Platte County Landmark  

The Platte County Landmark

Covering Platte County, Missouri Weekly Since 1865

Legal Notices
The official Platte County Legal Newspaper! Platte
County Foreclosures

Between the Lines
by Ivan Foley

The Rambling Moron
by Chris Kamler

Parallax Look
by Brian Kubicki

Off The Beat
by Eric Burke

Off the Couch
by Greg Hall





Weekly publication dates are Wednesdays

***Sign up for ***
The Landmark's E*Newsletter


Featured Advertisers

Click here to send your letter...

Earlier Letters to the Editor

Keeping hunting fees lows



Deer and turkey season have begun, and a hearty good luck to all the Missouri families continuing their traditions this fall and winter.

Residents of the Show-Me state have long supported the outdoors, whether through wildlife management or by enjoying the countless lakes, rivers, forests and more that our great state has to offer. Missouri is all the better for it.

As to hunting season in particular, hats off to the state for ensuring that hunting permits and fees remain affordable. The laws of economics suggest, and real life confirms, that if government makes something expensive to do, chances are good we'll have less of it.

High fees imposed on the hunt would make continuing family traditions and managing the state's wildlife populations more difficult. The state and its residents both benefit from keeping these burdens low. Kudos to them both.

--Patrick Ishmael
Show-Me Institute



Sheriff responds on speed enforcement



This letter is in response to a letter to the editor that appeared in the Sept. 9, 2015, edition of The Landmark.

As a starting point it is important for the citizens to know that the Platte County Sheriff's Office does not approach traffic enforcement with an eye towards revenue generation. Our concern is reducing the threats posed by speeding.

Speed limits are set by a city, county or the state based on the type of area they are posted in. In this case this area is a residential area with a steep hill crest. There are children playing in the area and numerous vehicles entering or exiting from private driveways on to this roadway with an extremely short line of site. Speeds any faster than the posted speed limit do not adequately allow for a safe entrance or exit from these driveways.

In addition there is a very sharp curve where numerous vehicles have left the roadway due to excessive speed.

The reason the letter writer observed several Platte County Sheriff's Office patrol vehicles in the described area enforcing the posted speed limit was due to a number of citizen complaints that we received about speeding vehicles on that roadway and in the adjoining residential housing area.

South Crooked Road is a high motor vehicle accident location. Since September
of 2013, the sheriff's office has worked 26 accidents along Crooked Road.
On the topic of low speed limits for revenue generation: Tickets issued by the Platte County Sheriff's Office are State of Missouri traffic citations and are the same as issued by the Missouri Highway Patrol. Neither the Platte County Sheriff's Office, nor the County of Platte, retain any of the fine money. The fines are paid to the State of Missouri Fine Collection Center or the court and distributed to area schools.

--Mark S. Owen
Sheriff of Platte County


Food truck craze is 'a wonderful thing'



The food truck “craze” is a wonderful one! I hope Platte City embraces it.

I'm remembering “Free Show” nights in the summers....always Saturday, I think, on the lawn of the Platte County Courthouse. While there were no food trucks, David Fisher manned the popcorn machine (the same one my daddy ran when he was in high school), and quite often the town-ladies provided homemade ice cream....the REAL stuff that they made while you watched.

People came in from other towns and it was a festive, wonderful, only a memory.

So what does that have to do with food trucks? Well, Phoenix is a food-truck-friendly city and workers in the city have a choice of many different types of food on any day of the week.

Then, there are food-truck-“festivals” where they are lined up and you can “eat yourself around the world.” Yeah, hot dogs and hamburgs and, of course, tacos are available, but why eat the ordinary when you could try an Asian-Fusion lunch or an African Veggie Stew!

I've read that the city does license the owners and I think I read that they are “assigned” specific streets and days they'll be there.....and there's an app for that!
Platte City's backbone has always been to support small businesses, so it's really a no-brainer. More jobs, more business for Platte City.

Platte City, my hometown, will always have a place in my heart!

PS: And perhaps the Pool Hall should have their own no-alcohol and smoke-free food truck. More business, more jobs.

--Brenda Giffee Grabowski
Phoenix, Az


Low speed limits being used to generate revenue



For many years we have been subscribers to The Landmark and appreciate the coverage of community issues that affect local citizens.

We support law enforcement officials, but the excessive use of the 20 to 25 mph zones in the Parkville area by the county and the city for issuing tickets is not about safety. Instead these are used for revenue.

The intersection of Hwy. 45 and S. Crooked Road leads to a dangerous curve that should have been corrected when the Tom Watson Parkway was developed. Instead the site has long been used for collecting money. This past week, for example, five Platte County officers were all at the site at the same time issuing tickets. When driving from the southeast, drivers arrive at the intersection by coming down a steep hill and must brake continually to hold any vehicle at 25 mph.

Recently more 25 mph signs have been posted near the site as the only safety improvement. Money was just spent on a new signal light only for the use of the new Engaged Companies’ employees and guests. Many people from surrounding communities refuse to drive in the Parkville area because of its reputation as a speed trap. People definitely avoid shopping in Parkville because of this. The reality is sad both in the downtown area and nearby county roads.

--Karen Ptacek


Missouri deserves better than "right to work"



Working families' lives are on the line. If the Missouri legislature votes to overturn Governor Nixon's veto of so-called “Right to Work,” Missouri could see a $5 billion loss annually in wages and tax revenue.

The writer of a previous letter to the editor on this topic, Mr. Stark, advocates for “Right to Work,” but he fails to acknowledge the true toll it would take on Missouri's middle class families. “Right to Work” is a policy that's being pushed by out-of-state CEOs and corporations that ship jobs overseas to increase their profits. It could mean lower wages, less benefits and less workplace safety for workers.

Seven of the 10 poorest states in the country have so-called “Right to Work” laws. Missouri deserves better.

I'm proud of our area elected officials including Senator Ryan Silvey and Representatives Kevin Corlew and Galen Higdon who stood with working families against so-called “Right to Work” this year. I hope the rest of the Missouri legislature stands with working families instead of those of out-of-state CEOs and corporations.

-- Bill Campbell
Kansas City in Platte County


‘Not completely correct’ info from Platte R-3



Once again in the past two weeks the Platte County R-3 School District has sent out information on another award that our school board has won.

Information was sent out in the Treasurers mailer to parents and press releases were put out for the local newspapers. According to the release, the R-3 Board was recognized as an "Outstanding Board of Education" and 22 districts applied for this honor.

Once again, not completely correct information. I guess they did not read my letter on their last awards fiasco just a few weeks ago.

A quick email to the Missouri School Boards Association, who gives out the award and they reported to me only four districts applied for the "Governance Leadership and Accountability" award, which is what R-3 received.

Out of the 158 eligible districts for the award only four bothered to fill out the application. Of the four applicants, two awards were given, to PCR-3 and Festus school districts.

The "Teaching Learning and Assessment" award had the most recipients. These awards were given based off of your application information so I took a look at what the R-3 board turned in. You will be interested to know that according to the application, Platte County is currently "exploding in the housing industry" and "we chart low, medium, and high projection of foundational information. As the years progress, we are learning that our projections are dead-on."

That's right, they said DEAD ON.

I went back through the paperwork we were all given for the 2012 election and the community meetings in 2013. The projections for enrollment for an exploding housing boom are shown to be over by almost 600 students. Enough students to fill one new school.

So they get an award virtually no one applies for and feel the need to fudge to even do that. Maybe they think 600 off is "dead-on," which might help explain some of the math issues at our schools.

The rest of the application deals with the Baldrige "Plan-Do-Study-Act" process the students and staff are currently working with along with a multitude of other board activities. The bond issue community meetings are mentioned as the board members attend to "support the issue and superintendent as the tough questions are fielded."

Some other highlights are phrases like "to become better at being us" and of course "the use of data as a flashlight vs. a hammer.”

If you want to know what has happened to the district academically over the past five years to allow, as the application states, only "most" of the scores to improve you will want to read the entire application. It appears everything revolves around focus groups, strategic leadership, processes, data analysis and meetings.

What happened to allowing good teachers to teach and spend time in the classroom?

There is a link on if you want to read the entire application. A note of warning: you may want to put on boots as it gets pretty deep.

--Kirby Holden
Rural Platte County


Medicaid expansion is failing patients



The U.S. Supreme Court's latest ruling on Obamacare has brought the issue of American health care into sharp focus yet again, and nowhere is that focus more warranted than on our country's broken Medicaid program.

Along with exploding the cost of private health insurance, Obamacare bent the cost curve up on Medicaid. A recent report issued by the program's administrators found that the cost of Medicaid will nearly double over the next decade, to just shy of a trillion dollars per year. New enrollees were supposed to cost less to insure than those already in the program; instead, the expanded population costs far more than we were told. Rather than draw down unnecessary emergency room use, evidence suggests Obamacare's Medicaid expansion is making the ER problem worse.

Obamacare's Medicaid expansion is failing patients and taxpayers. Now is the time to demand reform and reject doubling down on this broken status quo.

--Patrick Ishmael
Director of Government
Show-Me Institute


Same-sex marriages make common sense



Please note: I am a “fiscal conservative”/Republican. This is different from a Conservative Republican, who is a somewhat different voter. So, my long-time support of same sex marriage is quite different from the usual opposing Constitutional or religious arguments.

To me, same sex marriages make common sense. First, any adult has the responsibility to make adult decisions: sharing time and expenses with a significant other is a reward by itself.

Second, two adults’ commitment to each other reduces social issues, violence and drama, and provides stability.

Third, economic benefits derived from heterosexual marriages become available to same sex married couples. This benefit translates where community businesses, taxing units, as well as charities will gain added monies from their multiple incomes.

Finally, I am watching for their divorce rate. Having gone through a divorce, same sex partners should experience the same legal/financial hassles as everyone else.

Fair is fair.

--Lee Valentine
Platte County


Missouri needs to be a right-to-work state



Right-to-work supports individual freedom and liberty. Missouri needs to be a right- to-work state. Today, there are 25 right-to-work states in the Union. Hopefully, this September, Missouri legislators will override our liberal governor's veto threat and make Missouri the 26th right-to-work state.

There are many reasons to be a right-to-work state. Twenty-two of the top 25 economically performing states in the U.S. are right-to-work states. Right-to-work states saw 10% more growth than non-right-to-work states from 2003 to 2013. During this same period, the state of Missouri ranked 42nd in overall economic performance. President Obama's home state of Illinois is ranked 46th. Who wants to be associated with that kind of record? As they say, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the societal damage inflicted on middle class workers, jobs, and our state economy by liberal politicians and union bosses who don't want to lose their control and power.

We want workers to be able to take home their full pay checks and not be forced to pay union dues and agency fees that are spent to advocate political causes for which the worker disagrees. Supporting right-to-work is pro-choice, pro-worker, pro-jobs, and pro- family. Don't let the union shadow bosses intimidate their membership. The union leadership fears right-to-work because it means they will lose their exorbitant six-digit salaries and their political influence. Union officials don't like voluntary dues, but workers and voters certainly do.

We need right-to-work to break the strangle-hold public sector unions have on politicians and the taxpayer. No workers should be forced to join a union only to see their dues laundered through the union and back into Democratic Party coffers to help elect liberal policy makers who insist on raising our local, state, and federal taxes over and over again. Let's break this unconstitutional cycle of corruption and greed.

If you're a forced union member, you can be assured that every conservative legislator in our state government wants you to take home more of your hard-earned pay check. They are on your side because right-to-work means more businesses will come to Missouri. That means more jobs, more economic growth, more revenue for our state, and more individual freedom. Right-to-work is simply the right thing to do for Missouri. Contact your Platte County state legislators--Senator Rob Schaaf, Representatives Nick Marshall, Ken Wilson, Kevin Corlew, and Galen Higdon-- and tell them to support this legislation. Let's all tell the greedy union bosses where they can go, if they oppose worker choice and worker rights.

--Mike Stark
Platte City


For a fee, schools can buy almost any award



This past week The Landmark reported that the Platte County R-3 school district had received yet another award, the Meritorious Budget Award. In May of last year the district reported in their publication "Treasures" that they had indeed applied for this award along with the Missouri Quality Award. In the May 2014 “Treasures,” we were told this about the awards: "While recognition would be wonderful, it is also unlikely for first-time applicants."

An odd comment considering the organization that oversees this Budget Award shows there were 131 applicants in the 2013/14 school year and of those at least 122 received the award.

So you send out award information to the parents pretending to be humble and just looking for input then months after you receive the award you knew you were probably going to get anyway you present it at the school board meeting to be sure it is seen in the local paper. Why wait months? About the same time this Budget Award was received the Missouri Quality Award came back with this feedback about the districts finances:

4.1a(1) - While PCSD reports its fund balance and monthly budget versus actual to its Board of Education, other key short- and long-term budgetary and financial measures are not systematically monitored and analyzed. Developing an approach to create and monitor such measures may enhance PCSD's financial stewardship and address its strategic challenge of operating with increased efficiency.

7.5a(1&2) - Many of the results for PCSD Budgetary, Financial, and Market Results have no trends or the trends are adverse.

This information was not presented to the school board as the Meritorious Budget Award was. Tough to give yourself one award saying your budget process is awesome while these comments are reported by another. Just wait awhile, no one will remember.

Here is the kicker: the Missouri Quality Award cost the taxpayers over $10,000 dollars to apply for. The Meritorious Budget Award cost about $600. The organization that provided the Budget Award, the ASBO or Association of School Business Officials International (not to be confused with MOASBO the Mo Association of Business Officials, don't worry R-3 is members of both) has several other awards you may see in the future. The "Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting,” the "Eagle Award" for visionary school management and of course the illustrious "Pinnacle Award" for outstanding practices and procedures.
There are so many awards from different organizations with prestigious sounding names that can be applied for by school administrators it is almost unbelievable.

For just a small fee any district can have an award for almost anything that includes words like Meritorious, Pinnacle, Quality and of course Excellence.

Are any area public schools getting REAL state and national awards without fees? Yes, recently those have been going to Blue Springs, Park Hill, Basehor, Kearney, Blue Valley and Lees Summit.

While looking on line I did see an award for transparency, I wonder if R-3 can buy that one?

--Kirby Holden
Rural Platte County


Be wary of installation of electric ‘smart meters’



Be very wary of any electric company or cooperative attempting to install a so-called “smart meter” on your home. Smart meters are just one more component of Sustainable Development or Smart Growth under the guise of United Nations Agenda 21. Although they will be advertised as an energy efficiency and energy saving device, in reality, their ultimate purpose serves to control our lives.

Wireless smart meters are able to conduct two-way communication. Your current digital meter can only communicate one way. Old analog meters must be physically read. Smart meters are five times more expensive than digital meters and last three times less as long. Although utility companies will tell you they are measuring your energy consumption more accurately, in 80% of the homes with smart meters, electric bills have gone up. Currently, there are 36 million homes in the United States with smart meters. By the end of 2015, the number is expected to be 65 million.

Smart meters are able to communicate with every so-called “smart” device in your home, gathering consumption rates and times of operation. They then report this information at 15 minute intervals to a Neighborhood Area Network or NAN, which then reports to the utility company. It is all done wirelessly over the internet. It is real-time surveillance of your family's lifestyle; your family is being “electrically profiled.” There are safety, health, and privacy issues with these devices.

Smart meters are a proven fire hazard. For example, in Pennsylvania, there were 27 house fires or serious overheating incidents. In Oregon, 70,000 smart meters were replaced due to fire risk. In Florida, 10,000 meters are being replaced due to fire risk. In Canada, there were eight home fires in 2014 resulting from overheating smart meters.

Smart meters emit radio frequency radiation. This radiation is similar to that emitted by a cell phone. Although more studies are being done, experts are urging caution when using wireless devices, as they reassess the health affects for certain cancers and electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Even though these studies are controversial and on-going, we need to know, conclusively, if these devices are dangerous to our children and other family members.

Finally, the most concerning issue is privacy and how information can be used to control us. I believe the data collected by your smart meter will eventually be analyzed to change the way you live and your lifestyle. Could this information be shared or sold to third parties for consumer research purposes? In the future, could the government use this data to support energy rationing? Will the utility company have the authority to tell you that your appliances are not energy efficient or that you are using too much electricity? Will they be able to control the electricity coming into your home if you don't comply with “government-established” energy efficiency standards? The potential is now here for a great loss of freedom and liberty. As long as I pay my bill, it is no person's business how much electricity I use.

Call your state legislators and tell them Missourians want a user privacy rights bill passed that allows us to opt-out of smart meter installation and not pay the electric company a penalty or monthly “extortion fee.” We, as consumers, want the option to control the collection of our personal data and how it is used. We don't want one more government-imposed program designed to control our lives because liberal elites and radical environmentalists think we use too much energy.

--Mike Stark
Platte City


Descendants of Civil War veterans say thanks



To Olin Miller, The Platte County Landmark, and the People of Platte County:
On behalf of The Sons of Confederate Veterans, I wish to extend our sincere appreciation and gratitude for the honor you extended to the descendants of the Confederate Veteran of The Civil War by recognizing the Confederate Veteran during your Memorial Day ceremony at Platte City Cemetery.

I was fortunate to be forwarded a copy of your May 27 issue of The Landmark with the photo showing the display of the Confederate Battle Flag in tribute to the fallen Confederate soldiers buried in the cemetery. As a descendant of nine Confederate Veterans myself, it is indeed gratifying to see the sacrifices made by the Confederate Veterans and their families being recognized today.

The Sons of Confederate Veterans are grateful to Olin Miller for his presentation and tribute to the memories of the fallen soldiers. We are also grateful for the support shown by the people of Platte County and their desire to preserve history and truth for our children and our posterity.

--Jim Thornton,
Major Thomas J. Key Camp #1920
Sons of Confederate Veterans


Separation of church and state not in constitution



It would be interesting to know how many people believe the phrase “separation of church and state” is in the U.S. Constitution. Unless you are a so-called low information voter, you should know the phrase is not there.

So where did it originate? The phrase was first used in a letter sent by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802. At that time, the Baptists were concerned the federal government would establish a state-sponsored denomination like there was in England. Jefferson was assuring them that no single Christian denomination would become a national denomination in our country. The operative word is Christian. There was no discussion about other religions. It was understood that America was a Christian nation.

With the passing of time, liberal Supreme Court judges used this phrase to pervert the actual meaning of the First Amendment to our Constitution. One of the first victims of this decision was the American student. In 1947, in the case Everson vs. Board of Education, the Supreme Court ruled there was a separation of church and state in the First Amendment.

Since that ruling, the fabric of our public education system began to unravel. For example, in 1962 the court ruled that voluntary prayer in school is unconstitutional. In 1980, the court ruled that it was unconstitutional for the Ten Commandments to be displayed on classroom walls. In 1985, the court ruled it unconstitutional to have an opening or closing prayer at a graduation ceremony.

Since 1962, there has been an increase in divorce, violent crime, urban poverty, unwed birth rates, and abortions. Is there a connection? Ironically, one of the only statistics that decreased since that time was our kid's SAT scores, causing the test scale to be “re-centered.”

My question is this. What changed in 1962 that negated the first many years of U.S. history which permitted prayer and the Ten Commandments in public schools? I can come to only one conclusion. Humanism replaced Christianity as the religion of our land. Man, not God, has become the object of worship. This historical revisionism has led to anti-Christian sentiment, moral relativism, social justice initiatives, affirmative action, multi-culturalism and diversity training, radical environmentalism, situation ethics, and failed big-government programs. These principles of progressive government are influencing public education to its great detriment.

People may not like what I am about to say, but it is supported by historical fact. Our founding fathers wanted government out of religion, but they expected religion to be in government and also in education. Not just any religion, but the Christian religion. Other religions could worship freely in America, but the country was to be governed and educated using Biblical principles.

I'll conclude with a quote from the Northwest Ordinance, approved in 1789 and signed by George Washington: “Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.” Our founding fathers knew that schools were the proper places to teach religion, morality, and knowledge.

Liberalism, leftist politicians, and activist judges have corrupted this truth. Do you think you could find an average high school or college student today who could explain the significance of the Northwest Ordinance? I seriously doubt it.

--Mike Stark
Platte City



Celebrating those who shape lives



We all had a teacher from our childhood who pushed and inspired us to become who we are today. Those who challenged us to work harder, dream bigger, and reach our full potential. Legendary college basketball coach John Wooden famously said that “the teaching profession contributes more to the future of our society than any other single profession.” I couldn't agree more.

Last week, we celebrated National Teacher Appreciation Week. Every year, this is a time to pay tribute to those across the country who have dedicated their lives to educating children and preparing them for successful and productive lives.

America is home to about 4 million elementary and secondary teachers, those who deserve our admiration and appreciation not just during this special week, but in every week throughout the year.

Last Friday, I introduced a resolution in the House of Representatives honoring teachers and all of those who have dedicated their lives to education. These men and women have earned the respect of their communities for their commitment to our children, and their tireless work should make all of us proud.

Our education system is constantly evolving, and our teachers, principals and staff face new and different challenges every day. Working to prepare students for successful college and professional careers, the daily strains of managing a classroom and ensuring school safety are constant.

Our children are our nation's future. This resolution is a simple way for the United States Congress to say 'thank you' for everything teachers do to make that future brighter.

--Sam Graves
Sixth District


Major school reform at half the cost



The 1993 court ruling by Cole County Circuit judge Bryon Kinder still exists today as follows: "The system of public schools in Missouri is a state system, not separate district systems."

Then why are all 522 Missouri Public School Districts still existing today as separate school district systems?

If all of the 522 school districts are abolished, there would be no more unequal school district property taxes to pay, no more school district superintendents to pay, no more school district school board elections, no more school district bonds to pay, and no more state-wide 1 cent sales tax for education to pay that funds school districts.

Each of the 2200 separate public schools and principals that are within the 522 school districts are already monitored by the Missouri DESE, the state school superintendent and the state school board.

Each public school can operate separately, like New Zealand public schools do, with an elected board of trustees of parents at that public school only.

Missouri has about 13 in a classroom and California has about 26. By eliminating about ½ of Missouri teachers and about ½ of classrooms to match California's 26 in a classroom, about ½ of education costs can be eliminated in Missouri.

Missouri alone can equally fund each of the public school student's education by about $8,000 each, per year, from 25% of the Missouri budget (constitution mandate), the lottery and gaming revenues.

California voters passed statewide bonds for school building needs. Missouri can do the same.

---Ronald E. Levy
St. Louis County
Affton, Mo.


It’s about an ideology of hate and death



Christians are being slaughtered across the Middle East. Our President refuses to use the term Islamic terrorism for reasons no one can explain and makes deals with Iran. Our country and the world are facing a diabolical enemy with plans for world conquest and subjugation. We must be able to name and define our enemy. Since I have already named the threat, let me better define it.

Not all Muslims agree with the actions of the radical terrorists. That said, if there are 1.4 billion Muslims in the world and only 10 percent of them agree with the radicals (Pew Research says it is higher), there are 140 million people on this earth who have no problem murdering “infidels” or directly supporting those who do.

I find it troubling when Islamic groups try to convince us the word jihad only means an “inner struggle.” That is not supported by the teachings of the Koran. Jihad, in the Koran, is clearly a commandment to subjugate unbelievers and convert the world to Islam. Even the word Islam means submission or surrender. You probably heard Islam referred to as the “religion of peace.” You will be surprised to find out I agree. Islam will be a religion of peace once radicals forcibly convert the entire world to Islam, make any remaining unbelievers pay a tax to exist, or simply kill those who don't believe. At that time, when the entire earth is under Islamic rule, they will say the world is now at “peace.”

There is a teaching in Islam that everyone must understand. In most faiths, it is a sin to lie. This is not true in Islam. Under the Koranic doctrine of al toqiah, a Muslim is permitted to lie to or deceive an infidel if it furthers the cause of Islam. This is why you must be suspicious of any comments made by Islamic talking heads in the news or on TV. It is also why we cannot trust any nuclear deal made with Iran.

Iran is a Shiite country. Iran is also well on its way to getting a nuclear weapon. Many Shiites believe in the messianic return of the 12th imam whom they call al-Mahdi. They also hate Israel and believe the Mahdi will not return until the Jewish nation is eliminated and the world is in chaos. Do you see the problem here? The Obama administration, apparently, does not. If Iran gets a nuclear weapon and launches it against Israel, their mortal enemy, they firmly believe it will hasten the return of the Mahdi who brings peace and establishes a world-wide Islamic caliphate. This is a very dangerous prophetic interpretation our government is not considering. Do we want to take the chance this struggle is all about politics and diplomacy and not about a twisted apocalyptic view of future events that could lead to a nuclear show-down?

Finally, we are not simply fighting a political ideology as many progressives want us to believe. We are fighting religious zealots who want to forcibly impose their way of life on the entire earth. In Islam, there is no distinction between religion and politics. They are one in the same. The radicals fully believe Koranic teachings justify their actions. From their perspective, there can be no such thing as radical Islam; there is only Islam. As the Islamist president of Turkey once said: “Islam is Islam; there are no modifiers.”

Let's hope most Muslims want to live in peace; if so, they are not our enemy. Our enemy is the spirit behind a religious belief system that teaches hatred. This struggle is not about jobs. It's not about poverty. It's not about disenfranchised youth. It's not about Guantanamo Bay or Abu Graib prisons. It's about an ideology of hate and death that wants to control the world through fanatics who think they are doing their god's bidding.

--Mike Stark
Platte City


It's time to abolish the IRS



As another April 15 passes with our tax code as confusing as it's ever been, Washington must use this opportunity to highlight our desperate need for tax simplification.

According to the IRS, Americans spend over $168 billion and 6 billion hours each year complying with the tax code. The real impact of the tax code on Missouri families and small businesses, however, is not specific to any day or season. Small businesses make tax-related decisions throughout the year that impact nearly everything they do, from planning budgets to hiring new employees.

Just this year, the Taxpayer Protection Alliance found that nearly half of all small businesses will spend $5,000 preparing federal taxes, and 27 percent will reportedly spend over $10,000.

But perhaps what's worst of all, the IRS is now responsible for enforcing Obamacare. The IRS already has too much control over our lives. Given the recent controversy over its targeting of conservative political groups, it has a dangerous lack of oversight as well. It is clear to me that we need tax simplification in this country now more than ever.

That is why I am a co-sponsor and ardent supporter of the Fair Tax Act. This tax simplification proposal would essentially eliminate the IRS and our tax code entirely, replacing it with a pro-growth national consumption tax. The Fair Tax promotes freedom and economic opportunity, ensuring that small business owners can focus on helping our economy grow, not complying with the IRS.

Small businesses and individuals alike are put at a huge disadvantage when asked to comply with a tax code that even accountants now struggle to understand. Please know that as your representative in Congress, I will continue to support the Fair Tax and push for tax simplification as a top national priority.

--Sam Graves
Sixth District


Ethics reform important for maintaining integrity



One of the House of Representatives’ priority issues for the session passed another hurdle this week when the House members passed SB 11. SB 11 is the bill that reforms ethics, specifically, the lobby gifts and revolving door.

In years past, representatives have taken their seat in office with the highest integrity and every intention to represent the people to the best of their ability which most still do. Ethics reform is important to maintaining the integrity we Missourians hold dear.

Accepting lobby gifts is not new in Jefferson City, however, some reporting is not accurate. If you had coffee and a lobbyist picks up the bill, often times a report will reflect the whole or an equal portion split between parties. This means the ethics report could show $50 when I ordered a cup of coffee that should have been $2. The legislation proposed would cap lobby gifts for legislators. This means the legislator would not be able to get more than a meal which is all most really get anyway.

The other big issue and a new trend among a handful of legislators is to take new positions before their term has ended. This practice has left state seats open and people in the state without representation.

The House of Representatives would like to solve the problem of folks who lack representation by making sure a cooling off period is in place for legislators who have the desire to become lobbyists.

When the legislation went to the House floor, the issues were debated once again. The issues against the legislation were mainly folks happy with the current laws.
A few hurdles are required for SB 11 before becoming law. The bill is in conference committee where the legislators from the House of Representatives and Senate will have to agree to changes. With four weeks of session, this should not be a difficult task. The conference committee was appointed yesterday.

In the event that the bill passes with conference committee changes, it will be placed on the governor's desk for his consideration.

--State Rep. Ken Wilson
12th District


New toys don't make better students



I write today because I have been following the Platte County R-3 efforts to extract more money from the R-3 taxpayers, even as the district's income from various sources exceeds that of most school districts.

School representatives constantly use “the children” as the reason for needing more money, but the money spent is on “stuff,” not students. The school district should think of the children's education as its only focus. Tennyson, not tennis courts, should be a priority. Sciences are an ever-growing field; labs already devoted to this should be used. Math, history, and properly spoken and written English should be an imperative. Considering that colleges and universities must offer courses in pre-algebra and remedial courses for those students wishing to obtain a higher education, shouldn't this problem be the concern of high schools?

The school districts never fail to mention that when my generation went to school, others were paying the taxes for our education. True, our grandparents and parents were funding our learning. There is however, one major difference. Our parents and grandparents were never asked to fund tennis courts, Olympic-sized pools, huge stadiums with/without Astroturf, scrolling marquee signs which cost thousands of dollars--just some examples. Not one of these items will help our students climb up from the low rankings held in global comparison to other students.

I understand that one school in the southern portion of R-3 has temporary buildings to house classrooms. I don't understand how a new building in Platte City would alleviate another school's overcrowding. Pretty buildings with all of the newest toys in them are created to stroke egos and do not produce better students. As for having state-of-the-art buildings, let me say that the high school I attended used a “re-purposed' prison; and we had a terrific education within those walls.

One avenue to fund the frills could be to ask for businesses to donate funds. Some businesses have already done so-but sadly, only because they are ready to help spend the money of those living inside this school district. This district’s campaign committee has spent thousands of dollars (which this district says it doesn't have) on campaign consultants and about $30,000 on surveys; this should make taxpayers in this district question what is going to happen to any other money the district may obtain.

--Rebecca Rooney


Teacher says R-3 is on the right path



As an educator in the Platte County R-3 school district, I would like to offer my support to Dr. Mike Reik and the Platte County R-3 School District. I have taught in this district for 12 years and this is my 19th year as an educator.

During my time in the Platte County School District, I have witnessed much change. I was hired as a 5th grade teacher at Barry Elementary school in 2003.

Twelve years ago, there were only two of us teaching 5th grade at Barry, now there are five. That is an increase from about 50 kids in 5th grade to about 125.
I remember the first year I administered the MAP test. I had no idea what I was doing and there was very little follow through regarding the results of the test. Ultimately, during that time in my career I was allowed to teach what I wanted, when I wanted. I did not worry about my test scores. The results did not influence what I taught. The MAP test was just something I had to give.

Fast forward 12 years, I don't even recognize the teacher I was during that time period. When Dr. Reik became superintendent, it was very apparent that as a district we needed to work harder to stay current with proven best practices. Suddenly, PCR-3 teachers were learning so many new things. We gained knowledge about Professional Learning Communities (PLC's), Readers Workshop, Writers Workshop, Response to Intervention (RTI), Quality Classrooms, Data Walls, Data Notebooks, Standards Based Grading and the many technological advances that had been made over the years. During this learning period, Dr. Reik was not our favorite person, he was being blamed for putting so much on our plate; but my MAP test score increased 22%.

I have taught 19 years. I have a Masters of Education. I am a Nationally Board Certified Teacher. I am currently working on my Reading Specialist degree. I am able to do this because I have the support of the current administration, and I have the desire to better myself in these ways for the betterment of my students, your children. Education is constantly changing. Staying current is key. Thanks to Dr. Reik, we are on the right path. Are we there yet? No…but when I reflect on where we started and where we are now…I am PROUD to say I am a Platte County Pirate.

I am amazed at the many patrons that believe we don't really need a new building….I now teach at Paxton, next year we will have 10 teachers teaching 5th grade. If you are unsure about our need for a new school, I would encourage you to walk through one of our buildings, especially during lunch time. There are districts in the Kansas City Metropolitan area that are land locked. Growth cannot occur in these districts because there is no land to be had. Platte County is FAR from that. The residents that believe voting down this issue will stop growth in Platte City are fooling themselves. People from all over the metro move to Platte City. Why? Because contrary to what some patrons say and believe, we have a very good school district. Growth cannot be stopped. Growth predictions are guesses. That is a fact. But it is so much more effective to be proactive as the growth comes, because we know it will come. Trends have already shown us that, and land is available.

I know I speak for many of my fellow Platte County R-3 teachers when I express my frustration with the claims about how overpaid we are. The claims state that, PCR-3 teachers continue to get raises, and if the district needs more space raises should be cut. I have read that money could be found by cutting teaching jobs to help pay for this new building. When Dr. Reik became the superintendent, he walked into an existing salary scale that he did not create.

Three years during his administrative term, the district had a salary freeze. Teachers did not advance for years of service. However, the district did still honor educational raises. Just last year, the salary scale was adjusted. Across the board, teachers will be receiving an annual 1.5% raise. If PCR-3 teachers decide to spend our own money and pursue graduate level steps, we have the opportunity to move another 1.5% for every eight graduate level hours we earn. Last year, Dr. Reik wanted to grant teachers one year back from the years we were frozen on the scale. The board agreed that this would be a good faith opportunity to show the PCR-3 teachers that the administration wants to gain and retain the best quality teachers. On average we received a little over a 3% raise. The inflated raise percentage shown to the general public is inflated because we are fortunate to have teachers that are trying to better themselves; teachers that are going after advanced degrees.

Boundary lines seem to be another concern with patrons. I have heard patrons say that they want their child to be able to go to a school with all of their friends. They do not want the district broke in half, because then half of their friends would be going to one school and the other half would be at the other school. Just because all the students are currently housed in the same building, does not mean they actually see each other. We have nine sections of fifth grade this year. That means the kids have a one in nine shot of being with their friends. We have two teams. Four classes are on one team and five are on the other. The kids have a 50/50 shot of being on the same team as their neighborhood best friend. I seldom even see the students on the other team. We don't have lunch together, or recess together. We can't even go on field trips together because there are so many of us. We have a little over 200 students in Paxton's 5th grade.

I agree that the majority of the growth is happening in the south side of the district. However, the south side of the district is not large enough yet to constitute building a second high school; therefore all of those students will still be headed to Platte City in ninth grade. Building a new K-5 building will allow the high school to absorb Paxton. This has the potential to benefit so many.

Please show that you too are proud to be a Platte County Pirate and vote YES on April 7th. We need you…the kids need you…your community needs you.

--Stephanie Riechers
5th Grade Teacher,
Paxton Elementary School


Board member says the future is now



“Kids First” is more than a campaign slogan for the upcoming ballot issue facing the voters of the Platte County R-3 School District levy issue on April 7. While this slogan has been challenged by the group against the ballot issue, “Kids First” has always been the primary focus in our district. Obviously kids are the reason our districts exists and decisions are based on what is best for kids. If it is good for kids, we must find a way to do it. Sadly, we are being challenged by a negative campaign led by people who appear to have no experience in, nor knowledge of, operating a school district.

The students of our district, present and future, are in need of adequate facilities. Presently, some teachers do not have a classroom but must travel from room to room to hold their classes, thus causing teachers to be displaced for those periods. Our elementary class sizes are approaching capacity with many already at capacity. This cannot improve without more space. Trailers are currently in use at our schools to create more classrooms. As a former principal who in some years had students attending classes in trailers, I was constantly aware that these were not a good learning environment for students and created unique safety concerns. Traveling time between the main building and trailer results in a loss of instructional time. Placing students in a situation where security is compromised is unsafe but unavoidable when trailers must be used. Trailers are expensive to lease and set up, including the cost of decking, skirting, and connecting to the internet, phones and security systems. Thousands of dollars had to be spent to provide classroom space using trailers as a result of the defeat of the 2012 levy proposal. More trailers will definitely be in our immediate future if we are unable to provide building space through the passage of this levy. This is not a possibility but a simple fact.

The opposition has been critical of financial decisions made by the administration and board over the years. Our board has a legacy of being financially responsible. I can tell you that great consideration is employed when decisions are being made, and yes, we do put “Kids First” in all decision-making. Our vision, mission and values are engrained in our actions and thoughtful consideration is given to every issue. If it is good for kids we must find a way to do it.

The opponents of this levy began as a group who opposes tax increases. More recently, the focus appears to be have moved away from tax increase concerns. While the “tax” word is used occasionally, the greater emphasis is on utilizing incorrect or manipulated data to cast doubt on the integrity of those charged with running the district, thus taking attention away from the needs of our students and staff. Discrediting district officials seems to be at the forefront of their efforts. Please do not allow this to detract from the important task at hand.

Passage of the proposal will result in more classroom space, shorter bus rides, and fewer transitions. The new elementary school, the addition to Pathfinder Elementary, and the repurposing of Paxton Elementary will be ready for occupancy in the fall of 2016 if the levy passes. Classroom additions at Pathfinder Elementary will allow some classes from Barry to move to Pathfinder, alleviating some of the crowded conditions at Barry School. Crowded conditions at the high school will be alleviated with the repurposing of Paxton Elementary for high school use. Currently students on the elementary campuses at Platte City have three transitions: Rising Star (kindergarten) to Siegrist (grades 1-3) and to Paxton (grades 4-5). With the new configuration, students will be in the same building from kindergarten through grade five. This will eliminate the need for students to have to become familiar with new surroundings, special area teachers, cafeteria procedures, office personnel, etc. three times during their elementary career. Bus loading will occur at one building each for elementary schools, rather than at three buildings thus, saving time in the length of the bus rides. Kindergarten students will no longer have to change buses on the main campus, a necessity that has been concerning to me from a safety standpoint for years. Are these improvements all good for the kids? Certainly. Everyone benefits.

As a board of education member, a grandparent of children in this district, a proud graduate of Platte County R-3 and a patron of this district I seek your support for the levy issue. Classroom space is needed now, and the need will increase significantly as our enrollment inevitably grows. We must act to create adequate space for the students we have enrolled today and to build what is needed for future growth. We have undeniable immediate needs. The future is now and we must put “Kids First” by voting yes on April 7.

--Sharon Sherwood
Platte County R-3
Board of Education


Hallways at the high school overcrowded



Voters in the Platte County R-3 School District will be asked to consider a 43-cent levy issue on April 7. The board of education approved an election for a tax levy question to be placed on the ballot at the Dec. 18 meeting. This levy could potentially be extremely beneficial for staff and students throughout the district.
Since the last district bond issue was passed in 2008, district enrollment has increased by more than 900 students. The current district enrollment is 3,888 students. The district's estimated enrollment for the 2017-2018 school year will be 4,230 students. Currently five of the school district's buildings are over capacity, including Barry School, Pathfinder Elementary and the high school with a significant amount of overcrowding.

According to the school district's website, the question will appear on the ballot as follows: Shall the Board of Education of the Platte County R-3 School District be authorized to increase the operating tax levy of the district by $0.43 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation for a period of 20 years for the purpose of constructing, renovating, improving, furnishing and equipping school facilities, including; a new elementary school to be located in Platte City on property the district currently owns, additional classrooms and a multipurpose room addition to Pathfinder Elementary School, and renovations necessary to convert Paxton School to serve Platte County High School students? If the levy is approved, the adjusted operating tax levy of the district is estimated to be $3.9766 per one hundred dollars of assessed valuation.”

A yes vote for the levy would provide $29 million in funds for an expansion project. The project's main focus is on eliminating capacity issues through new facility construction, expansion, current facility repurposing and facility closure. With the rapid increase of the student population within the district, the levy would provide a more spacious environment for students; a spacious environment that is much needed.

There are three parts to the expansion project: repurpose for Paxton Elementary to become a part of the high school, build a new K-5 elementary school and expand Pathfinder Elementary. Adding Paxton to the high school would accommodate the continuous growth of the student body. Building a new K-5 school allows for the closure of the 60-year-old Rising Star, currently serving as a kindergarten, and the repurposing of Paxton. The expansion of Pathfinder would add 14 classrooms, a multipurpose room and increase the student capacity by 280 students, relieving Barry School from overcrowding.

Hallways in the high school are overcrowded with students. It is difficult to make it from the north end of the school to the south within the six minute passing period. Students are forced to push and shove themselves through the hallways due to the overcrowding. Adding Paxton to the high school would spread out classrooms, along with students, allowing more room during passing periods.

Another reason to consider the levy is because of the other benefits Paxton provides. The elementary school is already supplied with lockers, a gymnasium and a lunch room. This would allow students to have their own lockers. The extra lunch room would spread out students and reduce the wait for food. The gymnasium at Paxton would allow for more physical education classes for high school students.

If the levy does not pass, schools throughout the district will become overcrowded and fail to accommodate the entire student population. Without this levy, more trailers will soon have to be placed due to overflowing classrooms. Though trailers can provide an ease to overcrowding at a relatively low cost, there are many disadvantages to these classrooms. The trailers at the high school cannot fit as many students as the normal classroom can. Desks have been cramped together to try to allow more students into the trailer, which has only added on to the overcrowding. Also, there are no bathroom units in or by the trailers, forcing students to walk back inside the school. This can take up to 10 minutes of class time, just to go to the bathroom. The additional classrooms have reduced some overcrowding, however they are not a permanent solution.

Another reason to pass this levy is because of the current condition of Rising Star. The 60-year-old school is currently in poor shape. It would take around $500,000 to repair damaged roofs and pipes throughout the school. This is not a proper learning environment for the kindergarten students. Not passing the levy would ultimately take money from the district on a project that is not worth it. Tearing down Rising Star is a better option for our students. There is no point to put this sum of money into a lost cause. Paying the money solely on the kindergarten is like putting a new engine in a 20-year-old car. The time has come the close the school and build another.

Raising taxes on the property owners in the district is a controversial topic. For instance, for a homeowner of a $100,000 house would have an $82 tax increase for the whole year. A house that has a value of $300,000 would end up with a $246 tax increase. This is a significant tax increase, however there are positives to the levy. The amount of the levy increase being sought is 17 cents lower than the 60 cent increase sought in 2012. This levy focuses completely on the over capacity of the district, unlike the last levy question which proposed improved tennis courts and maintenance. Also, the district has provided a sunset provision, which means the tax will expire in 20 years.

If the voters in the district pass this levy, the building projects are planned to be finished by the start of the 2016-2017 school year.

--Brooke Zenner
Abagale Godfrey


There are issues of trust and accountability at R-3



Taxes rarely if ever go down and taxes never go away. Does a sunset clause mean there will be no additional tax increases until it has expired? No, a sunset clause does not guarantee that. New tax increases can be proposed before the expiration. A sunset clause is a tactic to make you think there is an eventual end to the over-taxation.

The current school tax levy proposal Platte County R-3 has a 20-year sunset clause. True, at the end of 20 years that tax will stop, but only a fool would believe it will not be replaced by a new tax. Remember, taxes never go away and you can bet they will go up unless you do something to stop it.

Here is another tax calculation to consider. If you permit a local tax increase, do you realize you pay more than once? First, your real estate and property taxes go up. Second, any business that suffers a tax increase passes it on to the consumer. You are going to pay more for their products and services. That is how a business usually absorbs a tax increase. The only other options are reducing employee compensation or layoffs. You, the taxpayer, end up paying for the increase over and over again.

America does not have free public education. You pay for public education through taxation over your entire lifetime, as long as you own real estate and personal property. For this reason, the tax paying public must be very sure that local administrators and school boards are fully accountable to the voters. I am disturbed when companies and organizations make donations to support a school tax levy question in hopes of benefitting directly from the passage of the ballot initiative. Follow the money. This may not be illegal, but in my opinion, it is a conflict of interest. Some will argue it's ethical because it's legal, but in government parlance it's actually a “pay to play” arrangement. This scenario is again playing out in our school district as we debate the new tax increase.

Is there a reason the proposed tax levy is less than it was in 2012? My first thought is the school district was disingenuous with us the last time around. The district was obviously asking for more money than they really needed. As a result, can we fully trust what they are saying now?

They say the new tax revenue of $29 million will only pay for a new building, classrooms, and other renovations. How do they plan to fund the new building's operating costs over time? Could it be they intend to propose another tax increase in the near future to cover those costs? Simple logic would tell you the answer is probably yes. If they get a new building, who would want to deny them the money to maintain it?

None of us are against public education. Many of our contemporary educators, judges, and politicians forget the primary reason a system of public education was established by the first American settlers in 1642. It was to prevent illiteracy and give the common man the ability to read the Bible and apply its teachings to civil governance. Unfortunately, as a nation, we have drifted a long way from those founding precepts. It's time to get back to the basics of education.

For some, public education is big business, people profit from it, and school boards rarely if ever say no to the administration. Schools get very comfortable budgeting for anything they want, like pay raises, but they are not willing to budget for what they really need. For those things, it becomes easier to raise your taxes.

Yes, our taxes are high, but the real issue is how our past tax dollars have been prioritized and spent.

In the end, the district's reasons for raising our taxes are clouded by issues of trust and accountability.

--Mike Stark
Platte City


Outside groups donating to tax increase effort



Attached for your verification you will find the latest list of donations made to "Quality Platte County R-3 School," also known as "Kids First" on your flyers.
$25,000 dollars has been donated for the fight to raise our taxes by out-of-town businesses and vendors of the district, along with the $7,500 from a construction company in Kansas--this is who is helping to fund the mailers and phone calls you have been getting.

Add Hollis and Miller out of Overland Park, Kan. to the list with a $5,000 donation. This is the company hired to do the plans for the new schools and paid over $800,000 by our district before we have even voted on it.

The Missouri National Education Association out of Jefferson City has now kicked in $4,000 to see that your taxes go up and the remaining donations come from other suppliers and companies from places like Lenexa, Kan. and Chesterfield, Mo. Only three donations of the $36,000 "Kids First" have received so far have come from private citizens not financially associated with the district.
This is about five times the amount of money spent in 2012 by the "Quality R-III schools" PAC. Local residents who will put their name out in support of the levy increase but only three so far willing to support it with their own money?

Why is so much money needed for "Kids First" vague, frightening mailers telling you your "children's education may be compromised" when nothing could be further from the truth?

Look at the information given to you so far. A flashy video paid for by the district, professional mailers and signs at the entrance to all of our schools. Now look at all of that information and see if you can find exactly what the expense is for each building and project the district wants? You wont find it even though the company above has been paid over $800,000 to produce those details. Nothing I have received says any more than here is the amount of money we need and here is what we want to do with it, "trust us". Think I am wrong, just read the ballot language. It takes a lot of money to put Lipstick on a Pig.... apparently $36,000.

Look at where the new school is located, look around at that area and decide for yourself how the boundary lines be placed. Why again are we not using PCMS for the growth?

Do you think the district will be able to come up with the other $185,000 needed for new tennis courts to match the $40,000 from the parks department when this is all over? Of course they will and you wont be voting on it because it is something they want, then you can pay more for the things that are needed just as has happened the past three years.

I would have voted yes next week for a small bond issue to take care of the South Campus just as I voted yes for my first 16 years in Platte County, but I will not be forced into voting for an unneeded $30 million plus package when there are other options for possible growth which would cost much less and accomplish the same thing. Those options are on the growth page of I have yet to see any of these options looked at by our school board.
Count our house as a NO vote.

--Kirby and Paula Holden
20-year Platte County Residents
Parents of two proud Pirates


Feedback report not correlated to letter grade



I feel compelled to write this week following advertisements in both weekly publications. Generally, I have chosen to remain quiet on most of the coverage provided by Mr. Holden because he has shown no desire to work with the school district, and his coverage only serves as documentation of what has generally been deeply flawed. However, the advertisement on the Excellence in Missouri site visit last week may be the most negligent. This visit was part of the Missouri Quality Award (MQA) Program which is modeled after the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award and offers a thorough and objective educational process through which an organization can learn and improve. Simply put, the percentage bands used in the feedback report should not be correlated to (A-F) letter grades.

To illustrate this further, most winners of the Missouri Quality Award such as Northwest Missouri State University, University of Missouri Healthcare, St. Lukes Health System, Heartland Health, and Park Hill School District would have also received a grade of "F" by Mr. Holden's flawed analysis. The percentages are relative to what is widely accepted as high standards of organizational quality. The feedback report is intended to be critical within the context of National Quality for Performance Excellence Standards. This critical feedback provides organizations with valuable information to utilize for continuous improvement. We care very little about the actual award, but care very much about continuous improvement. If Mr. Holden would have contacted us to objectively engage in a discussion on this matter we would have gladly accepted.

In about a week, taxpayers of this district will cast their votes on the R-3 levy proposal. The outcome will define our approach to dealing with overcrowding and continued growth. The projects proposed solve current overcrowding challenges and invests in our children with affordable solutions. Countless alternatives have been considered and all have fallen short on acknowledging and addressing reality. So called "cheaper solutions" will only cost you more in the long run and fail to provide quality, age-appropriate facilities with a sustainable solution.

Much has been said in the past four years regarding the management of growth, and much will be said over the coming week. We expect you to cautiously weigh the options and consider who really is accountable to tell you the truth. The district has a tested record of providing taxpayers with strong performance at a low cost and this proposal will not change that. Join me and countless others in voting YES on April 7 and taking care of the children of this community.

--Dr. Michael Reik
Platte County R-3 School
School District Superintendent


This time he supports the tax increase



I want to address the tax levy, which has been placed on the current ballot to raise funds for our school district.

Those who know me - understand I am not generally in favor of raising taxes under most circumstances. In fact, I did not support the levy when it was placed on the ballot in the spring of 2012. That being stated, I am now in support of this current tax levy. My position regarding this tax increase has changed for several reasons

·I have become more acquainted with Dr. Reik over the past few years and have a greater level of confidence in his ability to discern the current and future needs of our school district and to manage them in a prudent manner.

·I appreciate the fact that Dr. Reik and the board have decided to ask for less money and to place a 20-year limit on the term of this increase. It is more realistic to understand the needs for the foreseeable future than to propose a permanent increase.

·They have been more specific as to the use of our tax dollars.

·This is not going to be an operating loan but used for capital improvements.

·I have purposed to become more familiar with the needs of our school district since rejecting the last proposal and agree that we need to expand, improve and grow our facilities.

·Our needs continue to increase and we should be better equipped to serve the growing number of students coming into the district.

·While our overall economic conditions and federal governmental spending are of concern to me – we certainly have a better national economy than in the spring of 2012. I am also hopeful that our next Presidential election will produce better leadership than we have in place, at this time.

For those of you who do not know me: I have lived in Platte City for approximately 37 years. My wife Carey and I, both alumni of Platte County school district, have three sons – two of which are still students at PCHS and one who is a graduate. I am a businessperson and minister of the Lord Jesus. We have three generations of family living in Platte City.

I would humbly ask you to vote in this upcoming election and to please consider supporting the tax levy increase. I appreciate your consideration on this matter.

--Brady Rodgers
Platte City


Very Important Pooch



Recently Parkville lost a VIP (Very Important Pooch). Carley, better known to many as the red dog, died March 19 and we know she would have wanted to thank so many people for her 10+ years of life.

Carley had a rough start in life living under a trailer on Lewis Street in the Parkville Commons. Alone and wary of people, she quietly survived the weather and traffic. She would have wanted to thank those who first tired to catch her, and when that failed, watched over her, fed her, watered her and worried about her. As she journeyed from the Commons to English Landing Park and back she had protectors with water and food in hand. They were people at the school bus barn, Price Chopper and Roxanne's and also Deb and Lynda, and Butch, Terry and Peto with the Parkville Park Department and others we were not aware of. These people kept Carley alive.

When Carley was captured she was taken to the Friends of Parkville Animal Shelter. Probably for the first time in her life Carley had shelter. She also had found a group of people who refused to give up on this shy, scared dog. Working out of a small kennel by the railroad tracks in English Landing Park they began the time-consuming work of socializing Carley. It was always small steps like sitting by her kennel, touching her, training her to leash walk, talking to her, and giving her a routine. Once she was ready they fostered her and then one day they allowed us to adopt her. Carley would have wanted to thank Leslie, Robyn, Lincoln, Becky, Cindy, Amber, Adam and the many other volunteers for all the hours they spent gaining her trust and in turn teaching Carley to trust people. These people saw to it that Carley would always have a home.

Everywhere Carley went she gained friends and many became our friends. Everyone could not help but admire this beautiful, shy, intelligent, gentle soul. She would have wanted to thank Paula, Kathy, Sherry, Mike, Jim, Rebecca, Julia, Linda, and all those other walkers who greeted her with a smile, watched her while we were away and often had a treat in hand. These people became part of her family.

Finally, we would like to thank Carley. She came into our lives expecting nothing (expect maybe a belly rub in the latter years of her life) and gave us everything she had to give. Carley was a survivor and she showed us the best in people and this great community we live in. One of Carley's friends said she left a big paw print on the hearts of many. Indeed she did.

--Ann and Marc Siebert


State tax cuts needed



The Missouri Legislature has reached the midpoint of its legislative session, and overall, the chambers are on the right track in several key policy areas. Among other things, Obamacare's Medicaid expansion appears to be off the table for 2015, and legislators are pursuing Medicaid eligibility reforms to ensure limited state dollars make it to the beneficiaries who need them most.

We haven't seen—at least, not yet—progress on income tax relief. The legislature passed a very modest tax cut last year that won't come into full effect for about a decade, but taxpayers need more than a half-percent cut from their tax bills over 10 years.

Fortunately, there's still time for legislators to make a move and get tax cuts over the finish line. The clock is ticking.

--Patrick Ishmael
Director of Government Accountability
Show-Me Institute


R-3's ballot language is a blank check



I live in the Park Hill district and don't have a vote on the Platte County R-3 tax levy matter, but these issues have a way of impacting areas outside the immediate school district. Making projections is easy. Managing a growing cash flow is easy; just ask the Platte County parks board. Managing cash stressed situations is entirely different.

We moved to Parkville in 1994 when Parkville debt was $2 million and Platte County debt was $5 million. After rising to peak levels of $19 million and $85 million, the most recent published numbers are $17 million and $62 million, respectively.

In 2004, Parkville voters approved a levy increase to address numerous board of aldermen requested needs, including a $1 million city hall renovation. As it turned out, the board either intentionally misled or lied to voters. The board proceeded to borrow $3 million more than was approved and built a new city hall, an issue never discussed with voters. The funding hangover from that unauthorized debt, which goes through 2026, left certain of the 2004 needs unfulfilled and many new needs begging to other sources.

I vividly recall the discussions about all of the wonderful things that would be done with the levy funds. The board was gushing and had tingles running up their legs. Undisclosed to voters was that the building renovation number was a wild guess.

In 2006 and 2007, Parkville issued two NID bonds based on development projections. To date, there is next to no development in the NID areas and interest continues to accumulate on the principal. The most recent board package still attempts to disguise this debt as contingent, even though the city is primarily liable. This debt funding hangover hasn't even started.

In 2005, Platte County purchased Shiloh Springs Golf Course. Who knows what projections were used to justify that action. Anyone who reads this newspaper knows that Shiloh has cost the county millions.

In 2014, Platte County proposed building a $20 million jail facility based on jail population increases that were eventually shown to be temporary and area population growth numbers that were proven to be highly inaccurate. In the end, the proposal was unanimously rejected by the Jail Committee.

The R-3 levy letters and articles leave me with questions about the basis for R-3's population projections and whether R-3 has firm cost estimates. The ballot language, in my view, is the most glaring concern. It is general in nature, open to interpretation and non-binding. It is in essence a blank check. There is nothing in the ballot language restricting the new levy funds to specific expenditures and within specific spending constraints. I see a future R-3 board saying, “We had some unplanned expenses and had to direct the monies differently than originally planned.” Further, “furnishing and equipping school facilities” could just as well mean buying everyone iPads.

R-3 voters should also keep in mind that certain promoters of the levy increase are seeking to make a profit on the backs of Platte County. The school board's and promoters' gushing over a new school building, as evidenced by last week's page A-5 article, reminds me of the 2004 Parkville board.

Perhaps the most striking statement so far has come from Superintendent Mike Reik: "Debt per student is irrelevant."

I don't know Mr. Reik, but he couldn't be more wrong. Debt levels always matter. Refer back to Parkville, whose board is constantly begging elsewhere for funds, and Platte County, where law enforcement needs and staff pay raises go begging to park trails. Mr. Reik's mindset is one I would equate with establishment educators who seem to have only one solution to challenges: increase taxes.

Just as a new city hall has done nothing for the quality of life in Parkville or Parkville government, I doubt that a new school building will change R-3's education outcomes. Education outcomes are a function of parents, teachers, effort and discipline and not simply the physical plant.

From another perspective, my mother, who turns 97 in May, began her rural school teaching career in 1935 after completing one year of college. Such were Depression times. During those early years, she recalls having to carry coals for fire, having water brought to the school daily as there was no running water, and riding a horse through the fields when snow blocked the roads. In her words, "I never really minded the cold schoolroom in the mornings, because by the time I carried in a day's supply of coal, the banked coals left overnight were beginning to warm the schoolhouse." My mother's generation survived the Depression and won WWII. Never have I heard my mother complain about having to sacrifice or that she didn't have what someone else did.
Say what you will, but there was no school debt, no outside influence, and 100% of the facilities were dedicated to learning. Administration was discussed at a kitchen table.

Today's educators and school boards might be better off with a little more perspective and little less money. In the long run, they might produce better quality students and future parents.

--Gordon Cook


No one knows like the board, administrators



If you're registered to vote in the Platte County R-3 school district, you've probably heard discussions on both sides about the PCR3 tax levy issue on the April 7th ballot.

Some basic facts are irrefutable: 1) If this 43¢ per $100 of assessed valuation tax levy is approved PCR3 will maintain the fourth from the lowest tax rate among metropolitan districts; 2) District enrollment will increase. Predictions differ about how much and when, but it will increase; 3) According to students, parents, staff and visitors, Platte County High School, Barry, and Pathfinder schools are currently over-crowded, many say significantly; 4) Over half a million dollars will have to be spent to continue to operate Rising Star (a 60+ year old building) beyond the next few years if the building needs to continue to house students; and 5) The cost of construction will be greater in the future than it is now and when hiring construction companies, larger projects provide greater value than smaller projects. Sum it up to say the students are not going away, the buildings are not repairing or expanding on their own, and the cost is not decreasing.

We elected seven people to run the district because a majority of the patrons trust them to make the best decisions. These people are your friends and neighbors, they live in the community, their children and grandchildren attend the schools and they do not receive any compensation for their service. This board employs administrators who have the qualifications and prior experience to lead and manage. No one knows the details of the district like the board and administration. No data compiled from the internet or interpreted by someone who is not on the board and cannot know all the facts can adequately represent the complete picture that the administration and board see daily concerning school finance and education policy.

We will not be swayed by political activists who make it their job to create dissent to achieve their alarmist, extremist agenda. This is not a Republican or Democrat, conservative or liberal decision. This is a personal, local decision about what is best for our community. We support our board and administration and intend to vote yes for the PCR3 tax levy on April 7 and hope you do, too.

--Mary and Bob Temperelli
Kansas City

Don't let the Kids First slogan mislead you



Kids First – a catchy phrase everyone can get behind, right? Wrong! Thank you to Taxpayer Protection PAC for disclosing the rest of the story. We want to put kids first and advocate for the wise use of our already high tax dollars. Burdening our families with unnecessary tax increases does not put the kids first.

Our kids' parents and grandparents already provide millions of dollars for education. Let's hold the schools accountable to truly put the kids first and use those dollars for their real benefit. The schools have adequate funding. How are they using that funding? Do they really require ever increasing taxes? Why can't they budget adequately and prioritize their spending?

Facts are supposed to be complete and truthful statements; facts should make us better-informed voters. Facts should not be half-truths or cherry picked for ad campaigns designed to influence parents at meetings held to promote the tax increase. This tactic promotes fear that somehow our children are not being put “first.” Should we rely only on facts from the persons who are clamoring for more and more of our tax dollars?

Whether you own real estate in this district or rent, current taxes and tax increases on residential and business properties affect your pocketbook and ability to budget adequately for your family's needs. High taxes hinder your ability to personally budget for important family commitments like our children and grandchildren's college education. Would you not prefer to retain the freedom to decide how your hard earned money is allocated in ways that put your children first?

The current ad campaign and comments parroted from promotional meetings and advocates for the tax levy increase seek to impress upon us how “little” this increase is. They claim that those of us opposed to the increase selfishly want to deny our children. Nonsense! Using the tax dollars we already give them, we want our school administrators to truly put our kids first. These are difficult times for most. It is a shame to ask taxpayers for more dollars from us when nothing, in the last three years, has been budgeted from what is already collected for facilities upgrades.

It is very disheartening that our school board and administrators have not put our kids first by budgeting first for enhancing their education curriculum and for growth. Instead, they have set money aside for other things like salary increases and an Olympic-sized pool. According to the Platte County R-3 School Superintendent, the pay raise was “long overdue” and was made possible by years of conservative budgeting (July 23, 2014, The Landmark). So, the district can budget for annual salary increases and other projected expenses, but they apparently can't budget for growth? Meanwhile, they have almost $8 million sitting in the bank. Right now thousands of dollars are being spent on surveys and campaign material that have nothing to do with a better education for our children.

Do not allow a Kids First campaign slogan mislead you, as you analyze information that will influence your vote for or against a tax increase this April 7. Voting NO again!

--Edie Prost
Platte City

R-3 school has not been living within its means



It is astonishing that only one business with elected officials in Platte City is working and living within its income, the city.

The federally-mandated radio program is still hanging by the same token. Look at all the new vans and pickup trucks the sheriff’s department has.

Now the Platte County R-3 school system is so far in debt and asking for more money, all while they are spending our money on foolish things that are not necessary.

It would be nice if we as individuals could walk up and say “I need more money because I forgot to live within my means.”

--Lee Roy Van Lew
Platte City


Obama is community organizaing, Iranian style



Our current president sent a YouTube video aimed at the younger generation in Iran. In it he is trying more fear mongering to arouse their attention and support his initiative for allowing Iran to go nuclear, “best opportunity in decades” and “This moment may not come again soon”. Well, I hope it doesn't. Senator Blunt says about this agreement, “No deal is better than this deal”. Iran says its only purpose is peaceful and economical generation of power. “We just want to produce electricity.” Really? Does anyone outside of this administration believe this? Iran's supreme leader is on record saying that Israel must be destroyed and our own Senate has begun an investigation into taxpayer money being used, with this administration's knowledge, to influence the elections in Israel because Netanyahu is adamantly opposed to ANY deal with Iran that would allow enrichment of uranium. A rogue, terrorist nation wanting to enrich uranium, hmmm…why would they want to do that?

Our State Department, led by Kerry, has taken Iran and Hezbollah off the list of terrorist nations. Does that make it so? Of course not. Iran and Hezbollah both want Israel wiped off the map. Yet this administration tries to affect the ouster of Prime Minister Netanyahu because he wants to defend his country and its borders. Strange, wouldn't it be nice to see our own president want to defend our country and secure our borders?

Instead, our president makes a You Tube video and sends it to Iran hoping it will go viral. I suppose this is community organizing Iranian style. This president sent it in celebration of Nowruz. The spelling is correct. Never heard of it? Me either. But this president and his wife celebrated it in the White House. What is it? I'm glad you asked. It is the Iranian or Persian New Year. Why would we celebrate that in the OUR HOUSE? Don't know, it's beyond me. Do they celebrate the 4th of July in Tehran?

And as I write this, ISIS has struck in Yemen killing 137 and injuring 345 others. Are there more important issues demanding this president's attention besides allowing Iran to develop nuclear arsenals with the blessing of the USA? For my part, I believe so.

--Jim DeJarnatt


The political climate at Houston Lake



Small town rotten politics has arrived in Houston Lake just in time for the April 7 mayoral election.
After mayoral challenger Chuck Stone's campaign signs have been up for over a month without being disturbed, on the evening of Thursday, March 19 Mayor Mike Hallauer put his signs up in the yards of his supporters as they requested. Between the hours of 11:30 p.m. Thursday and 6 a.m. Friday morning a majority of his campaign signs were stolen. The stealing of election signs is a punishable offense in the state of Missouri with not more than one year imprisonment and a $2,500 fine.

As the state statute on Conduct of Elections, Section 115.637.1 states: "Stealing or willfully defacing, mutilating, or destroying any campaign yard sign on private property" is an election offense. This desperate and infantile act has been reported to the Platte County Sheriff and the Platte County Election Commission.

Is this unethical act the kind of governing or politics that awaits Houston Lake's future? One side’s camp of supporters believes this is how the election process works and should be conducted. We the residents and homeowners of Houston Lake deserve better. Send a message to these election thieves that skulk in the dark of night that their time is over. Vote on April 7 and let them know loud and clear.

--Dan Coronado
Houston Lake

First Easter Sunday for The Calling



This will be the first time for The Calling Community Church to celebrate the death and resurrection of Jesus, on Easter Sunday as a body of Christ. Our church may be new, but the Christian message of Easter is ancient. The Apostle Paul sums it up for us in 1 Corinthians 15:3-6:

3 For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, 4 that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, 5 and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. 6 After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep.

He goes on to say that if Christ is not raised, our faith is worthless. If we only have hope in Christ in this life, we should be pitied beyond all mankind. There is more to this life than just this life. Aren't you excited about that? But, Christ has indeed been raised from the dead and is the first fruit of those who have fallen asleep. Which brings me to my favorite passage of scripture to share at a graveside service. It is Paul writing again to a different church. He is talking to them about those in their midst that have fallen asleep, meaning they have died. 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18

13 Brothers and sisters, we do not want you to be uninformed about those who sleep in death, so that you do not grieve like the rest of mankind, who have no hope. 14 For we believe that Jesus died and rose again, and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him. 15 According to the Lord's word, we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left until the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep. 16 For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever. 18 Therefore encourage one another with these words.

We can be encouraged today because of the resurrection of Jesus, we know that He is still alive. And not only is He still alive, but He is coming back one of these days to take with Him all who have put their hope in His death and resurrection.

Maybe this news is discouraging to you today because your hope is not in Jesus. Well, the good news is you don't have to wait until Easter Sunday to do that in church. You can call on the name of Jesus right now. The Bible says in Romans 10:9-10 that if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Jesus from the dead, you will be saved. A prayer that simple can rescue you from death and give you eternal life if you believe it. Jesus said, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die; 26 and whoever lives by believing in me will never die. Do you believe this?”

Do you believe this? I hope that you do...I hope that you will. Answering that question correctly makes all the difference in this life and the life to come.

If you have just confessed with your mouth and believed in your heart I would like to know. Contact me @

If you have never been baptized by going under the water, I would encourage you to let me know that as well. We will be having a special baptism service at our church on Sunday, April 12th.

If you have a church home already, go there this Sunday and tell your pastor about this decision you have made to follow Jesus. If you don't have a church that you are a part of, come visit us soon and often.

I pray that you have been encouraged by my words. Actually they aren't mine, they belong to God. They are from His book.


--Pastor Brady Testorff
The Calling
Community Church


V.A. clinic coming to Platte City



Rick, Carolyn, and Blake Clark, the owners of the very successful Running Horse Ranch and Home business on Running Horse Road in Platte City, are building a brand new V.A. clinic in the shopping center behind their store.

I was honored to walk through the facility the other day. It is outstanding, with large access, lots of parking, and all on one floor.

This will furnish new jobs and bring people to Platte City, which will also bring income to other businesses in Platte City. Completion date is sometime this spring.

These are Americans helping our veterans, past and present.

Stop in and say thank you at Running Horse Ranch and Home.

P.S: The word is the city nor the Chamber of Commerce had anything to do with bringing the V.A. clinic to Platte City.

Special thanks and God bless.

--Dave Brooks
Former Mayor of
Platte City

Who is financing R-3's 'vote yes' effort?



Once again your digging for details in "Between the Lines" has piqued my curiosity. The $2,050 dollar video purchased by the school district and paid for with tax dollars by our "fiscally conservative" administrators made me wonder what else could they be paying for?

In January the district spent over $8,000 of your tax dollars on the levy, and that was before we started getting the flyers in the mail on a weekly basis and professional marketing boards and flyers at the entrances to all schools and activities.

The district can spend your tax dollars to give you any amount of information, right or wrong, as long as it does not tell you how to vote. Remember all of the incorrect growth information last time?

Who will pay when they want to get the word out to vote yes? It looks like they are using district vendors, most from outside the area. Vendors like one construction company out of Olathe, Kan. that donated $7,500 to "Quality Platte County R3 Schools," the political action committee (PAC) set up to fight for the levy which used the R-3 district office address and phone number until the end of January and is co-run by a current R-3 district office employee.

Why would an Olathe-based construction company give $7,500 to fight for a levy in Platte County? I don't know... they have received $158,000 in district work since April of 2012 and I could find where none of it was bid or bids voted on by the school board.

OPAA, a food supplier out of Chesterfield, MO has donated $1,500. According to school records from March of 2013 OPAA's contract was supposed to be up last year but once again I could find where no vote was done by the board or competing bids were taken.

A legal firm out of downtown Kansas City that our district has spent over $65,000 with since the last failed levy donated $1,000. There is a $2,000 donation from an architectural firm located in south Kansas City, Mo. R-3 has now spent $800,000 with architects over the past three years for a project the voters did not pass.

Last but not least, there is a $2,000 donation from Platte Valley Bank to fight for the levy increase. $14,000 from just the institutions listed above to get you to vote "yes.”

Remember who is funding it as you start to get your surveys, phone calls and literature in the mail to vote for the levy.

Back to the video. Five district employees speak at the start of the $2,050 PCR3 video. The average pay of these five employees is $97,745 plus free insurance. The average yearly stipend of the four men in the video is over $7,500 (Sarah Wright gets zero and she is a great teacher).

Platte County R-3 employees and families are the largest bloc of voters in the district. These employees all received a 3.59% pay raise this year voted for unanimously by your school board (as all votes have been the past three years). This is the same school board now telling you that other than the $8 million they have in the bank and the 50,000 square feet of extra "growth space" not being utilized at Platte Middle School, things are tough. That growth space still goes unexplained in the professional video when they talk about Maximum Operational Efficiency.

Is it operationally efficient to build a school that is not needed due to possible rising construction costs and then pay a guaranteed $6 to $8 million in interest over the course of the lease purchase? Do you see the same sense of urgency in how the board has handled your money the past three years compared to the dire need now being portrayed in the weeks leading up to the election?

--Kirby Holden
15 year Business Management



R-3 should build what it needs, not what it wants



In 2012 a small band of concerned conservative citizens rallied voters to defeat a Platte County R3 school tax ballot initiative. After the defeat, an accusation was made that this citizen group had members who did not reside in the school district. What the district did not mention was their supporters, for the tax increase, came from Olathe, Kansas; Kansas City; Jefferson City; and Chesterfield, Missouri. Many of their supporters were not only out of the district but out of the county and state as well. The donations came from construction companies, architects, food management and insurance companies. Is it possible any of these organizations would financially benefit if the tax initiative passed? Last, but not least, the teacher's union contributed to insure their uninterrupted flow of union dues. By the way, my discussion above is again repeating itself in 2015 for a new ballot initiative.

This April, another tax increase will appear on the ballot. Let's hope we don't continue to hear the tired old slogan: “It's all about the kids.” Unfortunately, it's not all about the kids. It's a simple fact, spending more money rarely equals better student performance. If it did, the U.S. would not be ranked number 14 in the world in education (Pearson Education, May 2014) and number one in education spending. What it is really about is growing administration, satisfying teacher union shadow bosses, spending with little prioritization, and being comfortable with excessive debt. You will rarely see organizations supported by public taxpayer dollars downsize, adequately prioritize, or budget to buy down their debt. As long as they can go back to the taxpayer for more money, they have no incentive to modulate their growth. The federal government has the same problem.

Our teachers and staff received annual pay increases for the last three school years; some were in excess of 5%, while the school district struggles with deferred maintenance and high debt. Where in the private sector are salaries increasing in our lagging economy? For the most part, they are not.

I support annual pay increases for our teachers and staff that match the federal cost of living adjustment or COLA that retirees get on their social security checks, but not one percentage point higher. That is more than fair in today's environment for public sector workers supported by the taxpayer.

But, here is the real problem. Any public entity that does not need to make a profit does not need to worry about their financial bottom line. Why, because they can always go back to the private sector for more money through taxation. All they have to do is convince you they are good stewards, spending wisely, and then make polite threats that if they don't get a tax increase something will fail. How many times do we hear this from the feds who now have our country in $18 trillion of debt? It's very hard to hold government accountable. But, here is a start: determine where you can take acceptable risk; prioritize your requirements; fund what you need, not what you want; start operating within your budget constraints; and make paying down your debt a priority.

On April 7 you have another tax decision to make. Does our school district currently receive sufficient funds through taxation to operate an effective school system? Have they convinced you they need more? Are their arguments, which you are now hearing, legitimate? Is it really all about the kids? Each of us will need to decide, but the most important thing to do is vote. April usually has a low voter turnout. Don't let one side benefit from this tactic.

--Mike Stark
Platte City


Proud of R-3's proposal



On April 7 taxpayers living within the Platte County R-3 School District will be asked to approve a levy proposal that will allow the district to continue to manage student growth and overcrowded conditions. I write today as the vice president of the Platte County Board of Education but I am also a proud Platte County R-3 graduate, a concerned parent, and a lifelong resident of Platte City.

I take my job as a school board member very seriously. I did not seek a position on the Board of Education to raise taxes; I sought this position because I am passionate about the Platte County R-3 School District and want to make sure each of our students is prepared for success in life. Part of this preparation is making sure our students attend adequate facilities that promote and support learning.

R-3 is one of three Missouri school districts that has double in size since 1999 and that led my capable predecessors to respond accordingly by expanding facilities. We have continued to grow since our last bond issue (by more than 900 students).

It is because of this growth and conservatively projected growth that necessitates action. It would be irresponsible of the board of education not to proactively manage district growth to best support student learning. Our capacity issues are not going away and are projected to worsen. Ignoring this completely (do nothing) or partially (a smaller project) would be irresponsible of the board of education compromising service to students and ultimately costing you more.

The proposed plan was developed by listening closely to our patrons. I am very proud of the plan that is being brought to our taxpayers. This is a larger project than the one in 2012 and is a smaller tax increase (more bang for your buck). This proposal includes a sunset provision and improves our overall efficiency which in turn benefits you, our patrons. Most importantly, this proposal benefits our students by providing more classroom space, shorter bus rides and fewer transitions.

Thank you to the following “forward-thinking” organizations for unanimously endorsing our levy proposal: Platte City Area Chamber of Commerce, Northland Regional Chamber of Commerce, the Platte County Economic Development Council, and the Home Builders Association of Greater Kansas City. These organizations recognize the benefits of quality public school districts and their impact on economic development and commercial vitality.

If you have any questions regarding the proposal, I urge you to attend one of the last two informational sessions where all questions will be answered: Monday, March 23, 6:30 p.m., Pathfinder Elementary Gym and Wednesday, April 1, 6:30 p.m., Wilson Auditorium, PCHS.

--Adam McGinness
Vice President
Platte County R-3
Board of Education


Small town, big heart



Have you ever visited a place and felt an instant connection? That's the way I was with Parkville. I've been in the Northland since 1990, even before the great flood of '93 and was looking for the perfect office space. I relocated my business in '09 after being in Leawood, Kan. as a financial advisor for another firm.

A friend of mine alerted me the building at 1st and Main in the center of this historic town was for lease. I rushed over and confirmed I had found my new “business home.” That was 13 years ago.
Since opening my office as an Edward Jones advisor in downtown Parkville, I've come to know and love a community that is both unique and familiar.

Coming from a family where my mother was a stockbroker and my dad was a farmer and cattleman in northern Iowa, I found much to appreciate about this small community, this haven that offers proximity to downtown and pretty much anywhere I want to go. Most of all, it feels like home. It's a town within a city.

Since moving here, I've been on the board of the Chamber of Commerce, sat on the Economic Development Council and eagerly became a part of the Platte County Education Foundation. With two daughters, one a recent high school graduate and one a high school sophomore, I've been fortunate to be involved with the things that matter to me, that make a difference in the short term, as well as long term of our community.

Not only am I fortunate enough to wake up everyday and go to a job I really love, but I'm a part of a friendly, welcoming town where I can walk down the street, people know my name, shake my hand and stop in just to say hello. That's my idea of community.

I love the diversity of Parkville, the eclectic backgrounds of the people I meet. I enjoy the parks, walking by the river, hiking and biking on the paths and the random wildlife that inhabit our nature trails. We really do have the best of everything here.

We have businesses that exist to make profit, but also reflect personal passions. Our business owners are also devoted family members. It's not unusual to see a “Closed Early to Attend Son's Baseball Game” sign on one of our Main Street doors. We're a small town with big heart.

It's the kind of town where everyone knows everyone. It's a place where a police officer will call you from inside your office after noticing a bench underneath an open window. He crawls inside to be sure nothing has been disturbed and doesn't lecture me about forgetting to close my windows. We've got each other's backs.

For those of you reading this who haven't visited Parkville, I recommend you stop by. Don't just drive through; you'll want to spend some time here. We have a little bit of everything and a whole lot of colorful personalities and unrivaled places and spaces to explore. You won't be disappointed.

I could've chosen a bigger city, a newer office space or a town with less history, but, why settle for less? I'm not a perfectionist, but Parkville is the perfect place for me. I'm proud to be a business owner, building owner and community member of this small, but mighty community.

Looking forward to what our community can do together as we grow forward.

--Mike Emmick
Edward Jones Financial Advisor
101 Main St.


Saying no to the R-3 school tax increase



Here they go again! They tried this same thing in 2012. But this time, they tried to give it to you as a Christmas present (see The Landmark Newspaper's article dated Dec. 24, 2014).

Platte County R-3 School District (PCR3) is proposing to raise our property taxes another $.43 per $100 of assessed property value in the April 7 ballot. Residents of the district are already paying $4.5989 per $100 of assessed value – which means an 8.55% increase in your tax rate for the next 20 years.

By the way that new $82 per year (on a $100,000 home) is on top of the $877 per year you are already paying. Plus if PCR3 gets it, they will be using a “lease purchase” deal. That “lease lurchase” deal is to get around the Missouri Constitution that states: “a school district by vote of the qualified electors voting thereon may become indebted in an amount not to exceed fifteen percent of the value of such taxable tangible property.” Which means that somebody/some company will be getting big dollars (for them to “finance” it) until the school district gets title to the building sometime in the future.

This also means that the new levy/tax will increase PCR3's debt to over $24,000 per student. At the current time the debt is already very high at approximately $16,000 for every PCR3 student. (Information is according to Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) website.)

PCR3 says that the proposal is to fund a new elementary school of 65,000 square feet to be built on the current campus in Platte City. That is on the same campus where the PCR3 middle school current has 49,000 square feet of “growth space” according to the current PCR3 superintendent.
PCR3 is also not forthcoming with the fact that over the last three plus years there has not been any money budgeted for space expansion/buildings and yet there is over $7.8 million in the general fund. Even with all these dollars, PCR3 has “deferred” maintenance on PCR3 buildings. Yet, they spent $30,000 on public surveys, etc. Where is the accountability and the planning?

In public forums last fall, PCR3 stated that they want to close the “Rising Star” Elementary School and move the students into the “new” proposed elementary school because of inefficiencies and the critical need for infrastructure maintenance (i.e. a roof). However, PCR3 stated they were considering selling it or using it for “other” PCR3 administrative needs. Question: What “other” administrative functions could that building accommodate without roof repairs? Does not appear that PCR3 had thought through this one very well either.

Again it looks like the PCR3 school board is not being frugal with our tax dollars. It looks more like they are playing “Politics” with your tax dollars, once again. I am all for providing our students with outstanding facilities but I do not feel like providing more taxpayer dollars to the PCR3 school district and its school board until they can show that they are managing the money they already get/have appropriately.

I will be voting NO on the proposed tax increase on April 7 and I encourage other voters to do likewise.

--William A. Prost
Platte City
Retired Military Officer
Taxpayer and Resident
for 23 years in the


Don't lose freedoms to progressive educators



I love America! I love freedom! Missourians living in the heartland of America cherish and love all of their freedoms.

You might ask why I would start a letter to the editor in this manner. It's because I had the opportunity last week to attend a hearing in Jefferson City. At this particular hearing, I heard about a bill that is being discussed in our Missouri legislature. The bill is House Bill 382. It relates to the establishment of developmental guidance and counseling programs in schools. At this hearing, the bill was so problematic it was drastically amended to avoid push-back.

The bill is still very disturbing to me. It affects all Missouri elementary and secondary education schools by adopting a 1000 page curriculum taught from 3rd grade to 12th grade. It would be linked to the school district's accreditation under the Missouri School Improvement Program or MSIP. The scoring guide under MSIP would include a “component of credit” if the district implements the comprehensive guidance and counseling program. If the district does not adopt the counseling program, it could effect the district's accreditation starting in the 2016-17 school year. This is the forcing function the government is using to make this program virtually mandatory.

I have some real concerns and questions. Has anyone in our state legislature read the 1000 page curriculum? Who wrote the curriculum?What businesses and publishers will benefit from its implementation (follow the money)? How do I know the counselors have my world-view and my social beliefs? Can parents participate in these sessions? Can students opt out? How does a parent know whether or not they are undermining the personal, political, and spiritual values that you are teaching your child at home? This is an unfunded mandate, so who will pay for the additional counselors, office space, and equipment? We probably know the answer to the last question. It will be the taxpayers. Finally, don't we already have counselors in our schools at this time?

Once a nation loses its freedom, it does not get it back. We need to protect the next generation from the elites who believe they are better educated and smarter than the local teachers, school board members, and the parents of our children. I am only guessing, but I bet these counseling sessions and the curriculum will have nothing to do with conservative American values.
Many men and women have fought and died to preserve our liberties. We don't want to surrender these liberties to progressive educators with world-views that run counter to ours. This appears to be one more attempt, like Common Core, for big government to control education.

Research the bill and contact your Missouri State legislators, your local school superintendent, and school board to share your concerns.

--Janet Stark
Platte City


The sound of political warfare at Houston Lake




I feel I must respond to the letter published in The Landmark of 2/25/2015 about the Feb. 9 Houston Lake City Council meeting.

I was there and what I witnessed didn't happen the way Chuck described in his letter. During the public comment portion of the meeting, Chuck stood up and yet again started parroting the uninformed ramblings of a bitter ex-resident about the Houston Lake City Council hiring a lake resident as the maintenance manager for projects around the lake.

He started spouting his misinformation and assertions (this isn't the first time he's brought this up, it's an important a part of his campaign rhetoric). At that point I challenged his continuous lies on this matter. It's true that the council voted to hire that resident. The mayor made the offer to that person, the offer was turned down for reasons only the resident and the mayor are privy to. It isn't any of Chuck's business to know those reasons but he continues to promote his fairy tale as fact and as an important Stone campaign issue. Stone continues to drop the name of that person without that person's consent (something he does with regularity to many other residents of the lake trying to appear knowledgeable, especially if it supports his cause).

As for Chuck's “chest thumping” that I backed down from him, this is as ludicrous as it is comical.
In my corporate and government career I've dealt with many “egos” much bigger than Mr. Stone. Chuck isn't one that I would ever consider backing down from, no matter what he relives in his fantasy. I guess he forgot that we audio tape every city council meeting and that there were witnesses, members of the home association board of directors, and a Platte County Sheriff’s deputy that heard and saw that exchange.

Charles Edward Stone seems to think he knows what's best for Houston Lake even though he does not own property on the lake (I understand he rents), someone else pays the property tax, and he is not a member of the Homeowners Association. Why? Missouri holds the answers.

Running for mayor has puffed you up, Chuck. But misusing city property, abusing Missouri campaign ethics, writing letters to create community division, repeating gossip and misinformation, a few yard signs, and proclaiming you are already winning this campaign publicly (The Landmark, 2/15/2015) only shows that you lack management experience, communication skills, a vision of the future for Houston Lake, and any real platform.

You want to call me out? Fine, here I am. I'll put my 35+ years as an entrepreneur, corporate director, and federal government administrator up against your new 3.52 grade point average from an unaccredited/credited “mail order” school (you never say). Your delusion Chuck, is that you're swinging for the fences, but you barely have enough for a bunt. Keep going to school, you have a lot to learn.

--Dan Coronado
Alderman, Homeowner
and HOA member
Houston Lake


Base your R-3 tax vote on facts, not emotion



I want to thank the Platte City Board of Aldermen Economic Subcommittee for taking the time to ask intelligent questions when deciding to not support the tax levy increase for Platte County R-3.

From the questions asked, they have obviously been paying attention. I would challenge other area economic groups and councils to take the time as these people did to do their homework and make a decision on what is best for the people of Platte City and Platte County based on facts, not emotions or who might benefit.

After reading the question they asked on R-3's large debt per student and remembering the previous letter to the editor about the growth at the school district compared to other districts it made me think: How is PCR3 debt of over $16,000 per student compared to other districts that have large growth?

Turns out there are at least 12 other school districts in Missouri that have grown more than 1800 students like PCR3 from 1999 to 2014. At the top are Wentzville which has grown over 8,600 students; Liberty 5,285 and Ft. Zumwalt 3,116.

Some of the other area schools with large growth were Grain Valley at 2,335, Park Hill 1,854 and Ray-Pec with 2,102 new students. Only Wentzville with growth of 8,662 students has a current higher debt load per student at $16,884 than PCR3's $16,326. The average debt for the other 12 districts with large growth is just $11,117 (see the chart printed below).

Grain Valley a district which has doubled in size was one of the lowest at just $10,591 dollars of debt per student.

If this $29 million lease purchase is passed in April, debt per student at PCR3 goes to almost $24,000 per student.

How has a lack of debt affected districts academically? Looking at State APR scores, seven of the 12 "growth" districts finished with a higher APR score than PCR3.

The aldermen also questioned using the lease purchase as a way to fund the projects. The average lease purchase amount in 2014 for these 12 other growth districts was under $14 million or 12% of average debt. If voters pass this ballot measure in April, PCR3 will have lease purchase debt of over $32 million dollars or 35% of our total debt.

We have now seen Lifetouch close, the Dairy Farmers are moving to Kansas and word is Fort Leavenworth is in reduction mode. How will this affect growth in the district? Just look at the empty office buildings on the east side of I-29 between Platte City and Zona Rosa. With the current state of the economy, how can higher taxes in any way help Platte County to regain or retain business and homeowners in our area?

Think about the facts and the questions these aldermen asked when you are approached to support this tax increase.

Information in this letter is from the Department of Secondary Education website.

--Kirby Holden
Former Business
Management Professional
(15 years)

DEBT per student for school districts with more growth than 1800 students from 1999- 2014


Wentzville growth of 8,662 students $16,884 per student debt. 96.1 State APR score

Platte County growth of 1,897 students $16,326 per student debt. 94.6

Liberty growth of 5,282 students $13,402 per student debt . 92.9

Nixa growth of 2374 students $13,241 per student debt . 96.8

Republic growth of 1835 students $11,278 per student debt . 95.7

Ozark growth of 2,013 students $11,044 per student debt . 98.2

North KC growth of 2,300 students $10,965 per student debt 92.1

Independence growth of 2,485 students $10,870 per student debt 80.0

Grain Valley growth of 2,335 students $10,591 per student debt 90.0

Lees Summit growth of 4,001 students $9,987 per student debt 92.5

Ray-Pec growth of 2,102 students $8,882 per student debt 96.1

Park Hill growth of 1,854 students $8,714 per student debt 98.2

FT Zumwalt growth of 3,116 students $7,549 per student debt 95.4


Open dialogue needed at Houston Lake



Finally some dialogue?

The Feb. 9 Houston Lake city council meeting was well attended by residents that take an interest is their community. One of them even mentioned a suggestion that I had made in the community newsletter (The Houston Laker, Jan. 2015) concerning infrastructure repairs.

Alderman Dan Coronado told the resident that the facts he is quoting are false. When I challenged Coronado, he back pedaled and recanted before proceeding with his view of the events. I was silenced by the incumbent Mayor Mike Hallauer when I tried to document my facts. I am his challenger in the April election for mayor.

Mitch Kelly, codes enforcement officer, stated that non-safety related ordinances will only be enforced if a complaint is involved, as per Mayor Hallauer's direction. I bet that statement will not appear in the minutes. It won't appear in the Houston Laker either. When I went to submit my article to them, I got an email rejecting it. Because the newsletter is printed on a printer that is partially owned by the city, it's against the law for them to print political ads (when the challenger is winning).

Maybe on April 7 Houston Lake will start to have a government that governs, is concerned about the roads and the bridges, and encourages open dialogue at the city meetings.

--Chuck Stone
Houston Lake


Former mayor has a golf course story



I see where Shiloh Springs Golf Course is back in the news (Between the Lines, 2/4/15).
Attached is a cut-and-paste of a recent article about a similar “financial disaster at golf course owned by taxpayers” situation where I live now in Florida.

Gulf Breeze (similar in population to Parkville) operates a sanitary sewer utility for an area substantially beyond its City limits. [That clarifies how 6,000 city population can generate 1.3 million gallons of wastewater per day to irrigate the 36 hole golf course complex. Otherwise, that would be 217 gal/person/day…] Since the area is mostly flat here, it is a “tight line” system where the effluent from treatment facilities can be pumped and re-pumped for several miles out to the golf course for final disposition – right into the drinking water aquifer!?!. Man, I gotta check on that.

So even if Platte County decided to pump all of its effluent out to Shiloh Springs….. it would look like the fountain at North Oak and Vivion Road during the winter, and the cost of all that “tight-line” would be Between the Lines fodder for years to come.

I check up on my previous home area via The Landmark and Parkville Board of Aldermen meetings online now and then, and I'm always looking for good ideas to pass on to my former digs.

Think beach.

--Jim Brooks
Former Parkville Mayor
Gulf Breeze, FL


Backyard chickens are 'not a nuisance'



Please help us folks who want to enjoy a few backyard chickens in O'Fallon, MO. Please help us educate people in the cities, suburbs and country that backyard chickens are a pleasure for all and are truly not a nuisance. Here is my letter to the editor. And thank you for considering publishing it.
This last fall my husband, Luther Viel, and I bought five laying hens for our enjoyment and for the fresh eggs they would provide.

We made a chicken coop for under the deck and reed fencing underneath the deck. From inside, it has the cozy feel of a tiki hut. We made a little pen for them to come out to the yard to enjoy the sunshine. The reeds look tidy. The pen has a low profile and is camouflaged with grasses.

Our hens are pampered. Getting checked on twice a day. And we enjoy a coffee while watching the hens scratch and go about their business. We also enjoy the organic eggs.

Then last week we got a notice from the City of O'Fallon, Missouri to remove any farm animals.
But what harm are a handful of pampered hens causing the city residents? Dog and cat bites send more people to the emergency room than do hen pecks. The list of animal to human diseases is much longer for cats and dogs than for poultry.

People are concerned about their housing values. However, home values have decreased substantially as a result of the housing bubble and increased unemployment due to the loss of manufacturing jobs. Pampered chickens are hardly the blame for our woes of the declines in home values.

Many cities including Columbia, Richmond Heights and Ladue allow backyard birds. Children are able to see where food comes from. Watching and caring for the birds provides a welcomed alternative to video games and social media.

In 2014 Missourians passed the Right to Farm Constitutional amendment that ensures that Missouri citizens have the right to engage in agricultural production and ranching practices and that right shall not be infringed.

Missourians seem to value the citizen's right to produce food. I do also. I have a front yard apple tree and backyard fruit trees and berries and a few tomato and pepper plants along with kale and green beans and herbs. We buy local and organic food as much as possible.

Backyard hens have become popular in recent years. Many people have found that they enhance our lives and do not detract from our health or well-being.

--Juli Viel
O'Fallon, Mo.


R-3 has cheaper options available



I saw the letter in last week’s Landmark signed by several area community members who were not happy with the ad I ran in your paper. As I know at least two of these people to be intelligent and highly educated, I thought I should probably revisit several of the items they pointed out to make sure that my facts were correct. I am assuming since I have never seen at least three of these men at any school board meeting, CAC or any of the "open forums" held by the district, that this letter was not written by them. They made the statement about items being "out of context,” "unqualified opinion" or "completely incorrect" but their letter does not point out a single item that was incorrect in the ad, only items they do not agree with.

Here are a few of their points I double checked on:

"Of 21 school districts" "PCR-3 has the 4th lowest total tax levy" A true statement--they just left out the part about R-3 also having the highest debt per student of any area school I could find. Almost 2 1/2 times higher if we go in debt another $29 million, putting us over $90 million in debt, about $24,000 per student. The average for other area schools is less than $10,000.

They don't like you knowing it but don't argue that our current levy rate is already over 10% higher than the state average. An average that includes all of the districts in the KC area, Springfield, Columbia, St Joe and the more than 60 districts around St Louis, not just "rural" districts.

Comparisons to state averages are used numerous times in the PCR3 Annual Report, but I guess for everyone else it is off limits.

"PCR-3 has the 6th lowest expenditure per pupil amount." Per the District Annual Report just mailed to us that also makes this insinuation, it shows per pupil spending at $9,069 and enrollment for 2013-14 at 3,788. Multiply these and you get $34,353,372 . But the budget for 2013-14 showed revenue of over $41 million. Where is the other $1600 per student?
If all expenditures for the district are counted, PCR3 does not have the 6th lowest in the area. Documents for this posted on

"PCR-3 is one of three districts in Mo. to have doubled in size since 1999." No argument. How has the district handled our tax dollars over that time period, have their funds also doubled? I don't have 1999 but I do have the 2001-02 budget that shows school revenue at that time being under $20 million. This past year DESE (Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) showed revenue for PCR3 at $49 million. Not only has revenue more than doubled since 1999, taxpayers have also passed bonds for almost $45 million during this same time period, not counting the $4.8 million lease purchase for the administration building.

In 2001 total salaries and benefits for the district were $11 million, almost triple that today at about $30 million. A rather large increase in payroll percentage. Could a private company that is not run on tax dollars afford this?

For the immediate future the incoming class growth seems to be on hold in Platte City as the last two classes at Rising Star are down by two class sizes. Another two years of this and they can move Rising Star students to Siegrist, which is below capacity. This may be the reason for the urgency to go for such a large levy increase now, even as the economy still struggles since the majority of voters come from north of Hwy. 152 so the district needs perceived problems in the north part of the district to try and get a levy or bond passed.

"Using lease purchase revenue bonds to finance is a solid option." According to PCR3, they have the ability to bond $18 million at this time, almost 25% of our total bonding capacity plus about $8 million in savings if needed. Here is a quote from the Missouri Municipal Financial Guide. "Disadvantages include generally higher interest rates for lease-purchase transactions than for revenue bonds or general obligation bonds with a similar term. Another disadvantage for lease-purchase transactions involving real property is generally higher transaction fees than for general obligation or revenue bonds, due to the more complicated nature of the financing."

"Using general fund balances to fund new buildings would be irresponsible." I agree, this is the district’s saving account. You should have a savings. How much? Here is what another state suggests "an amount sufficient that short term borrowing for cash flow could be avoided and would also allow the district to set aside sufficient assets to realize its longer range goals." What a novel thought. Save for "longer range goals," something we have failed to do while revenues have doubled.

Shortly after the 2012 levy failed you may remember the district immediately started a Budget Reduction Task Force/ "Dog and Pony Show," asking the community for input on how they could cut costs to prepare for impending economic doom since we did not pass the levy. Now we find out they added $1.8 million to the general fund since 2012.

The percentage saved in the general fund has gone up since 2012 from 17.5 to 21.2% while taxpayers are told in the district-led meetings that maintenance at our schools has to be deferred due to cost cutting.....and I am taking things out of context?

If everything the district does is about the kids then the district would be using the current space and funds they have for academics if needed. Gentlemen, tell me about our school’s priorities when your students cannot have lab class in chemistry due to "lack of space" but then you find out that same school has a huge "multipurpose" room for wrestling practice ONLY, which goes unused during the school day, and one lab room which is not used.

Less than 25% of our high school is being used for classrooms according to the district’s own study, 20% at the middle school. Exactly how many of our students go on to make a living in sports? How are our kids to be inspired by science if it is not hands on? Tell me "it’s about the kids" when you have a part time track coach sitting in the physics class for six weeks because you are told the district "cant afford" a qualified replacement, then at a school board meeting they vote to put a $44,000 generator at that same school. So yes, the individual expenses do matter.

Tell me it’s about the kids when students at the south campus are eating lunch in their rooms while the district sits on $7.8 million, of which just a portion would have addressed the problem two years ago.

No, this election is 100% about an administration that wants a new toy, a brand new school when other options they don't want to look at are available to solve any current problems at a much cheaper price. Solutions like using the growth space at our middle school, space that we paid an extra $68,000 to heat and cool just last year. This information is from a board meeting.

All who signed that letter last week might try coming to some district meetings so you can get this same information. My guess is the person who wrote the letter is already there.

---Kirby Holden
Community Member
R-3 Father of two
20 year resident

Holding R-3 accountable for its statements



Let me help set the record straight. An article was written in the Feb. 4 Landmark in an effort to discredit the research done by Kirby Holden concerning the R3 School District.

Mr. Holden's full page ad appeared in the January 18 edition of The Landmark. His research was labeled as “out of context” or “completely incorrect” by the writers of last week’s letter. Mr. Holden is a man of honesty and integrity and his work is based on quantifiable data.

His article is full of numbers and statistics, not just blanket statements. He spent hundreds of hours scouring the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) website for the information presented in his article.

Additionally, he created his own website and Facebook page (Platte County R-3 Facts) and is a regular attendee and active participant at the monthly district school board meetings.

Finally, he ran for the school board last April and came within 40 votes of being elected to that body. He is a concerned citizen and taxpayer.

I suspect he has done more work and fact checking on statements made by the district than the average school board member.

With all due respect to the four individuals who submmitted the Feb. 4 letter to the editor, how many school board meetings have you personally attended in the past two years? I regularly attend. How many hours have you spent checking the DESE website to compare it to the R-3 School District's talking points? Your letter certainly mimicked the talking points made by the school district, which I hear at the school board meetings.

Also, are any of your spouses receiving a paycheck from the school district? If they are, isn't that a potential conflict of interest, since you could personally benefit as a family from any future school tax increase?

You see, there are always two sides to any debate. Be careful what you read and be careful of the half-truths.

Thank you for allowing me to set the record straight in regard to Mr. Holden's character and research recently placed in The Landmark. Mr. Holden has been doing his best to hold our school accountable to the hard working citizens who pay their taxes and expect our school district to exercise financial discipline.

You as citizens will soon have an opportunity in April to allow the school to hear your individual voice at the ballot box.

--Janet Stark
Platte City


Plan puts school in position to manage growth



During their December meeting, the Platte County Board of Education unanimously voted to place a levy proposal on the April 7, 2015 ballot.

In the coming weeks, patrons of the district will be receiving information regarding this proposal. In the meantime, I would like to provide some background information in an effort to best inform our community.

As a taxpaying citizen and a district official, I wish it were feasible to construct the needed classroom space without asking you to consider a tax increase. The fact is our enrollment has grown by approximately 24% since our last building addition was approved in 2008 while our tax base has grown by approximately 4% during the same time period. Because growth in our tax base isn't keeping pace with growth in our enrollment, it leaves us with only one viable option to pay for needed expansion……a tax increase proposal.

While countless alternatives were weighed, the levy proposal that has emerged for your consideration represents an effective and efficient plan for managing student enrollment growth and overcrowded conditions. The plan provides adequate space for the foreseeable future at a reasonable cost. It also provides a sustainable elementary school plan that is age-appropriate for students, convenient for parents, and efficient for taxpayers. The plan provides the first step in a master plan for Platte County High School that is respectful of our past while being realistic about our future by investing in a building that has meant so much to so many. Lastly, the plan puts the district in the best possible position to manage future growth.

In the coming weeks, you will likely get information that will paint R-3 in a different light. I ask you to question those behind the message. Additionally, I welcome you to question our logic to best inform your voting decision. It is our intent to earn your support for the April 7, 2015 levy proposal by providing you with facts from qualified professionals.

--Dr. Michael J. Reik
R-3 Superintendent


R-3’s tax increase proposal is all about kids



We wanted to provide some much needed context to the full page paid advertisement in the Jan. 14, 2015 publication of The Landmark. Simply put, the information forwarded in the advertisement is a collection of unqualified opinions that are badly taken out of context or completely incorrect. Here are a few bullet points to assist in providing some context:

•Of the 21 school districts in Platte, Clay, and Jackson Counties; PCR-3 has the 4th lowest total tax levy. Comparing our tax rate to school districts in rural Missouri would be virtually useless given the undeniable differences in the market. The cost of living and the cost of doing business are simply higher in the metropolitan market, both for education and in the private sector.

•Of the 21 school districts in Platte, Clay, and Jackson Counties; PCR-3 has the 6th lowest expenditure per pupil amount (which includes employee salaries and benefits). This is hardly the “out of control” spending that was suggested in the advertisement. It is easy for anyone to be critical of an individual expense, with fair debate on either side. However, when reviewing all operating costs together R-3 is among the most conservative spending districts in the Metro.

•Since the last building project was approved in Spring 2008, Platte County School District has grown by more than 900 students (almost 30%).

•PCR-3 is one of three school districts in Missouri to have doubled in size since 1999. Because of this phenomenal growth, comparing R-3 to the other 520 districts in Missouri is extremely limited when considering debt. Past board members and administrators did what they needed to do to provide necessary space for students (with voter approval). According to Standard & Poor's, R-3 is in good financial condition relative to debt as referenced by their “AA” stand alone bond rating.

•Using Lease Purchase Revenue Bonds to finance new facilities is a solid option that is utilized by many rapidly growing school districts due to bonding capacity limitations. Utilizing Lease Purchase Bonds is inevitable for rapidly growing school districts that intend to provide adequate space for kids, and the time is right to capitalize on historically low interest rates.

•Using General Fund balances (or reserves) to fund new buildings would not only be irresponsible, but it is also not possible due to fund restrictions. The balances referred to in the ad (approximately $7.8 million or 21%) are Operating Fund balances that provide reasonable insulation from economic downturn. Additionally, healthy balances allow the district to avoid borrowing money to make payroll prior to local tax collection. The 21% operating reserve is within a desired range identified by the auditing firm.

Platte County School District has forwarded a solid plan to manage student enrollment growth.

Opponents imply that the April 7 levy proposal “isn't about kids.” They are wrong. The levy is all about kids and providing them adequate space to learn. Now is the time to take care of our kids in this area of need. Join us in voting yes on April 7.

--Doug Doll, Parent and Business Owner
Chris Patterson, Community Member
Dr. David Lowry, Parent and Business Owner
Vic Perrin, Community Member


Welcome news at Houston Lake



During the Jan. 12 city council meeting at Houston Lake, Mayor Mike Hallauer laid out some his intentions for 2015. He wants to replace two of the city trucks, contract more roadwork, and do some maintenance on the spillway bridge.

There were no votes taken on any of this. It was just part of his mayor's report.

This is welcome announcement for the residents of Houston Lake for two reasons. The first one is that all the plans for closing or replacing the spillway bridge are apparently rescinded; although, there was no formal statement made about that.

The second one is that the city council is putting these subjects up for public discussion before they are voted on.

Even though the city council had voted to close the spillway bridge last summer three city residents started a grassroots campaign to keep it open. More residents joined the cause. Through petitioning residents and standing up at city meetings, the bridge that was supposed to close July 4th remains open today.

On behalf of the residents of Houston Lake I would like to thank The Landmark Newspaper for taking up this story.

The Landmark should be proud of how it plays an active role in the community.

--Chuck Stone
Houston Lake


Another State of the Union



Ahead of last November's election, President Obama stated that “these [Obama's] policies are on the ballot. Every single one of them.” On this, I agree with him. His policies were on the ballot, and millions of men and women throughout the country went to their polling places to pull the lever in opposition to bigger government, more spending, and unconstitutional executive orders.

This year, President Obama delivered his sixth State of the Union Address. Like many Americans, I was hopeful that the president would outline a vision for our country that reflected the will of those we are here to represent. Unfortunately, he once again showed that he plans to ignore the message sent by the American people last November, pushing ahead with his big government agenda.

The American people sent us here to forge a new direction in finding solutions to the problems facing our nation – not to recycle the failed policies of the last six years.

While it is clear that President Obama did not hear this message, the House of Representatives did. In the opening weeks of the new Congress, the House has passed common sense legislation to promote economic growth, address rising energy costs, remove job-killing regulations found in Obamacare, and reverse the president's executive order on amnesty.

Common sense solutions are needed to ease the squeeze on middle class Missourians and I am confident that with a new Congress that is exactly what we will have.

While his State of the Union speech has left doubt, I am hopeful that President Obama will join with us in promoting bold, new solutions on behalf of the people of north Missouri and across America.

--Sam Graves
Sixth District


It's an issue of personal freedom



I have no desire for Missouri to be a part of the Prescription Drug Monitoring Program or PDMP, sometimes called the Central Drug Registry.

This is nothing more than another federal database that allows unwarranted access by people who have no business knowing our personal information. Supporters argue the database will reduce and prevent the misuse and abuse of prescription controlled substances. Maybe it could have a small impact, but is that worth the potential privacy violations or misuse of our medical information? For me, it is not.

There are over 24,000 health care practitioners and pharmacists in Missouri that would have access to the database. Now, multiply that by 50 states. Over 1,000,000 offices would have access to your personal information. Do you think your doctor will be the only one in the office with access? He or she will not. Doctors are too busy to search databases. This responsibility will be delegated to his staff and that only multiples the chances for a compromise of your information. Additionally, what happens if the information is hacked? Will the government be able to adequately protect the site? Historically, private businesses and government have a bad track record when it comes to internet security and cyber attack.

It may seem reasonable at first glace to be part of such a program. However, on closer scrutiny, it will not stop the actions of committed drug abusers or guarantee the security of your personal information. We do not need Missouri doctors to be policemen. Agencies already exist like the Missouri Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs who have the capability to implement procedures to curtail prescription drug abuse. They should be the ones who notify doctors and law enforcement about potential prescription drug abuses, not the other way around.

Just like the database created to capture student and family information under Common Core State Standards, the PDMP is just one more form of government intrusion and control of our lives. Once the government knows what medications you take, could they use that against you? Is it any of their business? For example, should gun owners be wary? If you take medications for depression or PTSD, could a government agency decide you are a threat to yourself or someone else and confiscate your firearms?

I would encourage everyone to contact your conservative state legislatures and ask them to seriously question the necessity of this program. I don't care how many states sign up for this program, Missouri should not. It is a personal freedom issue.

--Mike Stark
Platte City


Isaiah's Law legislation.



One of my priority issues for this session was filed last week during the General Assemblies first week of session. The bill known as Isaiah's Law will put decision making back into the hands of parents where the health of their children is concerned.

In the past few years, the legislature has had the duty to put children back into the control of their parents and out of the control of government. There is no question that the safety of children is the most important. When parents are providing a loving and caring home, but are condemned by the government for trying to make decisions that best meet the need of their child, we believe the parents decisions should stand.

Isaiah's Law legislation has been written after a sixteen year old boy with a prior medical condition needed a specialist to provide medical service to the boy named Isaiah. After the medical treatment was utilized, Isaiah's mother was concerned that her son was still in pain thirty days after the treatment. She wanted to seek a second opinion to the plan provided by the current physician. In doing so, she was immediately stripped of her parental rights. Almost a year later and after Isaiah was a ward of another state and allegedly abused in a foster home located in a dangerous area of Chicago, she is still without parental rights or custody of her son, Isaiah.

The greatest challenge with policies challenging parental rights is with the most recent ideology that children are not the possession of parents, but that children belong to communities. Whether possessing or belonging, the fact that remains is that the cared and loved child scientifically needs maternal and paternal fellowship.

The Missouri Department of Social Services is concerned with some of the language. In reviewing the language, the concern is simply technical. The department provided comments describing the section should be placed in another section of the statutes, if the law passes. Though, the language is actually a continuation of the medical abuse language that already exists.

The leadership of the House of Representatives is still in transition and committees are not yet known. When the committees are formed, I will have a better idea as to the next step in passing Isaiah's Law.

--Ken Wilson
State Representative
12th District


Graves is not a conservative



Open letter sent January 6, 2015 to Congressman Sam Graves (R-Mo - 6th district) on the first day of the new Congress (a postscript follows):

Congressman Graves,
When you take this oath of office today, remember, a vote for John Boehner as Speaker and/or a vote for John Boehner's agenda is a violation of this oath and a violation of the American People's trust.

“I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
It is your obligation to serve the people's interests ..... consider this carefully before you stray from that course.

--Terrence Durrill
Platte City

Postscript and a followup....within the last 30 days the following has occurred:

Congressman Sam Graves voted to fully fund Obama's unconstitutional Obamacare health plan thru fiscal 2015.

Congressman Sam Graves voted to fully fund Obama's unconstitutional Executive Order Amnesty for Illegal Aliens thru fiscal 2015.

Congressman Sam Graves voted to reelect John Boehner as House Speaker for the next two years, all the while, knowing that John Boehner is corrupt, that he routinely violates his oath of office and the Constitution of the United States, as well as the will of the American People.
Congressman Sam Graves is not the conservative that he claims to be. No true conservative could vote in good faith for the outrages listed above. No amount of smooth talk about promoting small business and such, no denials, no blowing smoke will cover Sam Graves' vote for unconstitutional laws and corrupt political leaders. Actions speak louder than words. We will remember.

--Terrence Durrill
Platte City


Disappointed in Graves



Missouri's 6th District Congressman Sam Graves just voted to re-elect Boehner to Speaker of the House.

I personally asked the aid that answered the phone how many people called to ask Graves to support Boehner. His answer was "None that I took." How many called and asked Graves to not support Boehner? "Sir, we had several."

Isn't it wonderful that the people we send to Congress are more concerned about the chairmanship to which they might be appointed or the committee they might be on than the wishes of the constituents they represent?

We, the people of the 6th District, must remember that Graves also voted for the Cromnibus bill that funded Obamacare and illegal immigration against the wishes of the majority of the 6th District.

We must remember this in 2016. Not the little things that Graves does, but the major votes he makes against the wishes of the people he purports to represent.

--Jim DeJarnatt


Keeping Main Street healthy



Ronald Reagan said that government's approach to business could be summed up in a few short phrases. “If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.” Unfortunately, some things never change.

Tuesday, Jan. 6 marked the beginning of the 114th session of Congress. It is imperative that we hit the ground running and move to pass pro-growth legislation that gives small businesses the needed resources to create good paying jobs for hardworking Americans.

In these tough economic times, we must make sure the federal government is working with small businesses to help them succeed and create jobs here in America. As chairman of the Small Business Committee, I led the fight to reduce the burdens the federal government places on small businesses and I will continue this fight in the new congress.

Small businesses are facing many challenges in these tough economic times. Accounting for seven out of every 10 jobs in America, it will be small businesses that lead our economic recovery. I remain committed to ensuring that they have the support they need to succeed.

Whether it is reducing an ever-growing tax burden, giving small businesses the ability to purchase affordable health care, stopping frivolous lawsuits, or ensuring access to capital, there are many opportunities to help small businesses.

Keeping Main Street healthy is an important part of keeping our economy healthy. I look forward to continuing to support and promote our small businesses as we move forward in the new year.

--Sam Graves
Sixth District


Actions, not words, matter



An open letter to Congressman Sam Graves (R-Mo 6th district) Dec 13, 2014

Congressman Graves,

Why are you voting to support this "Cromnibus" 1.1 trillion dollar spending bill? Among other things, this bill fully funds Obamacare and the unconstitutional executive order amnesty for illegal aliens forced upon this country by Barack Obama. Missourians oppose funding these unlawful pieces of legislation.

You are enabling John Boehner, Mitch McConnell and Barack Obama to destroy this country. I have told you before that your voting record reveals a politician standing on the sidelines claiming to be a conservative but doing next to nothing to stop the Marxist/Islamic takeover of this country. That continues to be the case.

There is no doubt that most RINOs are bought and owned by the United States Chamber of Commerce and other special interests. I am not sure what your motives are, but I am totally dissatisfied with your performance in representing the people of the 6th district of Missouri and the people of the United States.

I expect you to join with and support those members of the House who are fighting for the United States Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the American people or you need to get out of Washington and let an American Patriot take your seat. We are watching your voting record and we don't like what we are seeing.

Just remember, ..... words mean nothing ..... your actions mean everything.

--Terrence Durrill
Platte City


GOP committee needs members



We are looking for individuals who are passionate, enthusiastic, willing to volunteer and work hard to help get good Republican candidates elected. You need to be willing to work well as a team player and come to monthly meetings. Other contributions can come in various ways; we need your time, your money, & your energy, especially in election years. We need people who are willing to stand up, speak up, and do whatever it takes to fight for our faith, families, and individual freedoms.

So, if you care about the direction that this Country is going in; or about our Constitution and the rule of law; or are concerned about the next generation, then you're the person we are looking for - the active & engaged citizen. We also do fund-raising to have a Republican office open, parades, knocking on doors, and various other activities in support of our candidates. You will have the opportunity to help set legislative policy by being on the Republican Central Committee that determines and sends our legislative priorities to all elected officials.

Each subdistrict consists of one man and one woman. The open seats are listed below. You can view the sub districts on this map. For further information about the committee, please visit our web page.

We need:

1. a man and a woman in Subdistrict 12-1 (Platte City)
2. a woman in Subdistrict 12-2 (Hoover)
3. a man and a woman in Subdistrict 13-2 (W. of Prairie View Rd, N. of 152 Hwy)
3. a woman in Sub district 14-3 (Houston Lake and north to 66th St.)
4. a woman in Sub district 14-4 (N of 64th St., Platte Woods, Lake Waukomis)
5. a woman in Sub district 14-5 (Riverside up to Houston Lake)

Please contact Joanna Boyer:

--Joanna Boyer
Kansas City in
Platte County


State's neighbors raise the stakes



In 2014 the Missouri Legislature passed a modest income tax reduction which, given its size, by no means solved the state's tax competitiveness problems. That fact is made clearer by the news now coming from some of Missouri's neighbors. For instance in Iowa—where state lawmakers cut taxes as recently as 2013—the income tax reform movement is already getting bipartisan support.

But Iowa isn't the only border state looking to make income tax changes. In neighboring Nebraska, legislators are exploring a round of tax cuts of their own that would also chop the state's tax on incomes. On Missouri's southern border, Arkansas is looking to cut its income taxes too, in part by getting the state's tax exemption culture under control.

Missouri lawmakers deserved applause for finally getting a tax cut across the finish line in 2014, and make no mistake: Support for tax relief has never been greater in the Missouri Legislature than it will be in 2015. Legislative leaders should not sit on their hands and let the opportunity pass them by. Our neighbors certainly aren't.

---Patrick Ishmael
Senior Policy
Show-Me Institute


Analyzing Bev Roper’s logic



RE: Ramblings from Roper in last week’s Between the Lines column. I am no longer surprised by anything Commissioner Beverlee Roper says.

In July 2012, I wrote a letter supporting Ms. Roper's candidacy for commissioner. In hindsight, that letter was more fictional than factual.

Ignore her comment about the dollar amount of your property tax increase. Instead, pay attention to the logic Ms. Roper uses to justify her decision to impose higher taxes and her throwing almost everyone else under the bus.

Ms. Roper's trump card is that raising taxes was the "responsible action." She then proclaims that she has issued no new debt in two years. Anyone who reads the Jail Committee Report that included my financial charts will easily comprehend that the county is still digesting the $85 million in debt racked by former Presiding Commissioner Betty Knight.

As to some specifics:

1) In 2013 and 2014, Ms. Roper approved the Parks Fund loaning money to the General Fund to repay the early retirement of the Platte County Resource Center bonds originally issued in 2003. Unless you did some digging, this transaction was buried in the annual budgets approved by Ms. Roper.

2) Shiloh Springs Golf Course, about which I have written extensively, has been a drain on county resources for over a decade. Using Ms. Roper's logic, it is responsible to loan monies from parks to the general fund to pay Resource Center debt, but it is irresponsible to loan monies to law enforcement to pay radio debt. It is responsible for you to pay more taxes, but it is irresponsible for Ms. Roper and Commissioner Duane Soper to sacrifice golfing.

3) Ms. Roper states, "In fact, next year, we will pay off the Shiloh golf club bonds
early." December 2015 is the first call date of these 2005 issued bonds (thank Ms. Knight for ensuring bondholders their pound of flesh). The parks fund is gushing cash and early payment will save $106,000.

Why wouldn't they pay off this debt? However, what Ms. Roper really wants you to believe is that paying the debt will reduce the operating cost of Shiloh. This is like saying that if you pay cash for a house and prepay all the costs of ownership, you are living in it for free.

4) Ms. Roper states, "Legal and financial repercussions would be sure to follow," in reference to “a unilateral 25% reduction in the only funding stream available to pay the community centers debt.”

a) At the June 23 Jail Committee meeting, Ms. Roper told the committee that the county could lose $2.8 million in sales taxes due to pending state legislation. That caused "a breathless moment" for Ms. Roper. State Rep. Ken Wilson then noted that this communication was a result of Gov. Jay Nixon playing political games. Crisis averted. Ms. Roper's breathing and heartbeat were restored.

b) At this same meeting, committee members twice questioned Ms. Roper about the county budget. Perhaps sensing an impending loss of breath, she admitted she didn't know it.

c) The debt payments for the community centers represents 33% of the net parks fund revenues. Ms. Roper wants you to believe that increasing this 33% ratio to 45% is going to cause a default. Ms. Roper's breathing stops. More realistically, this is like saying the bank is going to foreclose on your home mortgage if you take the loan to collateral ratio from 33% to 45%. The banker yawns. It is thus responsible to incite fear without basis.

d) The bankers and the rating agency told us what they think of the community center debt as they downgraded it at the time of issue in 2011. The decrease was from Aa2 to A1. Thinking about that two notch reduction to what is still a prime rating apparently causes Ms. Roper's breathing to stop. As to market risk, the banker yawns.

e) Ms. Roper states, "...other DEBT....prevented the discussion" of "raiding" parks tax to pay the radio debt. Raid means to steal from or loot. That makes certain Jail Committee members potential criminals. In the end, the Jail Committee avoided prosecution, but not persecution, and the only discussion prevented was that amongst taxpayers. We are to conclude that Ms. Roper acted responsibly by unilaterally preventing you from having an opportunity to vote.

f) A key issue in the Jail Committee's work was the potential population explosion pertaining to the Twin Creeks development. Ms. Roper said Platte County's population could double in 10 years. More population would require more jail beds to accommodate the influx of criminals into Platte County. The Jail Committee subsequently obtained information that proved Ms. Roper's fear mongering to be almost farcical.

"The county commission has NO CONTROL over the other taxing jurisdictions." If you think about that statement (and what keeps causing her to keep hitting the caps key?), Ms. Roper's implication is that the commission's actions have no impact on other jurisdictions. The county commission is responsible for managing taxpayer resources that provide core infrastructure, essential services, and safety (i.e., law enforcement). Don't its decisions ultimately impact the decisions of every other taxing entity in Platte County? Isn't she sort of throwing every other jurisdiction under the bus?

Platte County residents would be wise to ignore the additional $20 in their tax bill and instead focus on whether Ms. Roper is capable of recognizing anything that truly could cause a breathless moment.

--Gordon Cook


An ode to Joan Harms, county clerk



With the Nov. 4 election making the change to the Platte County Clerk's office, a huge thank you to Joan Harms is in order.

Joan stepped up and ran for the county clerk position when no other Republican would run. She unseated a 23-year much- loved Democrat incumbent, which most people told her was impossible to do. Her campaign platform was saving taxpayers' money by cutting spending wherever she could, and that included not voting to give raises to elected office holders.

Joan Harms kept her promises. She never voted for county officeholders to receive raises, and Joan voluntarily requested to cut the clerk's budget by over 13% in 2012, saving the county nearly $10,000 annually. That same year she was forced by the county commission to cut an additional 14% from her budget, and the people of Platte County still received service with a smile from Joan Harms.
During Joan's tenure, the county funding of the clerk's office kept being reduced by a total of nearly $21,000, forcing Joan to create ways for the clerk's office to meet the budget. I wonder if the future budget will remain the same or continue to be reduced, as it was for Joan.

Having an elected official follow through on their campaign promises is remarkable, but Joan went beyond that. The clerk's office no longer takes money directly; having all payments made to the treasurer. She went out of her way to welcome people to the county commissioner's meetings, and she brought transparency to the county by enthusiastically showing people how to access information about the county.

Joan loves it when people show interest in the county she chooses to call home, and I hope she continues to inform fellow Platte County constituents how to find out what is going on with their county tax dollars.
Joan is also active in Republican clubs, and is always willing to lend a hand. Joan worked evenings at the election headquarters, helped out with the Organized Republican Conservatives of America and the Republican Central Committee events. She is involved with the Platte County Federated Republican Women, Pachyderms, Third Friday Patriots and more. She has been generously involved in many campaigns, with few Republican candidates able to say she had not stepped up to help them. She gave her time and money as a Delegate for the Republican National Convention in 2012. We can count on Joan to show up, and generously help out beyond belief.

Thanks again, Joan, for being a woman of your word, bringing transparency to Platte County, and always lending a helping hand to your fellow Platte County Republicans. Your smile and laughter are contagious, and the ORCA ladies would love to have you work with us, after you take a short vacation from politics. So, you can retire from the County Clerk's Office, but not from Platte County.

God Bless America and Joan Harms.

--Jane Scheckel
Organized Republican
Conservatives of America


Congressman sends congratulations



Congratulations on receiving six awards at the annual Missouri Press Association Better Newspaper Contest. I know your readers and peers all share in congratulating you on this outstanding achievement.

This selection shows the dedication you and your team display while delivering exceptional reports and commentary about the latest events in our society. For 150 years, The Landmark has informed and enlightened Platte County residents. Through times of war and peace, drought or abundance, Platte County has always been able to count on The Landmark to deliver the news.

Again, congratulations on the awards and on your 150th anniversary. I wish you the best of luck in the years to come.

--Sam Graves
Sixth District


Apparently R-3’s school buildings are shrinking



The members of Smithville American Legion Auxiliary 58 would like to express our sincere appreciation for the men and women who served in the United States Armed Forces.

Thank you for serving this great country. Thank you for protecting us. Thank you for the security we have and feel here at home. We know you sacrificed much for your country and all of us. And though you may no longer wear the uniform, we know you're always on call to serve and protect the freedom and security of the United States of America.

The American Legion Auxiliary supports and honors the sacrifice of those who served by enhancing the lives of our veterans, military and their families, both at home and abroad. We invite everyone to pause today to remember those who have fought for our freedoms. Thank you to all who have so bravely protected us.

Learn more about the American Legion Auxiliary at

--Amy Edwards
American Legion
Auxiliary Unit #58


Apparently R-3’s school buildings are shrinking



Platte County R-3 and the incredible shrinking school buildings.

A proposed levy for growth is once again in the news at R-3 which is funny because last Thursday night at the district "open forum" we were shown that only 25% of our schools’ square footage under roof is being used for classroom instruction.

PCR3’s worst offender is Platte County Middle school (our newest) with only 20% of the building being used for classrooms and this 20% is only being used 90% of the time according to Hollis and Miller the company that ironically is helping with the proposed new school.

Platte County Middle school was built in 2005 to handle over 750 students (Landmark Feb. 19, 2004) a number reconfirmed just last year by the district. It has 114,000 sq feet of which only 22,559 sq feet is now listed as usable classroom space. The "functional capacity" number presented at the meeting for the middle school is 623, a drop of 127 students from just last year and suddenly the school is too small. Odder is that a presentation based on square footage to the R-3 board in 2011 showed the school should handle over 840 students. A study not done by Hollis and Miller.

Park Hill’s Lakeview Middle School with 114,224 sq ft is very close to the size of PCMS. DESE (Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) shows last year it had 780 students, 157 more than PCR3 middle school’s new capacity. What's the difference? Park Hill is not currently pushing for a new school and uses capacity calculations like most districts, based on sq footage.
These guidelines based on state standards show a middle school should have about 130 sq. feet per student, elementary 110 and high schools 145. PCR3 has started using "functional capacity." This is a capacity analysis that, unlike square footage, can be manipulated to use or not use classroom space to figure the capacity of a school as needed and then a "utilization factor" will drop it even further.

Lakeview Middle school is fine and has 146 sq. ft per child. The PCR3 "functional" study says we need a whopping 183 sq. ft. per student for our middle school students. If Lakeview added on the space PCR3 says is needed they would have to build an addition of 28,000 sq. feet, or over half a football field. The R-3 High School building is not much better, showing they only use 23% of the school for classrooms and of this 23% it is only used 85% of the time.

Rising Star is all over the place. For the March 2013 Citizens Advisory Committee, we were told Rising Star would only handle 175 kids, four months later it was 184, three months after that it was down to 163 in the "functional study" and now it is back to 184, with the functional number not being used for obvious reasons.

In 2011 Rising Star had over 200 kids in the school and handled it with "no problem," per a school administrator. 200 is a number that still beats the guidelines by 10 sq. ft. per child. Rising Star enrollment has continually dropped since 2011, this year to 156 students. This drop leads you to believe we need to adjust our schools for a wave due to the previous building boom and not overbuild for the top of that wave.

To give you an idea of how PCR3 compares overall, Park Hill has about 136 sq. feet per student in its district, PCR3 has about 143 sq. ft. per student, not counting the trailers added shortly after the last failed levy (or the Barry trailers). On average, R-3 has more room than our neighbors to the south, who are not screaming for a new school.

Guess who did one of the studies for Park Hill and said "145 sq. ft. per learner" is adequate? Hollis and Miller. Guess who makes their living designing new schools and R-3 has paid them about $800K since last November? Hollis and Miller.

The first power point slide shown by the district at the "open forum" meeting had five of our seven schools in red currently over capacity. Does this remind you of anything from 2012, with all of the inflated growth numbers in red? Since the failed levy in 2012, the R-3 School Board and administration have not found ways to maximize our buildings as others are doing. Instead, they have actually found a way to make our schools appear smaller. All of this in hopes of getting a new school, which may not even be needed at the north campus.

Information given to the R-3 School Board in 2011 based on the square footage guidelines showed the district should be able to handle 4286 students. Last year we were given a capacity of 3775. Now "Functional Capacity" numbers show a new low of 3672. Down every study since the failed levy. Our school buildings have not changed but with just the mark of a pen they now have been made to appear 14% smaller than just three years ago.

Do you think those trailers were needed after the last failed levy? Do we have the most inefficient school buildings or should other adjustments been made?

Supporting documents for this are on the GROWTH page at

--Kirby Holden
Platte County


There are questions for R-3 school board



It's that time again, the general election, Tuesday, Nov. 4, is just around the corner. There are many good and trustworthy candidates running.

This is a reminder for voters to check out the four Constitutional Amendments on the ballot beforehand. There are many issues and candidates including state, county, and Missouri judges that you will have an opportunity to vote for.

In addition, there will be an open forum session concerning next April's ballot initiative this Thursday, Oct. 30 at 6 p.m. at the Forum Room in the Platte City Middle School, 900 Pirate Drive, Platte City. The subject is a tax levy increase facing voters in the April election. Questions from attendees will be accepted and answered at the session, R-3 officials said.

It has been two years since Platte County R-3 had a levy increase question on the ballot to raise your taxes. They work for you, the valued voter, and the active and engaged citizen.

Are you happy with the way the school is currently spending your money? Do you have any idea what their budget is? Do you know how their four different funds of money work? What their current debt is? Why our district is one of the highest districts in the state with debt per student? Why they are asking you to buy a new school building by leasing it, instead of “bonding” it? Have they saved any money for this project?

Can we afford to keep giving our administrators and staff salary increases of 3.59% to 5.12% (July 23, 2014, The Landmark) while patrons’ incomes have remained stagnant in this economy and some of our students are in trailers?

These are just a few questions that should be asked and answered by our district school board for the public to hear. Your attendance is appreciated.

--Janet Stark
Platte City


Stem the relentless onslaught of the left



This past weekend, I was phone surveyed on expanding Missouri Medicaid and implementing a prescription drug registry. I was also approached by a campaign supporter of these actions. Both contacts were related to the Missouri Senate race between Republican Rob Schaaf and Democrat Bob Stuber.

The campaign supporter wanted Medicaid expansion on the basis that if Missouri doesn't act, another state will get the funds. This is analogous to promoting participation in a public bank robbery on the basis that if you don't take some of the money, someone from another neighborhood will be there to take what could have been your portion.

The argument is premised on losing federal funding for charity (i.e., free) services provided under the Affordable Healthcare Act. Like the ACA, expanding Medicaid is another mechanism to transfer yet more "free healthcare" costs to those already paying into the system.

When asked to explain what price one should pay for health care or what those who provide the care should receive as compensation, this campaign supporter had no answer. How can you support expanding a system without first understanding the underlying cost structure? What other businesses write off 50-80% of their billed charges and still make a profit?

Regarding the prescription drug registry, 49 other states have adopted this legislation. Proponents say Missouri must also comply. Personal freedom stand aside. You must concede your personal and private medical information to government. Rob Schaaf disagrees with conceding to Democrats.

The federal government has proven itself to be full of snoops and thieves and otherwise incapable of securely maintaining your private information. So let's add another means for the unscrupulous to steal your personal data.

Why does the solution to a problem created by a very few have to result in punishing everyone else? Why don't they track buyers of potato chips or chocolate shakes since they are at risk of becoming diabetics? What societal imperfection is next on the agenda of the progressive left? Answer: there is no end to the progressive left's drive to control everything you do.

A Democrat flyer I received in the mail said affordable health care is part of the American dream. How demented Democrats have become to think that the American dream is something other than living free of government intrusion and control.

Government snooping, forcing you to pay for "free" things others receive, and forcing you to pay more for health care without any improvement in health care; these are Democrat ideals. Read some history and you will learn just how far left Democrats have moved.

Want to stem the relentless onslaught of progressive left, aka Democrats? Vote Republican. They aren't perfect, but compared to Democrats, it's the best choice. Then get involved. While you are ignoring the progressive left, they are stealing your country.

--Gordon Cook


Achievements over accusations



Dr. Stuber is undoubtedly a fine, compassionate doctor but we aren't electing a doctor. We are electing a legislator to represent the people of Missouri. Dr. Stuber's numerous published letters indicates he is an avid supporter of Obama's agenda, which he has neglected to mention in his campaign. His election committee appears to be as deceitful as Obama's “you can keep your doctor,” “you can keep your health care plan,” and Isis is “a jayvee team.”

In contrast, State Senator, Dr. Rob Schaaf is dedicated to truth and freedom – protecting our liberties, ensuring our laws are fair, and our tax dollars are not wasted. His campaign is built on his skills to help Missourians thrive. No negative remarks. No misleading attacks.

Dr. Rob Schaaf has delivered on issues such as lower taxes, better health care, more support for education, and $2 million for Rosecrans, always careful to protect your liberties. The Missouri 2015 budget includes a $164 million increase for K-12, higher education, and community colleges. Governor Nixon opposes these.

Dr. Rob Schaaf sponsored Amendment 9 which limited government snooping into your phone, email and electronic data without a warrant. He opposed forcing citizens to put their medications on a government database. Who wants our medications on a government data base after the intrusions by IRS, NSA, and Justice Department? They present no evidence that government tracking has protected citizens.

Rob sponsored the “Compassionate Care” bill to aid dying patients with more treatment options. He helped pass legislation to have medical school graduates provide care to underserved areas across Missouri. This bill also included MORx that helps reduce the cost of prescriptions for low-income seniors. His achievements go on and on.

It's clear he didn't do all these things himself. Schaaf worked together with other legislators for issues they knew would help and protect Missourians. Dr. Stuber has an “Obama bigger government agenda” but talks about popular “things HE will do.” Dr. Stuber has no power to create good-paying jobs, make college affordable (which is not affordable due to government programs), or lower taxes by expanding government.

Dr. Stuber implies Dr. Rob Schaaf takes tons of lobbyist money. Where is Stuber's big money coming from? Recently I've received eight negative mailers supporting Dr. Stuber from the Missouri Democratic State Committee and ADVOCATE, The Political Arm of Planned Parenthood of St. Louis, whose big money comes from abortions.

If you have an agenda that Missourians may not like, use the Obama method of attacking others, making deceitful claims, and if it doesn't work blame someone else.

--Bruce Huffman


It's important to vote for a conservative



OK conservatives and other thinking Americans, it's voting time. Is it critical? Yes. This administration continues with trillion dollar deficits, ignoring laws on the books (DOMA), has an Attorney General who is the first to be held in Contempt of Congress, continues to secretly collect personal data, about to issue some sort of amnesty for millions of illegals, destroying our health insurance industry which will inevitably destroy our health care system while simultaneously raising rates exponentially, and striking down voter ID laws. Holy moly, you need ID to cash a check! Shouldn't you need to prove who you are to select our representatives and president?

Don't be fooled by incumbents suddenly realizing that Obama's policies are toxic and telling constituents that “the last person they want to see coming is me,” Mark Udall-Colorado. Or “I'll be a thorn in his [posterior],” Mark Begich-Alaska. Or “I voted against every budget that President Obama has offered.” Mark Pryor-Arkansas. Or “I do not agree with President Obama on his energy policies,” Mary Landrieu-Louisiana. Or, Democrat Sen. Kay Hagan of North Carolina wouldn't say whether she voted for Obama. Or Mark Warner speaking on the ebola outbreak, “I think the administration should have acted quicker.” Or (I) “was troubled by the president's recent suggestion that the administration has not yet developed a comprehensive strategy to address the growing threat of ISIL's activities in Syria.” Al Franken-Minnesota.

All these have a couple of things in common, they are Democrats and they are in trouble. Does any reasonable mind actually believe that the DNC would allow this political mutiny? Heavens no. This is devised strategy to attempt to save these senate seats. If it works they go back to voting with Obama and continuing these horrible policies. But these shenanigans are not limited to national elections, oh no.

Take the reports that McCaskill's money is flowing into Stuber's campaign for state senator. Or Orman's campaign in Kansas claiming independence. Yeah, right. He's as much an Independent as I am! (BTW, my view of a candidate running as an Independent is someone who is too embarrassed to call themselves a Democrat.) Or consider the two liberal county commissioners that don't think the citizens of Platte County can decide whether or not to split off some of the parks and rec tax to pay for some high tech radios that we have been forced to buy. That was a little too blatant to convince me that someone on the bike path committee didn't have their ears.

Now, I know if you are reading this, I'm preaching to the choir but if a Republican would have done half of the crazy stuff that Obama has done he would have been impeached…and convicted…or resigned.

Barack Hussein Obama's policies must be stopped and short of a revolution, voting is how it is done in America. Please vote. Vote for a conservative. If you can't find one, vote for the Republican who you hope will at least be pro-life, pro one-man one-woman marriage, and balance a checkbook.

--Jim DeJarnatt


Voices need to be heard at Houston Lake



A quilt hangs on the wall at Houston Lake City Hall. In the early 1990's participating families donated a block to it that had their own pattern and signature. The quilt signifies a glorious decade in the history of Houston Lake. It was a decade when creative minds got things done.

The spillway bridge was rebuilt without any state funds to the tune of $4,500. Over 20 years later it is still in fine shape. The Lake Association purchased a dredger. A team of three citizens increased the depth of portions of the lake by two feet. They were paid only $10 an hour. They used the mud from the bottom of the lake to create a park by the dam and another peninsula that is still used for our annual fireworks displays.

Well now those days are gone. The bridge's status remains undecided, the dredger has been sold.

Now it appears that the quilt will come down as part of an interior renovation plan that the mayor and the city council are trying to push through. It almost passed at the last city council meeting. But thanks to a citizen's eloquent demand that they get more than one quote, the vote was postponed to next month's meeting.

So, what will they put up in place of the quilt? Apparently, one of the aldermen is a photographer. Pictures that she took will go up there.

Will the Houston Lake residents be paying for the pictures or will they be donated?

Citizens should attend the November city council meeting so we can have our voices heard and take back our town hall.

--Chuck Stone
Houston Lake


Test score comparisons not favorable for R-3



In last week’s Landmark, reporter Stephanie Eaton looked at the Platte County R-3 test scores for several subjects. I won’t go into detail about them all but I would like to point out a "fractional truth" in the explanation as to why 65% of all PCR3 students who take the 8th grade state required math MAP exam can’t pass it.

Superintendent Dr. Mike Reik said that he can't compare test scores because many districts do not test in Algebra I at the eighth grade level. He insinuated that since R-3 has more students taking the Algebra I exam (more than other districts) that leaves the students who perform poorer in math to take the Math MAP exam so our scores are lower.

Here are the numbers with a comparison to Park Hill. At Barry School, only 21 of our 8th graders took the Algebra I exam and they scored 100%. The other 70% of the class then took the Math MAP test and scored 38.5%, second lowest of all area schools.

At Platte City Middle School, 101 8th graders took the Algebra I exam, scoring 93%. The other students took the MAP math exam and scored 30.1% the lowest.

Can you compare this to other area districts? Of course you can. We compare ourselves to Park Hill in all areas from salaries to sports so let’s look at their scores. 218 eighth graders took the Algebra I test at the Park Hill Middle schools and scored 97.6% at Congress and 100% at Lakeview.

For the 8th grade math MAP score they had a 59.6% at Congress and a 66.4% at Lakeview, a 62.3% average, compared to PCR3's 33.4%. Almost twice as many Park Hill 8th graders scored higher on the MAP score and the others scored higher on the Algebra I test.

Kearney tested 311 students in Algebra I (majority of 8th graders), the other kids then scored a 40.6% on the MAP Math test. 90 more students tested in Algebra I than PCR3 and Kearney is a slightly smaller district.

By percentage, Kearney tested the most eighth graders in Algebra I with Smithville the lowest testing only 23.

Ten area middle schools were looked at for this letter, from NKC to North Platte. The ONLY district that did not test Algebra I at the eighth grade level was North Platte. Of the 10 looked at, the lowest score by 7% in Math Map testing was PCR3.

Even if you pull the numbers through and assume all of the 8th graders who took the Algebra I test would have passed the Math MAP test, we would have still ranked 5th (PCMS) and 8th (Barry) out of nine schools with Lakeview, Congress and New Mark at the top.

Overall, the Park Hill school district scored 15% higher in Algebra I than PCR3, 82.7% to R3's 67.3%.

This info and much more is available at Find your school, click on the test score tab and use the drop downs to navigate. The site also tells you how many students took the test and school sizes.

By the time you read this the R-3 school board meeting may be over, as it is this Thursday night at 6;30. From what I witnessed last year (when the scores were also lower) there will be Power Point slides comparing schools from outside the area Mehlville, Webster Grove and Kirkwood were used when unlike the majority of Missouri school districts in 2013 these three did not even test upper level math at their high schools. 520 districts to choose from and we don't compare ourselves to districts that test in the same subjects as us?

Platte County High School, which scored below state averages in three of the eight areas tested, if like last year will not even be talked about. Administrators will talk about our lofty goals, "reaching for success" and how hard everyone is working.

The school board will congratulate everyone for great presentations, look no further into the problem and next year we will be doing it all over again unless something changes or the scores are now as low as they can possibly go in these subjects. I hope I am wrong.

If you are in Park Hill School District, congratulations. From what I just looked at you are doing very well academically at both the middle school and high school level. Some of the best scores in the state.

PCR3 has improved in American History, English II, Biology I and Government at the high school level. English I has stayed about the same the past three years. It’s those three subjects which are all intertwined that seem to be the problem--Algebra I, Algebra II and Geometry.

The school board is going to have to get to work. In 2015, Missouri requires ALL students to be proficient in Algebra 1. Platte County R-3 will no longer get a pass.

--Kirby Holden
Rural Platte County


Alderman's behavior is 'inexcusable'



This is a follow-up letter to the one I wrote two weeks ago concerning the drunk-driving arrest of alderman and Mayor Pro-tem of Parkville, Marc Sportsman. To date he has not resigned for (allegedly) being drunk and driving near a school, nor has any other alderman asked him to resign or even speak on the subject. This is an unfortunate and unacceptable situation.

But, the focus of this letter is on another Parkville alderman whose recent actions also call for her resignation. Alderman Kendall Welch recently berated and mocked members of Main Street Association and our executive director. This berating took place at last week's CLARB (Community Land and Recreation Board) meeting in which Alderman Welch attempted to embarrass me and our executive director by pulling out non-approved, non-published minutes to illustrate that we were misrepresenting a portion of this year's Downtown Christmas celebration.

Alderman Welch obtained these minutes in a deceiving manner from our Main Street secretary. The minutes showed no such deception on our part and even substantiated everything we had said.

Again, this type of unethical and deceptive behavior from one of Parkville's aldermen is disgusting and deplorable. As an alderman, you should be supporting downtown initiatives, not calling Main Street officers and harassing them.

Welch contacted at least three officers and tried to get them to say they did not support the initiative. Which is not true. According to our minutes of the meeting we voted on, the initiative passed unanimously.

Alderman Welch, your behavior goes beyond the bounds of decorum that is expected from a public official. Your faint-hearted attempt to pull off a “gotcha” moment was at the very least unethical and at the worst possibly unlawful. Don't you have better things to do as a representative of Parkville, such as discussing the resignation of one of your fellow aldermen who (allegedly) drove drunk near a school? How about the financial mess Parkville is in with an overinflated budget due to excessive spending and a commitment to a bond issue you had no business obligating our citizens to?

Alderman Welch, as I recommended to Alderman and Mayor Pro-tem Marc Sportsman after he drove drunk, it is time for you to resign for your dishonorable behavior. Being a bully in front and behind the scenes seems to be a pattern with you. You tried to shove a single payer trash service system down our throats a few years back and were rightly rebuked by Parkville citizens.

In last week's meeting, I even sensed that the members of the CLARB board were embarrassed by your inexcusable and elitist behavior. You and Alderman Sportsman can start rebuilding credibility to a beleaguered city government by doing the correct thing and resign immediately.

Downtown Parkville needs support, not backroom politics or unprincipled behavior by our elected officials.

--Tom Hutsler


Amendment 3 is bad for children



I am voting no on Amendment 3.

This horrible change to the Missouri Constitution would require more testing of our students. Currently, our students take 26 “high-stakes tests” between third grade and twelfth grade.

If Amendment 3 passes, it would require more testing of every subject. Our children would go from 26 tests to 240 + tests. The cost to the state would be roughly a half a billion dollars. That half a billion dollars would be paid by us, the taxpayers.

Amendment 3 is bad for the children of Missouri.

--Paula York
Weatherby Lake


Support tax cuts not handouts



When the Missouri legislature returned to the Capitol last month, legislators decided not to override Gov. Jay Nixon's vetoes of a wide array of tax incentives, passed at the end of the regular session.
The governor had said the tax breaks--which he called “Friday Favors” -- would have bled millions from state and local coffers to the benefit of a variety of special interests.

His concerns were well-founded, and both the governor and the legislature that sustained his vetoes deserve credit for ultimately rejecting these tax breaks.

Tax incentives can be understood as an admission that the government's tax burdens are too high.

If the economic environment is “ripe” for incentives, then it is also ripe for broad-based tax cuts.
Indeed, tax cuts--not tax breaks--are what the legislature should pursue in 2015. By rejecting revenue-hemorrhaging handouts this year, the legislature kept the window open to substantive tax cuts next year.

I hope they seize the opportunity they've created.

--Patrick Ishmael
Senior Analyst
Show-Me Institute


Edgerton votes apparently don't matter



An open letter to all the citizens of voting age in Edgerton, Missouri. If I told you that our constitutional right to vote in our own community had been secretly taken away from us, what would your response be?

I hope, and I believe, it would be outrage. Yet that is exactly what has happened to us.
During our annual Pioneer Days celebration, “someone” posted a notice on our American Legion hall where we vote, stating that Edgerton citizens could no longer vote in Edgerton, but must now go to Dearborn. Citizens of Ridgely must now go to Hoover to vote.

Who made this decision and why were the citizens of Edgerton not notified of this well in advance of the upcoming November election?

This is nothing short of some local Platte County politicians once again infringing on our rights as American citizens to express our freedom to choose candidates of our choice or vote for amendments of our choosing.

Fortunately, an Edgerton citizen spotted this notice and informed many of us what was happening. It didn't take long to organize other neighbors to seek out answers about who and why this decision was made.

Calls were made to Platte County officials and a meeting was hastily called by a Chris Hershey of the Platte County Board of Elections at 4:30 on a weekday afternoon, knowing that most people, including our mayor, wouldn't be home from work yet.

However, several residents did attend, and asked him why this decision was made, and most of his answers to us were, “I'm really not comfortable with that.”

He told us Edgerton didn't have enough workers to man the voting booth. I believe this to be an absolute lie. As a lifetime resident of Edgerton, I have never gone to vote where there weren't an abundance of volunteers working. He told us we could apply for absentee ballots, but it was time consuming and the ballots have to be submitted six weeks before the election. I lost my temper at this point and stood up and told him, in effect, nothing we say or do matters at this point as far as the November election is concerned. Edgerton votes do not matter.

As I walked home from the meeting I was seething. This is not Iraq or Afghanistan. This is Edgerton, Missouri, in the United States of America, and we are not absent.

--Marie Daniel


Sportsman should resign his position



It is with much disdain that I read the article regarding Marc Sportsman, Parkville alderman and mayor pro-tem about his run-in with the law. I am very upset that he is continuing to drive drunk in this day and age. That anyone would do that is quite disconcerting considering all the evidence of the ramifications of loss of life and tragic endings when one drives drunk.

I hope he is receiving help from professionals for his drinking and driving problem. Most drunks that drive are repeat offenders and I can only assume that his behavior is no different from most drunk drivers.

This behavior is offensive for anyone, but is even further unacceptable from a public official, a supposed leader in our community as an alderman and mayor pro-tem of the board. Our elected officials should be held to a much higher standard in all aspects of their life. Mr. Sportsman has lost his right to represent Parkville in an ethical and moral manner. His actions, by driving drunk, constitute the worst type of conduct and he should immediately resign.

Further, his putting the resignation burden on the mayor and fellow aldermen is completely deplorable. This is made worse by his attitude when another Parkville elected official had the same charge levied against him several years ago. Mr. Sportsman led the band for this public figure to resign and that person had the guts to step down, which was appropriate in that case, and is proper in this case of Mr. Sportsman's drunk driving episode .

Considering the higher standard that Mr. Sportsman has recently called for from other public entities and individuals it is unacceptable to me that Mr. Sportsman do anything but immediately resign his office as an alderman and the mayor pro-tem of Parkville. His conduct of driving drunk near a school and in our neighborhoods is contrary to any ethical and behavioral standard set by our society today.

Mr. Sportsman you messed up, you made a grave error in judgment by driving drunk and now is the time to step up like a man and take the consequences. You no longer have the trust of the people of Parkville and you no longer deserve the support or respect of your fine constituents. You are not a reliable representative that should be able to pass judgment on the issues that Parkville is facing today.

Mayor Pro-Tem/Alderman Sportsman, step down, quit, resign; these are simple, straightforward recommendations that you should accept without complaint. You don't need to put the mayor or your fellow aldermen in a position to tell you to do the right thing. They probably don't want to make that decision for you. I am not sure any of them have the fortitude to make that call, anyway. You have been very vocal in the past when this has happened to others and you have been extremely loud lately about even the “appearance of impropriety” for Parkville officials.

Marc Sportsman, heed your own words and hand in your notice. Being embarrassed is not enough to satisfy the appropriate actions in this case. You should be humiliated and contrite in every bone in your judgmental body. It's time to judge yourself with that higher sense of standards you speak of for others. Your moral high ground is now a valley that you are languishing in with regret.

Parkville no longer wants you to sit in judgment of its citizens, financial well-being, or our future.

--Tom Hutsler


Change direction of Houston Lake at election



The August city council meeting had a lively debate between seven residents and Houston Lake's Mayor Mike Hallauer about the spillway bridge.

It concluded with Mayor Hallauer promising to invite a bridge expert from the county to the next meeting. I give praise to Mayor Hallauer's response to the public outcry over what seemed to be a hasty decision by him and the city council.

As promised, Greg Sager, director, Platte County Public Works, was at the Sept. 8 council meeting.

He handed out copies of the MoDOT bridge inspection report from earlier this year. The structure ratings are listed on the back. He read each of the applicable line items and explained the terms that bridge inspectors use.

I will number them as they appear in the “structure rating” section. All of the numerical ratings are on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the best.

“…even if the deck and superstructure were 10s it would still be rated low, because it is a one-lane bridge and has a two-lane road coming from either direction."

[58] Deck--On our bridge the deck is rated on any rotting or splintering of the cross-member timbers and runners. 6 - Satisfactory

[59] Superstructure--On our bridge the superstructure would be the I-beams that support the timbers. 8 – Very good.

[60] Substructure this would be the pillars, footings, and everything else that is underneath the I-beams. 7 – Good condition.

[61] Channel protection. He praised the spillway protective device that we constructed a couple years ago. 8– Protected devices stable

[113] Scour Assessment. Scour is an assessment of how vulnerable a bridge is to flash erosion of abutments and piers due to flooding. 8 – stable for calculated observed

Platte County Landmark journalist Valerie Verkamp was at the meeting and quoted Sager's explanation of [67], [68],
“The structure evaluation is rated a 2—basically intolerable— and the sufficiency rating on a scale from one to one hundred is rated 40.10%," said Sager. "The formula MoDOT uses to rate the bridge and come up with that sufficiency rating takes into consideration a lot of different factors. But the reason this particular bridge will never be rated high, even if the deck and superstructure were 10s it would still be rated low, because it is a one-lane bridge and has a two-lane road coming from either direction (Sept. 10, 2014, The Landmark).

Sager summed up the overall condition of the bridge, “'All in all, the structure is in good shape,” said Sager. “We have some bridges rated much lower'” (Verkamp, Sept. 10). He also said, “With proper maintenance this bridge could last 10 to 20 years.”

For further information on this meeting and the city council’s stand on the issue:

The gates that are intended to close this bridge have already been delivered; there have been no public announcements about its future. If the city’s reasoning for closing the bridge is because it cannot stand up to the increased traffic count, it is unwarranted. Residents discussed the possibility of placing speed bumps on the dam according to minutes of the Oct. 14, 2013 city council meeting.

“Another solution to traffic control would be closing the dam to traffic. Pedestrians only was also discussed" (City of Houston Lake Official Minutes of the Council Meeting. 2013, October 14).
Traffic control? Are you kidding me? This all started because we can't control the speed of the traffic over the bridge?

We can change the direction of Houston Lake on Election Day. (April 8).


City of Houston Lake Official Minutes of the Council Meeting. (2013, October 14) Public Discussion. Retrieved from

MoDOT (2014, August 25). MoDOT Bridge Inventory and Inspection System, Non-State Structure Inspection Report. [Design No. 2045001]. Structure Rating.

Verkamp, V. (2014, September 10). Inspector says bridge is good. The Platte County Landmark. p. 1. Retrieved from http://www.plattecountylandmark .com/Article11881.htm

--Chuck Stone
Houston Lake


Sign him up for The Landmark



Please sign me up for your newspaper.

Also as part of the offer, please send the Kansas City Renaissance Festival tickets to me in the attached envelope.

Thank you for this offer.

I have been buying your paper about once a month. I’m glad to get it weekly now.

Thank you.

-- Owen McCauley


Problems with Fairpoint



Another fiasco.

Fairpoint Communications closed their satellite office in Platte City.

Makes one wonder why when you call their 903 number it takes 15 to 20 minutes before you get to talk to anyone, then it takes another 10 minutes or so for the next person to answer.

They are now promoting an upgrade which I subscribed to because my original box failed.

I have spent several minutes trying to make the new system work to no avail.

Went to bed Friday evening with both televisions working. Woke up Saturday with no signal.
Finally, today I got some response. I told them to come pick up their gear and cancel my account.

This will take place tomorrow.

--Lee Roy Van Lew
Platte City


Jumping on board The Landmark



Over the past month I have noticed that your newspaper represents independent and professional journalism in its highest form. Therefore, I’ve decided to subscribe. I understand that you are running a new subscriber special at the reduced rate of $20.

I have enclosed a return envelope so that you can send me the Renaissance Festival tickets. You can use the above address as the billing and delivery address.

--Charles E. Stone
Houston Lake


The county's 'Oh crap' moments



There's always a reason why…

There's always a reason why elected officials raise our taxes. There's a pending crisis; there's a special need; there's looming disaster. Raising taxes on taxpayers is the easiest, quickest and least contested way to add spendable dollars.

Because Commissioners Beverlee Roper and Duane Soper were unable to adjust their mental mindset concerning Platte County's jail and federally mandated radio problems, Roper spearheaded another tax add-on. Because Park Hill School Board didn't like their tax levy increase being voted down, they've decreed a property tax increase.

The largest tax increase in United States history is the Affordable Care Act, where a U.S. president and both houses of Congress voted in ObamaCare.

Roper and Soper are raising our property tax from 1 cent per to 6 cents per $100 assessed evaluation, which amounts to a 500% tax increase. And, there's always a reason why.

A major economic driver is being overlooked by these “Tax and Spend” representatives. Whenever THEY take money out of a wage earner's pocket in taxes, THEY take away personal spending power, causing personal sacrifice. Has anyone noticed the number of company closures in Platte County? Please watch for vacant store fronts and listen to people talk about job loss.
The Roper and Soper 500% increase in new Platte County property taxes, coupled with new school tax increases, doesn't look like much, but it becomes unwarranted tax increases.

Our family annual income is set, but sometimes we experience a financial “OH! CRAP!” moment. Some major event occurs outside our budget: an air conditioner breaks, a health issue arises, the house needs painting, there's a car wreck, a lightning strike burned down the barn, etc. When an unexpected disaster strikes, we have to tighten our belts and manage our income to solve the new crisis. We become creative in finding solutions for this pressure point. Actually, every wage earner learns to be realistic about spending and budget priorities.

Unfortunately, our Platte County Commissioners view each crisis as unique, choosing their quick and easy fix for meeting the county's “OH! CRAP” moments. They simply smile, blame someone else, deny facts, ignore economic outcomes, and then vote to raise every owner's real estate taxes.

It's obvious these two commissioners are calloused about personal hardships or business failures within our fine community.

--Lee Valentine
Platte County


County bond transactions have a bad odor



I want to clarify an interest expense number I have been using in previous letters regarding the $21,015,000 par value Special Obligation Bonds issued in December 2011. These bonds provided financing for the expansion of the Community Centers in Parkville and Platte City.

$4,742,894 of interest will be paid over the life of these bonds based on applying the coupon rates (the stated interest rates) to the par values of the bonds. After reviewing the bond documents, the true interest is $3,329,067. However, there is more to this transaction.

Part of the bond proceeds was used to pay the remaining $1.1 million balance of the 2003 Platte County Resource Center Certificates of Participation (COPs). This debt was historically paid from the general fund. The final two payments on these COPs were due in 2012 and 2013. This COP payoff was funded by issuing the 2011 bonds at a premium, meaning the coupon interest rates were higher than the then market interest rates.

When taking into consideration the issue premium, the county actually borrowed $22,428,826, not $21,015,000 as represented in issued press reports. The total proceeds were allocated to underwriter discount ($189,135), issue costs ($144,600), the 2003 COPs ($1,091,841) and the expansion project ($21,003,250). But there is more.

Two $550,286 transfers, for a total of $1,100,572, were made from the general fund to the parks fund in each of 2013 and 2014 to repay the $1,091,841 COP payoff made in December 2011. The difference of $8,731 is presumed to be interest.

Do we know the commission's intent with the initial funding? Was there intent to move general fund debt into parks? Or was the general fund simply borrowing from the parks fund? And if the general fund can borrow from parks to pay for building debt, why can't the general fund borrow from parks to pay for radio debt? Is there a requirement to pay interest between funds? Is there a policy in place regarding interfund borrowing?

Other comments and concerns:

•The $21 million funding for the community centers had to be expended within three years. As I have previously noted, part of the financing could have been paid from annual cash flow. Who required this cash to be immediately available? How much interest cost could have been avoided?

•The bonds are not callable. As such, even if the county had funds available for prepayment, or if interest rates declined, the county has no ability to change the financing structure or cost.

•The county's general obligation bonds are rated by Moody's at Aa2, two notches below the highest possible rating of Aaa. The 2011 bonds are rated A1, two levels below Aa2. The Moody's letter states the lower rating reflects "the risk of non-appropriation and the essentiality of the projects financed." Doesn't that make a point? Financing non-essentials costs more. For a comparison, using the effective interest rates obtained by Liberty MO Water for bonds issued in December 2011, which also carried an A rating, the interest on $21,015,000 par value is over $1 million less.

•The current commission is concerned about a rating downgrade if they lower the Parks tax to 3/8 of one percent. Moody's has already made clear their view of these bonds. Further, the Moody's letter outlines factors that would change the county's rating. Why does the commission and its attorney insist on keeping communications about ratings under client/attorney privilege?

•The public notice of the issuance of these bonds was printed only in the Kansas City Star. Why was notice not printed in any of the local Platte County newspapers? No one at the county knew the reason for this omission.

•How much should it cost to issue A1 rated privately placed bonds using substantially the same form of documents as have been used for years and with the same underwriter and attorneys? With underwriter and issue costs totaling $333,735, how closely is the commission looking at costs?

•Details of issuance costs totaling $144,600 are not contained in the documents. Why not? My request for details is unanswered as of this letter.

•How do we know the underwriter discount (.9% of par value or $189,135) as well as the bond interest rates are competitive when the commission doesn't invite anyone else to bid on the deal?

•The certification of the interest rate calculations was completed by a CPA firm in Denver, CO.

Are there no Missouri CPA firms qualified to do this?

The documents state that a portion of the bonds would be available for purchase by the public. I was not aware and nobody I have asked was aware that these bonds were available. When told the interest rates and asked if they would have liked to own these bonds, the answer I receive without exception is "yes." But does anyone think the commission wanted the average person to know they were borrowing from the parks fund to pay general fund debt, that they were borrowing funds in 2011 for expenditures being made in 2013 and 2014, or that their non-essential borrowing is more expensive?

Now consider the debt explosion that occurred while Betty Knight was presiding commissioner. Would the public have tolerated that had they been given the opportunity to own bonds issued by the county during that period?

The 2011 bonds were privately placed by a financier who is a former county commissioner. How difficult is it to sell A1 rated bonds issued by a county with one of the highest per capita incomes in the state of Missouri? The tax effected rate on the longer dated bonds approximates 6%. The bonds are insured. I own bonds. Selling these bonds is a slam dunk.

This bond offering and the related transactions have a bad odor. And like sales taxes, enough is enough. If we, the citizens of Platte County want to protect the county's reputation, we need elected officials who won't engage in these type of transactions. The August election was a good start.

--Gordon Cook


Park tax should be cut back for radios



It is amazing that three individuals can sit down and raise taxes. These individuals knew about the upgrades on the radio system for the county sheriff when two of them were elected and you know who they are.

Now they have voted 2-1 to raise property taxes. Why did they or their former board members not wake up and see that this radio system was ordered by the federal government. Did they think if they ignored it that it would go away?

Now when it comes time to cough up a whole bunch of money to make the upcoming payment, they vote 2-1 to raise the property tax levy by five cents per $100 of assessed valuation.

There was talk about changing the tax rate for parks and turning that money over to the radio fiasco. This would be a good move. Parks has had a tremendous expansion over the last few years and should be cut back.

--Lee Roy Van Lew
Platte City


Attracting Google Fiber should be priority



In last week's Landmark article concerning Dan Demory and Mike Kearns trying to get the Platte City Economic Development Subcommittee interested in attracting Google Fiber to our area, the tone of the article makes it sound like our city administrator, DJ Gerhrt, is whining in that “Google is not really interested in talking to Platte City” and that “United Private provides the same amount of speed.”

First of all, I would suggest that Gerhrt and the subcommittee be more aggressive and do what it takes to get Google interested in us instead of giving up. I suspect Gerhrt and our economic subcommittee do not realize the impact this could have on Platte City.

Second, “United Private,” actually Unite Private (took me a while to find through Google) only provides service to schools, governments, hospitals, and so on, but not to our homes, so implying that we already have the same high speed services available is inaccurate.

I urge the Platte City Economic Subcommittee and residents to make this a high priority. Affordable gigabit speeds such as what Google provides attracts folks in Information Technology and related “work from home “ businesses. These kind of high income jobs/earners would only benefit Platte City. It's the kind of thing that can make a person in this field choose one city over another when deciding where to move to next.

--Robert Goen
Platte City


Why close the Houston Lake bridge?



Four months ago our elected officials at Houston Lake voted unanimously to close the bridge over the dam spillway (front page story, Aug. 20 issue of The Landmark).

They made this decision based on the claims of a few residents, who say that the bridge is “wearing out.” Mayor Mike Hallauer stated that it would cost a million dollars to rebuild it. That is a scary figure. But wait – the bridge is still safe right now.

These are the facts. Every two years the bridge gets inspected by the state. The last inspection listed the deck as good, the superstructure very good, the substructure: good, and the channel: very good. Because it is a one-lane bridge, the inspector listed the structure and deck geometry as a high priority for replacement.

The structure and deck geometry statement is not referring to the condition of the bridge. It is on there because it is a one-lane bridge. It has been on the bridge report since the day it was rebuilt in the 90s. So why close it now?

Alderman Phil Otte seems to think that closing it will somehow extend its life. During a city meeting, he asked the residents, "Do you want to leave the bridge open all the time and then have to close it in a year, or would you like to close it now and have it available during snowy winter days for about four years?”

I do not understand this logic. Traffic doesn't deteriorate wooden bridges as much as ultraviolet rays and moisture. It is my understanding from secondary sources that a bridge will deteriorate faster with little, or no traffic crossing it. Bridges are like houses: with little or no use they deteriorate quickly.

Maybe the bridge will be unsafe in a year, or four years, or longer. Right now it is a picturesque and welcoming sight, and I think we should preserve that before putting up some unsightly gates.
The bridge will be more of a liability to Houston Lake while closed than it will be with automobile traffic going over it.

Please don't ask me why I want it open. I ask you: Why do you want to close it before its time has come?

--Chuck Stone
Houston Lake


What we've learned about the county's situation



I attended the Aug. 14 meeting of the Platte County Commission wherein future parks commitments and reallocating a portion of the parks tax to law enforcement were discussed. Here is what we learned.

$8.4 million. That's how much in capital projects the parks department calculates will not be completed if the proposed tax reallocation is passed. And to anyone who wants to take away from parks funds, be advised that parks was promised $140 million and the residents of Platte County want parks. Law enforcement will have to find its own cheese pile.

Commissioner Beverlee Roper says decisions are hard. And for her, I agree that they are. Ms. Roper's governing is like that of a captain on a rudderless ship. She finds a current and proclaims to have control of the ship and sight of her destination, until the current changes. It is impossible to predict what Ms. Roper will decide regarding the proposed tax reallocation.

Commissioner Duane Soper does not want to take funds from parks. He can't say no to anyone, so his solution is to raise taxes. At least he is consistent in that regard.

Mr. Soper now wants another outsider who knows nothing about Platte County to study the jail issues. He didn't like the recommendations of the experts he commissioned and he doesn't like the report of the citizen committee he appointed. I suggest he have the county auditor produce some jail data. Soper seems to believe data prepared by the auditor. If Mr. Soper is looking for an answer to the jail issues, he should read the jail report. Hint: WSKF.

Commissioner Jason Brown wants to put the matter before the people and without raising taxes. He understands the consequences of government having too much of your money.

We learned that Riverside residents value park trails more than anything else. Perhaps Riverside residents need some enlightening on the core responsibilities of county government.

We were told by Parkville officials that attempting to take funds from parks is dishonest. This comes from a city that lied in 2004 about its city hall and who in recent years has been less than honest about its NID debt problems.

One person in attendance told the commission to raise his property taxes and leave the parks tax alone. I was later told that person was a parks board member. Never mind disclosing a direct conflict of interest before making public statements.

We learned that the parks board has no idea what its future maintenance costs are. When asked how they intended to fund those, we were told that future maintenance would be a matter for future commissions. I marvel that 14 years have gone by without the parks board giving appropriate consideration to future maintenance on the parks infrastructure they built.

I could be more sympathetic to the parks board's need for $8.4 million if the parks board was exercising good stewardship, but this board will have squandered close to $3 million on Shiloh Springs Golf Course and close to $5 million for interest on debt that could have been avoided. And as I recently learned, the parks board has granted tens of thousands of dollars to schools. When did schools become parks?

The parks board's current plan includes holding $7 million in reserves by the end of 2020 to cover future maintenance. What maintenance that will cover we don't know, because they don't know. I always supported the idea of a maintenance reserve, until now. I have no confidence that future commissions or any future Parks board will leave maintenance funds in place absent a legal restriction.

My suggestion: starve the beast. Spend the $7 million planned for reserves, add a few belt tightening decisions, and you quickly get to $8.4 million. Then leave the matter of future maintenance to future commissions and parks boards. This means that the proposed tax reallocation can be put on the ballot for voters to decide and current parks supporters can still have their parks.

I doubt the commission will propose anything that resembles a reasonable business solution. If the commission proposes raising your taxes to appease everyone, plan on voting against it. Then focus on 2016 when Commissioners Roper and Soper will be up for reelection.

--Gordon Cook


Jail committee's idea deserves support



On Aug. 4, the volunteer jail committee, appointed by our county commissioners, reported to them after finishing their summer sessions evaluating the current and future needs of our police forces. The recommendations were: 1) the need for basement jail space in the future, 2) the lack of sufficient space in the prosecutor's office, 3) the need for more space for evidence storage, and 4) the need for consistent funding for the short-wave band emergency radios, currently on lease.

In August 2009, a special one-ballot question was placed on the ballot. It cost the county $50,000 for that ballot question in an off-year cycle. Voters were not given or understood the full fiscal situation of the county at that time. They were asked if you would like more of your money to go to county parks. The voters agreed. At the same time, the commissioners knew there was an unfunded federally mandated requirement for law enforcement radios. It was not on the ballot. In our opinion, their priorities were out of balance. Safety and security should always be the top priority of government. Protecting citizens and pro-active crime prevention is paramount. Five years later, we are still left with the problem of how to fund these radios and other law enforcement necessities, as the revenue from the parks tax continues to grow.

The jail committee made various funding recommendations to cover these shortfalls. The most reasonable recommendation, in our opinion as fiscal conservatives, is to realign a portion of the park sales tax to cover the law enforcement requirements. Currently, the park sales tax is a half cent. The proposed ballot measure recommended by the jail committee would be in two parts. Part A would repeal 1/8 cent from the parks tax. Part B would reallocate that 1/8 cent to county law enforcement. As a result, 3/8 cent would still go to enhance our parks. The current parks sales tax would not go up, but remain the same half cent it is today until it sunsets in 2020.

This would allow our law enforcement agencies to obtain their long-awaited priority for a planned funding source for the federally mandated radios and other capabilities without raising our taxes.
In last week’s edition of The Landmark, our Platte County cities of Platte City, Parkville, and Smithville were rated as some of the safest communities in Missouri. This is not by accident. Our county is safe and secure because we have very dedicated, hard working law enforcement personnel and agencies despite the fact they need additional funding. They need our support.

Call and email the county commissioners to put this realignment of our tax dollars on the November 2014 ballot. Let the voters decide if they think law enforcement should be our top priority and be fully funded, instead of simply raising our taxes in a lagging economy. We think voters will make the right decision, if they are fully informed on the issues. Don't delay. Our commissioners need to hear from you by Friday, Aug. 22 because there is an Aug. 26 deadline to put this on the ballot.

Their phone number is 816-858-3334 and email addresses are:

--Mike & Janet Stark
Platte City


Park tax realignment is a novel idea



If you are like me, the “big picture” about constructing a new Platte County jail gets confusing--the issue is to build a big new one or not to build anything. Now there is a web link where the jail committee posted recommendations. It's a direct source allowing you to learn about the committee alternatives:

A lot of frustration stems from the '09 special election to renew the one-half cent Platte County park tax for another 10 years. Less than 5,000 residents voted on this tax, which delivered many millions of tax dollars dedicated to only build and maintain bike trails, horse trials and park facilities.
Some members on the new jail committee believe reallocating a small portion of the $140 million park tax money for Platte County law enforcement would solve some of the county's financial problems. The committee recommends 25% of the park tax funds be reallocated over the next six years (approximately $12 million) be reallocated for Platte County law enforcement as well as the currently unfunded federally mandated radio system. Their web site shows the percentage of impact, when diverting some tax money from the overall parks budget.

Further, the committee encourages our county's three commissioners vote to place this idea on the regular November ballot. The intent would not overturn original money for the park tax. Rather, the measure would allow voters to decide to reallocate a portion of the park tax for a short duration. A proposed ballot measure has two separate parts:

Part A would repeal a limited portion of the Park Tax:

Part B would reallocate that given percent toward county law enforcement.

Isn't this a novel idea asking Platte County voters for their in-put about spending their tax money?

Plus, you could send your thoughts to the county commissioners about the best way to spend our millions in tax money for the benefit our entire county.

--Lee Valentine
Platte County


Parks board, parks director running the county



I attended the Platte County Commission administrative meeting held on Aug. 6 at which the recently submitted jail committee report was discussed. I left this meeting with a number of concerns, the foremost being who is providing leadership in the county.

As readers are likely aware, I assisted the jail committee in analyzing the data it received from county officials and other parties. The foundation for the committee's work was an expert report requested by the commission whose conclusions were based on data provided by county officials. Not only were the population projections wildly inaccurate, but historical jail population data the committee obtained from the sheriff's office was noticeably absent from the expert report. One has to wonder.

During this meeting, the commission expressed concerns about the jail committee's proposal to allocate 25% of the current parks sales tax to law enforcement. The proposal calls for both revised taxes to sunset in 2020, the same date the current parks tax sunsets.

The jail committee report projected that the parks tax in its 20 year duration will generate in the range of $140 million, and is recommending that $12 million or 8.8% of that $140 million be allocated to law enforcement, but only with voter approval.

If one considers that the parks tax generated less than $5 million annually in the initial years of its first 10-year duration and apply simple math, the original projected parks tax total receipts might have been in the range of $50 million. At the 2009 renewal, receipts for the first 10 years could have been projected at $59 million as annual receipts were approaching $7 million. Again, applying simple math, the second ten year period could have been projected at $70+ million, so the total 20 year period receipts could have been projected at $130 million.

The jail committee report conservatively shows that after the reallocation, parks tax receipts for the 20 year period will approximate $128 million. Yet some parks supporters are crying foul. It's like parks supporters won a $140 million Powerball but complain that others held winning tickets.

The commission is concerned about changing the parks tax approved in August 2009. That ballot item was passed 54% to 46% with 2,667 yes votes, representing 4.36% of the then 61,231 registered voters.

The 2009 county commission failed in its duties by doing nothing to educate voters on the county's law enforcement needs and the radio mandate and by not offering voters any input on a funding solution.

The 2014 commission seems to be following the same footsteps. Instead of taking a proactive approach to this issue, this commission seems resigned to bowing to park trails and debt financed swimming pools.

At last Wednesday's meeting, we heard about phone calls from those opposed to taking funds from parks as well as the need to understand all future parks promises made to residents. In this same discussion, Sheriff Mark Owen noted ongoing staff turnover problems due to uncompetitive compensation. I reiterated the jail committee's findings that prosecutor staff had to work in ridiculously sized office cubicles inside a single congested room. At the same time, it was hard not to notice that our part time commissioners enjoy by comparison lavishly-sized offices with an adjoining conference room that comfortably seated over a dozen people.

Ultimately, the commission suggested making a deal. That "deal" would require Sheriff Owen and Prosecutor Eric Zahnd to meet with Brian Nowotny, parks director, to see if they could convince Nowotny to forgo some of his parks tax revenue for the benefit of law enforcement.

It was at that point that it became obvious who was running the county. It's not the commission, who by statute is elected to represent voters and act as a quasi-CEO. It's the parks board and Mr. Nowotny who rule the roost.

The county has no choice but to fund the radio lease. The commission at this point has limited options, the most likely of which appears to be raising the property tax levy from $.01 to at least $.05 as each $.01 increase will generate approximately $250,000, enough to cover annual radio lease payments of $1 million.

As we approached the end of the meeting, I sat there wondering. Here is a commission willing to unilaterally raise property taxes without any voter input but who at the same time is unwilling to give voters any opportunity to voice their opinion on alternatively funding law enforcement.

You, the voters, should be the voice in this decision. But you won't be if the commission doesn't act immediately. The filing deadline is 5 p.m. on Aug. 26. Contact your commissioner today. Tell them you want the parks tax reallocation as proposed by the jail committee on the November 2014 ballot.

Leadership requires courage and this commission needs help finding theirs. If you don't act, know that the parks board will continue running your county at the expense of your safety and security.

--Gordon Cook


County law officers may soon need to call 9-1-1



Help law enforcement now before they have to call 9-1-1.

Your review of the Platte County Commission's tax and spend decisions in 2009 (July 30 Between the Lines column) was very thorough so there is no need to revisit that. I would like to pick up with the August 2009 special election.

For some reason the half cent parks renewal election warranted a special election. Yes, special election, something that usually occurs to fill a state legislative or congressional seat or like a “special news bulletin” back in the day of five TV channels when something really big happened. A common characteristic of a special election is that it has only one item on the ballot and the originating entity picks up the entire cost of that election and in this case Platte County was out an estimated $50,000.

I don't know why it could not have been on the November 2008 General Election ballot when 46,789 people voted, the August 2010 Primary Election ballot when 12,777 people voted or the November 2010 General Election ballot when 31,462 people voted. All of these had greater turnout because they are regularly scheduled elections. People know we vote in April on municipal and school issues (although sometimes limited), even-year Augusts in primary elections and even-year Novembers in general elections. Who votes in odd-year August elections? Well almost no one.

To be exact, 4,940 people, or 8%, voted in that “special election” and only 2,667, or 4%, voted yes for the renewal. So let's see, 2,667 people out of 61,231 registered voters voted to spend another $70 million on parks, and without knowing about the impending $10 million federal radio mandate (which originated under the Bill Clinton administration!). The county commissioners who put this parks renewal on as a special election knew but didn't bother telling us. I guess that was truly a “special election.”

Please don't get me wrong here, I am not upset with the folks who voted yes. Our current situation is not their fault. We were presented with the opportunity to continue buying nice deck furniture without being told about the impending termite problem.

Last week, the jail study committee appointed by the commission to study the short and long term needs of the county's jail, judicial, and prosecutorial facilities as well as options for funding, if required, presented its recommendation to the commission. The reason this committee was convened in the first place was because Sheriff Mark Owen indicated a need in the not too distant future for additional beds. So now in addition to an unfunded $10 million federal radio mandate we learn that the sheriff will need additional beds at the jail and the prosecutor needs additional working space to prosecute the growing number of inmates in the jail. The jail committee believes all this can be addressed for around $12 million.

So where do we get $12 million?

1) A tax increase. In the past two years, Platte County voters have defeated three school levy increases and a state transportation sales tax and just elected a no-new-taxes presiding commissioner. Only Nancy Pelosi would consider this.

2) Budget cuts. The majority of the county's general revenue goes to law enforcement. Cut law enforcement to fund law enforcement? Might make sense to Nancy Pelosi.

3) More debt. How would it be repaid? That's the point here, we don't have revenue to pay for more debt. Nancy Pelosi would sign the loan documents to find out what's in them.

4) Realign existing sales taxes. Or put another way, realign our priorities. $12 million is 9% of the total amount parks is expected to receive when the tax sunsets in six years. Nancy Pelosi would never consider this.

I'm asking the current commission members to do the right thing by presenting the facts about our situation to the voters this November and let us decide if we want to help our sheriff and prosecutor by shifting $12 million from parks to law enforcement. And I'm asking the voters to do the right thing by encouraging them to do this and to vote yes if they do.

--John Elliott
Platte County


Platte County farmers dodged a bullet



Whew! That was close…

As Missouri farmers breathe a sigh of relief, Platte County farmers are grateful that they dodged a bullet and are left scratching their heads as to why their neighbors failed to pass Amendment 1 (failed 53% to 47%). With big bright orange “Yes for Amendment 1” signs sitting on farms all across Platte County, voters either thought farmers didn't understand what they were supporting; felt the amendment wasn't needed; or were swayed by the opponents' campaign scare tactics.

Missouri doctors don't have a constitutional amendment that gives them the right to practice medicine; nor do Missouri electricians need an amendment to install, support and repair the state's energy grid. So why do farmers need an amendment to do what they do? Answer: because there is a political machine in this country that is bound and determined to shut down animal-agriculture threatening farmers and consumers alike.

They are convinced that the farm to table practices in this country are wrought with abuse, so are determined to enact such onerous regulations as to make meat production cost prohibitive or better yet eliminate the meat counter at every grocery store in the country all together. They wrap their agenda in threats of foreign intervention (Missouri already statutorily limits foreign ownership of agricultural acreage in the state and imports/exports are already highly regulated); gruesome meat processing photos (again, regulations are already in place that govern humane domestic meat production practices) and little doe-eyed kitties and puppies (for emotional effect). They lobby hard and heavily fund efforts to shut down the meat supply chain from production to processing to retail across this country. While we are an omnivore species (consuming plant and animal protein), they certainly have the right to forego meat. But that does not give them the license to abridge the rights of American families to grill a burger or bake a chicken casserole to put on the family dinner table.

Missouri, as do most agricultural states across the country, already have a highly regulated meat supply chain. But that's not enough; there will continue to be more efforts to undermine animal agriculture and meat processing showing up on ballots in years to come. So I pray that next time you aren't so easily swayed by scare tactics of foreign threats or heart-tugging images of abused domestic animals. And if you need help understanding what the ballot initiative is truly about…ask a farmer, they can tell you what's really going on.

--Kay Folck
Platte County


Commissioners have fallen into the same mold



I just read your weekly “Between the Lines” column in the July 30 issue about the county commissioners involvement in the jail expansion discussion, park tax changes, and paying for law enforcement radios.

It seems to me that these commissioners have fallen into the same mold and pattern as many other elected officials. They have a wrong perception of their job. They seem to think that everything they do should address these priorities:

1. Don't do anything to keep themselves from being re-elected.

2. Only make decisions based on what their close friends recommend.

3. Never let the facts get in the way of following priorities 1 and 2.

I am not privy to the reasons why some commissioners might not like the sheriff, but what does that have to do with making sure that the deputies and other public safety people have good communication systems? And now, they are “up against the wall” with a payment due on the communication system. Alternatives have been proposed to pay for the communication system, but the commissioners don't want to even try to put them on the ballot because some of their friends don't want it to be on the ballot.

So, are these friends OK with their public safety people using outdated radios?

Governing is all about making choices. Good governing is about sometimes making tough decisions that not everyone likes, but are the proper thing to do.

--Ken Martin
Litchfield Park, AZ


Political parties are moot; give me motocross



I purchased the July 30 issue of the Landmark because it had fair motocross pictures on the front and I was looking for some race coverage. Sadly, the pictures were the extent of the coverage. Not to squander my fifty cents, I took a stroll through the rest of the paper.

While I was entertained by most of the tinfoil hat columnists, I was a bit taken aback to read a column by James Thomas and his gleeful declaration of success at, “Driving the Democrats from every elected office in Platte County.” Aside from the hubris of a statement such as that, I believe it perfectly symbolizes the toxicity of the current political climate.

Being a “Democrat” or “Republican” isn't like a religion or gender (well, for most people). Especially at the municipal and county level, party dynamics ideally should be largely moot. A candidate's position on pay for county employees, zoning, bonds, and all the other mundane aspects of local governance are vastly more important to residents and have little to do with national political ideology.

The remainder of the column reinforces my point. Comically, Thomas seems to miss the point that people being a Democrat or Republican isn't something you ARE but an affiliation. Reasonable people take varying positions depending on the issues and the candidates. A candidate claiming any party should be vetted based on their position rather than a arbitrary label. Of course, that would deprive the local political gurus of their power in anointing the true conservative; the ultimate badge on the Republican scorecard. Apparently.

I like to choose county candidates from either side of the aisle based on their ability to lead, their solutions to county issues, and their ability to build consensus and move the county forward. As a politically moderate Platte County voter, I'm normally left with a couple folks arguing over who is the “real” conservative on a primary ballot for elected offices. While some view this political cannibalism as preferential, I find it a myopic situation which dissuades fresh candidates from filing for office. To quote one of America's greatest leaders, as well as a Republican, Theodore Roosevelt, “Too often men who believe in moderation believe in it only moderately.”

In summary, for the 152nd Platte County Fair, please include more detail on the fair event results. It would be greatly appreciated.

--Jeff Owen
Platte City


The rest of the story on forum absences



The rest of the story.

Just want to fill in some blanks. Jim Plunkett ran a quarter page ad in this newspaper last week in which he shared that Ron Schieber didn't attend two forums. So far, truth. But here's the rest. The first was a big dinner where the candidates did not debate but rather stated their reasons for running. Schieber had a previously scheduled church function, however, his representative was at that event.

The second was a debate on a Thursday evening, May 1. Schieber was fulfilling his elected duties in Jefferson City, probably fighting for the same issues that Plunkett supports, only at a state level, and couldn't get to the event.

What the ad fails to mention is that Plunkett missed the third event, a Pachyderm event, but sent his representative. A fourth candidate forum was proposed by the Platte County Republican Central Committee but Plunkett couldn't attend so it was scrubbed.

Very misleading, Jim. The gander and the goose ring a bell?

So I ask you, if you print information that can easily be fact checked and find that it is only half the truth, is that the type of integrity that we need for the next presiding commissioner? I talked with one county resident who said, “Oh, it's just politics.” I respectfully disagree.

And if that doesn't raise questions in your mind, The Kansas City Star, the Left's mouthpiece, just endorsed Jim Plunkett for commissioner and cited Schieber's vote for a statewide tax cut as one reason for endorsing Plunkett. Really? Voting for lower taxes is a reason to support the other candidate?

I'll take NO NEW TAXES over a Star endorsement every time. I'll bet the Plunkett campaign won't even use that endorsement.

--Jim DeJarnatt


Vote no on the transportation sales tax



The proposed Missouri Transportation Sales Tax for an additional .75% sales tax is a sad statement on the condition of Missouri government and those running it. An essential requirement for safety, security and commerce can only be adequately funded by yet another new tax. Is this the best they can do?

If this tax passes, sales tax rates in certain Kansas City areas will exceed 10%, with some areas exceeding 11%. Add to that the 2% food establishment tax under the Kansas City Convention and Tourism Regulations that is paid by everyone living here.

The State of Missouri 2013 financial report shows that the largest outlays are for Human Services and Education, which combined are 11 times the amount spent by MoDOT. MoDOT's 2013 financial report shows that over 8% is spent for interest expense. The mentality of “wants” versus needs plus the cost of debt is very expensive.

Missouri, like so many governmental entities, needs to get its house in order, get out of debt, and focus on needs. More taxes means more government. If this ballot item passes, what will stop state leadership from shifting funds currently directed to roads to another political "want?"

I am not opposed to better roads or paying for roads, but there comes a time when enough is enough. We are taxed enough. Send a message to Missouri's leadership. Vote NO on Constitutional Amendment 7, the Transportation Sales Tax.

--Gordon Cook


Turn away from your candidate if. . .



Two years ago, I wrote a letter endorsing a county commissioner candidate because I was dissatisfied with the then incumbent. That turned out to be a mistake as that commissioner has failed to operate under the principles espoused during the campaign. Endorsing a specific candidate is not the purpose of this letter.

The best predictor of future performance is past behavior. I encourage you to vote for the candidate who will address the priorities of the county, cease the financial shenanigans of previous commissions and properly allocate resources to the real priorities of the county.

Which candidate will cease funding Shiloh Springs Golf Course? Through 2013, Shiloh has cost Platte County $8.6 million. 2013 revenues were 47.5% (less than half) of 2001 and the 2013 operating loss was ($376,000), a whopping 78% of revenues; add to that debt payments of $448,000.

I outlined the solution for Shiloh in a November 2013 letter. Keeping Shiloh open by approving an intentionally fictitious budget was a cowardly and juvenile act of the current commission and would be of any future commission.

Which hat will the candidate wear when they show up for commissioner meetings? Business experience means nothing if the candidate can't distinguish wants from needs, believes that raising taxes to balance a budget is being fiscally responsible, or believes they have the authority to issue non-voter approved debt.

Which candidate will cease the practice of issuing long term debt using the financing shenanigan known as “annual appropriation certificates of participation" (i.e., non-voter approved debt)? Several significant capital projects were completed by previous commissions using certificates of participation. The 2003, 2004 and 2005 commissions precipitated a debt explosion; some of those debt issues are still being paid today. Those commissions knew they were skirting taxpayers. We need a commissioner who will end these shenanigans.

Which candidate's priorities are aligned with the core priorities of the county? The top priorities of the county should be safety and security, roads and infrastructure and basic services. Which candidate believes the only method of addressing these needs is through a tax increase while turning a blind eye to unnecessary expenditures?

Which candidate can tell you about the revenue sources, expense components and debt of the county? If your candidate doesn't understand the budget, how do expect them to manage the county?

If your candidate carries a fiscal conservative banner but has a history of tax increases or funding non-essential activities, turn away. If your candidate has effected or supports annual appropriation certificates of participation as a way to avoid you having input on long term debt issuance, turn away. If your candidate won't defund unnecessary and non-essential expenses, turn away. If your candidate believes new taxes are needed without an offset of existing taxes, turn away. If your candidate can't talk intelligently about the county's finances, turn away.

The county in the aggregate is extracting more than enough from taxpayers. Proper identification of county priorities and allocation of county resources is the problem with Platte County.

Do your homework. Ask the questions. Vote wisely.

--Gordon Cook


Boyer would take clerk's office to next level



There are Republican candidates running for county seats this Primary Election, Aug. 5.
Some are true to their party, working hard to forward the party's platform and have previously given of their time, energy and treasure to help fellow Republican candidates. Robert Boyer is such a patriot.

This man came forward years ago out of duty to his county and conservative beliefs. He is not looking for a “job.” Robert Boyer is fulfilling his commitment at the local level where he lives.
Robert Boyer serves as the vice chair for the Platte County Republican Central Committee.

Entrepreneur, educated, and a leader in Platte County, this candidate steps into the race for county clerk because of character. Robert's computer/technology background in multi-level design and data storage to rigorous state standards will take the county clerk's office to the next logical level of recordkeeping, licensing and reporting.

The other candidate for clerk ran for treasurer and lost two years ago. Treasurer is a different job. Which job is she qualified for?

-Joan Harms
Platte County Clerk


R-3 school board needs to question superintendent



This past week our Platte County R-3 School board met and without a public presentation passed another increase in pay for all staff for the upcoming year. Several times after the vote which passed unanimously (like all votes), I heard Superintendent Dr. Mike Reik talk about pay having been frozen for several years. So I looked back at the previous years presentations for salary recommendations and this is some of what I found. There are also other increases not included here.

2011/12: 2.7% Increase for Certificated Staff not on Schedule; 5% Increase to all Classified Staff. Full paid insurance from $4,944 per person to $5,592 per person.

2012/13: 2.7% Increase for Certificated Staff not on Schedule; 2.7% for Classified Staff.

2013/14: 2% Increase for Certificated Staff not on Schedule; 2% Increase on average to all certified staff.

2014/15: 3.59% Average Increase for Certified Staff on Schedule; 3.59% Increase Certified Staff not on Schedule; 5.12% Average increase for Classified Staff

Payroll and benefits are now up by more than $2.5 million dollars during this four year period while student enrollment has gone up 297 students according to the Dept of Secondary Education website.

I believe Dr. Reik and his assistants are "Certified staff not on a schedule.” If that's the case their pay will increase by 10.99% or in Dr. Reik’s case over $15,000 by 2015.

The average Platte County household income went up about $3,000 during this period. The past year our district has spent close to $500,000 with just one architect firm Hollis and Miller on different studies and projects most of which are not even currently funded, all of this from a district that had to have a Community Budget Cutting Committee to try to find ways to make ends meet we were in such dire straits a little over a year ago.

All of this spending while we are using trailers at two schools for classrooms. Have you seen our really nice swimming pool ($195,000 per year)?

In the power point from the June board meeting talking about the tentative budget, you will see this statement to justify the new expenses:

"Platte County R-3 School District is a district with a tradition of excellence. We pride ourselves on our accomplishments. Our commitment to continuous improvement has created a vision for the future. The district has received a 91.1% on the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Annual Performance Report. Strong financial management allows Platte County R-3 School District to maintain our tradition, establish points of pride, and create an ambitious vision." (What does this last sentence even mean?)

Doesn't 91.1% sound great? Especially after that "excellence" comment. It's not great, it is mediocre at best. If I compare our 91.1% to the other 12 districts used in the pay comparison presentation to justify the new salary increases, PCR3 is dead in the middle with these six districts having substantially higher APR scores than us. That's how low these state standards are.

Park Hill 97.5%
Blue Springs 97.9
Lees Summit 96.1
Kearney 95.0
Liberty 93.6
and Grandview with 93.6%, which looks like is the only school listed that now pays teachers more than PCR3 when you factor in years of service and percent with upper degrees.

Dr. Reik talked about how we have not hired much due to fiscal constraints and need to catch up. The budget for next year has 17 new full time positions at a cost of $850,000. A look back at the past budget presentations shows we have actually now hired more than 48 new certified positions since 2012 while enrollment is projected to grow only 403 students during this four year time period.

Once again the AA bond rating came up in the budget presentation. Here's the quote.

"Maintaining healthy fund balances have contributed to a strong bond rating which provides the District with favorable interest rates on general obligation bonds. The District's bond rating was determined by Standard and Poor's to be “AA.” This stand-alone bond rating has been assigned to only a small percentage of Missouri school districts."

They are correct, we are one of the only districts in the state dumb enough to not "piggy back" on to the state’s bond rating of AA+ like the majority of districts in the state do (over 300), as it gives them a lower interest rate than us and they don't have to pay to get a bond rating.

Being able to make this "stand alone" statement costs our district thousands of dollars a year but it sounds good.

Folks, it is not just about how the money is being spent. It is how the information is being presented to us and the board and no one on our school board taking the time to question any of it. The vote for the newest salary increases took less than six minutes with virtually no conversation.

If raises are deserved great, give them to everyone if we can afford it but don't manipulate information to get what you want because you know no one is going to check any of what is presented or, in this case, not presented.

It is a trend that seems to continue from the current school superintendent and it won’t stop until people start to get fed up with the misinformation or you start to hold your school board accountable. They alone are supposed to be policing the job our administrators are doing and how our $45 million in tax dollars is being spent and not saved for any future growth.

Both school power points are on the district website and I will have a link at

Here is the website to the DESE information if you would like to check the other information listed in this letter.

--Kirby Holden
Rural Platte County

Opposed to transportation sales tax



Constitutional Amendment No. 7, a regressive tax, creates the largest tax increase in Missouri's history. Missouri's families are already hard pressed to pay their bills during this period of slow economic recovery; adding to their burden at this time is wrong. Missourians on fixed incomes, seniors and the elderly, and those with low-incomes are hardest hit.

Taxation based on everyday essentials like clothing, transportation, energy and housing are regressive. As a household's income rises, even significantly, the tax collected remains the same. So as a proportion of available expenditure, the tax burden falls far more heavily on households with limited incomes. For people in the bottom fifth of the earnings distribution, the ratio of benefits to taxes is almost three times as high as it is for those in the top fifth.

The state/local sales tax rate in Missouri is already one of the highest in the nation (14th). Should the transportation tax be approved, Missouri will have the 7th highest sales tax rate in the nation. Passage will be bad for business, as it will pose a great burden on local retailers, and create a further incentive for consumers to avoid sales taxes by making purchases online or in other states.
It is unfair that the trucking industry will pay practically nothing while they benefit most from the transportation tax and do the most of the damage to our roads. According to the Missouri Freight Study, 55% of Missouri's truck traffic by tonnage has neither an origin nor destination in Missouri.

The drive-through trucking industry needs to share in the cost especially because MoDOT's largest road project from this sales tax increase will be to rebuild I-70.

--Pauli Kendrick
City of Weatherby Lake
Platte County


Happy with Schieber's 'no new taxes' pledge



Plunkett a shoe-in? Maybe not. “NO NEW TAXES” is rather compelling.

After reading Mr. Foley's report on the Pachyderm Club's “debate,” the defacing of Mr. Schieber's signs, and getting an email invitation to attend the “debate,” I simply couldn't resist. Here goes.

The invitation to the Pachyderm Club's candidate forum was not to me personally but to anyone who wanted to PAY! $15 or $18 as I recall. Really? I can't come and listen or ask a question without having a drink and snacks? That's like paying to listen to the school board candidates give their reasons for wanting to be pummeled by district patrons for three years! No thanks.

I would like to ask a couple of questions, though, and the Platte City Chamber of Commerce is hosting a free, ah, I mean, a more fiscally conservative community event on Tuesday, July 29 from 4-6 p.m. at the NRAD office behind Jeff's True Value Hardware. Hope to see you there.

From my vantage point driving around “up north,” I didn't know anyone else was running for presiding commissioner besides Jim Plunkett. The Plunkett campaign has done a great job of putting up signs. But Mr. Ron Schieber has struck a nerve with many people. He also wants to be “our commissioner” but is taking a targeted approach to winning our vote, NO NEW TAXES. I like that.

So, I called Mr. Schieber, left a message, and HE CALLED BACK, the next day! We talked for a few minutes and my main question was can you do that, the NO NEW TAXES thing? A very concise, thoughtful answer was given even with the $10 million boondoggle radio upgrade. How you ask? Some shared belt-tightening, which for once won't mean that everyone in the county gets what they want (more money) and Mr. Schieber believes we are being taxed enough already.

Again, I like that.

Experience wise, the two are evenly matched with both having held elected positions. Hopefully they have both gotten over the scourge of an elected office, the insidious building of an ego, a false one I think. It will take fortitude in the face of friends, neighbors, and county sheriffs, to say NO to more requests for dollars and projects.

Mr. Schieber has shown a consistent record of fiscal conservatism at the state level as district representative. I don't personally know any of the candidates, but for me, NO NEW TAXES speaks volumes. And apparently it does with supporters of the opposition, also, judging from the defacing of Mr. Schieber's campaign signs.

So, Mr. Schieber's sign is going up in my yard. How about yours? NO NEW TAXES sound good to you?

--Jim DeJarnatt


The Obamacare numbers



I have comments on Congressman Sam Graves' recent letter to the editor concerning Obamacare's premiums.

The percentage increases in the letter are certainly noteworthy. But where did they come from?

“A new report” is the source of this information. What report was that? Comparisons in costs are made between pre-Obamacare and post-Obamacare. What are the variables between the figures? Were the coverages the same in both instances? For example, did the post-Obamacare coverage have a $100 deductible and the pre-Obamacare have a $1000 deductible?

Percentage changes can be hard to evaluate without some reference point of the values being compared. For example, XYZ Widget reports its sales have increased by 300%. What they didn't mention is that actual sales increased only from one widget to four widgets.

The examples quoted are for 27 year old males who I would guess have the among the lowest premium rates of any age and sex example. They would be expected to have a high percentage increase due to the initial low cost of their insurance. A increase in their rates could calculate as an 271% increase while the same premium increase for a 64 year male diabetic would calculate out to a much smaller increase. Of course, the coverage must be identical to be able to compare these premium numbers at all.

What about comparisons of premiums of a 43-year-old woman or a 73-year-old man? I hope we are not naïve enough to think that premiums will go down for every group of various ages, sex and current health.

The percentages given in Congressman Graves' letter indicate that something changed but it is impossible to tell what or if the change is significant without the background information. This means that no conclusions can be draw regarding the merit of Obamacare based on the information presented. Always check the figures when studies, surveys or statistics are used for political purposes.

--Ken Hunt
Kansas City
in Platte County

(Editor’s note: Ken Hunt is a member of the Platte County Democratic Central Committee)


Health care made more expensive



I reaffirm my support for fully repealing Obamacare after a new report was released showing how the law is making health care more expensive.

Aside from Obamacare's ongoing dysfunction and delay, the added costs and burdens being forced on Missourians are a major cause for alarm. What we are seeing in Buchanan County and the greater Kansas City area are some of the biggest premium increases in the country. The President even promised that Obamacare would lower premiums for the middle class.

This pattern of broken promises creates more confusion and damages our trust. The only way to truly prevent more skyrocketing premiums and dropped coverage is to fully repeal a law that is far too flawed to stand as law of the land.

The study, which looks at data from 3,137 counties around the country, indicates that Obamacare increased 2014 individual-market premiums by an average of 49%. From 2013-2014, Buchanan County had the largest average increase for men than any other county in the nation at 271%.

Specifically among 27-year old men, the study indicates premium increases of 411% in Buchanan County, 242% in Atchison County, 219% in Platte County, 38% in Adair County, 38% in Marion County, 219% in Clay County, and 36% in Pike County.

--Sam Graves
Sixth District


Happy that Plunkett is running



I was glad to hear that Jim Plunkett would run for presiding commissioner when he announced this spring. I appreciate Plunkett's approach to government. He was in office to serve, not to get a paycheck. In fact, Plunkett recently reiterated his promise to not take any contributions from individuals or companies that do business with the county. It was a promise that he kept during his eight years as second district commissioner and pledged to keep during his campaign for presiding commissioner.

I'll be there for Plunkett on Aug. 5. He's the type of leader that we need in Platte County.

--Dana Ashley
Kansas City
in Platte County


Identifying some old photos



I would like to introduce myself. My name is Peggy Wagers Bloss and I live in St. Joseph. I grew up in New Market and still go to church there. Many years ago (early 50s) I wrote the New Market News column for your paper and other area papers. When I married in 1955 my mother, Georgia Wagers, took over. The paper this letter is written on is paper your newspaper sent in 1989 to be used for this purpose.

What I am writing about concerns some old photos that are in my possession that I would like to find some family member to give them to. I am fairly certain the photos are of people from the Platte County area. Two of the photos have names written on them — Opal Scott and Harve Lawless. The largest picture is a wedding picture and the girl looks a lot like Opal Scott. I had the thought that perhaps your paper might be interested in publishing these pictures or at least mentioning these two names to see if any remaining family members remember them. Judging from the clothing I believe the wedding gown was from 1800s.

You may not be able to help me but before I destroy these pictures I wanted to try one more time to find a family member. I took them to the Dearborn High School Reunion and the oldest member there did not recognize them. Thanks for any help you can give. I really enjoyed the years I wrote the news. It was a good opportunity for a teenager.

--Peggy Bloss
St. Joseph

EDITOR’S NOTE: Anyone with information that may help in this matter can email The Landmark at


Free fishing weekend



The annual Free Fishing Weekend in Missouri is coming up June 7 and 8, 2014. This weekend allows anyone to fish in Missouri without a permit, trout stamp, or daily use tag. It is a great opportunity to get out and try fishing for the first time or get back into it if you haven't fished for a while. Any other time of the year, Missouri residents between 16 and 65 years old and all non-residents 16 years and older would be required to have a valid fishing permit.

On Saturday, June 7, Platte County Parks and Recreation and the Missouri Department of Conservation will host a free fishing clinic from 10 a.m. to noon. The clinic will be held at the fishing pond at Platte Ridge Park. The park is located at 17130 371 Hwy, Platte City, MO 64079, if you would like to punch it into your gps.

The pond is on the backside of the park behind the ball fields.

There will be fishing poles, hooks, and bobbers available for use if you don't have your own. Worms will also be provided for bait. You are more than welcome to bring your own equipment and “lucky lure” if you would prefer. There is no need to RSVP. Just show up and stay as long as you like.

If you have any questions about this event or conservation in general, please call me at (816) 244-0702. If you observe a wildlife violation, you can call me directly or call Operation Game Thief at (800) 392-1111. You can remain anonymous and rewards are possible.

--Aaron Post
Conservation Agent
Mo. Department
of Conservation



The Obamacare numbers



I have comments on Congressman Sam Graves' recent letter to the editor concerning Obamacare's premiums.

The percentage increases in the letter are certainly noteworthy. But where did they come from?

“A new report” is the source of this information. What report was that? Comparisons in costs are made between pre-Obamacare and post-Obamacare. What are the variables between the figures? Were the coverages the same in both instances? For example, did the post-Obamacare coverage have a $100 deductible and the pre-Obamacare have a $1000 deductible?

Percentage changes can be hard to evaluate without some reference point of the values being compared. For example, XYZ Widget reports its sales have increased by 300%. What they didn't mention is that actual sales increased only from one widget to four widgets.

The examples quoted are for 27 year old males who I would guess have the among the lowest premium rates of any age and sex example. They would be expected to have a high percentage increase due to the initial low cost of their insurance. A increase in their rates could calculate as an 271% increase while the same premium increase for a 64 year male diabetic would calculate out to a much smaller increase. Of course, the coverage must be identical to be able to compare these premium numbers at all.

What about comparisons of premiums of a 43-year-old woman or a 73-year-old man? I hope we are not naïve enough to think that premiums will go down for every group of various ages, sex and current health.

The percentages given in Congressman Graves' letter indicate that something changed but it is impossible to tell what or if the change is significant without the background information. This means that no conclusions can be draw regarding the merit of Obamacare based on the information presented. Always check the figures when studies, surveys or statistics are used for political purposes.

--Ken Hunt
Kansas City
in Platte County

(Editor’s note: Ken Hunt is a member of the Platte County Democratic Central Committee)


Health care made more expensive



I reaffirm my support for fully repealing Obamacare after a new report was released showing how the law is making health care more expensive.

Aside from Obamacare's ongoing dysfunction and delay, the added costs and burdens being forced on Missourians are a major cause for alarm. What we are seeing in Buchanan County and the greater Kansas City area are some of the biggest premium increases in the country. The President even promised that Obamacare would lower premiums for the middle class.

This pattern of broken promises creates more confusion and damages our trust. The only way to truly prevent more skyrocketing premiums and dropped coverage is to fully repeal a law that is far too flawed to stand as law of the land.

The study, which looks at data from 3,137 counties around the country, indicates that Obamacare increased 2014 individual-market premiums by an average of 49%. From 2013-2014, Buchanan County had the largest average increase for men than any other county in the nation at 271%.

Specifically among 27-year old men, the study indicates premium increases of 411% in Buchanan County, 242% in Atchison County, 219% in Platte County, 38% in Adair County, 38% in Marion County, 219% in Clay County, and 36% in Pike County.

--Sam Graves
Sixth District


Happy that Plunkett is running



I was glad to hear that Jim Plunkett would run for presiding commissioner when he announced this spring. I appreciate Plunkett's approach to government. He was in office to serve, not to get a paycheck. In fact, Plunkett recently reiterated his promise to not take any contributions from individuals or companies that do business with the county. It was a promise that he kept during his eight years as second district commissioner and pledged to keep during his campaign for presiding commissioner.

I'll be there for Plunkett on Aug. 5. He's the type of leader that we need in Platte County.

--Dana Ashley
Kansas City
in Platte County


Identifying some old photos



I would like to introduce myself. My name is Peggy Wagers Bloss and I live in St. Joseph. I grew up in New Market and still go to church there. Many years ago (early 50s) I wrote the New Market News column for your paper and other area papers. When I married in 1955 my mother, Georgia Wagers, took over. The paper this letter is written on is paper your newspaper sent in 1989 to be used for this purpose.

What I am writing about concerns some old photos that are in my possession that I would like to find some family member to give them to. I am fairly certain the photos are of people from the Platte County area. Two of the photos have names written on them — Opal Scott and Harve Lawless. The largest picture is a wedding picture and the girl looks a lot like Opal Scott. I had the thought that perhaps your paper might be interested in publishing these pictures or at least mentioning these two names to see if any remaining family members remember them. Judging from the clothing I believe the wedding gown was from 1800s.

You may not be able to help me but before I destroy these pictures I wanted to try one more time to find a family member. I took them to the Dearborn High School Reunion and the oldest member there did not recognize them. Thanks for any help you can give. I really enjoyed the years I wrote the news. It was a good opportunity for a teenager.

--Peggy Bloss
St. Joseph

EDITOR’S NOTE: Anyone with information that may help in this matter can email The Landmark at


Free fishing weekend



The annual Free Fishing Weekend in Missouri is coming up June 7 and 8, 2014. This weekend allows anyone to fish in Missouri without a permit, trout stamp, or daily use tag. It is a great opportunity to get out and try fishing for the first time or get back into it if you haven't fished for a while. Any other time of the year, Missouri residents between 16 and 65 years old and all non-residents 16 years and older would be required to have a valid fishing permit.

On Saturday, June 7, Platte County Parks and Recreation and the Missouri Department of Conservation will host a free fishing clinic from 10 a.m. to noon. The clinic will be held at the fishing pond at Platte Ridge Park. The park is located at 17130 371 Hwy, Platte City, MO 64079, if you would like to punch it into your gps.

The pond is on the backside of the park behind the ball fields.

There will be fishing poles, hooks, and bobbers available for use if you don't have your own. Worms will also be provided for bait. You are more than welcome to bring your own equipment and “lucky lure” if you would prefer. There is no need to RSVP. Just show up and stay as long as you like.

If you have any questions about this event or conservation in general, please call me at (816) 244-0702. If you observe a wildlife violation, you can call me directly or call Operation Game Thief at (800) 392-1111. You can remain anonymous and rewards are possible.

--Aaron Post
Conservation Agent
Mo. Department
of Conservation


Health care made more expensive



I reaffirm my support for fully repealing Obamacare after a new report was released showing how the law is making health care more expensive.

Aside from Obamacare's ongoing dysfunction and delay, the added costs and burdens being forced on Missourians are a major cause for alarm. What we are seeing in Buchanan County and the greater Kansas City area are some of the biggest premium increases in the country. The President even promised that Obamacare would lower premiums for the middle class.

This pattern of broken promises creates more confusion and damages our trust. The only way to truly prevent more skyrocketing premiums and dropped coverage is to fully repeal a law that is far too flawed to stand as law of the land.

The study, which looks at data from 3,137 counties around the country, indicates that Obamacare increased 2014 individual-market premiums by an average of 49%. From 2013-2014, Buchanan County had the largest average increase for men than any other county in the nation at 271%.

Specifically among 27-year old men, the study indicates premium increases of 411% in Buchanan County, 242% in Atchison County, 219% in Platte County, 38% in Adair County, 38% in Marion County, 219% in Clay County, and 36% in Pike County.

--Sam Graves
Sixth District


Happy that Plunkett is running



I was glad to hear that Jim Plunkett would run for presiding commissioner when he announced this spring. I appreciate Plunkett's approach to government. He was in office to serve, not to get a paycheck. In fact, Plunkett recently reiterated his promise to not take any contributions from individuals or companies that do business with the county. It was a promise that he kept during his eight years as second district commissioner and pledged to keep during his campaign for presiding commissioner.

I'll be there for Plunkett on Aug. 5. He's the type of leader that we need in Platte County.

--Dana Ashley
Kansas City
in Platte County


Identifying some old photos



I would like to introduce myself. My name is Peggy Wagers Bloss and I live in St. Joseph. I grew up in New Market and still go to church there. Many years ago (early 50s) I wrote the New Market News column for your paper and other area papers. When I married in 1955 my mother, Georgia Wagers, took over. The paper this letter is written on is paper your newspaper sent in 1989 to be used for this purpose.

What I am writing about concerns some old photos that are in my possession that I would like to find some family member to give them to. I am fairly certain the photos are of people from the Platte County area. Two of the photos have names written on them — Opal Scott and Harve Lawless. The largest picture is a wedding picture and the girl looks a lot like Opal Scott. I had the thought that perhaps your paper might be interested in publishing these pictures or at least mentioning these two names to see if any remaining family members remember them. Judging from the clothing I believe the wedding gown was from 1800s.

You may not be able to help me but before I destroy these pictures I wanted to try one more time to find a family member. I took them to the Dearborn High School Reunion and the oldest member there did not recognize them. Thanks for any help you can give. I really enjoyed the years I wrote the news. It was a good opportunity for a teenager.

--Peggy Bloss
St. Joseph

EDITOR’S NOTE: Anyone with information that may help in this matter can email The Landmark at


Free fishing weekend



The annual Free Fishing Weekend in Missouri is coming up June 7 and 8, 2014. This weekend allows anyone to fish in Missouri without a permit, trout stamp, or daily use tag. It is a great opportunity to get out and try fishing for the first time or get back into it if you haven't fished for a while. Any other time of the year, Missouri residents between 16 and 65 years old and all non-residents 16 years and older would be required to have a valid fishing permit.

On Saturday, June 7, Platte County Parks and Recreation and the Missouri Department of Conservation will host a free fishing clinic from 10 a.m. to noon. The clinic will be held at the fishing pond at Platte Ridge Park. The park is located at 17130 371 Hwy, Platte City, MO 64079, if you would like to punch it into your gps.

The pond is on the backside of the park behind the ball fields.

There will be fishing poles, hooks, and bobbers available for use if you don't have your own. Worms will also be provided for bait. You are more than welcome to bring your own equipment and “lucky lure” if you would prefer. There is no need to RSVP. Just show up and stay as long as you like.

If you have any questions about this event or conservation in general, please call me at (816) 244-0702. If you observe a wildlife violation, you can call me directly or call Operation Game Thief at (800) 392-1111. You can remain anonymous and rewards are possible.

--Aaron Post
Conservation Agent
Mo. Department
of Conservation


About the school transfer legislation



If you were a parent who lived in a failing school district and lacked the means to move, what would you do? Would you think about the opportunities you wanted most for your child? Should the opportunities be the same for the rich and poor communities?

The Missouri House passed legislation designed to empower parents in struggling school districts to choose a better life for their children. Senate Bill 493 aims to improve performance in struggling school districts through increased tutoring, enhanced early reading programs, and extended school days. It also gives the State Board of Education flexibility to take-over failing schools in failing school districts, and requires the State Board to proactively help struggling school districts improve test scores and other results.

Most importantly, the bill gives parents the freedom to choose the best school for their children. Under the current transfer law, every student in an unaccredited district is permitted to transfer out-of-district. This ignores the fact that not all schools in unaccredited districts are the same. In fact, some schools in unaccredited and provisionally-accredited schools are excellent or, at least, accredited.

SB 493 limits the right to transfer to those students who attend unaccredited schools. But it then opens a variety of options for parents. First, students in unaccredited schools are given the option to transfer to an open seat in an accredited school within their own district. After those seats are filled, students may transfer to any public school in the same or an adjoining county, to a charter school within their district of residence or, in St. Louis or Kansas City, to a private non-sectarian school near their home.

Certainly there are criticisms against proposals to provide poor parents who can’t afford private school tuition or to move to a better neighborhood with the freedom to send their children to private schools with public funds. In SB 493, we amended the private option to assuage all of those criticisms.

First, critics claim the option is unconstitutional. We fixed this potential problem by limiting the option to only those schools which are allowed to receive public funding under the Missouri and United States Constitution. The Blaine Amendment to the Missouri Constitution prohibits any public money from going to schools controlled by a religious denomination. As a result, parochial schools are eliminated from the program.

Second, critics claim the private option for St. Louis or Kansas City would harm education funding in the rest of the state. We fixed this potential problem by limiting funding for the private option to in-district funds. Under SB 493, the private option excludes state money.

Third, critics claim private schools will cherry-pick students for academic or athletic prowess. SB 493 strictly prohibits the transfer board from considering academic success, athletics, or poverty status in making school assignments.

Fourth, critics claim a private option would just lead to children who would otherwise be in private schools, siphoning money away from public schools. Despite the fact that this criticism treats private school parents and children as second-class citizens unworthy of equal benefits from their taxes, SB 493 requires students must have actually attended an unaccredited school before they are eligible to transfer.
Fifth, critics claim a private option is not fair because private schools are not subject to the same rules and regulations as public schools. We fixed this problem with an amendment to require all private schools which choose to receive transfer students to abide by every state statute and regulation that applies to public schools. Under this amendment, private option schools must give transfer students the same state assessment tests that are given to students in traditional public schools, and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will produce an annual performance report on the private option schools as it does for traditional public schools.

Sixth, critics say it’s not appropriate to spend public money on private institutions when taxpayers voted for levies to go to public institutions. This argument ignores the fact that the state spends approximately $8 billion a year on Medicaid, much of which goes to private medical facilities. The House version of SB 493 deals with this criticism by subjecting the private option to a local vote. Before any student is allowed to transfer to a private school, it must be approved by the voters of the failing district at a general election.

With these changes, SB 493 addressed every substantive criticism against similar “private option” legislation that I’ve heard from defenders of the status quo in failing districts. But it’s still not enough, and it’s easy to see why: individual freedom is scary for people in power. Regardless of the issue in the capitol, those who hold power fight desperately to keep it.

By allowing transfers from unaccredited public schools to nonsectarian private schools, SB 493 would allow children in poverty the opportunity to attend some of the same schools as the children of privilege. This seems right to me.

--Ken Wilson
State Representative
12th District


Small businesses don't need bureaucracy



Every small business throughout the country is a story of someone’s hard work, a good idea, or a plan to make life better for their family. Many succeed, some don’t. We should respect the courage, risk and sacrifice required to build a business. One of the purposes of National Small Business Week (which was held May 12-16) is recognition of that effort, but there’s more to it. We should examine policies that are helping and hurting small business and make the appropriate changes to encourage their growth because our economy hinges on their success.

Small businesses are responsible for about half the nation’s economic output, and when it comes to jobs, small firms have an outsized impact. Small companies comprise about half of all private sector jobs in total, and lead the way in job creation with 60-to-80 percent of all new jobs, depending on the year. All told, small firms can take credit for 65 percent of jobs created over a recent 17-year span, according to the Small Business Administration.

It’s fair to say that if small businesses are thriving, then the economy is likely to be healthy. If small businesses are struggling, then the economy is not strong.

Over the past month, the latest economic information has been a mix of good news and bad. The unemployment rate has fallen, but a closer look shows far too many Americans leaving the workforce. Moreover, the economy slowed to a mere 0.1 percent growth last quarter. Throughout the very slow recovery of the past several years, the economy has never really roared back or created jobs at the pace the country needs.

Small businesses are a major part of the solution for jobs and growth. When small firms grow, the benefits spread throughout the economy. The irony is that these businesses are often treated by Washington as though they are part of the problem. During the last five years, small businesses have faced numerous roadblocks to growth, including mounting federal regulations, higher taxes, economic uncertainty, and burdensome requirements from the health care law.

As one Connecticut small business owner, Dan De Clercq, commented to the Small Business Committee through our interactive website Small Biz Open Mic, “Since ObamaCare became a discussion in 2008, our yearly premium has doubled from 113k to 220k presently. Plus our deductibles and co-pays have increased to obscene levels. Eliminate or halve my corporate income taxes, help bring my company-sponsored health care back to normal levels and I'd hire four more people.”

Dan’s not alone in his experience. A recent NFIB study shows that ObamaCare’s Health Insurance Tax will cost the economy up to 286,000 jobs, and 57 percent of those jobs would be from small businesses. Over the past five years, the cost of new regulations on the American economy has spiked by $73 billion annually. The Administration has issued a burdensome 157 new major rules, each with economic costs of $100 million or more. This government power grab is predictably not leading to robust economic growth.

Despite the state of the economy, the U.S. Senate continues to ignore nearly 40 growth and jobs bills passed by the House. These bills range from reducing red tape to ensuring access to affordable energy.
Small businesses are widely supported by Americans, but they could use some more common-sense from Washington. The nation’s 28 million small businesses don’t need new bureaucracies or more government control; they need the administration to get out of the way so they can grow.

National Small Business Week is a great time to say “thank-you” to a small business in your neighborhood and “shop small.” I also believe this week is a great reminder that if Washington is going to talk-the-talk then Washington needs to get serious about a small business growth agenda that is going to back up that rhetoric.

--Sam Graves
Sixth District


Tax cut is a baby step of progress



As an organization that has helped lead tax reform efforts in Missouri for many years, the Show-Me Institute was pleased to see the legislature take a baby step of progress with the passage of last week's tax cut.

Make no mistake — this is a very modest tax reduction, and smaller than we had preferred. But this tax cut serves as a mile-marker on the path of greater reforms.

Indeed, thanks to the hard work of countless supporters of the free market, the pathway for tax reform is now opening wide. Policymakers are finally recognizing that the words “free market” actually mean something . . . and that free markets actually matter.

We believe this tax cut is just the first step on the road to enduring, people-empowering tax reform in this great state. We look forward to the future, and we hope you will join us on our journey to make our state even better.

--Patrick Ishmael
Policy Analyst
Show-Me Institute Kansas City, MO


A national sales tax is the answer



Time magazine published an article this week exposing the fact that $1 million dollars in bonuses was paid out to IRS employees who owed back taxes. I'm pretty sure if I owed back taxes the IRS would be knocking on my door and threatening to garnish my wages.

Why are IRS employees treated differently? It seems the all too familiar reason is that they work for the government and the government treats "their own" differently. If you are ever audited by the IRS - you are guilty until proven innocent and often the best course of action is to simply roll over and pay whatever they ask. That's state sponsored extortion. It doesn't matter if you are right or not - it will cost you more in time and money to try to prove you are right. With a tax code approaching 80,000 pages, that's pretty much impossible.

It is time to eliminate the IRS and the oppressive income tax and switch to something that is simple, fair and visible. Something that is easy to administer, easy to comply with and difficult to cheat. That solution is the FairTax. A national retail sales tax with no tax on the basic necessities of life. No IRS, no income tax and millions of new jobs.

You can learn more at

--James R. Donnell
Cameron Park, CA


Pandering and denial won't serve the students


Platte County R-3 Staff,

As a board member, I am dedicated to the success and care of our students, and to the teachers and support staff who work with them. We must provide to our students the resources necessary to guarantee optimal learning experiences, and our teachers must have the teaching resources to meet the needs of each student. Teacher recognition and compensation are issues that we are addressing, but more progress is needed to care for our teachers and support staff appropriately. I will make every effort to see that we continue to strive to provide fair and reasonable compensation.

While we face our challenges, I can say without hesitation that we have the best schools in the area, and thanks to your efforts we continue to become even better at being us, making this a great place for our Pirates!

I am asking for your vote on April 8th! Also, if you agree that I am a good choice, please encourage others to vote for me.

Thank you!
Sharon Sherwood

Dear teachers and staff,

I am contacting you to ask for your support in the upcoming School Board election April 8.
· I believe in fiscal responsibility so money can go towards our biggest district expense…salaries.
· I advocate for keeping small class sizes as we grow so you have a manageable workload.

Julie Vanover,
PCR-III School Board Member


What you just read were parts of emails sent by Platte County R-3 School Board President Sharon Sherwood and board member Julie Vanover from their private email addresses to the Platte County R-3 email staff addresses several days before the election.

What it looks like you have here is a current school board president sending out a note to one of the largest voting blocs (over 500 employees plus spouses) in the county basically saying she thinks they are underpaid and underappreciated and she will help correct this.

Mrs. Vanover suggests we have "fiscal responsibility" so we can pay salaries. Not pay down debt or handle growth, but “salaries.”

Funny, I read nothing about their obvious issue with compensation and salaries in their interviews with the newspapers.

No doubt these emails to R-3 staff were also read on "taxpayer" time as they were sent to R-3 email addresses.

School administrators were included in the Sherwood email. I will assume they knew about it and as far as I know no action was taken to correct what seems like an obvious problem.

Do school officials want all candidates for any public office sending emails to their (our) employees?
I just posted part of another email that was circulated by our previous school board president on my website about the election and will do the same with these.

My favorite line from Mrs. Sherwood in the email is "we continue to become even better at being us.” This must be the new way we set our standards as now ranks our Platte County R-3 High School as # 170th out of 521 in the state. That is below Smithville #82, Park Hill #88, North Platte #36 and West Platte #120. Are these schools in our area, Mrs. Sherwood?

Lets not compete, let’s just "be good at being us.” Not much competition there. Can’t wait for the kids to get their first job or college interview and be asked about their performance in school. "I was really good at being me" will make a great reply.

Workplace morale heads down: 70% of Americans feel negatively about their jobs, Gallup study shows--June 24th 2013 daily news.

I am sorry if Mrs. Sherwood thinks our staff feels unappreciated. From a quick Google search, it appears most people are not thrilled in their jobs. I think they call it "going to work" for a reason.

All you can do as a manager is set guidelines for employees, pay them a competitive pay and expect them to meet your standards. Private sector jobs do not recognize employee performance publicly at any level close to what we see from the schools.

The new Malcom Baldrige method being used by the district to try to force improvement actually started in the private business sector. Why should this thought process with staff be any different since they are currently copying a business model for improvement in other areas?

One thing I have found over the last year is that there are bad medical doctors, bad sales people and bad workers in all fields but according to the R-3 administration there are no bad teachers. They say poor student performance is due to bad parents, growth, bad students, growth, lack of money, growth and high free and reduced lunch percentages (did I mention growth?), but never the teacher.

We do have many great instructors and staff at R-3 but you cannot convince me all are great when I look at our current performance and the past 10 years of very little turnover. I don't think low morale and performance can be blamed on pay when our certified staff makes more than 10% above the state average.

If they want pay as high as Park Hill our teachers will have to get higher degrees. The Park Hill staff makes more due to this. 8% (about 50) of the Park Hill certified staff members have a master’s or higher degree compared to PCR3.

This information was not brought up at last year’s salary increase presentation by Superintendent Dr. Mike Reik or Mrs. Sherwood, and now after seeing these emails I know why.

Pandering is the act of expressing one's views in accordance with the likes of a group to which one is attempting to appeal.

Pandering and denial will accomplish nothing for our students. Our obvious academic issues must be addressed by school leadership not ignored for the sake of self promotion. Did you read anything even remotely close to what is pointed out in the above emails in the paper two weeks ago from these candidates?

Remember these emails the next time you are asked for more tax dollars to support our schools, as I don't see any major concern in either email for the Platte County taxpayers that pay the bills.

Thank you to those who supported me in last week’s election. The information above should give you an idea of how tough it will be to earn a spot on this board if you are a candidate who expects real results, transparency and is unwilling to pander for votes.

We did well, getting very close to a spot. I did not realize while my campaign was paying for mailers we could have just used an email list from the district and sent the information to school employees’ workplace. I thought those staff email addresses were for student-related communication. Rookie mistake.

Every candidate for every office in the future should know these 600 email addresses are available at the district website and it must be ok to send election material to them at work since the district has said nothing.

Do not forget to mention higher salaries, easier work load, compensation, recognition and salaries when you send your campaign piece to the R-3 email address list.

I am now going to go "get better at being me."

--Kirby Holden
Rural Platte County


Bids should be used for the public's benefit



Went to the fire board meeting last week with four other warm bodies.

For the record: Paul Regan, fire board chairman, told the taxpayers to fire him if we did not like his or the board’s decision to buy this new $700k fire pump truck without a bidding process.

He also stated that he was not legally obligated to take bids on this particular issue.

He concluded with saying that it’s up to the board to make decisions like this because the people voted him in.

My plea with this board:

1. Remove emotion and focus on your obligation to the public.

2. Remember that aside from protecting our constitutional rights, you are to vigorously protect our $$$.

3. Act like there is very little money to spend and you’ll FIND ways to lower costs and avoid debt.

4. Do not rely so heavily on opinion but focus on facts you discover or know.

5. Board member Andy Stanton’s diligence to conserve the public’s money should NOT be an offense, look past his style and let him be the balance to the emotion this board has.

We do need and trust experienced folks, but it is ill-advised to not verify a political figure.

Bids are to be used by the board willingly and at every opportunity as a tool on the public’s behalf. Bids help keep things verified, and curbs emotion. Bidding when you don’t have to means you hold that process as very valuable.

Why do the taxpayers expect a bidding process no matter how small the item or contract? Bids typically drive a price down. Those in high positions at the Pierce company must be giddy about the emotional blindness the Central Platte Fire Department is experiencing, and that board members Paul Regan and Mike Ashcraft actually fought against the process, totally forgetting they do not HAVE to accept the lowest bidder, but can choose a bidder for other reasons.

What a story the salesman must have regarding this pumper sale: “Their C.P.A. kept saying they have the money and the credit, and since they like us so much, they didn’t even do a bid – what a hoot!!”

I bet the president of Pierce bids out every single item possible because he knows the value of that process. Even homeowners use the bidding process to drive costs down. The pumper purchase is a fine example of emotion, personal opinions clouding logic, and the purchase signifies a severe breach in the commitment to conserve the public’s money.

Noteworthy: I had to leave the meeting early, but the board allowed me one more statement. How honorable! For all that’s wrong with this and various departments, the fire board allows the taxpayer to speak (respecting time, content, and language).

For it to be said the meeting was a monkey poop throwing mess is completely out of turn. What is wished for those attending the meetings – another gag? The exaggeration and description is hurtful to everyone’s reputation there, and suggests removing free discussion. The only person that seemed combative (face-making, head wagging, huffing, and side inputs) was Lisa Bjustrom, the fire district’s CPA. On the other hand, the district’s secretary was 100% professional, calm, and neutral 100% of the time. The personal moment between Ashcraft and Stanton was spot on, and short lived. Is that worthy of a low description? While I may question and object to their form of politics, I commend and applaud the fire board’s willingness to consider the voter’s voice.

Ever hopeful, still grateful.

--Kelly Goen
Platte City


Obamacare rebrand is lipstick on a pig



As this year’s Missouri legislative session approaches its end, one of the biggest issues before our representatives is whether they will reform the state’s broken Medicaid program, or whether they will expand it under Obamacare. They should choose reform, period. Missourians have made it clear again and again that they reject the health law passed in 2010. That rejection comes from a sound philosophical, fiscal, and moral basis, as Obamacare not only failed to fix the problems of American health care, but doubled down on them, to the detriment of millions.

Rebranding Obamacare in Missouri as a health care “transformation” is just lipstick on a special interest pig. Legislators should know better.

--Patrick Ishmael
Policy Analyst
Show-Me Institute


On the global warming scare, follow the money



Many call it settled science; I call it a convenient lie.

It was once called man-made (anthropogenic) global warming; now it is called climate change. Carbon dioxide emissions are the supposed culprit.

Since it has been scientifically documented there was no appreciable planetary warming in the last 16 years, there had to be an appropriate name change. We all know the climate changes, right? That way any so-called anomaly in the weather can be attributed to climate change. How convenient. If it's hot, the problem is climate change. If it's cold, the problem is climate change. If we have a hurricane, it must be due to climate change. All the environmental leftists, to include Al Gore, and the media are running from the term global warming.

Speaking of Al Gore, who produced the global warming documentary An Inconvenient Truth, he lives in a mansion (20 rooms and 8 bathrooms) located in the posh Belle Meade area of Nashville, which consumes more electricity every month than the average American household uses in an entire year, according to the Nashville Electric Service. I prefer to call this lauded documentary A Convenient Lie. It's convenient because a whole generation of people and educators have been duped into believing a fanciful fabrication, which has become very profitable for those involved in the global warming industry.
Follow the money. The global warming scare perpetuates government funding for grants to university professors in bed with radical environmentalists, who manipulate climate models to produce the conclusions they want. As a result, more tax dollars are funneled to additional bogus research projects. It funds carbon credit scams, which make millions of dollars for green energy shadow bosses who want to stifle corporate production, fossil fuels, and real energy development.

Additionally, billions of our tax dollars have been wasted by our government funding bankrupt renewable energy boondoggles like: Solyndra ($527 million), ECOtality ($96 million), Abound Solar ($60 million), Fisker Automotive ($139 million), A123 Systems ($132 million) and the list goes on and on. Finally, it's a redistribution of wealth scheme that wants to take money from rich nations and redistribute it to lesser developed countries in the guise of economic fairness and social justice.
I could look at this from a Christian perspective and say these environmental alarmists are nothing more than earth worshipers. They prefer to worship the creation rather than the Creator. God tells man to subdue the earth and take dominion over it. He punished nations in the Bible for worshiping nature. I like to say I am a conservationist; I am not an environmentalist. I define the terms this way.

Conservationists love trees. Environmentalists love trees more than people. You get the point.
However, let's look at this from a slightly more scientific perspective. Carbon dioxide is a naturally occurring gas. It is a small part of the atmosphere, yet it sustains all life on earth. It is not a pollutant; it is food for plants and trees. Plants and trees absorb carbon dioxide, and through the photosynthesis process, release oxygen which we breathe.

Over 31,000 scientists have signed a petition organized by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine stating that “there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will in the foreseeable future cause catastrophic heating of the earth's atmosphere.” You never hear this in the main-stream media, because to them it is “settled science.”

Well, it is not. Every shred of so-called evidence for man-made global warming comes from climate models. Let's apply a little common sense. If your local TV weather-person can't predict an accurate forecast two weeks from now, how can we believe climate models that span 30 years? You can't.
I believe many of these models are manipulated by agenda-driven scientists who tweak the results to support their flawed theories. This was recently substantiated by the disclosure of hacked emails generated by the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit between climatologists who appeared to admit to each other they had manipulated climate data in an attempt to suppress critics.

Just like United Nations Agenda 21, Common Core State Standards, Sustainable Development, and all of the progressive left's agendas, the ultimate goal of global warming alarmism can be summed up in one word: control. The elitists and academics who approve of these mandates believe big government knows what is best for us and we are not smart enough to run our own lives. These liberal belief systems have led our country into its current mess.

Don't buy the climate change lie. Our earth will be here just as long as God wants it around and we can all learn to be good stewards of His creation without the hysteria and ridiculous government controls.

--Mike Stark
Platte City


Park Hill no longer needs your yes vote



Great news—our school district no longer needs your vote for a proposed tax increase!

The USS Park Hill has dramatically shifted course and is now navigating toward the smoother waters of fiscal responsibility and transparent communication. The distress signal issued to parents and taxpayers has been lifted and replaced with a more composed message in recent weeks.

It appears that school safety is NOT, after all, contingent on the passage of this levy. After the last board meeting, a significantly-revised press release noted “the district will fund the safety improvements from our regular budget but the April 8 levy will allow us to kick-start the projects to finish them sooner.”

In short, district leaders are acknowledging that there is no crisis and that they have the money needed to make some adjustments to safety plans. Not sure what they mean by “kick-start”—I'll be discouraging my kids from telling me they've saved up for a new iPod but would like some money from me to “kick-start” their purchase. Sounds mostly like district leaders are apologizing for “crying wolf” and using school safety as a marketing strategy. I believe they're an earnest and well-meaning bunch--apology accepted.

It appears district administrators now believe they can implement the technology initiative successfully without additional funding, too. Friends and colleagues in Park Hill tell me the superintendent has quietly communicated that they will proceed with the FLiP initiative regardless of the levy outcome, and he's asked his leadership team to begin “battening down the hatches” of their respective budgets.

That is precisely the right thing to do and not surprising—months ago the district leased 2500 of the needed 10,000 laptops they plan to distribute to kids. If this effort is rolled out judiciously, there is no reason, short of wasteful financial diversions, that our kids can't have access to the recommended technology. Only time will tell if it will be used in ways that truly impact teaching and learning, as promised.

Now that the manufactured crisis has subsided, it is critical board members and district administrators turn their attention to the real dangers that threaten successful passage of our district into the next decade. A meaningful school option for alternative or suspended students, full funding for remediation programs like Smart Start and summer school that help kids with greatest need, district-wide implementation of anti-bullying programs like Olweus, equitable wages, training and benefits for support staff on par with those of their certified colleagues, and a fair and rigorous education for all kids regardless of zip code. No need to loosen the life rafts, but navigating these waters will require “all hands on deck.”

VOTE NO on April 8th for the tax increase proposed by the Park Hill School District. Now that the fog has lifted, let's put this issue behind us so we can all begin our focus on more important challenges ahead.

--Jim Dunn
Former Park Hill


Back to basics program, not laptops, needed



Recently I had the opportunity to listen to Park Hill Superintendent Dr. Scott Springston speak about the upcoming levy question coming up on the April 8th ballot.

Of course, Dr. Springston and his group of student spokespersons expressed how great the new Future Learner Project is going to be if the levy passes. As it was explained, this program will offer ongoing technology based education to students in an effort to make them more likely to succeed in a job market that is becoming more technologically oriented. According to Dr. Springston, talks with local businesses revealed a desire for future employees to be tech-savvy and have a good working knowledge of computers and technology.

To pay for this program, the school is asking the district residents to pick up the tab in the form of a levy. Like many other school projects and programs this idea sounds good in theory, however there is a bigger problem at hand here that the Park Hill district and many other districts are overlooking.

As I see it, tech-savvy students are not the problem. Most kids know their way around computers and technology quite well, but what they don’t know how to do is read and write. I am reminded of this fact every time I review a job application from a recent high school or even a college grad. To say that many of them are appalling would be putting it nicely.

Instead of a technology training program that costs taxpayers a great deal of money, how about a back-to-basics program that forces students to master the basic skills of communication, math, science and history with very little or no additional cost to the district taxpayers? I suppose that would be too simple and not progressive enough.

The second issue with this levy is that they have tacked on upgrades for school safety. This is a trick right out of the politicians’ playbook. Tie school safety onto anything and it is hard for the public to say no.

I must say that I will probably end up voting for this issue but not because I think that a Future Learner Program is the way to go, or I think that the safety in the district is derelict. (Truth be told, Park Hill has one of the best security systems and protocols of any local district.) I will vote for this because it is my opinion that the district has already made up their mind about the program and they will implement it no matter if they get the levy or not. The difference will be the funding. They will either fund the program with taxpayer money or they will take it from somewhere else in the district, like faculty and staff salaries. I would much rather pay for an unnecessary program than potentially risk the salaries of the great teachers and district workers that we have.

Just food for thought!

--Trevor J. Ballard


Consider ‘no’ on Park Hill laptop levy



I'd like to extend this “open letter” to Park Hill teachers and staff. I know that the district marketing machine is now in full swing, and you have no doubt been inundated by district administrators with newsletter highlights, video segments, and staff meeting presentations in favor of the upcoming levy issue. These are, of course, only “informational” and in no way intended to influence you to vote “yes” for this tax increase.

I won't presume to tell you what to do—that's an individual decision each of us makes in the privacy of the voting booth. But as you weigh your vote, I would ask that you simply CONSIDER NO.

If you have struggled to help a class of kids when the wireless connection (or email or software program or. . .) didn't work, and you long ago gave up hope of getting meaningful, “real time” tech support to fix the issues —CONSIDER NO.

If you know your students and suspect most will quickly grow uninterested in a district-provided laptop with significant restrictions on software, downloads and Internet accessibility—CONSIDER NO.

If you can't imagine how district infrastructure is going to handle 10,000 additional computers when it has never functioned consistently and effectively—CONSIDER NO.

If you've struggled through the adoption and implementation of a technology-based program (e.g., Digits), and couldn't get a common sense fix for the myriad of technical problems—CONSIDER NO.

If you've watched as millions of dollars have been wasted on “quality” initiatives that have never impacted your job as a teacher or support staff —CONSIDER NO.

If you saw, for months, a blank television screen in your school's office where recorded security camera footage was supposed to be monitored, and thought, “I hope to God nothing bad happens before the district gets its act together” —CONSIDER NO.

If you are appalled to learn the superintendent recently spent $47,000 remodeling the board room at central office for meetings held a few hours each month when this money could have been put to good use purchasing educational technology for classrooms—CONSIDER NO.

If you are a parent or taxpayer in the district but don't believe you're obligated , as an employee, to blindly support every initiative and tax increase proposed by district administrators—many of whom don't live in this school community and will never pay a penny out-of-pocket for this tax increase—CONSIDER NO.

If you feel fortunate to work in a great district like Park Hill, but have, at times, thought taxpayers would be upset by the waste you've seen around you—CONSIDER NO.

As a district employee, I asked questions and challenged practices but often felt I didn't get meaningful answers or solutions. Now all of us have a way to be heard that can't be ignored.

CONSIDER NO as you vote on the upcoming Park Hill District tax increase.

--Jim Dunn
Former Park Hill


Demand public input on proposed sewer deal



Once again, the Parkville board of aldermen goes down a path of a major financial transaction, avoids the public, and attempts to present an image of being in control of a situation spiraling out of control.
The city's latest charade is to sell the sewer facilities to pay the Brush Creek NID debt. I probably spent less time analyzing this transaction and its impact on sewer rates than city staff did preparing the various documents to hire outside experts. Perhaps they knew the outcome would not be favorable to sewer customers. And since their real motive is to rid themselves of the NID debt, better to dress a pig for auction than to show the real pig.

This proposed transaction is a smokescreen and a shell game. It is an attempt to hide the cost of a high risk annexation and NID development project inside sewer rates, which would serve as a cover-up of yet another failed board initiative.

The Parkville board won't admit it, but there is panic inside City Hall. It wants a definitive agreement before June 1, 2014. This means that in a period of less than 90 days, the board will have investigated, evaluated, and agreed to transfer to a third party assets that have been under city control for decades, if not longer. All without any request for public input.

Last week's Landmark presented significant background and facts. Additionally:

•Under the 2006 Cooperative Agreement between Parkville and PCRSD, Parkville assumed 100% of the debt risk while PCRSD assumed no debt risk. After being approached by PCRSD, Parkville assumed 100% of the cost ($13,500) for an expert report. Who is negotiating for Parkville?

•Parkville failed to disclose in the 2013 budget the degree of risk on this NID. After having been called out on the matter, they changed their disclosure for the 2014 budget.$317,000 is being added to reserves in 2014 to bring the reserve to $1.4 million.

•The annual debt service on the $4,935,000 NID, assuming a 20 year term and 3% annual interest, approximates $330,000. Ignoring any collectible assessments, Parkville essentially has sufficient tax revenues to service the NID debt. This transaction is not necessary.

•PCRSD is burdened with significant long term debt, which is the reason for their high fixed charge per customer of $26.22 in comparison to Parkville's $11.86. To fund the purchase, PCRSD would have to issue debt for 100% of the purchase price, adding more debt to an already debt burdened balance sheet. In addition, debt issued by PCRSD may carry an interest rate 50% higher than Parkville due to PCRSD not being rated.

•Assuming PCRSD paid an amount equal to the NID debt, substantially all of Parkville's customers will see their rates increase, some by more than 100%.

An underlying assumption being made by those involved is that the sewer assets of Parkville have a marketable value. In fact, there is none. This is a flawed assumption. Sewer charges are nothing more than a cost recovery mechanism. There is no “profit” in municipal sewer charges as any excess of revenues over costs is used to offset future costs. If there is no future profit, there is no market value to be determined. The only value in a municipal transaction is the cost of assets being included in the service charges. This does not require an outside expert report.

Consider yourself the buyer. Would you pay $5 million for an asset when the only amount you can generate in return is the $5 million you paid? On its own, this is ludicrous.

A further significant concern with the proposed transaction is that it would allow Parkville to free up hundreds of thousands of dollars of excess contingency reserves so the board can continue spending at will on unnecessary pet projects. Parkville generates significant excess tax revenues because it taxes everything that moves (read the second bullet point above again). In spite of excess revenues, the board has the gall to attempt to play a shell game with $5 million.

Parkville residents should be incensed. Call your alderman and the mayor. Stop this transaction and demand some input. There is more at stake than individual user sewer charges.

--Gordon Cook


Opposed to development east of I-29



Your position, pro or con, on the “long coveted” development east of I-29 is unknown to me. My position is decidedly con, for the following reasons.

Platte City is a decidedly unique community within the Kansas City metropolitan area. Unlike all the other periphery communities to KC, Platte City lacks the plethora of brand name box stores and morass of seething shoppers. The “un-likeness” is the very beauty of its situation. All of the shopping and dining opportunities available in the KC area are a mere 10-minute drive to Zona Rosa.

Meanwhile, small town advantages still apply to Platte City, and a trip to the country begins just across the HH overpass.

When noses are counted for expansion east of I-29, the outcome is predictable from thousands of preceding examples throughout the country. The developers will come, hungry with fervid anticipation of the money to be made and total disregard for any results save the profits in their pockets. The city’s officers will slobber all over themselves, and the developers, in an effort to please the big money. Even the mini-me Donald Trumps of the world have the power to awe the Offutts of the pastures. The politicians will see dollar signs, and parks named after them.

The majority of citizens will be only casually aware of the background details, lulled by expectation of their own Walmart, and oblivious to the loss of their current instant big city access and simultaneous remoteness.

The promise will be more jobs, a rising rate of development (a euphemism disregarding precise, accurate description), an increased tax base (erroneously suggesting taxes will go down), and a plethora of only positive results.

For too long, the paradigm has been that only growth can stave off decay. How about a new paradigm stressing maximizing what exists? Pursue development of quality within the existing structure instead of quantity of the structure. The false promise of “new” is a consequence of pursuit of “better.” New, or more, is not a guarantee of better.

Instead of bankrolling developers in acquisition east of I-29, how about spending those dollars on projects improving and protecting existing development, thereby really obtaining “better” for existing citizens?

--Stu Ostrander
Platte County


Park Hill using 'safety' to manipulate voters



Safety and security are basic human needs. But safety and security of our children are among the highest priorities of any parent or community.

I am always dismayed when the issue of safety is used to manipulate others. But I am deeply troubled when a school district, entrusted with the safe care of our children, “plays politics” with the issue.

In an effort to raise money to fund a technology initiative, the Park Hill School District has tacked on some safety upgrades to a proposed tax increase. District leadership is telling parents and patrons they need money to make necessary upgrades to improve the safety of our schools. In reality, they have simply chosen to spend millions of dollars on other projects. District administrators decided not to come to voters to approve $800,000 in spending on central office remodeling or a $500,000 canopy over the soccer stadium; they had little confidence that these would make for a “sexy” marketing campaign.

Instead, they've decided to tell our school community, “If you don't approve a tax increase, safety might be impacted. And none of us wants that, do we?”

Imagine telling an older parent, “Mom, I got your car inspected and they said you need brakes. But I decided to wait to get these fixed until I could ask if I'm going to be 'well-represented' in your will.”
Those with the means and responsibility to protect others should never wait to do the “right thing”—they should act with a sense of intention and urgency.

If Park Hill district leadership is aware that safety issues need to be addressed in our schools, I implore them to take action immediately, using available reserve funds, if necessary. Failure to act now, regardless of the levy outcome, would be nothing short of negligence. I can only hope that no tragedy befalls any of our schools or students because of the inaction of those we've entrusted to keep them safe.

I encourage parents to contact the school district (816-359-4000) to tell school leaders to act immediately to make recommended safety improvements. And if you attend the school board candidate forum at Park Hill High School on March 24th, at 6:30 pm., ask those seeking election how they would take action to address these safety issues if voters decide not to subsidize this costly technology initiative through a tax increase.

--Jim Dunn
Former Park Hill


Ron Schieber made the right move



This is in reply to Sue Lange’s letter to the editor in last week’s issue of The Landmark.

Ms. Lange, I can understand your personal choice of one candidate over another for Platte County's Presiding Commissioner. But, keeping Park Hill School fixed to a septic system rather than hooking into the city's sewer system seems like 1960 ecology.

Thanks for pointing out that Ron Schieber voted to move our school into the 21st century.

Then, your editorial noted this septic deal was some sort of deception. But, wouldn't the awful results have been from school plugged toilets and flooded bathrooms of foul sewage? Old septic systems leak; modern sewage systems work better with larger populations.

Further, I am a taxpayer shelling out tax dollars for our Platte County schools. Would you please provide cost/ratio data demonstrating how “our kids suffer?”

No doubt the teachers union wants more tax revenues to spend; no doubt political experts and special interest groups will spend lots of promotional monies to get your programs. How much more taxes will they cost me?

Please note: both candidates are really good, but your assertion that “our kids suffer” does not match with Park Hill’s high educational ranking in the state.

--Lee Valentine
Platte County


County doesn't need a rubber stamp



So Ron Schieber wants to become presiding commissioner of Platte County,
just like Jason Brown did? Well now, if that isn't just what this county needs, another career politician wanting a government funded salary, (whopping $65,755 as of 2011), without sacrifice from his family.

I admire a family man but we need an employee who is able to earn that money. That wasn't Jason and it's not Ron, either.

I'd like to remind voters out there that Ron Schieber served on the Park Hill School District Board of Education during what has to be one of the most egregious spending boondoggles of the century, the Union Chapel Interceptor Sewer. That's right folks; he was one of the board members who voted to put in gravity fed sewers to solve a problem that could have been fixed for a million dollars less.

I spent countless hours researching the problems and goals the school indicated they wanted to accomplish. I found numerous errors and flaws in the solution they were presented with. First and foremost was the idea that MoDNR was forcing them to install sewers. This was simply not true.

Admittedly their septic tank was aging but the bulk of their problems stemmed from abuse and lack of proper maintenance. The fact is that system they claimed was 'on its last legs' back in 2008 is still operating within proper effluent guidelines today and was recently recertified by the MoDNR to continue to operate. They did not need sewers then and to this day still do not.

I went to meetings and wrote letters pointing out the deception and discrepancies. It fell on deaf ears. I contacted outside experts who proposed alternative cheaper solutions, and was still ignored. Not one lazy person on the school board at that time, including Mr. Schieber, took it upon him or herself to read the facts or research them independently. With $1 million at stake, that's a travesty.

As a result, our kids have suffered. In recent years they been unable to get new text books, and currently they can't get new computers. I have no respect for anyone who sat on the PHSD school board at the time of the Union Chapel Sewer decision. By voting to install that sewer, every one of them, Mr. Schieber included, contributed to the fiscal challenges the school now faces. He has proven that his priorities are confused and he hasn't got the stomach for the hard choices.

Platte County needs someone who will take time to research the facts, rather than rubber stamp whatever the administration puts in front of him. We've had enough of that already with Jason Brown.

Mr. Schieber's track record on the PHSD board of education makes it very clear: he's Jason Brown II and he is not the person we need.

--Sue Lange
Platte County


There is an agenda behind the green mask



Have you heard of the United Nations (UN) Agenda for the 21st Century or Agenda 21? You probably have not. That term is purposely not used in the United States. You may be more familiar with terms like Sustainable Development or Smart Growth. It is important that every patriot understand this global plan that is being implemented locally across our nation and the consequences for our liberty and freedoms. This is not a partisan issue and we will all feel its impact. It is time to expose what is behind the “green mask.”

Background. In 1992 at the Rio de Janeiro UN Earth Summit, the U.S. and 178 other nations signed onto the action plan to implement sustainable development across the globe. The UN called it Agenda 21. The chairman of the summit is quoted as saying the current lifestyles of the affluent middle-class that involve high meat intakes, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work-place air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. The plan also cites the affluence of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected. It calls for lowering the standard of living for Americans so people in poorer countries have more. In 1993, the plan began implementation in the U.S. by the President's Council on Sustainable Development. By 2002, a legislative guidebook was written which defines the blueprint for every city, county, and state to implement Agenda 21 in America.

Purpose. Although dissenters can be expected to be labeled conspiracy theorists, the purpose of Agenda 21 (Smart Growth) is quite simple: control. The ultimate goal is to move people out of the suburbs and rural areas and into the cities or so-called islands of human habitation. This opens up the rural areas to become wilderness, wetlands, etc. Smart Growth has three pillars: environment, equity, and economy, in that order. The environment or ecology is listed first because it drives Agenda 21.

From the agenda's perspective, human population and private property ownership are a blight on the earth. These factors drive climate change, consume scarce natural resources, and tend to concentrate wealth among the very few. As a result, a “balance” between man and the earth must be achieved. The economy is considered last because it is the least restraining factor when it comes to “saving the planet.”

Finally, equity or social equity is a redistribution of wealth from the rich nations or people to the poorer nations or people. All of this is implemented for the common good to advance social justice. The rights of the individual are sacrificed for the rights of the community or collective. Heard that term before?

How. Across the nation, in large cities and small towns, identical programs are being rolled out. Land use restrictions (eminent domain), ordinances reducing energy use, smart meters, school programs, and candidate training are designed and implemented without your vote. You may be invited to city visioning meetings, but the outcome is decided before you ever enter the room. Your taxes at the federal, state, and local level are supporting this. This dramatic revolution in private property rights will extend into every facet of our lives: education, energy, food, housing, and transportation.

Follow the money. This rescue mission for planet earth carries a huge price tag. Besides being subsidized by our property taxes, your state and county may only receive federal transportation and housing dollars if they agree to Smart Growth initiatives. Sustainable redevelopment programs will steal property tax dollars. Public-private partnerships will emerge and redevelopment corporations will make billions of dollars from government-mandated Smart Growth projects. The model is to think globally, plan regionally, and act locally. For example, Platte County is already a member of the Mid-America Regional Council (MARC) made up of 9 counties and 119 cites with a vision for “creating sustainable places.”

Do your own internet research on this topic. This is not a conspiracy theory; it is a conspiracy fact. What is going on in your community? Attend local county and school meetings; get involved. Tell our politicians we don't want Agenda 21 in Missouri. Your ears should perk up when you hear code words like: sustainable, vibrant, connected, green, bikable, walkable, wildlands, regionalization, climate change, Common Core, balancing, mixed use, mass transit, smart meters, visioning meetings, blight, sprawl, and eminent domain.

Be forewarned, there is an agenda behind the green mask. A great web site, believe it or not, for information is:

--Mike Stark
Platte City


Chapel Ridge lawsuit irrelevant



Jason Brown and his surrogate(s) are in the local papers declaring that his Chapel Ridge vote was not "for sale!" This isn't the first time such declarations from Mr. Brown have been necessary.

In 2012, Jason Brown voted to give the lucrative community centers expansion project to JE Dunn, even though there were several lower bids (for construction management services). The county acknowledged that they received 10 bids for the project and all were quality bids. JE Dunn's bid was $350,000 over the low bidder—almost 40% higher.

After questions arose regarding the bid, Brown was forced to acknowledge in the press that he had been placed on the Dunn payroll for two 6-month stints including the six months he was campaigning for presiding commissioner. He stayed on their payroll until being sworn in as commissioner.

He was also forced to acknowledge that Dunn had hosted a fundraiser for him and given contributions to his campaign.

Chapel Ridge is not the only time Brown has put himself in the middle of an ethics controversy, it's merely the latest. The debate over what can be proven in court by the Chapel Ridge attorneys is irrelevant for Mr. Brown's political future, should he decide to seek re-election. His political future will be decided in the court of public opinion and Chapel Ridge was the last straw.

--Jon Miller
Kansas City
in Platte County


Left wages war on poor with minimum wage push



The Road to Washington may be paved with good intentions, but good intentions don’t always translate into good policy. Just ask the millions of Americans who liked their health insurance plans, were told they could keep them under the Affordable Care Act, but recently found out they’ll be losing them. Ronald Reagan once said that “the nine most terrifying words in the English language” are “I'm from the government and I'm here to help.” Those words are as true today as they have ever been.

Our government’s tendency toward crushing kindness is a big reason why Americans should resist the push to raise the minimum wage. We’re often told our collective compassion compels us to increase it, and on the surface, the idea sort of sounds good. No one gets rich with a minimum wage job, and we all want to help one another. But increases to the minimum wage do not help the poor as some might think.

First, most minimum wage earners don’t actually live in poverty. Two-thirds of minimum wage earners come from households making at or above 150 percent of the poverty line – in other words, they’re not technically considered poor – and just more than half of minimum wage earners are 25 years of age or younger. And more than 60 percent of those young people are still in school.

Second, the number of people paid the minimum is not especially high. Today, less than five percent of hourly workers are paid the minimum. Among all U.S. workers, minimum wage employees constitute just three percent of the American workforce. Not only are relatively few people being paid the minimum technically in poverty; relatively few people are being paid the minimum at all.

Moreover, the general consensus among economists is that minimum wage hikes are ineffective at fighting poverty. Christina Romer, who led President Barack Obama’s Council of Economic Advisors, openly conceded in the New York Times last year that there were questions about “whether a higher minimum wage will achieve better outcomes for the economy and reduce poverty.” Romer even panned the idea that a hike in the minimum wage would be a sort of economic “stimulus.”

The problems don’t end there. Consider that even the most stalwart minimum wage advocates aren’t trying to raise the wage to $150 per hour, or $100, or $75.

Why? Because proponents know that as they force the cost of labor up increment by increment, the cash that businesses have to pay for labor will remain about the same – forcing employers to raise prices for consumers, cut back on the number of people the company employs and the hours they work, or some combination of the two.

The awful truth embedded in this fight, which is rarely mentioned, is that there will be collateral damage among the low-skilled and the poor as a consequence of these wrong-headed policies.

How many jobs are boosters willing to destroy in their quest to increase the minimum wage? What level of government-imposed suffering is acceptable to them?

Human compassion compels us to promote policies that support job creation, not policies that undercut it. The problem of poverty in this country would be best addressed by making jobs more available — not making jobs more scarce.

And I could compare today’s $7.25 per hour federal minimum wage to past levels – I could remind proponents that the first federal minimum wage instituted in 1938 was the equivalent of $4.07 today, and that the inflation-adjusted average since is actually below the current wage – but that’s not even close to the best argument against their plans.

A minimum wage hike is a bad idea because it hurts the very people we should be helping. Isn’t that reason enough to oppose it?

--Patrick J. Ishmael
Policy Analyst
The Show-Me Institute


Enrollment projections need to be continually updated



This letter is in response to Mr. Holden's "letter to the editor" printed on January 29.

While we are happy to provide a response for The Landmark as requested, we have no intentions of making it common practice to speak with a patron through the local media. We welcome patrons to contact district leadership with questions and/or concerns. We have policies and procedures in place to assure patrons are able to seek answers to their questions. We take great pride in serving the public and look forward to speaking with caring community members.

The general assertion in the Jan. 29 letter suggests information is being manipulated and/or withheld by district leadership in an attempt to fool members of the public. In reality, the public has been routinely presented with the most current and best information available to the district. The Citizens Advisory Committee is no exception. The enrollment projections shared with the committee were the most current available and provided the CAC with part of the necessary information to consider growth management options.

Enrollment projections will need to be continually updated for our foreseeable future because the useful life of such a study is relatively short due to our rapid growth and perpetually changing factors such as the state of the economy and housing market trends. Whether considering the projections in 2010 or 2013, the implications are relatively consistent: continued growth and overcrowding. To focus on differences in the two studies that will naturally vary over time, would be to focus on the wrong information which could prove costly to our students and our taxpayers. We encourage you to contact members of the CAC to determine their opinion of our integrity and if their opinion has changed due to the presence of an updated study. In the interim, here are a few more points to consider:

•Our reported capacity numbers did, in fact, change after determining a scientific method was needed to calculate and report capacity. Prior to this, district leadership used numbers that were provided by past administrations. It should be noted, that through this process some buildings increased capacity and some decreased capacity. Overall, net capacity increased as a result of this process……hardly an effective strategy for overstating need. More importantly, we know how our buildings are being used and that, above all, tells us that overcrowding must be addressed.

•Growth and capacity, which appear on the surface to be substantially more concerning at Barry and Pathfinder, can be misleading if you ignore our community created Long Range Plan. The LRP calls for the closure of Rising Star and the eventual annexation of Paxton School by PCHS which removes space for almost 600 students at the elementary level. Consequently, capacity is concerning at both ends of the district at the elementary level if we intend on addressing overcrowding at PCHS in the coming years. You may also recall that a boundary line study is intended to follow an election to maximize the use of all facilities. Our Long Range Plan was created by community members from North and South and is designed to take care of all kids throughout the district.

In closing, we welcome questions regarding information we share with the public and rationale for strategic decisions. We are more than prepared to field such inquiries and would consider the opportunity a gift. Simply put, if ignoring growth and overcrowding was a viable strategy we would gladly share this good news with the public. Unfortunately, this would only cost taxpayers more and prove detrimental to our students.

Respectfully submitted.

--Dr. Michael Reik, Superintendent
--Gary Brown, Board of Education
and Citizens Advisory Committee

Platte County R-3 School's growth projections have lowered significantly



Over the past two weeks the Platte County R-3 Board of Education has emailed and published an open letter to the patrons of PCR-3 School District on why they are waiting another year to ask us for a levy increase.

First, I was a member of the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) that is mentioned in the board’s letter and mentioned so many times by the board and Dr. Mike Reik.

I want to point out the 16-member committee was given the "old" 2010 enrollment study numbers to work with. This would not be a big deal, but the difference between the high numbers in this study compared to the low numbers of the 2013 study just completed are around 1200 students lower.

That's right, 1200 or about 50 classrooms lower by 2018.

We (the CAC members) were not told a new study was being done or that the current numbers were much lower than the projections we were working with.

This year according to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) website, the five schools located in the Platte City area had a total growth of 1 (one) student, while the southern two schools increased by 52.

Barry and Pathfinder Schools need help now. Instead you have a "natatorium" (swimming pool) at a cost of over $1.3 million and $25,000 per year while those kids are in trailers. The study we were given showed growth of 150 to 200 students.

One other thing that seemed out of line was the capacity numbers we were given in the CAC for each school. The information presented to the CAC and the board by administration showed lower capacity numbers than what was listed in the studies.

Rising Star Elementary has had more than 200 students several years in the mid 2000's. It is currently down to 166 students, but the capacity given to us for Rising Star was 175. Why? Other information from the district shows its total capacity of 184 and 189.

The CAC was given a maximum student capacity at Siegrist of 550 but in the current study it is 596. Paxton was off by 15, Barry School numbers given to us were 71 lower.

Of the seven schools looked at, two were the same with only Paxton being higher in capacity as to what was given to us to make our decision on how the district should proceed with its growth.

Why would PCR3 administration want to show lower school capacity numbers to the group of people trying to decide for the community if we should try to fund a new school or not? We should have had the most up to date numbers. Things that make you say hmm.

Remember, the CAC presentation to the board and the new study were done just months apart.

Please do not continue to push the CAC findings off on us anymore. I was in the group of 15 and we were dealing with flawed enrollment information, the most important information I needed to base my recommendations on how to handle growth.

One last thing I found humorous was the statement in the letter from the board that "Overwhelmingly, patrons are generally supportive of expanding our facilities" then listing support from a recent survey at 59% (+ or - 5%). The same survey was done before the last election and showed support at 54% (+ or -5%). Then the levy was defeated 56 to 44%. So much for slanted surveys paid for by the taxpayers.

Here is an excerpt from the most current survey:

“In looking back at the 2011 study, $114 a year was the lowest of the three tax levels presented then, whereas it is the highest this year. In 2011, the results were 54% combined “strongly favor/favor.” This means that the results this year – for this tax level – are statistically identical to the results in 2011.)” --Patron Insight 2013 Fall Survey.

The lack of student growth in the northern part of the county along with this comment from the most recent survey most likely shows the real reason we will not see a proposed levy until 2015.

Get ready for lots of marketing this year from the district on anything done in the water. Documentation is included with this letter showing all of the information above.

---Kirby Holden
Platte County


Common Core means a federal takeover of schools



A few months ago I submitted a letter to the editor concerning Common Core State Standards (CCSS). Since then, I attended two local presentations, both presented by educators with multiple advanced degrees, one a PhD. Each have heightened my concerns. Although its proponents will swear the states had input developing the standards, this is completely untrue. As a matter of fact, when Governor Nixon unilaterally agreed to accept federal funding in June 2009, standards were not even developed. The Missouri Board of Education had no review or input. Under a Missouri revised statute (160.514.2), the law states that teachers shall be used to develop standards. It did not happen.

This should be of concern to students, parents, teachers and administrators alike. Our CCSS English and math standards were developed by the Federal Department of Education and the National Governor's Association in cohort with progressive private organizations like Achieve, with lots of funding from familiar personalities like Bill Gates. Most of the states “sold their souls” to get millions of dollars in Race to the Top stimulus money and signed contracts to adopt Common Core standards sight-unseen. Now, many states and their legislatures are having second thoughts.

What are some of the real dangers of CCSS? First, it violates our state Constitution by removing local control of education. CCSS is wrongly named. It should be called: Common Core Nationalized Standards. In actuality, it begins a federal take-over of our school systems. Second, it permits non-educators to politicize our education system. As the science and social studies components are added to the reading and math modules, you can probably guess what agendas will be included. I assure you from what we have seen so far, it will not have a conservative leaning or world-view. Third, there will be a massive student information collection and tracking effort fed into a national-level database.

Follow the money. Many of the major supporters of CCSS will make billions of dollars implementing the program by selling new books and computers to every child. In addition, the database can be shared with chosen corporations and agencies that benefit from knowing a person's habits, emotions, opinions, educational potential, family history, etc. It will even keep record of a student's disciplinary actions. All of this data will be tracked “cradle to career.”

I closed my first letter to the editor by stating I fear the government is trying to teach our children what to think and not how to think. I can now add another caveat to the CCSS morass. CCSS is not designed to produce a nation of thinkers; it is designed to produce a nation of workers. Does this scare you? It should.

Please start your own internet research on this topic. Attend local meetings and seminars. Inform your school board members. Many other Common Core consequences require exploration: lowering standards, cost, testing, technology replacing teachers, the impact on private schools and home schooling, etc. Get informed and don't believe all the spin you hear from the government. It is time for voters in Missouri to register their disapproval to state representatives, senators, and the governor. Missouri legislators are beginning to take notice. For our children and our state, we should all want Missouri out of Common Core.

--Mike Stark
Platte City


Park Hill patrons: Don't let sentiment cloud your judgment on levy question



Good schools serve as a pillar of any community, and great teachers touch our kids' lives in amazing ways. But school districts are government agencies, and without an active and vigilant electorate, they are prone to misdirected and wasteful spending. As parents and taxpayers, it is important not to let sentiment and positive regard cloud our judgment or deter our oversight.

For example, the Park Hill School District spent nearly a half million dollars on a canopy to cover the bleachers in the soccer stadium at the same time that they were fundraising in the community to pay for Smart Start, a summer program designed to help remediate struggling learners. Sadly, kids' learning is the very mission of the district and should have been the moral imperative and spending priority.

The Park Hill central office administration and school board have been working for months to determine the best time to “hit up” voters for a tax increase. They say without millions of new tax dollars, they simply can't prepare our children for the future.
In reality, they've spent millions in taxpayer funds on technology infrastructure and new devices in recent months. A review of school board approval and spending records reveals the following expenditures in just the last year:

·$220,000—wireless infrastructure improvements (January, 2013)

·$100,000—new electronic employee management system (April, 2013)

·$552,000—new technology department office construction and upgrades (May, 2013)

·$306,000—561 new desktop computers (May, 2013)

·$59,000—two new vehicles for use by district technicians (May, 2013)

These costs don't include the tens of thousands of dollars spent to fly district staff around the country for professional development or other “soft costs” (e.g., salaries, classroom leave, substitute pay) associated with teacher training for various technology initiatives. Nor do these reflect the hundreds of thousands of dollars spent to create new instructional and support staff positions focused on technology usage in the district this past year. In short, Park Hill is gearing up to spend millions more in taxpayer dollars, and they are counting on the trust and generosity of a community who has rarely said “no” when asked for money.

We all want to support our children and our schools. But being a good parent sometimes means doing the right but difficult thing—and the same is true of a good taxpayer. Overindulgence and entitlement are unattractive and unhealthy, in kids and in government. It is time to kindly but firmly say “no” in April to a Park Hill tax increase.

--Jim Dunn
Former teacher and
school administrator


Editor 'sounds like a liberal'



I read your Twitter post about how we need more Qwik Trips and lots of rooftops (such as Chapel Ridge) because Parkville is in deep trouble financially. Your line of reasoning escapes me.

We here in the county did NOT run up Parkville's debt. We here in the county did not benefit from Parkville's expenditures that got them into so much debt. We owe Parkville nothing, and certainly should not have to forfeit years of savings invested into large lot housing so we could escape the city, only to have the city forced on us to fix Parkville's budgetary problems.

Whatever happened to personal responsibility, the buzz-word-phrase of the Tea Party that you champion? How do you figure that persons who did not run up the debt (and can't vote in Parkville, thus had no say) should suffer loss in order to free those who did?

I've seen you say and do a lot of noble things. Your steadfast support for Jason Brown when he's clearly in the wrong with regard to Chapel Ridge is admirable as a friend even though misguided as a journalist.

But the idea that county residents should bail out Parkville because her citizens failed to keep check on their duly elected leaders? With all due respect, you're starting to sound like a liberal there, Ivan, and hypocrisy is unbecoming of you.

--Sue Lange
Platte County

EDITOR’S NOTE: I admire Ms. Lange’s spunk but question her reading comprehension. Ms. Lange is arguing against a position that was never taken nor implied. Judge for yourself. The Jan. 16 posts dealing with Parkville’s financial future are still available for public viewing at The posts are free market observations and do not state nor imply anyone should ‘bail out’ Parkville from the Neighborhood Improvement Debt it faces. Thanks for reading.


New legislative session begins



The 2014 legislative session began on Jan. 8. It was mostly a day of formalities, but before the week ended several bills were referred to committee and now the real work can begin for the second regular session of the 97th General Assembly.

While January marks the start of a new year, it also marks the beginning of our task to craft and pass legislation that protects citizens and prepares Missouri for the 21st century. Approximately 500 bills already have been filed by the House of Representatives and Senate. If history is an indicator, nearly 2,000 bills will be filed by springtime and most will fall to the wayside when the session ends in May.

This year I have several priorities. Reforming certain tax credits that annually wreak havoc on the state budget is near the top of my list. As senators have sought tax credit reforms for several years in a row, this year may see a break in the logjam with the help of Missouri’s governor. Also related to tax policy, the General Assembly plans to revisit legislation that would provide a modest cut to the state income tax. I intend to support such a measure.

As the state unemployment rate steadily goes down, Missouri’s tax revenues will be up this year. Many special interests will be anxious to spend those tax dollars. As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I will work closely with legislators and staff to monitor the spending of what is expected to be hundreds of millions of new dollars in the state budget. I don’t want a single dollar misspent.

As a physician, I take seriously the ongoing challenge of ensuring quality health services are available in Northwest Missouri and throughout the state. I’m currently working with representatives in the House to jointly propose a healthcare package intended to remove barriers to the free market, while reducing the role of government at the same time. I’m convinced we can lower the costs of healthcare if we can get government and special interest groups out of the way. My hope is that the Legislature will come to a consensus on what is best to reduce medical costs.

If you have any questions about the upcoming session, you can visit the Missouri Senate website (, where you can review legislation, keep track of important dates, and review hearing schedules for Senate and House committees. If I can be of assistance or can answer any questions, please feel free to contact my Capitol office at (573) 751-2183.

–State Sen. Rob Schaaf
District 34


Park Hill should 'suck it up'



The Park Hill School District is at it again - asking for more money after spending $500,000 for a soccer stadium canopy, so spectators would not get hit by errant foul balls from the baseball field.

I've been denied a pay increase for the 5th time in 6 years, because I'm a public servant and times are tough. I don't have the spare change the Park Hill Schools want - suck it up and absorb it in your budget.

They should have been forced to choose between this and the stupid soccer stadium canopy, and we'd see the importance of this newest idea. Quoting this from an email sent out by the district:

“The ballot will ask voters for authorization to increase the levy by 32 cents, but the board plans to only take half of that amount from 2014-2016. Because we are implementing FLiP slowly over several years, the district will not need the full amount right away, and the Board has a history of only taking what we need and no more. Park Hill's levy is lower than most other districts in the area, ranking 11 out of 12. For the owner of a $200,000 house, this will mean an increase of $61 a year for the first two years, or $5 a month. After that, it could mean up to $122 a year, or $10 a month.”

--Richard Ford
Kansas City in
Platte County


Others deserve tax relief that was offered Boeing



Missouri lawmakers have returned to Jefferson City this month with a jam-packed agenda in tow. One issue that has the potential to dominate all the others in 2014 is the issue that dominated 2013 – tax relief.

That fact came into sharp focus over the last month. Just weeks before Christmas, the Missouri Legislature decided to play Santa to Boeing with nearly $2 billion in tax incentives – that is, your money – to attract about 8,000 jobs. The state’s plan didn’t work; Boeing decided to manufacture its 777X in Washington as planned, rather than bring those jobs here to Missouri. Throughout this process, the Show-Me Institute heavily criticized the push to deliver special tax benefits to a single, powerful company.
But the legislature’s quixotic quest for the Boeing project has produced something remarkable: it has put practically every legislator in the state, including many who opposed last year’s tax cut, on the record as supporting a tax cut as a way to boost growth.

If the Missouri House can vote 127 to 20 for a handout for one company, shouldn’t those 127 legislators support tax relief for the rest of Missouri’s entrepreneurs? If not, what makes Boeing more deserving of tax relief than the family businesses in our communities? Expect those questions to be answered in the coming months.

--Patrick Ishmael
Policy Analyst
Show-Me Institute

For earlier letters to the editor, click here





































































































Earlier Letters to the Editor