else.
All residents are encouraged to take the time to vote in the Tuesday, April 5 municipal election. If you do vote, consider voting “No” on the Platte City out of state vehicle sales tax ballot measure.
Contact D. J. Gehrt, city administrator at 858-3046 or firstname.lastname@example.org for additional information.
Sierra Club endorses KC earnings tax
On Tuesday, April 5 voters in Kansas City will decide whether to retain the current city earnings tax.
The Sierra Club is recommending a “YES” vote on Question 1 to retain the earnings tax. The earnings tax generates more than $240 million in revenue for the city, and makes up 40% of the general fund dollars.
The earnings tax also supports environmental programs that improve the health and quality of life of Kansas City residents and visitors. The general fund supports curbside recycling and recycling center programs and energy efficiency investments in city buildings. It also funds the Office of Environmental Quality in Kansas City, an office whose core mission is maintaining and improving the environment.
The Sierra Club is launching a grassroots campaign to support the earnings tax to counter Missouri Mega-Donor Rex Sinquefield. Sinquefield has contributed $1.8 million to the Anti-Earnings Tax campaign in St. Louis City and Kansas City.
As a city resident who recycles and wants to see our city succeed, I see the benefit of the earnings tax. I will vote YES on Question 1 on April 5.
The Sierra Club has released a report focusing on environmental programs supported by the earnings tax and the importance of a healthy city center.
The Sierra Club, Missouri Chapter is a grassroots environmental group with more than 8,000 members in the state of Missouri.
Monitoring the visa overstay bill closely
In reading the information Congressman Sam Graves, Sixth District, provided regarding enforcement of Visa Laws in the March 16 Landmark, it appears that the salary of the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will be withheld unless or until the Department does it's job tracking down all immigrants living here on an expired visa. This is identified as H. R. 4726. Preventing Illegal Visa Overstays Act that Representative Graves recently proposed.
This is exciting information! This bill must be monitored closely, it may give many of us frustrated citizens the boilerplate instructions that will enable us to withhold the salaries of all the Representatives and Senators of the United States. Kudos to Representative Graves for bravely taking a significant action against non-performance.
We just have to hope the current GOP position regarding delay of selection of the next Supreme Court Justice of the United States will enable Representative Graves to push this through the House and Senate very quickly.
Please, please do not tell me this is an early April Fools Joke. It does seem too good to be true.
--Carol A. Clopton
in Platte County
Visa laws should be better enforced
There are nearly 12 million immigrants living in this country illegally; drawing welfare benefits, sending their children to public schools, and pushing down wages for American workers.
And while liberal politicians and poor border protection have contributed to illegal immigration numbers, the problem extends well beyond amnesty and open borders.
Last week in Kansas City we saw the tragic consequences of the failure to enforce immigration laws. Right now, the Department of Homeland Security is responsible for making sure all immigrants temporarily living in the U.S. do not overstay their visas. To make that possible, the department is required to use a process known as biometric exit tracking at all domestic air, sea, and land ports.
But in many cases DHS fails to fulfill its responsibility, and in others it ignores the requirement entirely.
On Thursday I introduced a bill to change that. H.R. 4726, the Preventing Illegal Visa Overstays Act, will withhold the Secretary of DHS' salary until the department does its job and tracks down all immigrants living here on an expired visa.
DHS' failure to follow biometric tracking laws adds millions to the illegal immigrant population. Congress examined this issue in a hearing earlier this year, where it was estimated that as many as 40% of all people living in America illegally are here on expired visas.
If we don't enforce visa laws, we basically have open borders. DHS has got to take advantage of the technology and resources we have to keep illegal immigration numbers down, and my bill will make sure that happens. It's not just a matter of economic security, it's a matter of national security.
Releasing terrorists is not a security plan
Since September 11, thousands of young men and women have given their lives to defend America. We've spent so much in the war against violent Islamic extremism, and we continue that fight to this day.
That's why it's so disturbing to see the Commander in Chief jeopardizing all that our military has worked for just to fulfill a campaign promise.
Last week, President Obama announced his plans to close the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, which is used as a prison for terrorists that have tried to harm American soldiers across the globe.
The President says closing Gitmo is a matter of national security. But if Obama wants to close the prison, it means he would have to let the terrorists go free back to their home countries, or transfer them to bases on U.S. soil. Either way, closing Gitmo does more to threaten national security than strengthen it.
The Pentagon recently announced that 13 sites in the U.S. would be considered for relocation of current prisoners, with Fort Leavenworth in Kansas expected to be among them. Last summer, representatives from the Pentagon toured Fort Leavenworth's Disciplinary Barracks for that very reason.
But Obama's plans directly violate standing U.S. law. The annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has prohibited the transfer of detainees from Gitmo to American soil for the last few years, and Obama has signed each of those bills into law.
Moving terrorists to U.S. soil does not make Americans safer. It's not only the wrong plan, it's an illegal plan. And as a member of the House Armed Services Committee, I will continue to fight against it.
Union says Menards should pay more
I was pleased to read there was significant job growth in Platte County during 2015 (see Job Growth Came to Platte County in 2015, front page of The Landmark, Feb. 3, 2016). Unfortunately, the Menards development which is expected to open next year near Green Hills Road may only provide low wage employment.
Menards pays its employees extremely low wages-- often $10 per hour -- or less. Ask them if you doubt me. Because Menards pays low wages its workers are often forced to rely on Medicaid, Food Stamps or other public assistance to meet their basic needs. So Menards is receiving a public subsidy: Platte County taxpayers are forced to subsidize the employees because Menards fails to pay a living wage.
Menards, whose revenue is approximately 7.9 billion dollars (Forbes, 2013), can afford to pay their employees a fair wage and take the burden off the taxpayer. Menards should immediately adopt a $15 per hour minimum wage rate--which is being demanded by workers across the United States--to bring a needed raise to their employees and reduce taxpayer subsidies to Menards.
Local 153, Office and Professional Employees International Union is particularly concerned by the company's anti-worker behavior and we have filed several Unfair Labor Practice Charges against Menards at Region 18 of the National Labor Relations Board.
Platte County should demand Menards provide a sustainable living wage.
Senior Business Representative
Local 153, OPEIU
Office and Professional Employees
New York, NY 10011
Platte County has lost a political giant
Platte County lost a political giant last week with the death of Barbara Cooke. No. Barbara wasn't particularly tall. In fact, she was rather short. And she wasn't rich, powerful or famous. And she never held any elected office, unless you consider her several decades of service as a committeewoman on the Platte County Republican Central Committee as an “elected office.” However, she was the matriarch of the Platte County Republican Party.
Barbara was a Republican in Platte County before it was “cool” to be one. She used to joke that they used to be able to have a meeting of all the Republicans in Platte County in a closet. And, the Democrats so dominated the political process that you kind of needed to meet in a closet so no one knew that you were a Republican. She was on the front line of the uphill battles where most elections were decided in the Democrat primary and if there was a Republican candidate on the November ballot he or she didn't really stand much of a chance. But that didn't stop Barbara from trying to help the Republican win.
Although Barbara was an adamant Republican, she was not all that ideological. When the Republicans finally rose to dominance and a war broke out between the liberal Republicans and the conservative Republicans, I know she was disappointed. Just like she was even more disappointed when the conservatives started fighting with each other after defeating the liberals in the party.
Barbara was always a faithful donor but she was not personally a big donor. However, she was amazing at getting a whole bunch of people to make donations both large and small to the party's efforts. She was also the queen of raffle ticket sales and of staffing the headquarters.For decades Barbara personally sat at the headquarters and coordinated volunteers to be there.
As Barbara got older (she was actually near 70 when I first met her 20+ years ago), she couldn't drive at night. So, Timothy Thompson and I frequently shared the responsibility of picking her up and taking her to the 7 p.m. meeting of the Republican Central Committee on the first Monday of the month. Of course, that meant her driver also had a “date” when a small group of us went to dinner after the meeting. It was kind of inconvenient sometimes, but on this sad occasion I fondly recall those extended evenings spent with Barbara and wish I had done it more.
Barbara had many activities outside the Republican Party. She had a loving family. She did a variety of charitable work, including the Platte County Eleemosynary Society. She touched many lives through these activities but our paths mostly crossed in Republican activities (or when she would sell me tickets to a charitable event).
There was a gathering in memory of Barbara at the Coves (South) Club House on Monday. That was a particularly fitting location. It used to be the primary venue for political fundraisers for Republican candidates and the annual Platte Republican Association Christmas Party.
Although a physically small woman, Barbara was a giant in Platte County Republican politics. She was friendly to everyone who came to a Republican event. She was more about the party than any sort of “brand” of Republican. She volunteered almost daily at the Republican headquarters. She got many others to make financial contributions to the party. She found numerous volunteers to work alongside her. Barbara was the matriarch of the Platte County Republican Party and she will be deeply missed.
--James C. Thomas III
Progress on reforms at state
After years of fruitless discussion, the General Assembly appears ready to pass legislation to ensure our elected officials represent their constituents' interests while they're in Jefferson City-- not the special interests that regularly call the Capitol home. From lobbying reforms and transparency measures to gift restrictions and campaign finance changes, the list of issues being debated, and the seriousness with which they're being debated, is a vast improvement over past reform attempts. Indeed, prospects are good that the chambers will send real ethics legislation to the Governor this year, and if they do, it will be a great success for supporters of good governance.
Kudos to the legislators from both sides of the aisle who are leading this effort. I hope they are successful.
Why does Platte County R-3 even need a school board?
Why do we have a school board at Platte County R-3?
Over the past four years there have been approximately 1700 individual votes from board members with only one vote against anything proposed by district administration.
During that time the seven member board has voted about 240 times, if you figure an average of five votes per meeting. Every item voted on has passed. During this time taxpayers have paid thousands for yearly trips to Tan-Tar-A for many board members and administrators, along with training sessions and dues for the Missouri School Board Association. Other expenses would include the time our paid employees spend with our board in sessions, travel, food, training etc.
So why have a board? The obvious reason should be for checks and balances but as you can see that's not needed anymore, as R-3 administrators only propose items that are perfect and always needed, according to the R-3 School Board.
School board is an unpaid position. Why are the current members serving if they want to make a difference, as many claim, but then rubber stamp approval for all items while academics goes down and R-3 debt and spending is now some of the highest in the state? We now spend over $11,000 per student per year at R-3 with interest on the debt taking up about $1,000 of that per student.
Once again this year there will be no board election at PCR-3 as only the two incumbents are running again. The board is now currently made up of four individuals who have not had to run against anyone due to lack of interest: Gary Brown, Lori Bogart, Steve Goettling and Adam McGinness.
Board vice president Adam McGinness, who just signed up again, has now served for six years and I could not find a single “no"
vote from him, not one.
Out of these four board members I found only the one "NO" vote. (A vote regarding the purchase of a new four wheeler).
For those who have asked, I would love to have run again for the board but if I was elected due to the way board policy is written you have to go along with how the majority votes and I would be unable to voice my opinion on any items disagreed with afterward. Watching the district and keeping taxpayers informed via the "facts" website of factual, complete district information has done the students more good than casting the occasional "NO" vote. Wish I could do both but I doubt you'll see them changing this policy. LOL.
Park Hill just had five people sign up for two open board spots, R-3 has not had more than three sign up for over three years. Do you think there is a correlation since Park Hill School District has been repeatedly beating R-3 in academics during this time period?
R-3 has a first time school superintendent, are we to believe everything he has proposed is correct? After all, everything he has proposed has been passed almost unanimously?
Dr. (Mike) Reik was so new when starting this job the previous superintendent was paid for about a year to help him out. He must have done a great job as we now have only "YES" votes for everything and yet Dr. Reik can't seem to get hired at any other district, even though he has tried.
Why can’t he get hired elsewhere? What could the other board have been looking at? My guess is the same things I look at, information your school board pretends to ignore.
How is it so many parents from R-3 can fill the gym for a wrestling match or for a student archery exhibition but seem to have no interest in district finances or academics? Academic matters are how their kids will ultimately make their living. I don't think R-3
has produced any professional wrestlers, football players or archers. If parent participation is any measure these three seem to be what is most important.
Why does it not bother people that R-3 has one of the lowest performing Special Education programs in the state, the lowest ACT scores in the area?
And do taxpayers not care that the board just passed a half million dollar change order for Compass Elementary construction? A $500,000 change order that was not mentioned in the "Board Highlights" emailed to parents this past week. If not affected directly is it easiest to just stick your head in the sand? That's the way it looks.
Per the December meeting district policy now dictates that for students who may be failing a course the district can "delay" administration of the state EOC exams until they retake the course a second time. If used, how can we now measure how PCR-3 students are performing against other districts? You can't, but it could falsely increase our scores against those districts, allowing PCR-3 to tell you how much they have improved. Much like when the district dropped several high school EOC exams this past year, exams given by Park Hill and others. Not a word at the school board meeting from any board member on this test information.
So why? Why pay for the thousands of dollars for travel, dues and training for a school board that rubber stamps everything put before them? My suggestion is to keep the state happy by pretending we have a school board but never meet and then use the money we save to buy more large orange foam fingers for the sporting events. From what I have seen, they are more useful to the students.
Rural Platte County
Cruz has a problem on citizenship issue
As some of you may know, I spent hours with Lt. Col. Terrance Lakin while he was in the Detenion Barracks at Ft. Leavenworth, visiting twice a week until his release on May 13, 2011. Dr. Lakin challenged Obama's eligibility for president and was court marshaled, discharged, and sentenced to six months in the Ft. Leavenworth prison.
Some of you may have read the Constitution, specifically Article II, Section 1, paragraph 5 which I will partially quote: “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,…”
The term “natural born citizen” only appears under the qualifications for president. For representatives and senators, the Constitution only requires that the individual be a citizen by birth or naturalization, seven years for House members, nine years for a Senator.
The addition of “Citizen…at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution…” was necessary because we were a new nation and someone running for office of President may not have had BOTH parent citizens.
The term “natural born” has not been adjudicated, but the Supreme Court in the 1875 case, Minor vs. Happersett, involving a Missouri woman seeking the right to vote, in the majority opinion written by then Chief Justice Waite, attempting to understand the writers of the Constitution did give his opinion, although refusing to argue the point. Here is what he said:
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.”
So Justice Waite relied on the understanding of the law at the time of the writing of the Constitution, that a natural born citizen was the offspring of two citizen parents. Logical.
Along comes Obama. Obviously Obama is not a natural born citizen as given by Chief Justice Waite in 1875. Obama's parents were not both citizens. One was from Kenya. The problem lies with the courts and their refusal to hear any case involving Obama's eligibility on the grounds of “no standing,” whatever that means, essentially that the plaintiff wasn't affected by what he, the plaintiff, was arguing.
So, what's good for the gander is certainly good for the goose.
But Cruz, although I like him, his positions, and his disdain for Obama, has, in my opinion, a problem. He had only one parent that was a citizen and he was not born in the United States or its protectorates, that is unless Canada will admit that the US is their overseer, which I genuinely doubt. He is best suited for attorney general which I hope will happen. That would straighten out much of the Obama mess.
Incidentally, Justice Waite did not grant “Mrs. Virginia Minor, a native born, free, white citizen of the United States, and of the State of Missouri,…”, the right to vote. Women's suffrage would wait a few more decades. The 19th Amendment was ratified August 18, 1920.
It's time for change at Park Hill
The Park Hill School Board's decision to spend $28,000 on a superintendent search was an unnecessary and wasteful use of taxpayer dollars. It appears the board was never serious about finding an outside candidate since they chose an insider with little experience to fill this important district role.
Don't blame the consulting firm. I'm sure they brought in precisely the types of candidates they were asked to pursue. Criteria were set by the board before the “headhunters” even opened the application/search process.
We need only look at other successful districts to see the type of experience and expertise we should have expected in a superintendent. When Shawnee Mission needed new leadership they chose Jim Hinson, who led Independence Schools for years. This past spring, Blue Valley recruited Todd White from North Kansas City as they prepared for some administrative transitions. Center School District hired Bob Bartman, former Missouri DESE commissioner, who helped in the renaissance of their struggling schools. Even former Park Hill boards provide a
blueprint of success. Gayden Carruth, arguably one of the district's finest superintendents, had years of experience in districts in several states and was found with the help of a consulting firm in the late 1990s.
Do Park Hill school board members expect us to believe, once again, there are NO candidates, after conducting a "national search," who have 10+ years of experience actually leading a suburban school district of 10,000 students with a proven track record of success?
Instead, this board chose a candidate who has few of the requisite skills of the position:
·No direct experience/expertise with district finance
·No direct experience/expertise with bond/levy issues
·No direct experience/expertise with business or community development
·No direct experience/expertise in statistical or data analysis
·No experience leading a district or even a school
And for this, to use a baseball analogy, Park Hill is going to pay Zack Greinke money and hope a 20-win record miraculously develops from an unproven prospect? With salary and benefits, the new superintendent
will make nearly a quarter of a million dollars next year. A high-caliber district like Park Hill, which is attractive to prospective candidates for its history of excellence and generous compensation package, should have easily secured a proven “ace.”
Jeanette Cowherd is a fine person with good communication skills and a knack for looking you in the eye and making you a believer when she says things like “trust” and “best practices” and “what's best for kids.”
But while she is personable, Jeanette doesn't have a proven record as a superintendent; it's entirely different sitting in the “big chair” than sitting beside it.
Perhaps that's the point. I suspect some on the board prefer a superintendent who follows orders and doesn't exercise an independent sense of direction and purpose. Unfortunately, that's not the leadership Park Hill needs heading into the next decade.
I'd urge district patrons to remember the wasteful spending and questionable decision-making when school board elections and bond/levy issues come around.
Folks, it's time for some real change.